I think you're a conceited idiot. Honestly, feminism is wanting equality for both sexes but only focusing on the problems of one.

Log in and take it like a man .jpg anyone?

socialism master race

You say that like communism was invented, and then died off because it was so flawed.

Clearly he is a very outdated robot if he can't make his own sandwich. Shameful.

He's talking about the future, where we bring sandwiches to our new robot overlords to appease them.

You have a sandwich eating robot?
Why?

So you mean wise men? hue

That's a guy by the way

name's Teddie.

Source?

Persona 4

Don't forget farming.


Oh, and I know a lot of inventors were male, but that may be due to the fact that women had less of an oppertunity.

Do you know what is ``Norways paradox``? In Norway, the country with one of the most gender equal sistems in the world they have less girls going for engeneering and physical sciencies then in 3rd world countries. So opportunitity is not answer.
Video on that subject www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTOFXLl7eh4

In my case (as a woman from the USA), science wasn't consider what a women wants to do. Since I didn't want to be picked on (I was young, being popular was important) , I didn't spend extra time studying it as my guy friends did. There was even a camp I thought looked cool (they built mini robots for a final project), but no other girl went to it, so I didn't either. Looking back, I realized how silly I was to not do what I wanted due to what other people thought, but hey, everyone wanted to be cool. Anyways, what I'm trying to say is that although there is an equal oppertunity for women, a lot of them still wants to fit in, so they don't do sciency stuff.


Although even if it was considered cool for girls to do science, there would be a lot more women but still more guys.

Do you think that it is considered cool for boys to do science? Nerds/geeks were always social outcasts (but lately we can see some change). But they dont care that much about ``cool`` they want to do what makes them happy. I was always interested in science, books, tech...etc but I dont think that I ever felt as outcast but on the other hand I am not American and I went to preaty good high school.

I am psychologist and at univeristy I was surounded by girls....something like 85-90% of all students were female. Then I went to several psychology symposiums and noticed that around 35--50% of participants were male

I see that you are really in to gender subject. Checked out your profile and there are 2 full pages of your discusions on this pic. (also that video referencing amanda tod in your favorites is awesome) . What is your field of studies (if you have one, there is no age info on profile)?

Nerds and geeks are their own cliche, mostly made up of boys, they may not be considered popular, but it's much easier for a geeky boy to fidn a group than a geeky female.


Sorry for the super short reply, I have to go. If I remember, I will be back to discuss your other points.

Except for you know, Kevlar

Or the ability to know the distances of stars and galaxies outside of our own.

You and ICEDgrunge both raise valid points and yes women had contributed to technological and scientific developement. But even today vast majority of scientists and engineers are men

Oh god yes I too believe that the scale of what men have produced to what women have is extremely tipped to the left, that's without a doubt. I literally just cannot fight that.

I.....are you sarcastic or not? Its hard to tell on internet

No I'm serious, I'm sorry, it's hard to make that clear sometimes and my 2nd statement was a little too aggressive even for my own tastes.

its ok. Have a nice...day/night

If women are considered to be worse than men at driving, what the FUCK makes you think they're better at something more complicated?

That's a sterotype, not exactly the truth.

You're equally fuckin retarded.

Stereotypes don't just fuckin make themselves up, they're conclusions made from inductive reasoning.

In other words, women across history must have done something for us to conclude that they are bad drivers.

Yes, they may be more careful than guys are, but that's only because they can't afford to NOT be careful because of their poor reaction skills.

Sterotypes (for the most part) originated from a while ago. They had some truth to them back then (A lot of Jews being bankers a while ago because being a banker was a crappy job, which led to people believing Jewish people can handle money and are greedy), but in todays modern age and time their is little truth to them.

Wow... I... I seriously can't tell whether or not you're actually serious...

I'm not sure when the first vehicular car was invented but... I do know when they were mass produced. If my memory serves me correctly, it was around 1901, and during this time and age. Which means it's only been a little more than 100 years since cars have been around.

I'm sure this is recent enough for us to conclude that all of the percentages we gathered up are still relevant.

Do you know how much have changed in 100 years?! Wasn't the 19th amendment signed in 1920?

All these statistics are static, meaning they haven't changed. Women have always been more careful, but guys have always just had better reactions.

It doesn't even have to be about driving, we're just all around better at activities that require good hand eye co-ordination.

Such as: Driving, sports, video games, and last second decisions.

Not always true.

Driving: Once again, I knwo a lot of good female drivers.

Sports: When I was in highschool, I could shoot a basketball better than most of my guy friends on the boy team could. (Not saying I could outplay them, I just had better aim)

Video Games: That may be because they tend to play video games more (girls play farm vill, boys play call of duty)

last second decisions: When?

I know a lot of good female drivers too, but I've yet to find one that can actually beat me in a race.

What the fucks the point of playing basketball if you're not going to do cross-overs and lay ups? Speaking of cross-overs, I've yet to find a women that can actually do one successfully.

We have a steeper learning curve when it comes to activities revolving around reaction skills.

Try calling the names of a boy, and a girl, then throw a basketball at each of them, and you'll know what the fuck I'm talking about. In general, the male will attempt to catch the ball, as to where the female will turn back around, duck, and screech.

I haven't raced anyone yet, boy or girl, because I find no need to, so I know little about it and cannot argue.

Actually, the majority of girls on my team and myself could do a pretty decent crossover and made almost all of our layups.

I have found no research on that study, please provide the source.

That's the fight or flight instinct. In general, girls will flee from danger, while boys will comfort it. It's not reaction time, it's just how they react in general.

The last segment of your reply speaks volumes.

There's no way a person that would confront danger would have instincts worse or even on par with that of someone that runs away.

Also, the only women I've actually seen that actually confronts danger are mothers, but that's only when their babies are at risk.

So um, can I have a source for the studies about the steeper learning curve? It's not that I don't believe you, it's just that I want to see proof.

Men, in general, are stronger, while women would rely on males for protection (this happens less now) This is not because of reaction time, but because of the fact that males are generally stronger and have a better chance in a fight against an enemy due to the fact that they can punch stronger and get punched more. Instincts are there to keep you alive, and it works for both genders (for the most part)


I've seen many women back away from danger, because they would have gotten hurt if they didn't and there was no need to put themselves on risk (no people they oculd save) That's not weak, that's smart. Why put yourself in danger unless someone you love (or, for very heroic people, anybody at all) is at danger and you want to save the,

Yeah. No.

You know, you could have saved the thumbing down by explaining this by stating two things, 1), a generally small body build allows a female to feel less cramped in a cockpit(haha, recoveryone said cock), which is generally very confined in military aircraft. 2) Women are generally less susceptible to eye disorders(such as colorblindness, vision is very important when piloting aircraft).

Yes, but how does that affect the actual piloting of the aircraft? If you were to take a poll between licensed pilots, you would find no difference. Hell, someone with colour blindness isnt even allowed to fly a plane, so that point is irrelevant.

You like shitstorms? Well, in that case, take this red thumb.

Do you also enjoy the red thumbs that come along with it?

I enjoyed the part were you explained why.

Said no one ever.

Librarian likes your roll,

well, shit

The Library.

Worst fucking mission in the entire game.

Metro 2033 is such a good game.

Last Light? OOOOOOH MAN, let's do this.

MFW I see the "Genesis" trailer

that's the greatest roll ever rolled

such a good roll...such a good roll...

moterfucker, got beat by anon. props.

As funny as that is, you used that meme wrong