Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
+21
#456 - commandurrazor **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#448 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
Yeah the first one isn't true... It's a relativity thing. The formula actually changes to keep the fundamental laws of physics happy so that mass (which is intrinsic) stays constant. For this you need the equation E=(gamma)*m*c^2
#447 - beerterror (01/10/2013) [-]
MFW the last one. What disorder do they mean?
User avatar #505 to #447 - carnagejc (01/10/2013) [-]
Simple way of understanding entropy is to picture knocking over a bookshelf of organised books.

There is a tiny chance that they may retain order and fall neatly in place, but chances are they will fall in a big mess.

Things naturally become more chaotic over time.
User avatar #455 to #447 - anormalbrony (01/10/2013) [-]
just the general chaotic form of matter and energy. that one is supposed to be entropy if im correct, it is the measure of chaos
User avatar #464 to #455 - beerterror (01/10/2013) [-]
fair enough. i just feared that it's some para-sociological ******** !
#445 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
The first one is so wrong...
The faster you move, the more energy you have.
Even if it were to be: m=E/c^2, it means you have a smaller mass if dividing by an increasing variable.
#463 to #445 - didactus ONLINE (01/10/2013) [-]
You know you can move around in the Equation and if you divide both sides of E=mc^2 by c^2 you will get E/c^2=m so it's true what says in the content.
You know you can move around in the Equation and if you divide both sides of E=mc^2 by c^2 you will get E/c^2=m so it's true what says in the content.
User avatar #465 to #463 - alhemicar (01/10/2013) [-]
c is the speed of light in vacuum and it is constant
User avatar #471 to #465 - didactus ONLINE (01/10/2013) [-]
If energy increases i.e. velocity increases and E/c^2=m and kinetic energy=mv^2/2 then mass must increase by higher velocities.
#478 to #471 - gillypie (01/10/2013) [-]
The equation E=mc^2 is only used when velocity is 0 (object at rest). The ful equation is E=mc/Sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2)). Your logic works with the info provided in the content but not in physics.
User avatar #476 to #471 - alhemicar (01/10/2013) [-]
damn didn't take that in count, I barely understand these formulas, we use entirely different letters
#479 to #476 - didactus ONLINE (01/10/2013) [-]
It's understandable, I study this 						****					 quite hard right now so that's why you got the snarky reply. And considering I actually use these exact letters I should know it or I would be a failure of a student.
It's understandable, I study this **** quite hard right now so that's why you got the snarky reply. And considering I actually use these exact letters I should know it or I would be a failure of a student.
#449 to #445 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
c cannot increase. It stands for the speed of light...
User avatar #441 - alhemicar (01/10/2013) [-]
Yeah good thing our site is called ScienceJunk! Oh, wait....
#451 to #441 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
Its not called faggotscomplainingwhentherearemuchworsepostsonthefrontpageeverydayjunk either.
User avatar #453 to #451 - alhemicar (01/10/2013) [-]
yeah and I will never see the day it will be named **************************
#460 to #453 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
The **** that anon "bitched" about was you bitching/ making a bad joke, so yeah, **** you.
User avatar #461 to #460 - alhemicar (01/10/2013) [-]
1st thing, log the **** in
2nd, what I complained you little cunt was justified, what does this have to do with funny? All you do is being a bitch
#473 to #461 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
How was that justified? It was a mediocre unfunny post like most of funnyjunk, do you comment under every post that is not funny? So what if it is science, at least it is not a ****** le ragecomic or a faggot trying to get internet fame.
And I do not have an account.
Inb4 "hurr durr gtfo anon you so fag lewl"
User avatar #581 to #473 - alhemicar (01/11/2013) [-]
a mediocre unfunny post on funnyjunk? Well, too bad, you prob won't see this, that's what you get for hiding behind anon like a pussy.
did this post have anything that atleast was AIMED to be funny? No. It's intention wasn't anything near being funny. Yes, there are unfunny posts on frontpage, but that depends on what you consider funny. Yet NO ONE considers can possibly find physical formuals funny, if someone finds them funny he probably has psychological problems.
And adding an inb4 hurr durr and at the end of your comment can make your comment even more stupid than it already is.
User avatar #439 - aleksisti (01/10/2013) [-]
The third from the top: "Moving through space faster makes you travel slower through time". That is basically: moving fast through space with a car that goes like 140mph (200kph) makes u travel slower through time. Say, you are going to travel from point A to B at 140mph and between the points there's a man with a watch. When you are next to him at 140mph, u should be, according to the formula, in the past.

Some scientist proved this on a tv-show of National Geographic.
#438 - acemrhawk (01/10/2013) [-]
MFW
#436 - TrollBringer (01/10/2013) [-]
CAN YOUR SCIENCE EXPLAIN THIS
User avatar #435 - jonasmsv (01/10/2013) [-]
If I would need to break up with someone in a long distance relationship, I'd be smug as **** while I posted #2 on her facebook-wall(Or something)
#432 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
Uh no, it means: Random assortment of numbers, lines and the alphabet
#426 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/10/2013) [-]
First one is: Matter is energy
User avatar #440 to #426 - GritaGris (01/10/2013) [-]
No, it means there is a direct relation between energy and matter. This does not mean they are the same thing.
#474 to #440 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/10/2013) [-]
But they are
#422 - BobbyMcFerrin (01/10/2013) [-]
Jesus christ OP the second from the bottom was proven wrong because it violates all of the physical conservation laws.

Stephen Hawking himself, the main proponent of the idea of information loss in a black hole, conceded in 2004 that he was wrong. Instead, he admitted that information is contained within the black hole for 'eons' until it is finally released in some mangled, unrecognizable form.

If you're going to put something in *************** , make sure it's correct please.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2004/07/21/hawking040721.html
User avatar #420 - swordyou (01/10/2013) [-]
How did this make frontpage?
#450 to #420 - hypex ONLINE (01/10/2013) [-]
because all the dumb twats on this site like to think they're smart by liking science
#419 - lamarisagoodname (01/10/2013) [-]
Not to put a damper on how much you enjoy science but many of these formulas are purely theoretical, believing them to be true is the same as someone saying 2+2=god's particular mood today, we know very little about spacetime, black holes, electromagnetics and entropy. Only thing we can apply is the universal gravitation equation which isn't all that exciting. Seek knowledge as far and wide as you can but don't expect it to give you all the answers.
User avatar #443 to #419 - GritaGris (01/10/2013) [-]
Apart from the second from the bottom, every single one of these is, for all intensive purposes, a FACT. I think you misunderstand the meaning of "theory" in a scientific context.
User avatar #442 to #419 - lamarisagoodname (01/10/2013) [-]
mention "god" on science post, red thumbs

I should have seen this coming
#418 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
information is never lost ....
"In July 2004, Stephen Hawking published a paper presenting a theory that quantum perturbations of the event horizon could allow information to escape from a black hole, which would resolve the information paradox" - from wikipedia on Black Hole information paradox.
Now it is only a theory but well accepted one.
#415 - tanabata (01/10/2013) [-]
This image has expired
MFW reading this post
User avatar #414 - sorryminesbigger (01/10/2013) [-]
If OPEN wasn't a fagot he would know Hawking's back hole equation was shown to be not correct. OPEN=FAG
User avatar #586 to #567 - sorryminesbigger (01/12/2013) [-]
Sorry, it was my tablet's autocorrect
User avatar #417 to #414 - workinprogress (01/10/2013) [-]
"back hole"?
#412 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
The first one isnt true
#410 - anonymous (01/10/2013) [-]
da **** is this general knowledge **** ? stupid americans
 Friends (0)