Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #71 - oikake (01/09/2013) [-]
where's the rape option?
User avatar #110 to #71 - ihatem (01/10/2013) [-]
In aisle 6, right next to the hand cuffs.
User avatar #68 - dubstepforme (01/09/2013) [-]
Shitstorm below
-2
#55 - keirabarnez has deleted their comment [-]
#50 - aakn ONLINE (01/09/2013) [-]
User avatar #42 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
A whore is someone who sells sex for money, regardless of clothing.
A slut is someone who sleeps with many guys without emotional intentions, again, regardless of clothing.

I like girls who dress how they want, short or long, why do you have to ruin it for people like me by making girls think they're sluts for wearing short shorts or skirts?
Just because you can't get a girlfriend or someone to sleep with you, doesn't mean you have to shame any girl who's ever had sex. Fuck off OP, cancerous faggot.
User avatar #139 to #42 - flutterdoc (01/10/2013) [-]
that may be op's point i dunno though
User avatar #76 to #42 - cbadlaxer (01/09/2013) [-]
i dont understand why guys care so much anyway? We're the ones that can just look and enjoy anyway. i think some girl made this out of jealousy and girls should be the only ones that are actually mad(because of jealousy)
User avatar #84 to #76 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
Oops, pressed the wrong thing, anyway, a funny thing a dude said in a previous comment:
"Slut (noun): A girl who thinks sex is fun, but not with me."
User avatar #81 to #76 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
Sounds like a pretty good conclusion to be honest.
But on the subject of jealousy, a lot of guys get jealous when no girls will have sex with them...
A funny thing a dude said in a previous comment:
#75 to #42 - devout feminist (01/09/2013) [-]
That is not the definition of slut the proper definition is a woman unable to keep a clean house. And before you argue that is just a British usage they used long before it meant anything else.
User avatar #123 to #75 - awesomenessdefined (01/10/2013) [-]
Old is not proper. Old is old.
User avatar #79 to #75 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
I am British, and I was not aware of that usage of the word!
#86 to #79 - devout feminist (01/09/2013) [-]
I dont think it is commonly used in that sense anymore due to us kinda bastardizing everything in the English language.
#65 to #42 - anonomysmonkey (01/09/2013) [-]
I don't think you're understanding the meaning behind the tattoo...
#62 to #42 - seawrath (01/09/2013) [-]
Yes! This guy gets it! Thank you for posting this.
#58 to #42 - spidahridah (01/09/2013) [-]
Yes, this.
User avatar #46 to #42 - rhiaanor ONLINE (01/09/2013) [-]
Although i agree with your first point, i believe wearing a short skirt that you bend over less than an inch and your people can see your underwear that is slutty clothing.

There is a difference between dressing like a slut/whore and being a slut/whore. That is the point of this MOTHER FUCKING POST. Goddamn you, overthinking it and mis... mis-fuckifiknowthefwording.
#59 to #46 - spidahridah (01/09/2013) [-]
And yes, this as well.
User avatar #54 to #46 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
I believe in wearing what you want and as long as is remains inoffensive it's okay.
By inoffensive I mean law abiding.
In my opinion there isn't such a thing as "dressing like a slut/whore". There's a reason people dress this way on TV, on magazine covers etc.

Do you go to the beach and then complain when you see girls and women in two piece bikinis instead of the one piece?
Do you go to raves and then complain when girls are wearing next to nothing? Sometimes as little as a tape cross covering their nipples.

I'd never say someone is a slut for how they dress, it can be provocative, sure. But that is often the reason for this type of clothing.
During summer I spend most of my time at the beach, and here in France women are often topless at the beaches. So during other times of year, or at other places I pretty much never see any clothing as too little or showing too much.

I thought the point of this content was slut shaming, not "dressing like slut" shaming.
User avatar #91 to #54 - iliketires (01/09/2013) [-]
I guess the comment on your first comment is really just a cultural difference then. He/she may not live in France.
User avatar #94 to #91 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
But yeah, I'd agree that culture as a strong effect on opinions.
User avatar #95 to #94 - iliketires (01/09/2013) [-]
I know in Europe things like showing more skin, sex, things like that are pretty acceptable in the general public. For me, living in America, that kind of stuff isn't okay, although we have way less restrictions on violence and gore. But I agree with you, clothing alone shouldn't determine someones reputation.
User avatar #93 to #91 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
I was born and raised in Scotland. Moved to France 6 years ago though.
User avatar #56 to #54 - rhiaanor ONLINE (01/09/2013) [-]
Well i believe there is a time and place for everything, at a beach i could care less as long as they are naked, and i dont go to raves so i dont know what the hell you are supposed to do there.
User avatar #57 to #56 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
Just a big party pretty much, where everyone goes wild.
I suppose of course there is a time and a place, in certain occasions appropriate clothing has to be picked out, but that doesn't just go for mini skirts.
#41 - devout feminist (01/09/2013) [-]
A whore is someone that gets payed for sex. A slut is someone that has a lot of sex for free. They both have a lot of sex.
User avatar #35 - reican (01/09/2013) [-]
or FJ's logic, every girl who isnt anime, movie chick or pornstar is a slut who breaks their faith in humanity.
#34 - thinkwithportals ONLINE (01/09/2013) [-]
But what do you call past "whore", because she is showing it?
User avatar #64 to #34 - thefurie (01/09/2013) [-]
Prostitute because i can't get a girlfriend
User avatar #48 to #34 - yunablade (01/09/2013) [-]
The crab zone?
User avatar #39 to #34 - darthacerbus (01/09/2013) [-]
Naked.
#36 to #34 - toostonedtopost (01/09/2013) [-]
Rape, perhaps?
-5
#33 - smokedmeatlog has deleted their comment [-]
#22 - devout feminist (01/09/2013) [-]
WHERE ARE HER KNEES?
User avatar #32 to #22 - angreif (01/09/2013) [-]
they were surgically removed. god, can't you see the scar?
#24 to #22 - devout feminist (01/09/2013) [-]
where they should be, that's the back of her leg you are seeing
User avatar #19 - semisane (01/09/2013) [-]
Slut (noun): A girl who thinks sex is fun, but not with me.
User avatar #60 to #19 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
Perfect!
User avatar #17 - diabolicgnome (01/09/2013) [-]
I like a girl with a long skirt
User avatar #43 to #17 - defeats (01/09/2013) [-]
I hate long skirts...
User avatar #29 to #17 - rokkarokkaali (01/09/2013) [-]
And short jacket
User avatar #20 to #17 - bigbeaufort (01/09/2013) [-]
I assume it's because you want a tight ass to go with that then.
User avatar #21 to #20 - diabolicgnome (01/09/2013) [-]
No i just think a girl looks cute in a long skirt
User avatar #13 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
I don't care how women dress, she's a slut/whore if she fucks every guy around and says she doesn't feel wrong about it sometimes.
She's asking for it/being provocative if she flirts with guys and has her way and gets drunk enough to forget she wasn't being serious.
She's proper/old fashioned if she's not interested in sex, tells men/women this when appropriate, and doesn't string men along to have her way.
And she's a prude if she demands that no one should fuck and connects all world issues to people having sex for fun.
User avatar #61 to #13 - spidahridah (01/09/2013) [-]
You're absolutely right. I don't get why the fuck you got thumbed down that much. Don't mind them, they're just retards.
User avatar #72 to #61 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
They're not dumb, they just firmly believe there's no consequences to sex and it's wrong for me to think about others because (as the internet has taught us) it's wrong to feel sympathy or empathy.
#292 to #72 - devout feminist (01/10/2013) [-]
You're not thinking about others. You're thinking about your own opinion being forced on others. You're like that asshole who says "I'm against gay marriage, but I'm not against homosexuals and support them fully."

Believe it or not, the majority are capable of dealing with the consequences of their actions. They don't need "hot coffee is hot" labels. STDs are a possibility, however the incurable ones are rare and unlikely to be contracted using protection. It's like telling someone not to have sex because you could have a baby. Do we really fucking care about the 0.001%? No, that's like living in fear because there's a 0.001% of aliens invading and killing us all. You're just as likely to catch an std from a friend who secretly tells lies than from a stranger. You're just as promiscuous if you have sex with 5 friends rather than 5 strangers.

Your logic assumes people don't know the risks, and your own logic is twisted into believing you are less of a slut/lessen the risks with friends. Both of those are wrong.
User avatar #67 to #61 - dubstepforme (01/09/2013) [-]
Because of the opinion bashing arguments below making sense
0
#38 to #13 - toostonedtopost has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #31 to #13 - chucknorrisTHEGAME (01/09/2013) [-]
So you think that girls are "prudes" if they think there's a problem with sex for recreation, but if a girl has, in your opinion, "too much" sex for recreation, they're just as bad, if not worse, as "sluts". So the appropriate measurement of sex for recreation is to be determined by you, and someone who holds the opinion that any more or less is better is absolutely wrong.

Seems legit.
User avatar #47 to #31 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
Let me rephrase myself.
Too much sex is a bad thing. Everything has to be done moderately and responsibly.
Telling people they can't have any sex just because you think having sex is wrong, is just as bad if not worst.

Get it?
User avatar #66 to #47 - illegalartist (01/09/2013) [-]
too bad you didnt say that originally
User avatar #69 to #66 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
I have a bad habit of writing too much and having people read too far into what I said.
#16 to #13 - IPointMan (01/09/2013) [-]
Or maybe her sexuality is abso-fucking-lutely none of your business, and you should stop pretending like it is.    
   
No one ever asks for/deserves rape, and men are not animals who just have to fuck a woman if the opportunity arises, whether she wants it or not. We can make the choice, regardless of what she says or does, to not have attempt to have sex with her. Just because she may have been leading a guy on, or acting flirty (or some guy feels like she was) does not automatically give said guy some divine right to sex with her, regardless if she actually wants it.    
   
Also, since when is having sex with a large amount of people a bad thing? How does something that someone does in a consensual, recreational matter, define their moral character? I mean, I could maybe see your point if said woman was not practicing any kind of safe sex and/or spreading STDs, but why is the concept of just sleeping with people inherently bad? Is there like, a set number of people a girl has to sleep with to be defined as a slut in your eyes?     
   
You were born with a fucking brain dude, please use it.
Or maybe her sexuality is abso-fucking-lutely none of your business, and you should stop pretending like it is.

No one ever asks for/deserves rape, and men are not animals who just have to fuck a woman if the opportunity arises, whether she wants it or not. We can make the choice, regardless of what she says or does, to not have attempt to have sex with her. Just because she may have been leading a guy on, or acting flirty (or some guy feels like she was) does not automatically give said guy some divine right to sex with her, regardless if she actually wants it.

Also, since when is having sex with a large amount of people a bad thing? How does something that someone does in a consensual, recreational matter, define their moral character? I mean, I could maybe see your point if said woman was not practicing any kind of safe sex and/or spreading STDs, but why is the concept of just sleeping with people inherently bad? Is there like, a set number of people a girl has to sleep with to be defined as a slut in your eyes?

You were born with a fucking brain dude, please use it.
User avatar #70 to #16 - Crusader (01/09/2013) [-]
No, but many times rape is unjustly accused
The gap between 2 peoples 18th birthday, if they ahve sex, the elder one is now a rapist.
If a girl gets drunks, loses her inhibitions, has sex and then she claims the man took advantage of her, that is still rape, even if the drunk chick initiated it.
some rape laws are bullshit.
#291 to #70 - devout feminist (01/10/2013) [-]
On the last one, it's illegal to have sex with anyone drunk.
So, you know, if they're obviously drunk the answer's pretty simple, right?
Keep whatever you got in your pants until they sober up the next day.

If they really want to fuck, fuck them when they have their inhibitions like a man/woman and not a child who needs a handicap.
User avatar #294 to #291 - Crusader (01/10/2013) [-]
What if you are both drunk?
#27 to #16 - drtfgyhuj (01/09/2013) [-]
i think that people are sluts if their promiscuity is the defining feature of their personality. this can equally apply to males and females.
User avatar #45 to #27 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
I agree with that.
Good job drtfgyhuj.
User avatar #25 to #16 - sovereignsunkown (01/09/2013) [-]
arguably, "slut shaming" has it's roots in our biology.
it mostly relates back to the "men are performing to their maximum reproductive advantage if they mate with as many females as possible and then stop other males from mating with said mates". this gave rise to ownership of women, polygamy, and in the modern day, having large amounts of sex with random women being "exalted" in a sense.
on the female side, (in a hunter/gatherer society) a female is performing to her reproductive and survivalist advantage if she can find one male to mate with and aid in supporting her and raising children.
in modern society, this is obviously totally obscelete, but i feel most people don't understand the root cause of the phenomena.
tl;dr: "slut shaming" exists because our species hasn't evolved past our hunter/gatherer roots, and our genes push us towards behaving as if we're still in that sort of society.
User avatar #23 to #16 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
It's not, but if I want to call out a slut, then I should be able to without people telling me it's wrong to do so.

No one asks to be raped, but it sucks that a girl leads you on, gets drunk, forgets they don't want sex, tells the guy yes while inhibited, waking up and regretting the decision, and legally being able to report it as rape.

Too much of a good thing is a bad thing. Think of it like this, eating isn't a bad thing, however when you finish a family size bag of chips alone you feel bad because it's unhealthy. Sex, even when done safely, has it's risks. You should feel like ever time you do it is you gambling your life away(That guilt).
Though I wouldn't mind if they're only having sex with close friends, but we live in a society that considers sex with friends as a bad decision even though you can definitely trust them more than the random strangers we're told it's fine to screw. So using that logic, most people are having sex with strangers and putting themselves at risk.

A lot of sex with only one person, you're not a slut, you like sex.
A lot of sex with close friends, good. Just be sure you can really trust them.
A lot of sex with strangers, be safe but you're being really slutty for banging the best of a group of horny people you only just met.
A slut to me is an immature woman who has sex because it feels good without knowing the risks and ignores other's feelings. And yes, men can be sluts too, there just isn't an existing word I know of that defines it.

I've got a brain. You need to use yours since you feel so superior for stating the obvious.
#63 to #23 - kneehumper (01/09/2013) [-]
Yes you are able to call people sluts if you want to, but that also makes you a judgemental prick.

Sure it may suck, but imagine how you would feel if you woke up with no memory of the night before with a 200 kilos 40 year old man next to you. If you want to avoid it, use our common sense. If you see that the girl is too drunk to make logical decisions it's nothing else to do than to back off. Drunk sex isn't even that good so it's not worth it.

"Too much of a good thing is a bad thing" is a retarded saying. Sure it may apply to food as you said, but sex isn't the same thing as food. As long as you protect yourself there no downside at all. If people want to have sex, fucking let them and stop judging them, it's none of your damn business.
#173 to #63 - devout feminist (01/10/2013) [-]
also, legally a drunk person is unable to consent. Period. If you have sex with someone who is drunk, you face consequences. It's simple, so don't bitch because YOU didn't have the hindsight to be smart yourself and let your dick walk you into trouble. Don't act like you didn't have a choice.
User avatar #73 to #63 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
So if you see a fat person who's asking to be insulted, does you knowing and telling them they're fat mean you're a judgmental prick?

Actually, if the guy's drunk too, the guy's still given full blame.

Dude even protected sex has it's risks. 99.99 percent pregnancy prevention means that 1 in 10,000 people that have sex are fucked. And you're screwed if one of you have STD's, the condom breaks, and you either don't noticed or it doesn't take much sexual fluids to get you.

It's not my business, but it's okay for me to be concerned about the issue.
#49 to #23 - CaptainChristberry (01/09/2013) [-]
You feel bad when you eat an entire bag of chips?
User avatar #51 to #49 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
Not the 99 cent ones, the big ass ones you buy for parties.
And yes, because I feel fat afterward.
#52 to #51 - CaptainChristberry (01/09/2013) [-]
Lightweight
User avatar #53 to #52 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
What?
You can eat 2 of them or something?
#297 to #53 - CaptainChristberry (01/11/2013) [-]
Yes, and I look fantastic
User avatar #298 to #297 - sketchysketchist (01/11/2013) [-]
Well I qould be able to so that some day, but I'm chubby at the moment. so every extra calorie hurts.
User avatar #30 to #23 - emptysuperman (01/09/2013) [-]
You're a fucking fascist moron. It's this simple: if an act does not hurt anyone, it is not wrong. And don't throw that "Sluts hurt themselves!" bullcrap. That's like saying "People who use computers are hurting themselves. They are denying themselves of a simple, enriching life." Just because it isn't in your best interest to have lots of sex doesn't mean everyone is just like you.
User avatar #44 to #30 - sketchysketchist (01/09/2013) [-]
I never said sex wasn't in my interest.

Moron, people have to check how often they screw because grown people are the example anyway.
If kids see grown people screwing around and saying it's not a big deal, we'll end up with more 12 year-old sluts.
#175 to #44 - devout feminist (01/10/2013) [-]
just kill yourself. Teenage sexuality is the lowest it has been in decades.
User avatar #87 to #44 - emptysuperman (01/09/2013) [-]
So we shouldn't do something that's not hurting anyone so that children don't do something that's not hurting anyone? Even though nobody is doing it in from of children. (If they were in would be wrong.)
User avatar #103 to #87 - sketchysketchist (01/10/2013) [-]
Dude, sex isn't a perfect concept that solves the worlds problems like you make it seem to be.
And honestly, sex has risks. Protected or not.
We have to be concerned about this because we're just dumbing down society if we don't.
Sex isn't bad, but it has risks and the more you do it, the more you put yourself at risk.

We don't need kids having sex because teen pregnancy is a big issue.
Young people getting pregnant and getting STD's is a vital issue we need to solve to improve society.

And your previous statement, "People who use computers are hurting themselves" is now proven true because how stupid you are.
The internet has taught you it's wrong to feel bad. The internet makes you think people being responsible for one an other is fascist. And only would the internet make you retarded enough to imply children having sex is absolutely okay.
You're a fucking waste of space.
Go read a book or something, I'm done with your ass.
User avatar #112 to #103 - emptysuperman (01/10/2013) [-]
I've been having sex longer than I've been on the internet. I've been having sex since I was 18. Everyone who I have had sex with has been a fully consenting adult. I have no STDs because I use condoms and I get tested at least once every few years. You have no leg to stand on. And just trying to say general things about my personality that you have no idea if they are true or not doesn't make you right in anyway. I'm a college graduate and a productive member of society. Just because I don't agree with your idea of "sex is bad cuz I said so" doesn't make me stupid. Look at the thumbs dude, you're in the red because it's clear how wrong you are. But hey, I guess it's just because you're sooooo smart and everyone on the internet is illiterate and corrupt, right?
User avatar #270 to #112 - sketchysketchist (01/10/2013) [-]
1. No where did I say being a slut meant you were unproductive or unsuccessful.
2. Lots of sex means you should get tested more than once every few years.
3. Consenting adults, and yet you implied kids having sex isn't wrong because sex isn't.
4. Sex isn't bad because I said so. Sex is bad when done irresponsibly.
5. Red thumbs/people disagreeing with you don't mean shit anywhere. Didn't scientist get shit from the majority a little more than a century ago for calculus, physics, more forms of math and science, and even proving the earth revolves around the sun? There's a difference between being right and being the most favorable.
6. Not everyone on the internet is an idiot. Just the ones that argue with, "you're wrong because I'm right and don't need to back up what I said", "you're dumb", "you're fascist/communist/nazi", "fuck your theory, I'm going to not bother to disprove your evidence and try to enlighten or be enlightened, no I'm going to talk shit", and so much more.
User avatar #287 to #270 - emptysuperman (01/10/2013) [-]
I wasn't going to reply until I saw number six. It's just so ironic it's perfect. You realize that's exactly what you're doing, right? The only arguments you've been able to give are "You can still get STDs even when using condoms." and "Think of the children" Yes, you CAN get an STD while using condoms... but you can also crash while driving a car, or your wife could fuck some diseased dude and pass it to you, and you probably shouldn't be using that computer as you might get decapitated. If we couldn't do anything even when doing it as safe as possible, there wouldn't be too many things to do. And I didn't feel like having to hold your hand with my response to your whole "Think of the children" argument, but seeing as you came to a pedophile-y conclusion, I really should have. I'm sorry, I shouldn't have given you that much credit. No, I'm not saying children should have sex. I'm saying that there is nothing wrong with sex and since I'm not doing it even remotely in front of children, there's just no reason to even consider them. But if a child happens to see me flirting with a nice lady for some reason, it's not like he saw me bashing her fucking skull in. I really can't believe I had to explain that to you. The short of it is you simply don't have much of an argument. Why is having (protected) sex with lots of partners wrong? No one is being hurt. Saying it's wrong because it's not how you think people should be or because it's not something you would do does in fact make you a fascist. Not a communist, not a nazi, just a fascist. Also, you're a fucking egotistical bastard. Your "theories" are old, tired, and abandon. Don't act like you are a new age thinker. And certainly don't compare yourself to pioneer scientists and philosophers.
User avatar #296 to #287 - sketchysketchist (01/11/2013) [-]
My theories are still young for this age, Read above how nothing is a sure thing yet.

Also, I wasn't comparing myself to those philosophers, I was disproving your point about how everyone says your opinion is bad that means it's wrong logic.
User avatar #295 to #287 - sketchysketchist (01/11/2013) [-]
There's a risk to doing everything dude, but sex doesn't accomplish anything like your comparison choices. Driving gets you to an from work, and you feel tense driving and get extra careful since you can endanger yourself and those around you. Computers help you accomplish a multi-tude of tasks, but you'll still feel guilty for spending 4 hours just browsing facebook/funnyjunk/fourchan/whatever.

Let me get this straight, I'm not against people having sex. I think people should just feel guilty for having to much of it or at least know they put themselves at risk.
Dude I must of misread your quote, that's my bad. I understand what you said now. I just feel people shouldn't be completely desensatized about having too much sex and whoring around.
Look, I feel when we've found cures and preventions for all STD's and sure fire pregnancy prevention, I'll stop caring about people being guilty for having too much sex.
Why? After a decade/generation or so of careless sex people will stop making such a big deal about it. No more pressure to have or not to have sex, lower rape occurences, and people will have kids when they're ready.
But at the moment we're not ready for young people being so careless. How many people under their 30's get pregnant or an STD and hold back their lives or shorten them? One is still too many. Their's no stopping them from fucking, but we got to let them know they've got to try to be careful and make better decisions. The best way is to make them feel guilty after sex. You know, "Oh god I shouldn't of fucked that slut last night/ I should've worn a condom" mentality that's good for people.
#28 to #23 - devout feminist (01/09/2013) [-]
The problem with you calling out a "slut" is that you will probably never know if they are actually one. Do you see women go around showing pictures of them with all the men they screwed? You can't take their word for it, because women either undercount or overcount depending on where they are.

Ps: Maybe you just shouldn't fuck drunk people. Ever. It's just a rule of thumb, that requires about 5% of your brain power to figure out.
"Hey, I really want to fuck this girl, but she's obviously drunk. Maybe I should wait a day until she knows what the fuck she's doing to fuck her? It would reduce my chances of going to jail by 98%. No, that's silly, sex anyways."
#15 to #13 - devout feminist (01/09/2013) [-]
cause you know, it'd be terrible if women decided how many people they wanted to have sex with. i'm sure you know better.
#11 - tinymushrroms (01/09/2013) [-]
im i the only one who realized that her tan line is in line with the whore mark
#26 to #11 - lazragoon (01/09/2013) [-]
Any girl who goes swimming, even the pale ones, have a tan line there/
User avatar #9 - lillelise (01/09/2013) [-]
Oh im so gonna show this to my girl - friends. They are gonna rage for sure
User avatar #37 to #9 - Zarke (01/09/2013) [-]
"Prudish" and "Matronly" have a slightly insulting connotation. It's more of a "there's no way to win" argument in my eyes, aside from EXACTLY knee-length, which, personally, I don't think looks all that good anyways.
+191
#7 - funkymongoloid **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#14 to #7 - xzynth (01/09/2013) [-]
Don't be silly, it's just a black post box
User avatar #12 to #7 - bokkos (01/09/2013) [-]
AN INCH OF THE STRAP FOR AN INCH OF SKIN. I SEE APPROX 4 INCHES.
User avatar #8 to #7 - slyve (01/09/2013) [-]
I can see a part of her nose. KILL THAT UNHOLY WHORE!
#10 to #8 - srapture (01/09/2013) [-]
DAT RADIX
User avatar #6 - dragonbeeon (01/09/2013) [-]
Well, she IS asking for it
User avatar #5 - thecharliesheen (01/09/2013) [-]
I really hope this is a joke and not something you take seriously.
User avatar #4 - thetom (01/09/2013) [-]
cheeky isn't bad, like i wouldn't even think twice if my girlfriend went out like that with friends. you know...... If i had a girlfriend
 Friends (0)