Flea is a beast

Flea is a psycho

Watch the 1963 Django instead

Never seen that one I guess I'll check it out, I don't know why I'm getting thumbed down for disliking Tarantino... Wait, that's right, I'm putting my opinion on fj.

you arent getting down thumbed because you dont like tarentino, you're getting down thumbed because you called him a racist douchebag which he is not. even if you only based your accusation on Django, you have to consider that people used the word nigger all the time back then. even if tarentino did use it a lot throughout the movie, it doesnt make him a racist.

>Wasn't reffering to Django hence "is the movie really worth watching"
>I already had a conversation about this with three different people below.

i hadnt read the other comments and didnt see the end of your first comment.

You called him a racist, you dumb bastard. Why would you call someone who is clearly not racist racist?

Have you seen his independent films?

Let me get this straight: So you think because he made a work of art that has tones of racism to it that makes him a racist? Okay, now use your fucking brain for a second. Why would a racist make a movie about a black man killing slave owners? Why would a racist make a movie dedicated entirely to the idea of a Jewish Special Forces team killing Hitler?

inb4 u mad bro?

Okay, you're right, calling him a racist was too far, I'll admit that, but he still pushes some bullshit agenda in some independent movies that make me turn away from his other movies.

you assume it's an agenda. maybe he's just making a movie for the sake of entertainment. most of his movies are twisted or off the wall in some way.

For calling him a racist douchebag before even seeing the film. You and Spike Lee are cracking me up.

From his other films silly, he seemed like a racist prick in his other movies, I stil give each movie a chance, I thought Pulp Fiction was great.

How does he seem racist?

Mostly from his independent films, I can't remember the name of one I watched, but it had this mexican long haired guy in it who had a motorcycle with machine guns. Basically it was him pushing bullshit propaganda throughout, I don't automatically dislike someone because of an independent movie, but they usually keep me away from watching movies by them. But people who agreed with his agenda will most likely watch a lot of his movies.

Charles Dickens here:

I don't agree with the idea that anything contained in a movie is the inherent opinion of the writers, directors, or actors unless it's something absolutely filthy like "Birth of a Nation."

In Django (and plenty of older Tarantino films), he effectively uses racist dialogue or notions to either develop characters or to show the very wrong-ness of stereotyping or using something like the word "nigger." As much as i love him, I'd consider Dave Chappelle more of a racist for repeatedly using "nigger" as a source of comedy rather than commentary.

I left Django Unchained with a more intimate knowledge of how fucked up slavery was. It's one thing to hear about things in history class, it's another to see a man get torn apart by dogs because he can't fight other slaves to the death anymore.

Whether or not the so-called "mandingo" fights every happened is another lane of conversation, but the point remains.

True, slavery was a terrible thing, but it has been proven that most of the stuff he puts in his movie is over exaggerated (obviously) and I just hate when directors do that.

I can understand that, too, but at that point I have to say there is a difference between documentaries and movies that are clearly for entertainment purposes. I went to Django to laugh and see some wicked action scenes. I don't know anyone who wants to pay 10 bucks to sit in a theater and cry as they watch how fucked up history is.

Well I am going to do some research on this and if it is true I will change my opinion, but I still think he should make that point more public and obvious.

But today... You are a good anon.

What propaganda was there exactly?

The way I saw it (and I'm not alone on this) mexicans were killing tons of white guys IN america justifiably because they were apparently taking Mexican people away and raping them while the white cops did not care.

That's not racism.Just because the good guys were all one race and the bad guys were all another doesn't make something racist.

I think to make a story purposefully that way and not denying that you made it that way on purpose, really rustles my jimmies. He made a movie about black slaves killing their slavemasters, seems right to me because the whites were actually dicks to the blacks and they were evil, but come on now, he's making up a story, and it also doesn't help his case that he is Mexican.

I see (roughly) what you're talking about, but something like that seems more to come down from the mechanics of story telling. Russians, Chinese, Iranians, Koreans, etc. fill the roll of "villain" in so many modern day movies that it isn't outright specific rasism so much as it is the idea of "us vs them." Obviously not all russians are not evil people trying to kill james bond, and not all germans are trying to kill bruce willis.

See and I'm not fond of those movies either, I just hate when directors put races differentely in there unless they are historic events, I see what he was trying to prove but what makes me mad is that honestly every race is mistreated. When I was a little white boy in the ghetto I would get treated terribly out the ass. But anyways I'm done commenting, this took too much time I got homework to do.

I imagine the idea was to point out how in some places Mexican immigrants are mistreated by white people and authorities don't give a fuck. This really does happen and not just to Mexicans but really to minorities in general. I don't think it's supposed to be anything pro-Mexican or anti-white people.I don't know the movie so I can't say for certain.

I see what you're getting at.

POOOONNNINES

That picture has a horse in it! You are obviously a closet brony.

I know nothing of ponies and plan to keep it that way. And rolling pictures is funnnnnnnn!

You know what the ponies look like.

then don't roll pictures

Ummm let's not forget Inglorious Basterds.

or Kill Bill

Also in FOTR when the Uruk chief throws the knife at him he was suppose to hit the tree by viggo, but he missed at him and Viggo actually blocked him

That's why I love Bennington

But how do you know that he did it better if Will Smith didn't do it?

Dunno, just think he wouldn't have done it as well.

Ah right.