Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#567 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
Drugs don't get people high, people get themselves high. Let's give everybody some heroin and expect that nobody will use it.


Fukken logic.
#627 to #567 - swagbot (01/07/2013) [-]
I you give *me* heroin, I would NEVER use it. Actually i would douse it in gasoline and eliminate it...   
   
But don't listen to me - Ron Paul said it best: www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFcuAPjBpiA   
   
#ThinkBeforeYouSpeak
I you give *me* heroin, I would NEVER use it. Actually i would douse it in gasoline and eliminate it...

But don't listen to me - Ron Paul said it best: www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFcuAPjBpiA

#ThinkBeforeYouSpeak
#626 to #567 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
Lets outlaw all drugs because your mom sucks ****** dick for coke. see the difference?
User avatar #617 to #567 - ninjaspartan (01/07/2013) [-]
People do get themselves high. With drugs. Or paint. Or air dusters. Or anything that can kill you that is supposed to be used for something else, like your fine example of hemp which can be used medically.

Yet another fine example of how resourceful people with desperate needs can be. Because of people.
#574 to #567 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
yea, when you take logic to extremes in politics everything sounds ******* ridiculous. gtfo
#562 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
Yay, more of this ******** ! Why don't we ALL just start posting things so we can get thumbs and people to stroke our egos instead of JUST ******* BEING FUNNY.
#568 to #562 - pourqee (01/07/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure it's in top 5 because it's funny as **** . You see it's funny, because it implies i watched an inanimate object, That cannot move, because it is not alive, for a long period of time.
#588 to #568 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
That is quite literally one of the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
#561 - finnini (01/07/2013) [-]
"Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Guns defend people against people with smaller guns."
User avatar #542 - xxospreyxx (01/07/2013) [-]
**xxospreyxx rolled user bloodtear ** Guns don't kill people....but this person does.
User avatar #550 to #542 - basstard (01/07/2013) [-]
The name justifies it.
User avatar #541 - chubberbrother (01/07/2013) [-]
"Guns don't kill people people kill people"
People with guns kill people. It's harder to take down a crowd wielding a knife.
User avatar #587 to #541 - IamSofaKingdom (01/07/2013) [-]
It's called an IED and plenty of armed soldiers die to those everyday.
User avatar #553 to #541 - ohgodnotthebees (01/07/2013) [-]
Doesn't mean it's impossible. There's plenty of room for improvement: a knifegun!
User avatar #566 to #553 - noblexfenrir (01/07/2013) [-]
Why not a gun that shoots knives? I'd be scared ******** if a flurry of Bowie knives were flying in my direction.
User avatar #539 - theist (01/07/2013) [-]
Gun control isn't about pointing the blame on weapons, it's about simply taking away the object that is the cause of harm. Jesus, you people are stupid.

It's like if you give someone alcohol and a car. Sure the alcohol didn't force the person to drive and crash, nor did the car make the person drunk. It's simply an act of extra precaution to remove harm causing substances.

Why is this so hard to understand?
#650 to #539 - swagbot (01/07/2013) [-]
Don't call me 'stupid', buddy - YOU are teh one who has clearly not thought deeply into this issue:

"Gun Control isn't about putting the blame on weapons". Oh, really? Though this usually dips into the 'conspiracy' realm, there is TONS of evidence to suggest that our Federal Government is systematically disarming the U.S. populace so that they can exercise more control over our lives. (This applies to other countries as well)

...that is to say, maybe for good people like you, it's not about control...but for our politicians, it's PRECISELY ABOUT CONTROL.

2. "The object that is the cause of harm..." is THE PERSON'S SICK BRAIN! *THAT* is that needs to be fixed. Take away guns, and they'll murder people with knives (like in Japan) or with a pipebomb. It's our sick, wimpy, bullying, hyperactive Culture that needs to be fixed... then maybe these young Introverts won't keep snapping and these mass shootings won't happen!

All of that notwithstanding... if you want to ban guns IN YOUR LOCALITY (state, city, whatever), then fine... I am disagreeing with a Federal gun Ban, which the Federal Gov't has no right to do. But i think you'll find that there will be many undesirable consequences from doing that. Suffices to say... better make sure that all the "bad people" are removed from your community at the same time! Or else, you're gonna remove one of the best self-defense tools available to humans... and you can bet that the criminals still in your community will still have guns!
#722 to #650 - theist (01/07/2013) [-]
I refuse to listen to someone named "swagbot"
I refuse to listen to someone named "swagbot"
#795 to #722 - swagbot (01/07/2013) [-]
Okay. Stay ignorant, you wet twat.
#558 to #539 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
Because you're basically trying to eat soup with a fork. I'd love a gun free society, but unfortunately too many people have guns. Other countries, other people, and our own governments. I live in Illinois and 70% of gun crimes are committed with unregistered guns meaning they have no serial number and cannot be tracked, we can thank Chicago for that. If people are known for anything besides stupidity, it's perseverance and if they truly want to get something, they will. Why in the name a zombie jesus would we want to go after the facilities with means for non-criminal citizens to get guns? How about we give more power to police and stop with this shoot to wound ******** . You think a piece a paper will really stop crime?
#607 to #558 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
you think people with guns will stop crime?
#911 to #607 - swagbot (01/07/2013) [-]
Here's the bottom line, bro - our Society and Culture needs to heal from the sickness that got those guns there in the first place.

Until then, yes - let people defend their lives and property with guns - believe it or not, there are *thousands* of cases annually in the U.S. where guns are used to stop crimes.
#528 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
how many children need to be shot before you stupid americans get it through your mentally handicapped brains? no other country is this retarded
#589 to #528 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
No other country that banned guns has an illegal gun market the size of America's.
#583 to #528 - IamSofaKingdom (01/07/2013) [-]
Until this recent shooting the worst school shootings were committed in Britain and Germany. In China there have been multiple accounts of a man with a knife stabbing several dozen children. Your argument against this country being the dumbest is groundless and incorrect.   
   
Here is a link to back up my information as opposed to your biased opinion.    
   
www.nationalreview.com/articles/335739/facts-about-mass-shootings-john-fund#   
   
   
P.S. #1 weapon used in crime, a baseball bat. Bonus: When a police chief in DC was asked about gun control he said they had some of the strictest in the nation and still had one of the worst crime rates.
Until this recent shooting the worst school shootings were committed in Britain and Germany. In China there have been multiple accounts of a man with a knife stabbing several dozen children. Your argument against this country being the dumbest is groundless and incorrect.

Here is a link to back up my information as opposed to your biased opinion.

www.nationalreview.com/articles/335739/facts-about-mass-shootings-john-fund#


P.S. #1 weapon used in crime, a baseball bat. Bonus: When a police chief in DC was asked about gun control he said they had some of the strictest in the nation and still had one of the worst crime rates.
User avatar #552 to #528 - thatoneiranianguy (01/07/2013) [-]
It's worthless arguing with a foreigner because you are too ignorant to understand the political climate of the United States.

But seriously, if you're going to call the Americans retarded, sign in and be a man about it. Don't hide behind your pussy ass anonymity.
#576 to #552 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
ohh somebody is an internet tough guy because he has his big bad internet ego to collect thumbs on. That makes you sooooooo much tougher.You, sir, are a true keyboard warrior.
User avatar #592 to #576 - thatoneiranianguy (01/07/2013) [-]
I'm the keyboard warrior? Really?

Please, look at your own comment, read what you said. If I'm a keyboard warrior you must be too, the only difference is when I open my mouth **** doesn't spew out of it.

Just give me a break.
#612 to #592 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
First, I'm not the anon above. Second, yes you are the keyboard warrior, acting like you're so great on the internet. Get over yourself.
User avatar #633 to #612 - thatoneiranianguy (01/07/2013) [-]
Sigh, I'm not acting like I'm anything. I'm stating my opinion on a matter.

When someones going to call a whole group of people retarded and then hide like that, anything he says loses credibility and respect.
#557 to #552 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
lol
#524 - nyehsquidward (01/06/2013) [-]
Why is this in Stoner Humor?
#572 to #524 - pourqee (01/07/2013) [-]
I posted it when I was dim. and I watched my gun when I was dim. I also forgot I was posting in stoner humor.
#522 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
USA ******* sucks dick...the whole country is retarded
#513 - flamingpie (01/06/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people, I kill people, with guns.
User avatar #833 to #513 - voteharveydent (01/07/2013) [-]
Old people burning.
Old people burning.
-9
#508 - kanade **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#505 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
******* americans
#501 - warrollan (01/06/2013) [-]
**warrollan rolls 30**

No math to leave a comment now? I was on at noon today! What is this sorcery?
#516 to #501 - pourqee (01/06/2013) [-]
That math is ****** man.
0
#498 - bumsnatcher **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#499 to #498 - bumsnatcher **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#511 to #499 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
Unfunny post about a ****** movie.
0
#500 to #499 - bumsnatcher **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#502 to #500 - bumsnatcher **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#503 to #502 - bumsnatcher **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#504 to #503 - bumsnatcher **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #494 - Bohya (01/06/2013) [-]
Hey. I'd rather be walking past a group of neds on the way home in the dark than be walking past a group of armed neds on the way home in the dark. There's no arguing over gun control on this website since 90% of the people here are still in school. They are probably the same people who ''can't wait for a zombie apocalypse''...
User avatar #512 to #494 - bamman (01/06/2013) [-]
Yeah, unless they have knives instead. I hope you're a good runner. Gun control discussion with a European is also pointless.
User avatar #520 to #512 - Bohya (01/06/2013) [-]
I'd much rather they had close proximity knives than guns that can shoot from across the street.
User avatar #547 to #520 - bamman (01/07/2013) [-]
That's implying that they have the experience required to shoot a gun accurately at any distance. It doesn't take much practice to stab someone. Honestly, I'd rather them be equipped with a tool that they are ineffective at using as opposed to one that anyone can use effectively. Punks also tend to prey on the weak, the chance of an elderly person escaping from an aggressor is not likely. Also, I'd prefer being able to carry my own gun to use in case of an imminent threat as opposed to relying on laws that are trying to prevent such threats from occurring in the first place. The threat of being attacked by the victim is a much greater preventative measure than the risk of being imprisoned.
User avatar #556 to #547 - Bohya (01/07/2013) [-]
Doesn't matter if you have a gun if they shot first. It also doesn't take much effort to aim down a sight and shoot. Honestly, I'd rather neither of us be equipped with a tool which allows us to deal grevious bodily harm to the other.
User avatar #569 to #556 - bamman (01/07/2013) [-]
But tools like that will always exist in one form or another. Assuming you could take guns out of criminal hands (which you can't), it would still make no difference in the amount of crime and death actually occurring. You're merely trying to declaw a lion only to be ripped apart by its teeth. Also, you don't instantly fall over dead when your shot, unless they manage to make a 1/100 shot to the right part of the head. There is usually time to retaliate, and gunshot wounds are not usually fatal if treated in a timely manner.
User avatar #579 to #569 - Bohya (01/07/2013) [-]
Sigh, you see people. This is why you cannot argue over gun control on this website...
User avatar #635 to #579 - bamman (01/07/2013) [-]
Because there are others with different opinions? Isn't the point of an argument to convince those with differing viewpoints that your opinion is the most correct? Sure, you can go discuss it with people that exclusively side with you, but that is simply preaching to the choir. I don't think I said anything that would make me come off as a kid with a zombie-apocalypse fantasy. Also, referencing the previous post, shooting a gun accurately is something that does take time, money, and effort, none of which criminals are willing to give up. Try shooting a gun and you'll realize that there is far more to it than pointing and pulling the trigger .
User avatar #573 to #569 - bamman (01/07/2013) [-]
*you're
#506 to #494 - winsauceiswin (01/06/2013) [-]
group of neds
#514 to #506 - Bohya (01/06/2013) [-]
What?
What?
User avatar #519 to #514 - winsauceiswin (01/06/2013) [-]
"Hey. I'd rather be walking past a group of neds on the way home in the dark than be walking past a group of armed neds on the way home in the dark."

group of neds...that's ned from ned's declassified in my picture. btw that gif is supposed to mean the image you're replying to is too small to see.
User avatar #525 to #519 - Bohya (01/06/2013) [-]
Btw, I can use a GIF however I want so long as it fits. It also looks like he has trouble comprehending what is written on the note, and that's how I am interpreting it. What has some guy called ''Ned'' got to do with the scum of the Earth anyway?
#530 to #525 - winsauceiswin (01/07/2013) [-]
hey man, relax. i was just trying to be funny. no need to get defensive. btw i didn't thumb you down if that's what you're thinking...
#493 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
Well the purpose of a gun is to kill people.
User avatar #534 to #493 - redeadhunter (01/07/2013) [-]
Some guns, yes. But many are designed with animal hunting in mind.
User avatar #604 to #534 - RandomAnonGuy (01/07/2013) [-]
And aren't some designed to be non lethal? Or is that the bullets you use?
I don't know much about guns, can you tell?
User avatar #621 to #604 - redeadhunter (01/07/2013) [-]
Both, actually. You can get an airsoft or paintball gun almost anywhere, and police quite often use shotgun shells filled with rubber BBs instead of metal that apparently hurt like a son of a bitch Also there are blanks that are essentially bullets without actual projectiles (just gunpowder and casing) and are mostly just for special effects, starting races and shutting a room full of people up, though will kill you if you put the gun against your head.
#492 - badsamaritan (01/06/2013) [-]
enlarge if you have too
#489 - hauntzor (01/06/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people; the government does.
-2
#487 - jakederps has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #491 to #487 - Lainge (01/06/2013) [-]
You know, when you go on a rant about how stupid other people are... maybe you should check your spelling.
#483 - cometfire (01/06/2013) [-]
Why is this in stoner-humor?
#486 to #483 - isus (01/06/2013) [-]
My thoughts exactly..
 Friends (0)