| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
Comments(882):
Pretty sure he just set them there, took a picture, and put them back in his gun safe. The object of this picture is to prove a point, not to be taken literally in the since that he actually left his gun there all day.
#693
-
doctorhobo (01/07/2013) [-]
I once tried this with my motion detection triggered machinegun turret, shit was so cash bro.
#681
-
wymetehoriginal (01/07/2013) [-]
I just set my nuke here and it didn't go off on it's own! I guess that means it's safe!
It was only good because you were watching the second you leave it'll bust out the door trust me. I once had mine come back with a dead cat it was disgusting.
#636
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
usa is so fucking stupid. i hope there is another 9/11.
#karma
#karma
#711 to #703
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
as long as they're americans. due the world a favour. start a war with china and lose. save the rest of us this awkward time, usa is like an old man that thinks he is tough because he believed it when he was young. sit the fuck down before you hurt yourself
#634
-
Uranium ONLINE (01/07/2013) [-]
I love it when Europeans try to sound like they're so more moral about mass shootings than Americans. Let's see....well in the UK the IRA was actively shooting a bombing people up until 1994 when they called a ceasefire. Germany had a shooting in 2009 that killed eleven kids. France March of last year a Rabbi and his three sons get gunned down. Norway 77 people gunned down in Oslo. I could keep going but simple fact is no one is immune to this. its tragic, it happens. This is not an issue of gun control its an issue of mental healthcare.
#834 to #634
-
mbthegreat (01/07/2013) [-]
1. You can't compare terrorism (IRA) to civilians carrying out mass shootings. It is not the same thing.
2. Saying things like "Germany had a shooting in 2009" shows how weak your position is, you have one example from three years ago, the US had 16 mass shootings last year alone. USA gun murder rate: 10.2 / 100,000 German gun murder rate: 1.10 / 100,000, not to mention accidental gun deaths. This isn't exactly rocket science
This is why Europeans seem so arrogant to you, were are literally amazed at how in love with killing each other you all are.
2. Saying things like "Germany had a shooting in 2009" shows how weak your position is, you have one example from three years ago, the US had 16 mass shootings last year alone. USA gun murder rate: 10.2 / 100,000 German gun murder rate: 1.10 / 100,000, not to mention accidental gun deaths. This isn't exactly rocket science
This is why Europeans seem so arrogant to you, were are literally amazed at how in love with killing each other you all are.
#786 to #763
-
Uranium ONLINE (01/07/2013) [-]
Absolutely the big picture is that Sandy Hook, Aurora theater, and the Brookfield Mall shootings were all carried out by people that were certifiably insane. In the case of the guy that shot up the Aurora he was crazy his psychiatrist knew it but was powerless to do anything to stop him she could proscribe him medication but couldn't make him take. She didn't have any power to have him committed or observed. Once again this isn't an issue of gun control, its a mental health care issue.
#676 to #651
-
ibettyhumpder (01/07/2013) [-]
for starters, AMERICANS got there freedom from fighting off the British tyrants that were over taxing its people in the colonies. The whole reason why we can have guns is because we don't want dick head power hungry monarchists to rule us with an iron grip.
#674 to #661
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
ok, not that anon here and I don't give half a shit about your cute little argument you two are having (but you two should just fuck already, release the tension) but the anon thing is just stupid. There's nothing "manly" about having an account on FJ whose sole purpose is to whore thumbs on and feel like you have some big ego on the internet.
#631
-
demcomments (01/07/2013) [-]
**demcomments rolled a random image posted in comment #2771697 at MLP Friendly Board **
If people don't kill each other with guns people will just find another way to do it.
Current - ERMAGERD BAN GUNS
After bunning guns - ERMAGERD BAN SWORDS
After banning swords - ERMAGERD BAN ROCKS
After banning rocks - ERMAGERD BAN STICKS
The US can make guns illegal all they want, people will still manage to get them. What happens when the actual lawabiding citizens need to defend themselves against someone with a gun?
If people don't kill each other with guns people will just find another way to do it.
Current - ERMAGERD BAN GUNS
After bunning guns - ERMAGERD BAN SWORDS
After banning swords - ERMAGERD BAN ROCKS
After banning rocks - ERMAGERD BAN STICKS
The US can make guns illegal all they want, people will still manage to get them. What happens when the actual lawabiding citizens need to defend themselves against someone with a gun?
#641 to #631
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
Oh look, the slippery slope argument. That hasn't historically been proven to be the stupidest fucking thing in the world before...
not to mention, people being armed has not shown to do anything to prevent crimes, so why should we just make it easier for the criminals?
not to mention, people being armed has not shown to do anything to prevent crimes, so why should we just make it easier for the criminals?
#783 to #637
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
In my home I have prevented two home invasions, by the necessary means of force issued to me by my state of residence. Meaning I shot the dumb son of a bitch as soon as the door broke open. How you might ask, did I know he was there? Because I am vigilant w/ the security of my home and neighbor hood. With the use of that fire arm my wife and son might have been killed. Fuck all of you spineless cock sucking retards who think gun control stops all of the gun/ammo smuggling through the Mexico/USA border.
#614
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
ASIANS CAN ACTUALLY READ MINDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
they can hear, and see what your visually thinking
this is the absolute complete truth!!!!!
The reason a lot of Asians have completely expressionless faces, segregate from everybody else-only associate with Asians and don’t associate with non Asians that much, are very untalkative, and are very unfriendly in general is to avoid accidentally revealing that they can read minds by accidentally showing a facial expression or dirty look when someone thinks, or visually pictures something in their mind they don’t like, find astonishing, or funny etc because those people might see that and really wonder what that was that just happened there and see the connection, and they might accidentally say something similar to what the person was just thinking and going to say. If they all associated with non Asians a lot more then there would be a lot more people around for them to accidentally show facial expressions when those people think things they don’t like etc, so they segregate and only associate with Asians so there won’t be anyone around for them to see that and have any accidents happen in the first place.
Try thinking, best yet visually picturing in your mind something absolutely wild as you possibly can when you are around Asians, and try looking for Asians who give people particular looks, especially dirty looks for what appears to be for completely no reason.
YOU NEED TO SPREAD THE MESSAGE!!!!!!
they can hear, and see what your visually thinking
this is the absolute complete truth!!!!!
The reason a lot of Asians have completely expressionless faces, segregate from everybody else-only associate with Asians and don’t associate with non Asians that much, are very untalkative, and are very unfriendly in general is to avoid accidentally revealing that they can read minds by accidentally showing a facial expression or dirty look when someone thinks, or visually pictures something in their mind they don’t like, find astonishing, or funny etc because those people might see that and really wonder what that was that just happened there and see the connection, and they might accidentally say something similar to what the person was just thinking and going to say. If they all associated with non Asians a lot more then there would be a lot more people around for them to accidentally show facial expressions when those people think things they don’t like etc, so they segregate and only associate with Asians so there won’t be anyone around for them to see that and have any accidents happen in the first place.
Try thinking, best yet visually picturing in your mind something absolutely wild as you possibly can when you are around Asians, and try looking for Asians who give people particular looks, especially dirty looks for what appears to be for completely no reason.
YOU NEED TO SPREAD THE MESSAGE!!!!!!
why the fuck would any person need an AR. and don't say hunting because if you need an AR to hunt you are a shitty hunter.
#710 to #669
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
but they're losing that right rather quickly. Do you know why? It turns out that other people's right to not get lung cancer are being threatened by their right to give themselves cancer just like those kids rights to not get shot in the fucking face was taken away by the psychos' rights to have guns.
If an animal was to turn at the last second or a hunter simply missed and only wounds the animal it will more than likely run off before he can take a follow up shot if he is using a bolt or lever action rifle; therefore leaving the animal to die in the wilderness.
Cause....its cool? No but honestly he could easily be part of a gun club where you can buy guns from and shoot down a range etc. He may be a gun enthusiast I loves to collect guns. Maybe his wife/gf said she would suck his dick if he bought it. Their are many reasons.
**newmanchamp rolled user Benka ** Guns don't kill people, this guy kills people
#602
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
I think your missing the fact that OP didn't make this a pro or anti gun rant.
i think the whole point is the "I have the best behaved AR in the world!" joke...
i think the whole point is the "I have the best behaved AR in the world!" joke...
#597
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
hahaha, guns don't kill people hurrdurr...
try and dig a hole without a shovel, you can, but it's hard, so why not use the shovel you have lying around? it"s called facilitation, open a book somethime
try and dig a hole without a shovel, you can, but it's hard, so why not use the shovel you have lying around? it"s called facilitation, open a book somethime
#620 to #596
-
swagbot (01/07/2013) [-]
Anon missed the point... what a fucking surprise.
No, we should;
1) Still keep driving drunk (shooting people) illegal
2) Still prosecute the fuck out of people who drive drunk (shoot people)
3) Still promote a culture of not driving drunk (going crazy and shooting people)
We should NOT:
1) Pass a law panning cars (guns), because the car (gun) didn't do anything wrong.
GET IT?!!?!
No, we should;
1) Still keep driving drunk (shooting people) illegal
2) Still prosecute the fuck out of people who drive drunk (shoot people)
3) Still promote a culture of not driving drunk (going crazy and shooting people)
We should NOT:
1) Pass a law panning cars (guns), because the car (gun) didn't do anything wrong.
GET IT?!!?!
#629 to #620
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
-coming from swagbot
No, that was a cheap shot.
-coming from someone who thinks having the means to whore thumbs and an artificial internet ego makes them a tough guy
No, that was a cheap shot too.
Not everybody who drives drunk hurts everybody, we should totally let them do it because only some people hurt others by those means. We should let everybody drive drunk and only punish them AFTER they t-bone a minivan and kill six kids.
No, that was a cheap shot.
-coming from someone who thinks having the means to whore thumbs and an artificial internet ego makes them a tough guy
No, that was a cheap shot too.
Not everybody who drives drunk hurts everybody, we should totally let them do it because only some people hurt others by those means. We should let everybody drive drunk and only punish them AFTER they t-bone a minivan and kill six kids.
#715 to #629
-
swagbot (01/07/2013) [-]
Okay... I don't even get what those first four lines mean or how they address what i wrote, so I'll ignore those...
No - I WISH there was some way to know that a crime was imminent, so that those people could be apprehended before they do harm to others...interesting, you made me think of something:
- We live in a society where we interact with other people.
- That means we Could possibly (at some point) "interact" with a mass-shooter, or a drunk-diver, and be killed as a result of their actions.
- Since a "Pre-Crime" system is impossible, and we don't want to die because of dangerous shit in our society, we have to (as a society) do what we think is necessary to prevent such problems from happening.
So... for example - to prevent drunk driving incidents - What's the only foolproof way of doing that? To have absolutely NO Alcohol in your entire State! Personally, I would join you in that! I don't drink, and i usually despise people who do! So maybe, some people will get together and make the first completely alcohol-free state!
But think of the cost of enforcing that if the populace doesn't 100% agree! Someone makes some moonshine in their backyard, drinks it, kills someone on the road - And our perfect Utopia-where-nobody-will-ever-be-killed-by-drunk-driving is immediately a failure!
Same thing applies to guns:
1) It is almost IMPOSSIBLE to seal an area off from guns.
2) Guns are used for legitimate purposes as well.
3) If you ban guns, the 'assholes' of society who don't follow the rules will GET guns anyways!
You'd go through all that hassle just to stop a few mass-shooters, who do less damage than CAR ACCIDENTS AND HEART ATTACKS every year? No.
What's the solution?
Fix the societal problems that are causing people to turn into mass-shooters
Promote a culture of responsibility around the things in our lives that could potentially be harmful.
No - I WISH there was some way to know that a crime was imminent, so that those people could be apprehended before they do harm to others...interesting, you made me think of something:
- We live in a society where we interact with other people.
- That means we Could possibly (at some point) "interact" with a mass-shooter, or a drunk-diver, and be killed as a result of their actions.
- Since a "Pre-Crime" system is impossible, and we don't want to die because of dangerous shit in our society, we have to (as a society) do what we think is necessary to prevent such problems from happening.
So... for example - to prevent drunk driving incidents - What's the only foolproof way of doing that? To have absolutely NO Alcohol in your entire State! Personally, I would join you in that! I don't drink, and i usually despise people who do! So maybe, some people will get together and make the first completely alcohol-free state!
But think of the cost of enforcing that if the populace doesn't 100% agree! Someone makes some moonshine in their backyard, drinks it, kills someone on the road - And our perfect Utopia-where-nobody-will-ever-be-killed-by-drunk-driving is immediately a failure!
Same thing applies to guns:
1) It is almost IMPOSSIBLE to seal an area off from guns.
2) Guns are used for legitimate purposes as well.
3) If you ban guns, the 'assholes' of society who don't follow the rules will GET guns anyways!
You'd go through all that hassle just to stop a few mass-shooters, who do less damage than CAR ACCIDENTS AND HEART ATTACKS every year? No.
What's the solution?
Fix the societal problems that are causing people to turn into mass-shooters
Promote a culture of responsibility around the things in our lives that could potentially be harmful.
#686 to #664
-
tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
... No. Pretty much anyone can get guns. Legally or not that doesn't matter. You will always be able to find one if you want one. Really drunk driving. Come on. My parents own a liquor store and people come in drunk all the time only to drink more. You really want them behind the wheel of a car?
Still, why would anyone need an AR? It's not like you need such a bad-ass mother just to defend yourself against some robbers or something.
Like oh shit my house is getting robbed, they probably won't listen to me when I catch them with this simple handgun, nah that's not gonna do any mortal harm to them, better take out my FUCKING ASSAULT RIFLES AND SOME MACHINE GUNS to teach them a lesson.
Like oh shit my house is getting robbed, they probably won't listen to me when I catch them with this simple handgun, nah that's not gonna do any mortal harm to them, better take out my FUCKING ASSAULT RIFLES AND SOME MACHINE GUNS to teach them a lesson.
#623 to #591
-
N. Korean citizen (01/07/2013) [-]
Machine guns have been illegal since 1937 stupid fuck. that's not a machine gun and not really even an assault rifle.
Speaking of Rifles, during katrina rifles helped home owners avoid getting looted and or murdered. Just one more reason. The main reason though? To defend against our government. You can say "dey hab tanks and shit" but you'd be wrong. the germans had tanks and shit, if the jews were well armed shit would have went different. Plus the US government can't really take a tank down a neighborhood without making even more enemies, as we learned in Iraq. the difference? We're tax payers.
ps
Fuck you.
Speaking of Rifles, during katrina rifles helped home owners avoid getting looted and or murdered. Just one more reason. The main reason though? To defend against our government. You can say "dey hab tanks and shit" but you'd be wrong. the germans had tanks and shit, if the jews were well armed shit would have went different. Plus the US government can't really take a tank down a neighborhood without making even more enemies, as we learned in Iraq. the difference? We're tax payers.
ps
Fuck you.
I'm sorry for not looking up what particular gun that is, as I do not have neither a legitimate reason, nor do I care.
I'm sorry but I completely lost myself in your argument, are you saying you need rifles to protect yourself against the government shooting you down with "tanks and shit"? Now I have little knowing of what the government does with its free time, but I seriously doubt they would ever turn against their own people, as I see no reason they would. It's not like Obama will be the next Hitler.
I'm sorry but I completely lost myself in your argument, are you saying you need rifles to protect yourself against the government shooting you down with "tanks and shit"? Now I have little knowing of what the government does with its free time, but I seriously doubt they would ever turn against their own people, as I see no reason they would. It's not like Obama will be the next Hitler.
I swear, the arguments (both for and against) gun control are getting dumber.
I know that this is just my opinion, but in most states, assault rifles are not allowed to be used for hunting. If they aren't used for killing animals, then they are used for killing people. I'm fine with other weapons being possessed, but when it comes to assault rifles, that's where it crosses the line for me.