Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
-12
#707 - flange has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #804 to #707 - counteractive (01/07/2013) [-]
Pretty sure he just set them there, took a picture, and put them back in his gun safe. The object of this picture is to prove a point, not to be taken literally in the since that he actually left his gun there all day.
#727 to #707 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
Anyway. You're talking about responsibility herr derr, but you leave a ******* gun with tons of ammo where anyone can just run up and take it? Yea, giving you a gun was a ******* brilliant idea.
#723 to #707 - blackleather (01/07/2013) [-]
I had to do it. I just couldn't resist.
User avatar #693 - doctorhobo (01/07/2013) [-]
I once tried this with my motion detection triggered machinegun turret, **** was so cash bro.
#681 - wymetehoriginal (01/07/2013) [-]
I just set my nuke here and it didn't go off on it's own! I guess that means it's safe!
I just set my nuke here and it didn't go off on it's own! I guess that means it's safe!
User avatar #673 - KingRANDOM (01/07/2013) [-]
It was only good because you were watching the second you leave it'll bust out the door trust me. I once had mine come back with a dead cat it was disgusting.
#660 - thisotherdude (01/07/2013) [-]
Guns are for pussies, if you really want to go down a badass get a sword, some armor, walk into a crowded mall, and then start slaughtering everyone until eventually they manage to take you down. One big ol' blaze of glory.
User avatar #699 to #660 - JMF (01/07/2013) [-]
Go back to 9gag.
User avatar #740 to #699 - joekooldash (01/07/2013) [-]
9fag*
User avatar #747 to #740 - JMF (01/07/2013) [-]
Yeah.. Yeah!
#659 - elcreepo (01/07/2013) [-]
Comment sections a ********* . Look what you've started with your conservative logic, OP.
User avatar #728 to #659 - pepemex (01/07/2013) [-]
You mean his logic logic?
#734 to #728 - elcreepo (01/07/2013) [-]
No, I mean that because he brought conservative logic on funnyjunk, he started a 						*********					 of an argument that quite frankly is beating the entrails of what was once a horse into the ground.
No, I mean that because he brought conservative logic on funnyjunk, he started a ********* of an argument that quite frankly is beating the entrails of what was once a horse into the ground.
User avatar #760 to #734 - pepemex (01/07/2013) [-]
It's not conservative logic to say that guns don't kill people, it's simple common sense
User avatar #782 to #760 - elcreepo (01/07/2013) [-]
I'll say this again though.

This argument is pointless and has been fought more times than I care to count, and if you want to fight there's a whole lot of other arguments going on in the comments that I'm sure you'd be happy to join.
User avatar #778 to #760 - elcreepo (01/07/2013) [-]
Guns are tools for killing people, are they not?

OP's logic is the same as saying heroin injects itself.
#765 to #760 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
so conservatives don't see that as logical? I don't think you get adjectives.
-2
#672 to #659 - pourqee Comment deleted by pourqee [-]
#696 to #672 - elcreepo (01/07/2013) [-]
Bit of advice, just stay away from politics in general while uploading to FJ.    
   
Then we could have nice things.
Bit of advice, just stay away from politics in general while uploading to FJ.

Then we could have nice things.
#700 to #696 - pourqee (01/07/2013) [-]
I even posted it in stoner humor to tell everyone that i didn't mean for it to be provocative.
#781 to #700 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
Yea, I'm gonna go make Holocaust jokes in a synagogue and be surprised when people get upset.
User avatar #735 to #700 - elcreepo (01/07/2013) [-]
I kind of figured that. Sorry for all the hate you're getting, it'll be over by tomorrow.
#683 to #672 - dirkdirkmoo (01/07/2013) [-]
it's okay, I still love you for this funny ****
#636 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
usa is so ******* stupid. i hope there is another 9/11.

#karma
#689 to #636 - dirkdirkmoo (01/07/2013) [-]
OH MY GOD

YOU'RE SO RIGHT

PLEASE FORGIVE ME

*sarcasm*
#644 to #636 - tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
wow. you sir are an asshole
#691 to #644 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
he has a point though, you guys had it coming and are seriously due another one
#703 to #691 - tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
Hush anon no one wants you here. What you're saying is you want thousands of people to die. Is that right?
#711 to #703 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
as long as they're americans. due the world a favour. start a war with china and lose. save the rest of us this awkward time, usa is like an old man that thinks he is tough because he believed it when he was young. sit the **** down before you hurt yourself
#806 to #711 - tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
what ever happened to people getting along. Im american and yea this country is ****** up. Not gonna lie. But do you see me wishing death upon people. No you don't.
#653 to #644 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
welcome to FJ, where everybody has an IQ of 85, an age of twelve and the self image of a highly successful economist, social psychologist, philosopher and political scientist.
User avatar #708 to #653 - neoexdeath ONLINE (01/07/2013) [-]
I'm 22, IQ of 108, and I'm well aware I'm a jerk of reasonable intelligence who does not know enough about the world because I've only been remotely self aware for something like fifteen years.
#775 to #708 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
I forgot to mention the people who always show up to say how different they are to absolutely nobody.
#695 to #653 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
buttrage all you ******* want, it doesn't change the fact that most of you here arguing barely know algebra, much less the subtle nuances of social psychology and US law.
#666 to #653 - tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
Oh i have been here for some time now believe me I know all of this. Just making a statement
User avatar #643 to #636 - thepalmtoptiger (01/07/2013) [-]
Jimmies unrustled, maybe next time.
-5
#640 to #636 - crippledwookie has deleted their comment [-]
#634 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
I love it when Europeans try to sound like they're so more moral about mass shootings than Americans. Let's see....well in the UK the IRA was actively shooting a bombing people up until 1994 when they called a ceasefire. Germany had a shooting in 2009 that killed eleven kids. France March of last year a Rabbi and his three sons get gunned down. Norway 77 people gunned down in Oslo. I could keep going but simple fact is no one is immune to this. its tragic, it happens. This is not an issue of gun control its an issue of mental healthcare.
#834 to #634 - mbthegreat (01/07/2013) [-]
1. You can't compare terrorism (IRA) to civilians carrying out mass shootings. It is not the same thing.
2. Saying things like "Germany had a shooting in 2009" shows how weak your position is, you have one example from three years ago, the US had 16 mass shootings last year alone. USA gun murder rate: 10.2 / 100,000 German gun murder rate: 1.10 / 100,000, not to mention accidental gun deaths. This isn't exactly rocket science

This is why Europeans seem so arrogant to you, were are literally amazed at how in love with killing each other you all are.

#853 to #834 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
The Murder rate in United States is so vastly skewed due to the drug problem in our country. Nearly half of all murders in the US are related to drugs. And the US murder rate in 2011 was 3.59 per 100,000 last year not 10.
User avatar #867 to #853 - Utkezabanje (01/07/2013) [-]
Sorry, but I must say you are a very poor debate partner.
#882 to #867 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
I don't understand what you're debating. From what i understood overwhelmingly skimming through the comments that there should be stricter gun laws and regulations.
#749 to #634 - Utkezabanje (01/07/2013) [-]
Except that most of those that you stated killed for their ideals... and weren't 18 year old kids with and easy access to guns and ammo.
#754 to #749 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
You know he stole the two handguns right? Its illegal to own a pistol under the age of 21.
#763 to #754 - Utkezabanje (01/07/2013) [-]
I gave an example of a kid who shot up a school... It doesn't matter... Try and see the big picture.
#786 to #763 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
Absolutely the big picture is that Sandy Hook, Aurora theater, and the Brookfield Mall shootings were all carried out by people that were certifiably insane. In the case of the guy that shot up the Aurora he was crazy his psychiatrist knew it but was powerless to do anything to stop him she could proscribe him medication but couldn't make him take. She didn't have any power to have him committed or observed. Once again this isn't an issue of gun control, its a mental health care issue.
User avatar #789 to #786 - Utkezabanje (01/07/2013) [-]
He's not the only kid that shot up a school.
#798 to #789 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
Nearly all school shootings are attributed to bullying. And same thing there's very little done in adolescent mental health care.
User avatar #803 to #798 - Utkezabanje (01/07/2013) [-]
Thus proving that the USA has a big problem in its very core.
#807 to #803 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
Blame the right problem.
User avatar #812 to #807 - Utkezabanje (01/07/2013) [-]
There are too many problems. And you are not dealing with them properly.
#815 to #812 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
Prey tell oh master of political and moral design tell me how will solve our problems for us.
User avatar #823 to #815 - Utkezabanje (01/07/2013) [-]
By not changing the subject to "You know he stole the two handguns right?" and giving a proper argument to what I said in the first place.
#830 to #823 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
Sorry you didn't understand my point. How would adding a new law prevent people from getting guns when the person was breaking the law possessing the weapons in the first place.
User avatar #837 to #830 - Utkezabanje (01/07/2013) [-]
I never mentioned anything about the idea of introducing a new law..
User avatar #665 to #634 - sonnyboii (01/07/2013) [-]
77 people gunned down on an island
#675 to #665 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
? No in Oslo,Norway.
User avatar #685 to #675 - sonnyboii (01/07/2013) [-]
If youre talking about 22 july, wich im pretty sure you are, it was on utøya.
I live in norway and i know this ._.
I think it was about 67 shot though, about 10 got killed in the explosion IN OSLO
#702 to #685 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
Ah I didn't realize that the were two separate events done by the same guy.
#642 to #634 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
no its gun control. tard
#645 to #642 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
Nope, one thing all of these shootings have had in common was that everyone of the shooters were crazy. People knew it but were powerless to do anything about it.
#651 to #645 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
how about not giving stupid americans guns? you cant stop the retards but if they have no gun then no one gets shot simple right?
#676 to #651 - ibettyhumpder (01/07/2013) [-]
for starters, AMERICANS got there freedom from fighting off the British tyrants that were over taxing its people in the colonies. The whole reason why we can have guns is because we don't want dick head power hungry monarchists to rule us with an iron grip.
#661 to #651 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
You have no idea what you're talking about you just want to get a reaction out of someone. Either add something constructive or sign in and accept your red tide like a man and/or woman.
#674 to #661 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
ok, not that anon here and I don't give half a **** about your cute little argument you two are having (but you two should just **** already, release the tension) but the anon thing is just stupid. There's nothing "manly" about having an account on FJ whose sole purpose is to whore thumbs on and feel like you have some big ego on the internet.
#692 to #674 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
A good **** would probably smooth things over. But some people take thumbs seriously. I don't really care that much but anon's on FJ are exploiting the fact that they can just say stupid infuriating **** get thumbed down and not get banned.
#705 to #692 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
and what happens if your account gets banned? You just give up and leave?
#706 to #705 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
If nothing else it give closure.
#733 to #706 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
then they make a new account and start over again. Nothing changes. That name still means dick compared to anonymous. All anonymity does is save them 30 seconds of getting a new disposable email account. btw that's not me thumbing you down, just fyi
#739 to #733 - Uranium (01/07/2013) [-]
Thats true but that takes effort
#678 to #674 - ibettyhumpder (01/07/2013) [-]
but it makes you feel like you have a big dick
#682 to #678 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
If you need to feel like you have a big dick, yours is probably pretty tiny. Just sayin.
#694 to #682 - ibettyhumpder (01/07/2013) [-]
its so tiny that when i was ******* your mom, she was all like "is it in" and ****
#632 - paarskwadraat (01/07/2013) [-]
guns don't kill people. Uh uh   
I kill people   
with guns. POW!
guns don't kill people. Uh uh
I kill people
with guns. POW!
#631 - demcomments (01/07/2013) [-]
**demcomments rolled a random image posted in comment #2771697 at MLP Friendly Board **

If people don't kill each other with guns people will just find another way to do it.

Current - ERMAGERD BAN GUNS
After bunning guns - ERMAGERD BAN SWORDS
After banning swords - ERMAGERD BAN ROCKS
After banning rocks - ERMAGERD BAN STICKS

The US can make guns illegal all they want, people will still manage to get them. What happens when the actual lawabiding citizens need to defend themselves against someone with a gun?
#641 to #631 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
Oh look, the slippery slope argument. That hasn't historically been proven to be the stupidest ******* thing in the world before...

not to mention, people being armed has not shown to do anything to prevent crimes, so why should we just make it easier for the criminals?
#637 to #631 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
I totally agree. We should also legalize murder. People are still finding a way to do it.
#783 to #637 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
In my home I have prevented two home invasions, by the necessary means of force issued to me by my state of residence. Meaning I shot the dumb son of a bitch as soon as the door broke open. How you might ask, did I know he was there? Because I am vigilant w/ the security of my home and neighbor hood. With the use of that fire arm my wife and son might have been killed. **** all of you spineless cock sucking retards who think gun control stops all of the gun/ammo smuggling through the Mexico/USA border.
#614 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
ASIANS CAN ACTUALLY READ MINDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
they can hear, and see what your visually thinking
this is the absolute complete truth!!!!!

The reason a lot of Asians have completely expressionless faces, segregate from everybody else-only associate with Asians and don’t associate with non Asians that much, are very untalkative, and are very unfriendly in general is to avoid accidentally revealing that they can read minds by accidentally showing a facial expression or dirty look when someone thinks, or visually pictures something in their mind they don’t like, find astonishing, or funny etc because those people might see that and really wonder what that was that just happened there and see the connection, and they might accidentally say something similar to what the person was just thinking and going to say. If they all associated with non Asians a lot more then there would be a lot more people around for them to accidentally show facial expressions when those people think things they don’t like etc, so they segregate and only associate with Asians so there won’t be anyone around for them to see that and have any accidents happen in the first place.

Try thinking, best yet visually picturing in your mind something absolutely wild as you possibly can when you are around Asians, and try looking for Asians who give people particular looks, especially dirty looks for what appears to be for completely no reason.

YOU NEED TO SPREAD THE MESSAGE!!!!!!
User avatar #610 - newmanchamp (01/07/2013) [-]
**newmanchamp rolled user Benka ** Guns don't kill people, this guy kills people
#602 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
I think your missing the fact that OP didn't make this a pro or anti gun rant.

i think the whole point is the "I have the best behaved AR in the world!" joke...
#597 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
hahaha, guns don't kill people hurrdurr...
try and dig a hole without a shovel, you can, but it's hard, so why not use the shovel you have lying around? it"s called facilitation, open a book somethime
-2
#594 - morelazors has deleted their comment [-]
#603 to #594 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
I love seeing people without so much as a high school education act superior over the internet.
User avatar #658 to #593 - TheCodFather (01/07/2013) [-]
Honestly though there should be more gun regulations, like more background checks etc
User avatar #670 to #658 - namseal (01/07/2013) [-]
I agree that there should be regulations but the idea that banning guns entirely is just plain stupid.
User avatar #709 to #670 - TheCodFather (01/07/2013) [-]
They couldn't do that in the US though could they? It's in their (your) constitutional rights
User avatar #667 to #658 - violenthandjob (01/07/2013) [-]
There already are background checks
#596 to #593 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
Well then, I guess we should legalize drunk driving.
#620 to #596 - swagbot ONLINE (01/07/2013) [-]
Anon missed the point... what a 						*******					 surprise.   
No, we should;   
1) Still keep driving drunk (shooting people) illegal   
2) Still prosecute the 						****					 out of people who drive drunk (shoot people)   
3) Still promote a culture of not driving drunk (going crazy and shooting people)   
We should NOT:   
1) Pass a law panning cars (guns), because the car (gun) didn't do anything wrong.   
   
GET IT?!!?!
Anon missed the point... what a ******* surprise.
No, we should;
1) Still keep driving drunk (shooting people) illegal
2) Still prosecute the **** out of people who drive drunk (shoot people)
3) Still promote a culture of not driving drunk (going crazy and shooting people)
We should NOT:
1) Pass a law panning cars (guns), because the car (gun) didn't do anything wrong.

GET IT?!!?!
#629 to #620 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
-coming from swagbot
No, that was a cheap shot.
-coming from someone who thinks having the means to whore thumbs and an artificial internet ego makes them a tough guy
No, that was a cheap shot too.
Not everybody who drives drunk hurts everybody, we should totally let them do it because only some people hurt others by those means. We should let everybody drive drunk and only punish them AFTER they t-bone a minivan and kill six kids.
#715 to #629 - swagbot ONLINE (01/07/2013) [-]
Okay... I don't even get what those first four lines mean or how they address what i wrote, so I'll ignore those...

No - I WISH there was some way to know that a crime was imminent, so that those people could be apprehended before they do harm to others...interesting, you made me think of something:
- We live in a society where we interact with other people.
- That means we Could possibly (at some point) "interact" with a mass-shooter, or a drunk-diver, and be killed as a result of their actions.
- Since a "Pre-Crime" system is impossible, and we don't want to die because of dangerous **** in our society, we have to (as a society) do what we think is necessary to prevent such problems from happening.

So... for example - to prevent drunk driving incidents - What's the only foolproof way of doing that? To have absolutely NO Alcohol in your entire State! Personally, I would join you in that! I don't drink, and i usually despise people who do! So maybe, some people will get together and make the first completely alcohol-free state!

But think of the cost of enforcing that if the populace doesn't 100% agree! Someone makes some moonshine in their backyard, drinks it, kills someone on the road - And our perfect Utopia-where-nobody-will-ever-be-killed-by-drunk-driving is immediately a failure!

Same thing applies to guns:
1) It is almost IMPOSSIBLE to seal an area off from guns.
2) Guns are used for legitimate purposes as well.
3) If you ban guns, the 'assholes' of society who don't follow the rules will GET guns anyways!

You'd go through all that hassle just to stop a few mass-shooters, who do less damage than CAR ACCIDENTS AND HEART ATTACKS every year? No.

What's the solution?

Fix the societal problems that are causing people to turn into mass-shooters

Promote a culture of responsibility around the things in our lives that could potentially be harmful.
#652 to #629 - tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
I can't tell if you're serious or not
#664 to #652 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
I'm totally serious. Let's let everybody have guns and only punish them if they use them and let everybody drive drunk and only punish them if they cause an accident. Dead ******* serious.
#686 to #664 - tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
... No. Pretty much anyone can get guns. Legally or not that doesn't matter. You will always be able to find one if you want one. Really drunk driving. Come on. My parents own a liquor store and people come in drunk all the time only to drink more. You really want them behind the wheel of a car?
#714 to #686 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
You're.... you're really bad with sarcasm. People get drugs too, we should just let every junkie run around getting high and ******** all over the place, right?
#793 to #714 - tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
how was i being sarcastic?
#818 to #793 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
I was.
#721 to #714 - swagbot ONLINE (01/07/2013) [-]
Anon, you're being too smart by half... just read my damn reply to your original post.
#790 to #721 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
tldr
0
#649 to #629 - tbombrtwo has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #591 - chairypie (01/07/2013) [-]
Still, why would anyone need an AR? It's not like you need such a bad-ass mother just to defend yourself against some robbers or something.
Like oh **** my house is getting robbed, they probably won't listen to me when I catch them with this simple handgun, nah that's not gonna do any mortal harm to them, better take out my ******* ASSAULT RIFLES AND SOME MACHINE GUNS to teach them a lesson.
#657 to #591 - tbombrtwo (01/07/2013) [-]
really do i have to spell it out for you. Z-O-M-B-I-E -A-P-O-C-A-L-Y-P-S-E
#623 to #591 - 4chan refugee (01/07/2013) [-]
Machine guns have been illegal since 1937 stupid **** . that's not a machine gun and not really even an assault rifle.

Speaking of Rifles, during katrina rifles helped home owners avoid getting looted and or murdered. Just one more reason. The main reason though? To defend against our government. You can say "dey hab tanks and **** " but you'd be wrong. the germans had tanks and **** , if the jews were well armed **** would have went different. Plus the US government can't really take a tank down a neighborhood without making even more enemies, as we learned in Iraq. the difference? We're tax payers.

ps

**** you.
User avatar #716 to #623 - JMF (01/07/2013) [-]
Also, tanks don't do well under water.
User avatar #639 to #623 - chairypie (01/07/2013) [-]
I'm sorry for not looking up what particular gun that is, as I do not have neither a legitimate reason, nor do I care.
I'm sorry but I completely lost myself in your argument, are you saying you need rifles to protect yourself against the government shooting you down with "tanks and **** "? Now I have little knowing of what the government does with its free time, but I seriously doubt they would ever turn against their own people, as I see no reason they would. It's not like Obama will be the next Hitler.
User avatar #615 to #591 - petro (01/07/2013) [-]
For some reason, that just sounds more appealing. Not being an ass, or troll. I just sounds funny. Why the hell not?
User avatar #616 to #615 - petro (01/07/2013) [-]
*It
User avatar #585 - elyiia (01/07/2013) [-]
I swear, the arguments (both for and against) gun control are getting dumber.
User avatar #578 - Whetstone (01/07/2013) [-]
I know that this is just my opinion, but in most states, assault rifles are not allowed to be used for hunting. If they aren't used for killing animals, then they are used for killing people. I'm fine with other weapons being possessed, but when it comes to assault rifles, that's where it crosses the line for me.
User avatar #606 to #578 - whaawhaa (01/07/2013) [-]
In reference to the AR-15 being illegal to hunt with its because it shoots a .223 round which is a .22 cal and considered not strong enough to hunt with so its inhumane because it wont always kill.
#571 - BobbyMcFerrin (01/07/2013) [-]
But while it was sitting there it accomplished both of it's goals besides killing people:   
   
1. Nothing   
   
2. Making you forget about your tiny penis
But while it was sitting there it accomplished both of it's goals besides killing people:

1. Nothing

2. Making you forget about your tiny penis

 Friends (0)