Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #102 - jokersaysamuseme (01/04/2013) [-]
That is what I call a badass right there
0
#101 - kevinhanianthree **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #97 - BigDoktor (01/04/2013) [-]
it's like skyrim with guns
#92 - starswirl ONLINE (01/04/2013) [-]
**starswirl rolled a random image posted in comment #42 at Brostar Thread **

Gunmans face when he realises that isnt even his final form
User avatar #90 - paulxdragon (01/04/2013) [-]
That was obviously an airsoft gun, otherwise the ****** would've fired it.
User avatar #89 - datargumme (01/04/2013) [-]
It is not about having gun controll, it is about the people having a decent standard of living. If they get in fine in their life, they have no reason to commit crime.
#91 to #89 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/04/2013) [-]
lol, like thats gonna happen in the usa
#88 - hipsophobadon (01/04/2013) [-]
Gun vs Chair, and the chair wins.
Gun vs Chair, and the chair wins.
User avatar #87 - nrhv (01/04/2013) [-]
funny how the pro-lifers picket hospitals but not gun shops
User avatar #221 to #87 - teoberry (01/04/2013) [-]
Yeah, but the purpose of abortion clinics is to abort babies. The purpose of gun shops is not to arm killers. It's to arm normal people who like shooting guns, or hunters who make a living off it.
User avatar #94 to #87 - poutinesalad (01/04/2013) [-]
Abortion has nothing to do with gun control.
User avatar #104 to #94 - Triskiller (01/04/2013) [-]
If you're pro life, you better not be supporting any goddamn wars or the death penalty. 'Cause that isn't very pro life, now is it?
User avatar #105 to #104 - poutinesalad (01/04/2013) [-]
Yes but they have seperate fights against them. You can agree with both movements with no harm or foul.
User avatar #106 to #105 - Triskiller (01/04/2013) [-]
I think it's pretty hipocritical to say you are pro-life by being against abortion, but still supporting the death penalty, wars, and the right to bear arms. All those things are about taking lives. Just call yourself anti-abortion, 'cause that's what you are if you're like that.
User avatar #110 to #106 - poutinesalad (01/04/2013) [-]
Nothing is black and white, and they are separate political movements. You can agree with guns but not abortion.

The black market will get criminals guns regardless of legality; so its a right to protect yourself.
(This belief doesn't conflict with abortion beliefs)

You can also believe in abortion but not guns.










User avatar #126 to #110 - icedmantwo (01/04/2013) [-]
its also easier to get a gun illegally if every house you break into has one or more
in addition its very hard to argue or justify the possession of fully automatic guns, where at least with pistols you can argue defense and pump, bolt, lever action rifles and shotguns or semi automatic rifle you can argue for hunting
plus you should also be required to take gun safety courses and back round/mental health checks as well
User avatar #114 to #110 - Triskiller (01/04/2013) [-]
That's true, I agree with that sentiment, but calling themselves pro-life is what I don't agree with; because they aren't pro-life, they are anti-abortion.

I don't agree with your sentiment about guns offering protection, but that's a whole other discussion I am not willing to partake in at this point.

Have a good day. ;)
User avatar #115 to #114 - poutinesalad (01/04/2013) [-]
That's the P.C. name of the movement, you talk about pro-life/pro-choice you're talkin bout abortion
#84 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/04/2013) [-]
As an american I don't feel safe knowing how easy it is to get a firearm. And I don't want to have to walk around with a gun to be safe. That's like living in the middle east where people are always at war and have to fight for their lives.
I agree with heavily regulating guns.
User avatar #86 to #84 - bigbeaufort (01/04/2013) [-]
All conservatives please note.... he said regulating guns not... break into your house at night, take your guns and rape your family. Though that's how you may view it...
#100 to #86 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/04/2013) [-]
Not even kidding, just because a select few who have never owned a gun think it is the devil, doesn't mean that its bad. Regulating guns has already been put into effect. Look at what has happened, Nothing.

I'm not Conservative, but i do feel that restricting guns is only another way to empower the Government against the people. The only people who go on massacres are clinically insane, and yet they can pass for regular in our society. What does that say of the Society we live in?
User avatar #81 - gtk (01/04/2013) [-]
How could that happen!? Im sure that man went through hours of training to obtain that firearm! I believe that the man with the chair is being wreck-less with that chair and very well could hurt someone if he were to go insane! I say we ban all chairs that are foldable, have and accessories such as arm rests, cup holders, or a reclining option. Even though this chair had none of those things we must act now! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
#138 to #81 - stripeygreenhat (01/04/2013) [-]
Don't be such a dumbass. No one has ever shot up a school with a chair. What a ******* retarded fallacy.
User avatar #280 to #138 - gtk (01/04/2013) [-]
Im sorry, that was supposed to come out as being overly sarcastic..

..Because outlawing stuff does absolutely nothing in the US... Prohibition, currently drugs.. Mexico (and in prohibitions case Canada) will always supply crime in our country..
#282 to #280 - stripeygreenhat (01/04/2013) [-]
If heroin were legalized, people would have a much easier time accessing it. I'm not for banning all guns ever, but I think automatic and semi automatic weapons should be restricted from civilians. Yea, some criminals will always still have access to them but people wanting to do spontaneous crimes will have a much harder time finding said weapons. You won't be able to just walk into your mom's house and take her weapons.
User avatar #288 to #282 - gtk (01/05/2013) [-]
May I ask you where you live?

Im out in Northern California and it is extremely easy to illegally obtain anything from drugs to fire arms..
#290 to #288 - stripeygreenhat (01/06/2013) [-]
Tennessee. I've lived in several places in the Southeast, and for the most part organized crime isn't prevalent in this region. In TN it's easy to most obtain fire arms because everyone here loves guns but it's challenging to obtain illegal drugs.
User avatar #292 to #290 - gtk (01/06/2013) [-]
I guess that makes sense. For us we have a lot of immigrants to work the vineyards but with immigrants come crime. (This isnt me being racist, there are tons of good honest people here trying to make a life, but a few bad seeds spoil the batch) At my high school the most popular drug was cocaine, and many people did meth. At the private schools it was mainly acid. Long story short drugs are everywhere here, and im in a medium sized city, I can only imagine how bad San Fransico/Oakland is.
#80 - pasiusquotum (01/04/2013) [-]
Next thing you know soccer moms are going to be crying to congress about chairs being a dangered weapon, and how most deaths are when you're sitting down anyway.
#79 - phanact (01/04/2013) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #77 - leettaco (01/04/2013) [-]
That man practiced his right to defend himself. unarmed.
People say that if you have a CCW you will freeze up or kill other people. that is clearly not the case.
User avatar #76 - vade (01/04/2013) [-]
I dont care if I get red thumbs but in the end help take more innocent lives than they save and the only real reason why guns were in the second amendment was because they were scared of a British invasion and america had no real army to fight so they had to completely rely on the people unlike now where the US basically has the number one army in the world guys lets be rational and logical
#85 to #76 - wyldek (01/04/2013) [-]
Ugh. The primary reason for the second amendment was because they had seen how oppressive governments could be, and wanted to give citizens a way to protect their rights.

The second amendment wasn't protection against the British, it's for protection from the US government, should it ever become corrupt.
#75 - jakols (01/04/2013) [-]
muggers face when, man goes into "						******					 Rage Mode"
muggers face when, man goes into " ****** Rage Mode"
+2
#73 - soule has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #99 to #72 - zzzebror (01/04/2013) [-]
Will this really help as an aversion if the killer has the intention of taking his life after killing the children?
User avatar #71 - Shiny (01/04/2013) [-]
I was about to post my opinion on gun control, then realized that nobody cares, reminded myself of the objective meaninglessness of my existence and found something actually enjoyable to do
#62 - kingthatcrawls (01/04/2013) [-]
That guy must have a tough time walking, now.
I mean, how can you get place to place with balls the size of Jupiter?
#256 to #62 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/04/2013) [-]
Bet you he grew up in the ghetto and knew the pussy ass white boy wasnt going to do **** , so he put fear in his heart. I bet he knows the stare of a murderer
#70 to #62 - SatanicMonk (01/04/2013) [-]
Ask this guy. Yeah, that's a hoodie on his 145 lbs balls.
User avatar #74 to #70 - damienas (01/04/2013) [-]
Guy lives in Henderson, A suburb of vegas and i've talked to him, pretty cool guy, but he cant find his penis.
 Friends (0)