because the Bible is historicall verifiable

Doctor Who is just as historically verifiable as the bible.

historically

Is this guy gonna be an atheist zlamous?

his old account was captaincupcakez

that is completely irrelevant

why did u make an alternate account?

This is my FJ account. I've pretty much quit FJ, I'm mostly on reddit now.

I made the "religionisweird" account to debate about religion, seeing as reddit is 90% atheist biased, and there is no real debate going on.

go to r/debateachristian

nope

my beliefs don't attempt to restrict others freedoms.

but you have no problem with imposing your immorality on others

I'm not imposing anything on anyone.

I know you will never be an atheist, I just want to debate

i mean you want to force people to accept fag marriage

You want to force people not to get married.
He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone.

we should do everything possible to discourage sin

think from an unbiased perspective for once (even though it isn't possible for humans) and see how different religions have different moral codes and different laws. Not everyone believes in your religion, little people want to follow your laws.

"According to you and your book, one that is not universally accepted or even universally respected. You're applying your own religion and code to everyone else."

what you fail to realize is that all of our innate morality is from God. moral laws are absolute and unchangeable

WHAT YOU fail to realize is that not everybody believes in what you believe so laws shouldn't be based on 1 religion.

we can't let people steal stuff just because they don't acknowledge that stealing is wrong. moral laws apply to everyone equally

you have different moral laws then others. Of course there are things we can all agree on such as stealing is wrong but you (and ur religion too) are a homophobic and not allot of people agree with that. Theirs a line to draw.
Anyone can do what they want aslong as it doesn't endanger or decrease the rights of others.

We all acknowledge that stealing is wrong because of our innate morality. our innate morality also tells us that homosexuality is wrong, so why should we try to make it socially acceptable?

Because a majority of people want to accept it. If a majority of people excepted bestiality, i bet we would have it legal.

"If a majority of people excepted bestiality, i bet we would have it legal. "

no because it goes against God's will

Aaaa dumbass, its called voting and appeal to political figures of power.

the majority of people will never accept bestiality because it's contrary to God's will

I'm giving you a theoretical example. Homosexuality wasn't excepted by many people along time ago and it was against god's will apparently too, but look at now.

i'm explaining why it should be illegal

popular opinion cannot change absolute moral truths. homosexuality will always be against God's will. it will always be wrong no matter how many people think its right

but its legal.

""If a majority of people excepted bestiality, i bet we would have it legal. "

no because it goes against God's will""

You said because its against gods will it wont be legal but homosexuality is so wtf are you rambling about?

According to you and your book, one that is not universally accepted or even universally respected. You're applying your own religion and code to everyone else.

I want gays to have freedom to love who they want.

The only reason I think gay marriage should be allowed is because it gives benefits in society. If it was purely religious, then sure, gays can't marry.

Non-religious people believe that Earth is the past place humans will reside, and so they try to idealize it and make it as liberated and free-spirited as possible. Religious people believe in an afterlife which is a bigger deal than this life because it's eternal. Therefore we don't care about making everybody happy so much as we try to give them a better afterlife, since the afterlife is more crucial.

That's the equivalent of me telling you "I'm going to force you to do what I say, and then santa will bring you presents"

it means nothing if you don't believe in it

Well we're not forcing you to do what we say. We're giving you a choice.

He didn't create us in His physical image

Then what image?

Spiritual and logical image. The ability to think and love and make choices. Of course we're a heavily limited version of this compared to Him. But we're closer to Him than animals because animals pretty much just act on instinct and don't share the same kind of intelligence with us (unless you count apes and dolphins, but they still don't apply their intelligence in a way that significantly separates them from normal animals).

Any thought provoking question like this is answered with some variant of "God works in mysterious ways" or "you can't question the works of God"

Hmm, what?

If you say Jesus backwards it sounds like sausage.

Which is funny because He told the Disciples to take His body and eat it, and they were Jews.

thanks?

It was a very good day. And #19933 was glorious.

thanks

But since it's 4am here, I better go to sleep, goodnight board!

Night, i love you.

Night bud.

Today was a good day, wasn't it. :)

#19933 became a little bit of a shitstorm, but yes today was a interesting day.

I'm so famous

they should both be illegal. end of discussion

The government should not be concerned with morality or religion. Enforcing either is not a legitimate or justified function of government.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_law

There are many different philosophies of law.

all laws are based on moral systems

I disagree. The fundamental purpose of government is to protect the people and their rights, by means of law enforcement, national defense and the justice system. There may be other, secondary purposes as well, such as promoting the general welfare. But the government is NOT a parent or a pastor whose job it is to teach us to behave properly and push one moral code or another.

That is disgusting of you to say so. Have your religion, sure, but keep it in your home. Religious beliefs shouldn't change the laws of a country.
Religion not equal to state.

Quick question, do you think the government should regulate some of what religious people do? (ex. make them not be able to rally against gays, make the church pay taxes, etc, regulate how much money a church can get)

Church pay taxes, that sounds about right. Other then that no, I just don't think their should even be votes based on human rights laws like gay marriage. It should be universally allowed and excepted.

So should the government get involved in church business or no?

Why you ask anyways

Just wondering. If you come up with an answer let me know.

Let me guess, your just waiting me to say yes so you can throw something at me.
Curious, what genre of music do you like?

Rap and country.

Two very opposite genres that hardly relate to each other but okay.
Don't like rock or metal?
this? www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYKYk0XlFK4

Not metal. Only rock I'll listen to is stuff like the tragically hip and U2.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYKYk0XlFK4

i don't like the vocals or the cheesy keyboard shit

they're talented (only listened to the first bit), but metal isn't my genre.

Just for reference, churches aren't forced to marry anyone, they can turn away any couple they wish without hesitation. So it would be the same with gay couples.

Just in care that's what you were getting at, otherwise don't mind me.

That was not what I was getting at, but nice try

Thats a very broad question. I cant answer that with my knowledge and not seem ignorant.

all of our laws should be based on the moral absolutes that God has created. we can't create new moral laws, moral laws already exist and they're unchangeable

lol

as long as congressmen have affairs adultury will not be illegal

why?

because they both violate the moral laws of the Bible

US is not a theocracy, retard.

why is that grounds for making it illegal?

because God is the basis of morality.

laws aren't based on morality

yes they are

law is not based on morality, morality and law are both based on rational self-interest.

rational egoism is a form of ethics(morality)

ethical egoism is related to morality, rational egoism is not

our laws more closely resemble ethical egoism than rational egoism

but neither is based on the bible

all morality is from God though

according to your belief system, but we are not a theocracy

Dumbass.

It shouldn't, and this shouldn't even be a question. Regardless of what you believe in, religious doctrine should not be taken into account when making laws that govern all citizens.

i agree with you, im just trying to make a point that most of the arguments against gay marriage dont even line up with religious doctrine

why should prostitution be illegal when adultury isn't?

its not in many states

as long as those mudblood gays are still illegal im happy

why?

because gay people cant eat dairy

the fuck?

why are you dodging the question?

ive become good at dodging trying to avoid the rape attempts from gays on my tight butthole

ok, i can tell you're not looking for serious discussion

im really not at this moment

i am a lot of times but at this particular moment no i am not

8/10 troll, nice

Keep talking about your tight butthole, no homo btw of course because that would be gay.

i know its tight because when i tried to stick a pencil in earlier i needed a lot of lube. So therefore i can't be gay because its tight

Interesting, I'm sort of uncertain about me not being able to eat a whole dairy, am I gay?

yeah. Fagtose intolerant

Oh no!

i forget the song that gif plays to

4am soon here, should I go to bed?

Modern secular laws, some people say "but we want this!" to something that was illegal before, so the state allows it.

so you think adultery should be illegal and punishable by law?

Adultery was illegal and punished, I'm just stating a fact.

i know, but its not anymore. do you think it should be?

In germany it's still a breaking of the law but not punished anymore.
But in my eyes it's a intentionally violating of marriage, which is bad.

why are you dodging the question?

Dis you meant by "do you think it should be?" if it should be punished?
I'm sorry if misinterpreted this.

do you think adultery should be illegal?

Yes, and it should be punished because it's a breaking of trust.

so people should go to jail for cheating on their spouses?

Yes, is your question answered?

yes but it leads me to other questions.

wouldn't that infringe on freedom?

Breaking trust is a bad thing, you know. Also do you see going whoring as a freedom when you have a partner?

im not saying adultery is good, but you shouldn't be able to regulate what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes

A secular marriage under the goverment has to obey the rules of this goverment.
Also adultery involves at least 3 people.

the rules of government dont dictate who you sleep with

I'm not talking about the state, I'm talking about marriage and marriage will always "dictate" who you sleep with because you accepted with marriage this infringe of your freedom.

thats why adultery is grounds to end a marriage, but the act itself is not illegal

Depends, as I said adultery is still a violating of the law in germany, but no punishment.

to be honest, im mostly talking about america since california's prop 8 is in the supreme court right now so it is a relevant issue

Natural law, as in god's law?
It was my understanding the bible condemned lying with another man. It did not state that gay marriage was an abomination, yes?

its one of the ten commandments

it would seem so

or maybe its my way of acknowledging that i made a mistake

you can see it on my profile. i'm not hiding anything

why don't you log in, multimedia?

I love how you pathetic fuckheads think it was me. No, I was actually out while this argument was being posted.

Do you know what common sense is multimedia? There's protecting your security online, then there's being a bitch who can't take red thumbs (I'm sure there are other things you take tho)

Again, look up at your buttbuddy zlamous's post, wasn't me.

I've never been too much of a coward to say what I wish to say, you dumb sack of crap.

Brave.

Whoa, chill out buddy. The anon types exactly like you, has the same attitude as you, and yet you claim it's not you. Also, only bitches block. SMH man.

I block because I don't want people seeing my profile and thumbing down everything I post, which has happened before. If you disagree with my opinions, fine, thumb that post down, but don't be the fuckhead who thumbs down 100 unrelated posts about Pokemon and crap that has nothing to do with my religious beliefs.

As I said above, I was out.

Why would I post as anon for the whole argument only to come out later? If my goal was to avoid red thumbs, I wouldn't have posted as me at all.

If you say so. And trust me, I'm not the type to do that. People have tried it on me, it's annoying as hell.

I wasn't implying you were. Zlamous, on the other hand, I wouldn't put above doing so.

Then why'd you block me? Also, the same thing has happened to him, a furry guy, he had 'nine' in his name, was doing that and was inviting others to do so. So no, I doubt he would.

Is this a second account for you, because "afucknigga" is not blocked on my account. In fact, my settings are to allow anybody to see my profile...

reply limit, no offense taken, the feeling is mutual.

Good to know.

Have a nice night/day/whateverthefucktimeitisinyourtimezone

Yeah, it's teoberry, I was banned for most of the morning so I used this to post.

Ah. Well, I blocked you as well because I very much so do not wish to communicate with you on a frequent basis, no offense.

Also because of the thumb thing. I was covering my bases, really. But frankly, you do seem to be an up-front person, and while I disagree with what you believe and all, you don't present yourself in the self-righteous and absolute way zlamous does.

It's not a problem anon. You come off as a bit sarcastic, but whatever, that shit gets muddled on the internet anyways. Have a nice night.

i have problem with people who are too cowardly to even use their accounts

if the thumbs aren't important to you then why are you logged out? prove that they're unimportant and log in

i'm not worried about them, thats why i log in when i post

What were your old accounts names? Or will you conveniently forget?

you're not acknowledging it, you're hiding it

i cant hide the fact that i deleted it

you can hide what you said

you can still see the comment on my profile

only because you can't delete that. you would if you could

then why did i post a screencap of it ? #20163

to make it look like you weren't trying to hide anything, but then why did you delete it in the first place?

because it was a mistake. i didnt want to leave it up and have people think thats its my actual opinion

ok, thats all you have to say.

Is there an asshole fork?
He'd be that fork.

you made me google dildo fork for this.

hes not gay

The infinite fork of forgiveness? I know shit about forks.

Shit there's different types of forks? I just use big ones for everything

more than one when you high class like me

fuck off now please

nope

kill yourself noob

no thanks, rather enjoy life for the time i have

i wish your life ended the way it started. with a bang

Nice grade 4 joke. I think that's pretty evil of you to say, why do you want me to die?

because god told me he wanted you in heaven for your 40 virgins

Ohh, I see. We got a true believer in here. I rather dine in an eternity of spaghetti and meatballs with the flying spaghetti monster.

in Spaghetti Monster heaven you get strippers and there is a beer volcano, I have read the Gospel it actually has some pretty good arguments compared to other religions

Link to description of Spaghetti heaven?

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster#Heaven

"like heaven, has a beer volcano and stripper factory. The difference being that the beer is warm and stale, the strippers all have STD's, and there are penguins everywhere"
I laughed

spaggetti isn't real

Brains are for thinking

and to feel pain

And to not believe in stupid things, hint, hint

actually thats exactly what the human brain is. thats where imagination and creativity and therefore art comes from

thanks i knew that

Does any one have the on about bread?

These things are hilarious.

BECAUSE IT'S SO MUCH MORE FEASIBLE THAT GOD JUST APPEARED FROM FUCKING NOWHERE




fucking hell that is the worst theist argument I have ever heard

Damn, you pissy, how butt hurt are you anyway?

I hate that argument.

Carry on using your overused edgy words to describe how mad I am.

Edgy = butt hurt?

I get the overused part but seriously, you get way to mad too fast dude. I posted that pic, and the bread one because they are all funny, even the one about Christianity.

I already had this conversation with thebritshguy, #20164
www.funnyjunk.com/religion/20164#20164

It's easy to type in caps lock to emphasize a point and not be particularly angry.

I was actually tabbing in and out of a TF2 game in friends while typing it, so I was in a pretty happy mood anyway.

Actually atheists say "we don't know how it started, the big bang theory and evolution have strong evidence though" you are the ones who claim to know and it is not supported by any evidence

man, you get pissy really fast, don't you.

I don't see how I was pissy I explained my position

He's christian. No use arguing with him sadly.

there whole thread was just things like "atheists have bad lives and are annoyed" it just makes them look silly

So was your guys'. It was a massive circlejerk.

but most of mine had substance, they had points which could be expanded upon and debated rather than "atheist have small dicks :P"

Too stupid to undesrtand science? Try religion!

yeah that one wasn't very good but a lot of them were true were as all of yours were lies, misinformation or just "your angry, it's not very nice"

aint atheist, doesnt relate to me BUT makes more sense then any religion especially Christianity.

How so?

<-- this so

weak

explain why it is weak?

repeated first pic.

no I meant explain why his argument is weak? correct him

If he is seriously using that as an argument, he's even more idiotic then any of the theist's that you call retarded.
It was nothing more than an insulting paragraph, that was meant to be funny. I actually find it quite funny, which is why a posted the one about atheism and bread. they are funny, but not something you take seriously.

but that is actually what you believe, if you find it laughable why do you believe it?

That is not what i believe, that is an over dramatized, simplified lie, of what i believe. if siad, without any true meaning behind it, just as a joke, ya it's funny.

you are just showing how much of a bigot you are towards this, and just trying to justify him simply you have a corresponding view point.

how was it over dramatised, tell me what parts of the story he got wrong?

"multi-dimensional flying Jew that came back from the dead so that it can give your spirit eternal life if you eat his flesh and drink his blood..." And so on and so fourth.

If i honestly have to explain each detail to you then fine. God is not multi-denominational, he makes up time and space. We donot drink his blood to go to heaven, we are not being saved from him, nor do we suffer from the curse of a rib women.

fair enough, don't know why it took so long for you to refute it

watching the walking dead, sorry.

there's a marathon tonight right? I hardly watch it but I know what happened with you know, that guy. I'm hoping the governor gets whats coming to him.

there has been a marathon all week, and the finale just ended here.


And it doesn't...

oh.

Jk. But it is interesting what happens.

you asked --> "How so?"

and you replied weakly.

i dont have the time to reply to 6 people with good answers, srry, figure it out on your own.

... what, that you an unoriginal bigot?

if I was brought up in an Islamic family I would be particularly anti-Islamic but I know Christianity better and am personal with it as I used to be a Christian

I'm dissapointed in you. If your going to post, insult but at least say something else related to the matter.

It's related in it's own way.

?

in the Dark Ages the Christians spread lies about how Jews ate babies, this later spread to being used against atheists

don't question it.



P.s. if you can't tell, i don't care about this thread anymore.

Never mind found it!

"creatures so small nobody can see them"

ever heard of microscopes?

Are you serious?

lets retaliate. i'll post all my anti-atheism pictures

why don't you research things before you criticise them? theories on the origin of life: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
<= fossil record

none of those are transitional

please explain how a bunch of amino acids could have assembled themselves in multi-layered, algorithmic patterns within a phospholipid bilayer. DNA isnt just a random molecule, it carries information. information is immaterial so it couldnt have been produced by material causes

chance.

Space is infinite. Hence why life exists on only one planet. It's insanely unlikely, but in an infinite space, it happens.

the universe is not infinite.

www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/People/Is_the_Universe_finite_or_infinite_An_interview_with_Joseph_Silk
It's not even known by scientists but your most likely right.

OH I'M FUCKING SORRY

I wasn't aware that you, an insignificant spec in the TINY amount of the universe we can observe is in any position to know SHIT about the universe. Shut the fuck up, you have no idea what you're talking about.

we have this tool called logic. you should try using it sometime

I don't understand what caused this - Therefore God

Great logic

strawman.

it's logically possible to determine properties of the universe's cause. for example, the cause must have been spaceless, timeless, and immaterial since it created space, time and matter. what fits this description?

Why can't the universe and space itself be causeless?

that would break the causal principle.

God breaks the causal principle

No because He never began to exist. He's beginningless by definition.

the universe began to exist so it must have had a cause

To prove something, you must apply the rules of logic and the universe. Otherwise you could prove anything by just saying "oh, it doesn't need a cause" or "it's beginingless by definition"

why is it logically incoherent for an immaterial, spaceless, timeless being to be beginningless?

why is it logically incoherent for something we know very very little about (the universe) to be beginingless

it if was eternal it would have already experienced its heat death

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe

evolution is a theory

just a convincing one I believe to be true

If I get proved wrong, then ok. Too bad there is a lot more evidence for evolution than God.

you can't escape the fact that the universe is finite. since it has been in a state of cosmic expansion throughout its history, it must have had a space-time boundary

The heat death of the universe is a !! suggested!! ultimate fate of the universe

It's a theory dumbass

i could say that about evolution....

we know for a fact that entropy is always increasing. if the universe was eternal it would be infinitely entropic

actual infinites do not exist. infinity is just a concept.

if actual infinites did exist, logical absurdities would occur.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_paradox_of_the_Grand_Hotel

i do agree on that. It is impossible of infinite to exist.

<=transitional fossils

>thumbnails
>2013

shiggy diggy

there are several theories
http://www.evolutionofdna.com/Evolution-Of-DNA.html

aaand none of them explain how material causes could have created genetic information

By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of:
*increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
*increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
*novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
*novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)
2. A mechanism that is likely to be particularly common for adding information is gene duplication, in which a long stretch of DNA is copied, followed by point mutations that change one or both of the copies. Genetic sequencing has revealed several instances in which this is likely the origin of some proteins. For example:
*Two enzymes in the histidine biosynthesis pathway that are barrel-shaped, structural and sequence evidence suggests, were formed via gene duplication and fusion of two half-barrel ancestors (Lang et al. 2000).
*RNASE1, a gene for a pancreatic enzyme, was duplicated, and in langur monkeys one of the copies mutated into RNASE1B, which works better in the more acidic small intestine of the langur. (Zhang et al. 2002)
*Yeast was put in a medium with very little sugar. After 450 generations, hexose transport genes had duplicated several times, and some of the duplicated versions had mutated further. (Brown et al. 1998)
The biological literature is full of additional examples. A PubMed search (at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query… on "gene duplication" gives more than 3000 references.

"increased genetic variety in a population"

can be expressed by pre-existing information

"increased genetic material"

mutations can only delete base pairs or insert old ones in new places. this does not constitute new information

"A mechanism that is likely to be particularly common for adding information is gene duplication, in which a long stretch of DNA is copied, followed by point mutations that change one or both of the copies. "

duplication does not constitute new info. point mutations substitute a single base pair, which invariable corrupts information

invariably

you honestly dont believe in evolution. Okay know i actaully am laughing unstoppably.

it's the point when he comes up with bulshit like that I just stop taking him seriously.

Ah-ha! That will show them!

Never mind the fact that atheists have been opressed and executed the last 2000 years.
"OH NO SOMEONE DOESN'T BELIEVE IN MY GOD HELP THEY'RE OPRESSING ME"

"I NO LONGER GET SPECIAL RIGHTS FOR BEING RELIGIOUS WHAT WILL I DO?"

It
is
a god
damn
joke
...

aah man if I had a penny for every single time I had a leaflet on atheism, or if I had someone knocking on my door telling me "there is no God", how about all those times I have seen atheists in the street singing or school plays about atheist matters...I would have zero pennies

I know man, it's awful, they are everywhere now'n days.

If I had a penny for every time I've been called a retard or dumbass by you guys I could buy myself a private island

but you are always insulting us

not as much as you guys. lulz started an anti religious thread, this is just our retaliation.

ok, but don't complain about us being insulting when I know you called me a faggot for no reason, I wasn't even talking to you

That again? You two were acting like a couple on their first date. 'I declare a new religion thebritishguyism'

I thought it was funny

If i had a nickle for every time i was called brainwashed, i could get the U.S. out of dept.

If every Christian combined that, we could pay off all debt and still have some left over.

Dude, if that happened, we'd still more than half of it left over.

please do me a favor and create your own thread if you plan to do this.

lol nope

please do me a favor and fuck off

Are you mad at what im doing, you show signs of being irrational, illogical and plain out stupid so why don't you?

No, I just really like telling people to fuck off.

Yah it makes you cool and all.

About as cool as making fun of dead kids

Oops

you? out of all people?

www.funnyjunk.com/funny_gifs/4301914/what+really+happened+in+connecticut/

i posted it on my other account

Good name for your account, I don't like liberals too. Not as much as old white republicans though.
But i thought your god doesn't allow these types of disgusting jokes?

The Bible doesn't condemn humor

While here, What is your political perspective?

conservative

It's a movie, I don't care. Try harder plz

Oops

Don't feel bad, don't show your tits if ya don't want trouble

Trust me i dont

I said I don't feel bad. Sandy Hook didn't affect me, it just irks me when kids try to be funny off of it.

im not being funny, i liked that name. Thats all that matters, its an inside joke anyhows but i coudnt care anyways. Dont get butcheese over humor.

I constantly see hitler/holocaust memes, i dont get offended and start saying shit.

>inside joke

yeah man last time I checked that isn't an inside joke. maybe if TCR was still on and someone used it there it could be but it's not on.

>Ghetto Ghost at church
>Steals from donation box
>Ghost hears and rages

Best ghetto ghost moment was his i have a dream speech. Favorite moment overall is when someone played the Russian anthem.

I cant even think of a favorite. Too many good moments

scratch that, fav moment was when the engie played the boss nigger song on the air. that was amazing.

shit, you listen to TCR. I dont car who the fuck you are high fucking five for now. Still constantly listen to the past episodes

Oops, wrong pic.

2^78edgy4(x2^5)me

Dawkins is quite witty I think he often tells jokes in "the God Delusion"

Only image I have.

that isn't true

5 stages of grief buddy, 5 stages of grief.

give me a real argument based on evidence against Dawkins, I think he's a cool guy

What? I was making a joke about denial.

yeah I know, these anti-atheist posts don't seem to have any substance to them

it is based on over whelming evidence, do you think Dawin just went "I reckon we cam from frogs!"
compare this to creation which isn't even supported by any evidence at all and says dinosaurs and humans were wandering around with each other

the fact that you post this shows that you are the ones who are desperate to attack us rather than refute our arguments or have rational discussion

how? it's an attack on theamazingatheist, tho it could apply to some people here.

oh right I didn't see the note, theamazingatheist is obnoxious but I think he has some good points

watched his first video, shut it off a minute later. people claim Christians are bigots but this guy used nigger and called muslims towelheads.

This sums up a good amount of religious arguments on FJ accurately.

Here's the thing
I'm not special
You're not special

No-one is fucking special

You guys think you are tho.

as some of you do, besides it doesn't mean we are wrong just as it doesn't mean you are right

some of us do

not exactly anti-atheist, more of an example to all the kids who think saying 'CREDIT SCINCE BRIANWHSED MORONS!111' is funny

liberal, atheist, what's the different

also forgot this one