| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
Comments(626):
#222
-
savyx (12/13/2012) [-]
**savyx rolled a random image posted in comment #69 at Nature ** feels
I hate it when people post stuff like this.
You're allowed to have opinions but I'm not?
I call major BS.
You're allowed to have opinions but I'm not?
I call major BS.
#221 to #206
-
ARRRGGGG (12/13/2012) [-]
I actually agree. Freedom of speech is for the stuff we don't like just as much as the stuff we do. All this censorship and hate for people who aren't politically correct is just as bullshit as it was when we spat on liberal ideas. They're a bunch of hypocrites.
Yes it is hatefull.
Hate is defined as a distaste or negative attitude towards something, when you hate something that does not affect your life whatsoever such as the color or sex or a person then it is hatefull.
It's not bigotted, that's like saying standing up to a bully is bullying. Eye for an eye.
Hate is defined as a distaste or negative attitude towards something, when you hate something that does not affect your life whatsoever such as the color or sex or a person then it is hatefull.
It's not bigotted, that's like saying standing up to a bully is bullying. Eye for an eye.
Because mine is right, the utalitarian method of philosophy states that right and wrong is defined by maximizing hapiness and reducing suffering. Being nice to others instead of hatefull for no reason therefor is factually a superior method. If you hate someone for no reason and try to state that makes you automaticly hatefull which history shows that hatefulness does never work out. I have a reason to hate you though because you are hatefull.
Having opinions and beliefs are okay, but there is a line. And when you cross it you don't earn respect.
Having opinions and beliefs are okay, but there is a line. And when you cross it you don't earn respect.
Your belief isn't right, according to my belief. My belief isn't right according to yours.
That still gives no definite answer.
I never said I hated anyone, and I don't hate people for no reason. I just disagree with homosexuality because I believe it is wrong.
That still gives no definite answer.
I never said I hated anyone, and I don't hate people for no reason. I just disagree with homosexuality because I believe it is wrong.
Again it is not wrong, that is a fact. Like i said it is based on maximizing utility.
Your belief is wrong because there is no valid reason to consider it right. There are far more reasons to state why my opinion is right because my opinion is backed up by civil right, biological facts, sociological facts, tolerance and compassion.
There is no valid reason to consider homosexuality wrong other than to be an intolerant bigot.
Your belief is wrong because there is no valid reason to consider it right. There are far more reasons to state why my opinion is right because my opinion is backed up by civil right, biological facts, sociological facts, tolerance and compassion.
There is no valid reason to consider homosexuality wrong other than to be an intolerant bigot.
See, you're the one using the hateful language here. There are valid reasons to consider homosexuality wrong, but no doubt if I mention any you will shout them down with words like "bigoted" "Hateful" "Spiteful" and other such things.
But anyways, who are you to judge what is right and wrong by 'maximizing utility'?
You cannot say that your belief is a fact. That's your belief.
It's like saying, "I believe that my butt is made of ice cream." Therefore I am a hot fudge sundae.
But anyways, who are you to judge what is right and wrong by 'maximizing utility'?
You cannot say that your belief is a fact. That's your belief.
It's like saying, "I believe that my butt is made of ice cream." Therefore I am a hot fudge sundae.
Because those reasons are hatefull by definition. I don't think it's hatefull it's a fact that it would be hatefull. There are no valid reasons whatsoever.
I don't judge what is right and wrong, common sense does.
Maximing utility is about increasing happiness and reducing suffering. Now how the hell is that not wrong?
I guess the KKK is also a valid group that should be respected right? I guess racism should be allowed right? Because who are we to decide if it's wrong or right.
It doesn't work that way. When someone says to someone else that their life is wrong and that who they are is wrong then that will cause social stigma and the person who you claim it to be wrong to will feel emotional pain, therefor it can be concluded that it is wrong.
I don't judge what is right and wrong, common sense does.
Maximing utility is about increasing happiness and reducing suffering. Now how the hell is that not wrong?
I guess the KKK is also a valid group that should be respected right? I guess racism should be allowed right? Because who are we to decide if it's wrong or right.
It doesn't work that way. When someone says to someone else that their life is wrong and that who they are is wrong then that will cause social stigma and the person who you claim it to be wrong to will feel emotional pain, therefor it can be concluded that it is wrong.
No i am saying that what you believe is wrong because it's wrong by definition. Just like how people believe the KKK is wrong.
By that logic i could also say i don't thing black people are wrong, but what black people do is wrong. Yet that is hatefull and bigotted.
By that logic i could also say i don't thing black people are wrong, but what black people do is wrong. Yet that is hatefull and bigotted.
I think the situation here is that one of you seems to think homosexuality is a choice and the other seems to think that it is a part of the person and they are born with it.
If you believe its a choice then you can believe the choices these people made were wrong and not be hateful.
If you believe it is a part of who they are; that they were born with it, then you will see it as hateful to not agree with homosexuality.
If you believe its a choice then you can believe the choices these people made were wrong and not be hateful.
If you believe it is a part of who they are; that they were born with it, then you will see it as hateful to not agree with homosexuality.
Depends what those black people do. If they kill people then saying they're wrong is fine by me. If they don't, then you're wrong.
But when people do something that is against my beliefs, I believe that doing that is wrong.
How is what I'm saying 'by definition' wrong, and not what you're saying?
I say your beliefs are wrong, you say mine are wrong. 'by definition' we're both wrong.
But when people do something that is against my beliefs, I believe that doing that is wrong.
How is what I'm saying 'by definition' wrong, and not what you're saying?
I say your beliefs are wrong, you say mine are wrong. 'by definition' we're both wrong.
No, that's not by my logic. Where in your beliefs does it say that being black is wrong?
That is just on all levels ethically wrong.
1. I do not discriminate against homosexuals, discrimination is wrong.
2. I believe that homosexuality is wrong. The act of homosexuality is wrong. It's not the actual people, it's what they do. Being black isn't doing something, that's being a different race.
That is just on all levels ethically wrong.
1. I do not discriminate against homosexuals, discrimination is wrong.
2. I believe that homosexuality is wrong. The act of homosexuality is wrong. It's not the actual people, it's what they do. Being black isn't doing something, that's being a different race.
Haha looks like you can't even give an answer.
You're a hypocrite. You claim that being against act of black people sex is racist yet you don't see how the act of homosexual sex is homophobic.
The same logic applies to both. Both black people and homosexuals are genetically born this way. To say that either one is right while the other is wrong is pure hypocrisy.
You're a hypocrite. You claim that being against act of black people sex is racist yet you don't see how the act of homosexual sex is homophobic.
The same logic applies to both. Both black people and homosexuals are genetically born this way. To say that either one is right while the other is wrong is pure hypocrisy.
Why would that be wrong? Why would black people having sex be wrong? There's no difference between black people having sex than white people. That again is a term of racism.
This is something different. Sex isn't wrong, black people aren't wrong for being black, but people are wrong for having homosexual sex.
You are missing the point.
Look, I'm done here. This is getting nowhere and it's pointless. It all boils down to what we believe, and we cannot determine here who is right and wrong, because we both believe each other is wrong and we ourselves are right.
My initial point is exactly that, that we all believe we ourselves are right and each other is wrong. Henceforth it annoys me when people make posts slating my beliefs as falsehood when they are my beliefs. You have yours, I have mine. Don't force yours on me.
This is something different. Sex isn't wrong, black people aren't wrong for being black, but people are wrong for having homosexual sex.
You are missing the point.
Look, I'm done here. This is getting nowhere and it's pointless. It all boils down to what we believe, and we cannot determine here who is right and wrong, because we both believe each other is wrong and we ourselves are right.
My initial point is exactly that, that we all believe we ourselves are right and each other is wrong. Henceforth it annoys me when people make posts slating my beliefs as falsehood when they are my beliefs. You have yours, I have mine. Don't force yours on me.
There are reasons for it to be right. Scientific, biological, sociological [maybe not anymore, since society has changed] and psychological.
Your arguments, my friend, are constantly turning back on themselves, as you repeat the same 'by definition' and 'maximum utility'.
Your maximum utility argument destroys itself. By making the homosexuals happy you are causing the people who disagree suffering too.
It works both ways.
Your arguments, my friend, are constantly turning back on themselves, as you repeat the same 'by definition' and 'maximum utility'.
Your maximum utility argument destroys itself. By making the homosexuals happy you are causing the people who disagree suffering too.
It works both ways.
That is the MOST retarded statement i've ever heard in my life.
Homosexuals suffer because they are being discriminated. Give me ONE VALID reason how making homosexuals happy cause other suffering?
By your logic making black people happy cause KKK members to suffer. That is no valid reason.
Giving homosexuals equal rights creates a neutral space.
Homosexuals suffer because they are being discriminated. Give me ONE VALID reason how making homosexuals happy cause other suffering?
By your logic making black people happy cause KKK members to suffer. That is no valid reason.
Giving homosexuals equal rights creates a neutral space.
How does that infringe on people's beliefs whatsoever? IT DOESN'T
Giving homosexuals the same rights as heterosexuals does not destroy their religion, does not destroy their beliefs, they can still deny gay marriage, they can still practice their beliefs.
So how did it infringe with their beliefs? IT DIDN'T
Giving homosexuals the same rights as heterosexuals does not destroy their religion, does not destroy their beliefs, they can still deny gay marriage, they can still practice their beliefs.
So how did it infringe with their beliefs? IT DIDN'T
#199
-
N. Korean citizen (12/13/2012) [-]
If this comic showed two guys the comments would be very diffrent, probably filled with "OP is a fag" and other stupid shit.
Guess them being lesbians isn't much better, now it's full of people saying "LAWL LESBIANS ARE HAWT FAPFAP"
Guess them being lesbians isn't much better, now it's full of people saying "LAWL LESBIANS ARE HAWT FAPFAP"
I find it odd that everyone's disrespecting your comment on a post that's all about those that truly matter, so by everyone being disrespectful towards you, they are saying that they don't matter which is a negative to them in the context of this post... Fascinating!
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.
-Dr. Seuss
but speak you mind on how this makes you feel and everyone will thumb you down because they don't agree with your views or opinion....For being yourself and not posting Anon you have earned a Green thumb from me.
-Dr. Seuss
but speak you mind on how this makes you feel and everyone will thumb you down because they don't agree with your views or opinion....For being yourself and not posting Anon you have earned a Green thumb from me.
Well I don't understand his point full because of the lack of punctuation so this is just how I read it.
"They're probably getting bullied because they're ugly, not lesbians."
Or
"They're only lesbians because they're ugly."
I could be interpreting his point very wrongly, but you get the idea.
"They're probably getting bullied because they're ugly, not lesbians."
Or
"They're only lesbians because they're ugly."
I could be interpreting his point very wrongly, but you get the idea.
#155 to #149
-
drainbramage ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
Well I'm the top of my English class and the top of most English classes for that matter, and if you're better than me at English, then why don't you show it? And I juxtaposed your poor grammar and another point to show that I wasn't down to my last argument but you obviously couldn't pick up on that. Now, why are you saying that these girls are "fat lesbians"? They are by no stretch of the imagination fat, and high-school girls will pick on anyone for any reason, but maybe you'll learn that when you get there kid.
Juxtaposed isn't even a big word, just because you don't understand it doesn't mean I'm trying hard, this is just casual language for me.
So who's out of arguments now? I make a point and your can't get past the vocabulary.
You truly are one of the lowest form of life.
So who's out of arguments now? I make a point and your can't get past the vocabulary.
You truly are one of the lowest form of life.
#143 to #139
-
thatstraightop (12/13/2012) [-]
If you're trying to be a troll, you're failing like fuck. And no, they weren't depicted as fat. Popular high school girls will do whatever they can to put someone else down. Now leave this site and go fuck yourself.
Someone is an absolute cunt. And if you could see, they aren't depicted as fat, you fucking retard. I also like how you pointed out that you were going to fap. Woop de fucking do, you're a real man son! Oh wait, you'll never be a man, you fucking cretin.
#127
-
N. Korean citizen (12/13/2012) [-]
This gave me more of a feel than most of the posts on the feels channel.