Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#219 - telamatoes (11/30/2012) [-]
Praise the SUN! Mother 						******					!
Praise the SUN! Mother ****** !
#216 - fugbaum (11/30/2012) [-]
the youth word of the year in Germany is acutally YOLO, but mostly they invent words and claim it's young people language.
the youth word of the year in Germany is acutally YOLO, but mostly they invent words and claim it's young people language.
User avatar #220 to #216 - octaviano (11/30/2012) [-]
Well, at least they used YOLO's real description.

As in you have only one life, and you should enjoy it.
Not to do every stupid sh*t in the world.
+2
#210 - garagesale **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#205 - anonymous (11/30/2012) [-]
"word of the year"
they are both acronyms
wat
User avatar #217 to #205 - hjgamer (11/30/2012) [-]
When "gif" comes in the dictionary, it's not a acronym anymore, then it's just a word.
#202 - tkuja (11/30/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#213 to #202 - inunic (11/30/2012) [-]
And I just can't hide it!
And I just can't hide it!
#199 - boxdweller (11/30/2012) [-]
MFW title.
#198 - falloutreaper (11/30/2012) [-]
****					 yeah!
**** yeah!
0
#196 - donttouchthat has deleted their comment [-]
#191 - silentnigga (11/30/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#178 - abaraxus (11/30/2012) [-]
PRAISE THE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNN
PRAISE THE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNN
#504 to #178 - finishhimlarry (11/30/2012) [-]
This image has expired
If only I could be so grossly incandescent.
User avatar #171 - Loppytaffy (11/30/2012) [-]
How can you have an Oxford American dictionary? Oxford is in England, and American isn't a language
(more like bastardisation the same as Engrish and Hinglish)
#218 to #171 - anonymous (11/30/2012) [-]
We don't speak "American" here in 'murica, We speak freedom! If you don't like it you can giit out!
User avatar #197 to #171 - poutinesalad (11/30/2012) [-]
Because there are many differences between the way americans say things and the way english people say things. Canadians are similar to americans, although there are pronounciation and spelling differences.
#175 to #171 - anonymous (11/30/2012) [-]
It's a dictionary they develop in Oxford. An alternative to the standard dictionary, because Americans are so damn stupid, they need one of their own.
User avatar #190 to #175 - plainarcane **User deleted account** (11/30/2012) [-]
Haha, good one. Yeah if Americans were any dumber, they wouldn't be leading the world in computer technology, medical technology, military technology...
User avatar #453 to #190 - Loppytaffy (11/30/2012) [-]
Cough Berlin. Cough Cough Estonia. Cough Cough Cough Russia. Cough Cough Cough Cough Sweden.
Huge brain blasting sneeze JAPAN.
User avatar #533 to #453 - plainarcane **User deleted account** (12/02/2012) [-]
Cough Cough the UK is nowhere on that list
User avatar #534 to #533 - Loppytaffy (12/02/2012) [-]
we're not really leading in technology. Only our military, which parliament lacks strategic skill to know how to use
User avatar #535 to #534 - plainarcane **User deleted account** (12/03/2012) [-]
Yes, you do lead Europe militarily. And I'm not trying to sound like I'm trying to start a flamewar or anything, but the United States really does lead the world militarily, by a huge margin. We could probably conquer the entire continent of Europe if we had any reason to, which we don't. We're falling way behind in many ways, but we're still way ahead in military technology and logistics.
User avatar #536 to #535 - Loppytaffy (12/03/2012) [-]
You have one military. Europe has near 100. With countless soliders, weapons, and strategies.
There's no way America could ever conquer Europe. Just because you have a more powerful one in sheer number compared to Britain, doesn't mean you'd be able to take on Britain, the Nordics, the Baltics, Russia, Greece, Turkey, France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, North Italy, South Italy, Poland, Switzerland, Belgium, Monocco, Spain, Belarus, Ukraine, the Czec republic and the rest. Not a chance.
User avatar #538 to #536 - plainarcane **User deleted account** (12/04/2012) [-]
I don't think you understand modern warfare, sir. Numbers don't matter nearly as much anymore, it's technology. Our stealth bombers can come in and take out the enemy radar (and no doubt a handful of other key targets) before they even realize they're at war. The United States Navy posses 12 Nimitz class nuclear powered aircraft carriers, each weighing about 200,000 tons. All of those in one spot can provide enough air cover over a beach to allow us to drop whatever troops, vehicles, and supplies we need to. Not to mention nuclear submarines that no one (including me) has any notion of the location of, each one capable of delivering nuclear weapons. It sounds impressive when you can list off a huge list of countries, but each one of those is tiny. Switzerland is smaller than most individual states, and many are probably larger than Belgium too. Not to mention our research into anti-missile technology. In 20 years we'll probably be able to launch ICBMs at whomever we want and be able to completely block any counter attack. Don't get me wrong, I'm not entirely proud that the entire focus of my government has been our capacity for destruction.
User avatar #539 to #538 - Loppytaffy (12/04/2012) [-]
One country cannot invade a continent and hope to succeed. You inderestimate how much fire power and technology we have. Perhaps through your lack of history you do not know, but there have been more wars in this continent than you can comprehend.
User avatar #540 to #539 - plainarcane **User deleted account** (12/04/2012) [-]
Are you sure about that? Because I'm pretty sure Hitler actually pulled that off, while the vast majority of his military force was tied up fighting the Russians. He also could have taken North Africa, and the entire Mediterranean area (including the oil in the Middle East) if he had simply given Rommel the additional 15 thousand or so men he needed (which is a minuscule number in comparison with the force on the eastern front). He wasn't able to take the UK because he had no navy to speak of, and like I already said all his force was fighting in the East. Despite these factors, he still almost toppled England. Had he not attacked Russia like a moron, he could easily have taken the entire continent of Europe (excluding the portion that belonged to Russia obviously), and North Africa, and the Middle East. After securing those resources he probably would have had no problem conquering Russia (which btw he almost succeeded in anyway). Plus he would have fought off the Russians and maintained control of Europe for a lot longer if the United States hadn't entered the picture. Now I could go on to explain why the United States in present day makes Germany in WW2 look like a pack of cub scouts armed with bb guns, but I think I've typed enough.
User avatar #544 to #540 - Loppytaffy (12/04/2012) [-]
hitler had Italy, Japan, Bulgeria, Hungary, Austria and other countries on his side. And Germany is a HUGE country in Europe- and they had Prussia, too. Granted it was only a state at that point, but Prussia used to be an Empire. Plus, he simply went accross the landmass.

Let us not forget that Germany has good relations in Europe up until that point- Britain was a fantastic ally. We were hesitant to attack because of this.
We would not hesitate to take down the rebellious son of the empire.

I don't know how you think you'd possibly be able to conquer Europe, when you'd never even conquer a single country (Russia). Or the Nordics. The Royal marines aren't anyone to trifle with, either. Hell, Sealand alone is evidence enough that we have brilliant sea defences in Britain.

Please stop assuming we haven't advanced in military technology- our troops are fighting in Asia, too, not just the Americans. We didn't just stop at WWII.
User avatar #545 to #544 - plainarcane **User deleted account** (12/06/2012) [-]
Hitler's allies during WW2 were literally almost useless to him, particularly the Italians. Japan was on the other side of the world fighting us, so I'm surprised you would even mention them. And I never said the UK was weak military, or that they weren't advanced, just that they don't compare to the United States. Also the United States has conquered half of Europe as well as Japan for all intents and purposes, it's just that nobody sees it that way because we gave them back control of their own countries because we are liberators, not conquerors. But if we were empire-minded then the United States would now include half of Europe, the Japans, and the Philippines.

Not to mention the fact that a huge chunk of the present day Continental United States had to be taken from Mexico.
User avatar #546 to #545 - Loppytaffy (12/06/2012) [-]
yes, you have concquered us- in trade. the Wall Street crash screwed all but Russia over. Poland was hit worst.
User avatar #204 to #190 - mublerking (11/30/2012) [-]
-leading world in computer technology
-Canada has built a quantum computer and America has not.
Those two things just don't seem to work together.
User avatar #173 to #171 - robothuck (11/30/2012) [-]
I used to be vindictive and hateful, but now I consider American English to be a dialect. Same language, just a bit different.
#170 - drulludanni ONLINE (11/30/2012) [-]
well gentlemen its time to bring out your weirdest gifs .
well gentlemen its time to bring out your weirdest gifs .
#413 to #195 - coolcalx (11/30/2012) [-]
that was amazing
that was amazing
User avatar #224 to #192 - arijan (11/30/2012) [-]
wat
#187 to #170 - walcorn ONLINE (11/30/2012) [-]
ALL HAIL THE RED BALL!




ALL HAIL THE RED BALL!
#184 to #170 - monkee (11/30/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#172 to #170 - samoaspider (11/30/2012) [-]
Horse powerslide. Your move.
Horse powerslide. Your move.
#174 to #172 - drulludanni ONLINE (11/30/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#189 to #180 - drulludanni ONLINE (11/30/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#168 - matralith (11/30/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #167 - natabre (11/30/2012) [-]
YOLO shouldn't be even considered to be put in dictionary...
User avatar #179 to #167 - lolzordz (11/30/2012) [-]
if it was up to me, 'gif' wouldnt be in there neither..

since when does anyone say 'gif' in real life
#166 - kilroyxx (11/30/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#164 - mcbmichael (11/30/2012) [-]
fits i say
fits i say
0
#162 - jordni **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#159 - ednaeoj (11/30/2012) [-]
yay exam week finally over!
yay exam week finally over!
#157 - thefuckingbieber (11/30/2012) [-]
in germany YOLO actually was named the word of the year
User avatar #158 to #157 - alekksandar (11/30/2012) [-]
This summer some ****** guy from Germany came to my neighborhood to see his parents and kept saying swag and yolo. care to explain yourself, Germans?
#160 to #158 - thefuckingbieber (11/30/2012) [-]
i actually never heard anbody here in germany say Yolo or Swag
 Friends (0)