| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
#201 - zangonest (11/26/2012) [+] (1 reply)
pls i do dis evry dey
pls i do dis evry dey
#235 to #201 - godofcodes (11/26/2012) [-]
pls
pls
#440 - goodeater (11/26/2012) [-]
yeah, that's flawless.
yeah, that's flawless.
#427 - notsixroller (11/26/2012) [-]
'If you don't believe in God, you have no morality!'   
   
The Atheist and Agnostic's worst nightmare. Because it's watertight reasoning.   
   
Yep...   
   
Totally...   
   
Watertight...
'If you don't believe in God, you have no morality!'

The Atheist and Agnostic's worst nightmare. Because it's watertight reasoning.

Yep...

Totally...

Watertight...
User avatar #343 - charagrin ONLINE (11/26/2012) [+] (22 replies)
I am athiest, and a good person. And technically that makes my good will more valid then a religious persons good will. I am a good person for the sake of being a good person, a religious person is a good person for the reward. And even if they were a good person for the sake of being a good person, they do so believing that they will get rewarded, which kind of taints their whole view. It's kind of like doing chores, a good kid will do a chore because it is a responsibility, another good kid will do it for allowance. etc.
User avatar #371 to #343 - candidvres **User deleted account** (11/26/2012) [-]
That's a generalization. Don't do that. Some religious people are good without the base ethic code for religion.

We are inherently different. Why should your will of doing good be any more valid than a religious persons? Consider the following scenario.

Religious person is poor. Religious person REALLY needs money for his own food, but he doesn't mind. He is motivated by the belief that he will go to Heaven. He doesn't care about his own hunger. He feeds the homeless instead to sacrifice himself. An atheist would NOT do the same thing, because he would have to take care of himself first. He does not believe in Heaven.
User avatar #327 - dovakiin (11/26/2012) [+] (2 replies)
atheists actually have a stronger reaction to empathy than religious people
#303 - cazabrow (11/26/2012) [-]
Because I have morals....   
   
   
and most people feel guilt
Because I have morals....


and most people feel guilt
#288 - tentaquil (11/26/2012) [-]
BE ADVISED
BE ADVISED
User avatar #278 - massus **User deleted account** (11/26/2012) [-]
I just am afraid of the punishments, and I don't think I could go around killing people. It is common sense, not religion.
#172 - whywouldyou (11/26/2012) [-]
**whywouldyou rolled a random image posted in comment #1855041 at MLP Friendly Board ** OP's face when he knows this is a repost
#156 - nickyandkamy (11/26/2012) [-]
**nickyandkamy rolled a random image posted in comment #335975 at Anime & Manga **
User avatar #150 - regentdoku **User deleted account** (11/26/2012) [+] (4 replies)
If you have to have a book and a preacher to tell you why you shouldn't blow up a hospital, then you need to have your head checked faggot, and you're a really shitty atheist to boot.
User avatar #107 - deathleprechaun (11/26/2012) [-]
Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved.
#90 - blahblahcubed (11/26/2012) [-]
The biggest problem nowadays is that the majority of atheists are people who really have no actual concept of the term and just choose to say they are atheist because it makes them think they sound smart. Now, I don't have a problem with atheists or theists and am not religious in the least; I just think that a lot of people who talk about their superiority due to them calling themselves atheists only harms that atheist point of view in the long run.
#76 - stianx (11/26/2012) [-]
Not believing in hell and jail is two completely different things. I've said it everytime I've seen this post, and I'm going to say it again. If it weren't for laws and jail, religion still couldn't keep loads of people from being killed.
User avatar #26 - imagnetsux (11/26/2012) [+] (1 reply)
becuase you will be escorted by the constabulary to the penitentiary where a large gentleman named tyrone will violate your hindquarters.
#366 - Sylphion ONLINE (11/26/2012) [-]
Religion or not, there's still a loose sense of what's right and wrong. I mean really, was there really a point in the Crusades? Hundreds of thousands of people slaughtering each other in the name of their gods/who gets dibs on Jerusalem, kind of pointless in my opinion.

On the other hand, not believing in whatever god that the majority of your society doesn't mean that you can do whatever the fuck you want without fear of divine retribution, there's still something called the law, which can be horribly painful to go against
#341 - oversoul (11/26/2012) [-]
because of the ethic
User avatar #337 - sigmundisdabest (11/26/2012) [-]
because that shit is plain wrong and you will go to jail?....
#329 - N. Korean citizen (11/26/2012) [-]
It's all about how you're raised, if I was raised by extremist muslims in a 3rd world country, I'd likely be impartial to death or murder, but on the other hand, being raised by an average middle class family in a 1st world country would have the opposite effect, as the morals of both my parents and the society in live in would shape my views.
 Friends (0)