Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#65 - herpderppppp
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
the one about bellatrix is pretty stupid. did you know shes the most loyal servant bc shes on the right hand side? umm no ****
#89 to #65 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
It's called symbolism, ************.
#64 - frysfrys
Reply +17
(11/22/2012) [-]
Harry Potter Fact # 601
#161 to #64 - wickedtruth **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#223 to #161 - xxxdemongirl
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
#63 - jibb
Reply +3
(11/22/2012) [-]
I have never watched the seventh film, so I just sit here and recieve spoilers daily.
#71 to #63 - retributionthepimp
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
part one or part two? watch them if you like HP, they're pretty good.
#237 to #71 - jibb
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Neither
#62 - flufferduff
Reply +2
(11/22/2012) [-]
Lucius Malfoy can produce a patronus. It's a peacock.
also, Lupin means wolf in latin
#97 to #62 - latinotornado
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
actually you are wrong on both those accounts. Since marcello got the first one, ill tell you the other. Lupin does not mean wolf in latin. Lupus means wolf. I know because my school mascot is the wolf, Cannis Lupus. Lupin means buck or deer
#232 to #97 - flufferduff
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
oh yeah yeah yeah! thats what i mean! lupus! forgive me, I wasnt thinking clearly.
#69 to #62 - marcello
Reply +5
(11/22/2012) [-]
In the first chapter of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, a white peacock appears in the gardens of Malfoy Manor. Some fans believed this bird to be Lucius Malfoy's Patronus. However, J. K. Rowling stated that no Death Eater except Severus Snape could conjure a Patronus.[11] This means that the peacock was in fact a living creature. It is stated in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows that the creature was in fact an albino peacock.
#233 to #69 - flufferduff
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
oh! okay. Thanks. reading that part made it sound like it was a patronus, but I guess not.
#59 - faithrider ONLINE
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
also about Remus Lupin. Lupin is derived from the latin for Wolf. reemus is a werewolf...
#61 to #59 - wolverinebamf
Reply +3
(11/22/2012) [-]
Romulus and Remus were raised by wolfs and became the founders of Rome according to mythology.
#96 to #61 - faithrider ONLINE
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
i knew that part too, but i forgot. thanks for reminding me.
#177 to #96 - wolverinebamf
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
No problem, I may be wrong Greek mythology is my area of expertise, not Roman.
#231 to #177 - faithrider ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
no that's true. i just had forgot about that
#58 - jalthelas
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
**jalthelas rolled a random image posted in comment #1672020 at MLP Brony Board **
#57 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
J.K. Rowling has had quite a good education. She's had latin, so there a lot of refrences. Thats why all the names etc make so much sense, almost everything has a 'second' meaning (mashed up, or just in latin). That why you can still love the books as an aldult.
#55 - thelovableop
Reply +2
(11/22/2012) [-]
Remus is also the name of one of the two patrons of Rome. Who were raised by Wolves.
#73 to #55 - sometimeswefuck
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
woo i only looked into that because i played assassins creed and found it really interesting, the "romulus temples"
i love little things like that.
#53 - riefenstahl
Reply +1
(11/21/2012) [-]
Am I the only one that thinks that Harry Potter started as "juvenile literature" but then became a really really complex (and awesome) book/story? I mean, I was totally ********** during the last books, how everything made perfect sense although there were millions of things and they just matched in the end...
#70 to #53 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
im not sure if it's true or not but i was once told that the books started for children and were meant to progress as that generation aged, so it starts out basic and gets more complex as the target audience matures
#66 to #53 - simbasa
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
What's weird is that I see them in the "young readers" section at bookstores.
#50 - maxismahname
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
******* J.K rowling and her ******* cleverness. i noticed how tom marvolo (whatever) riddle ******* rearanges to i am lord voldemort. god dammit it's hard to make two names be rearanged to form each other and make sense.
#49 - Sunset
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#46 - galkawhm
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
315 blew my ******* mind.
#44 - ddylann
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
harry potter takes place in the 1990's?
#91 to #44 - tehphire
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Yeah because James and Lily die in '81 I think, so you can calculate from there.
#43 - kusalranawaka
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
5 pounds a second?....Bill gates makes 750 a second
#48 to #43 - lolfire
Reply -1
(11/21/2012) [-]
Bill Gates created a multimedia empire.
J.K Rowling wrote a few books.
#41 - rangerofthesea
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
in response to 191... jk rowling would have made approx. $250,779,110.4 that year...thats bankin bitch!
#40 - twatmissile
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
One of the saddest parts was when marla singer killed sirius black.
#45 to #40 - ddylann
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
that ******* tourist.
#39 - vexaton
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
In Norwegian, Remus Lupin is "Remus Lupus", where Canis Lupus means wolf.
#54 to #39 - thelovableop
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
Remus is also the name of one of the two patrons of Rome. Who were raised by Wolves.
#36 - Katzie
Reply -1
(11/21/2012) [-]
I'm fairly sure when filming the sixth one, most of the actors that were students were given rubber wands after frequent breaks.
#32 - dragonballs
Reply +8
(11/21/2012) [-]
FALSE!
The first Harry Potter was published in 1997.
#56 to #32 - thearcher
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
#42 to #32 - kripke [OP]
0
Comment deleted by kripke [-]
#35 to #32 - Katzie
Reply +10
(11/21/2012) [-]
Released in UK in 1997
Released in US in 1998
That took me two minutes of googling, I don't think much effort went into these "facts"
#31 - sausydangles
Reply +4
(11/21/2012) [-]
Fiddled with his wands....fiddled
#51 to #31 - maxismahname
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
wands...