Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#126 - mrbull (11/21/2012) [-]
I'm not very good at scaling **** . So can somebody who's better tell me how big this painting is?
User avatar #137 to #126 - shootindownsnoopy (11/21/2012) [-]
I saw the original last week; its about 4 foot square, I guess. It's ******* amazing
#125 - garymotherfinoak (11/21/2012) [-]
This image has expired
I have that painting, its very gorgeous in person.
#121 - biggrand (11/21/2012) [-]
This image has expired
was at the Milwaukee museum of art last Thursday and I saw this
#116 - algorath (11/21/2012) [-]
**algorath rolled a random image posted in comment #48 at basket of shame ** Whats this piece called?
#115 - kidsquicker (11/21/2012) [-]
It's... beautiful.
#112 - Ken M (11/21/2012) [-]
How big is the original picture, that is the real question.
#110 - eliisfresh **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#107 - Ken M (11/21/2012) [-]
What are most mind blowing to me are how detailed the picture in the picture is... I mean how the hell to you paint so small in such detail? microscope?
User avatar #108 to #107 - mylazy ONLINE (11/21/2012) [-]
I suppose we have to know how big the picture is normally too.
#103 - pengpeng (11/21/2012) [-]
User avatar #102 - liftplus (11/21/2012) [-]
so why is the Mona Lisa the best painting inthe world when this should be **** ****** its got paintings in the painting
#130 to #102 - mrcrowleysr (11/21/2012) [-]
because it was the first portrait painting in which no matter from which angle you look at it, it's eyes will always follow you, I thinks that's the main reason why it became so famous.
User avatar #111 to #102 - crazyhindu (11/21/2012) [-]
because of that dumb hoe's "mysterious smile" while in truth she was most likely a hooker that he picked up had sex with and painted, some theory i heard a while ago.
#117 to #111 - apocalypseboyz (11/21/2012) [-]
The theory that I like is that it's a self-portrait of Leonardo as a women.
User avatar #118 to #117 - crazyhindu (11/21/2012) [-]
huh, ive never actually heard that one
#124 to #118 - apocalypseboyz (11/21/2012) [-]
in b4 wall of text.
#123 to #118 - apocalypseboyz (11/21/2012) [-]
Yeah, I knew about if before the whole Da Vinci code thing, but that's where the theory got really popular. Leonardo most likely was gay (there's evidence all over, such as him never beng recorded with a woman, never marrying and lavishing gifts on one of his apprentices), so maybe he self-identified as a woman or something. And that, my dear crazyhindu, is the reason for the smile.

Honestly though, we'll never know for sure.
Technology has discovered that the Mona Lisa has been painted over many times and what is most likely the original layer, she is wearing what is to be believed the pregnancy robes of the time, so perhaps she's smiling 'cause she's about to plop out a baby? Who knows for sure, the original reason died the the Renaissance man himself.
User avatar #129 to #123 - crazyhindu (11/21/2012) [-]
i see
#96 - pedogod (11/21/2012) [-]
I heard that if we post xzibit or leonardo dicaprio on inception-related posts we get thumbs.

So i thought, why not both?
#94 - illegalartist (11/21/2012) [-]
pff please, got nothing on these squares.

#93 - scumbagposter (11/21/2012) [-]
#106 to #93 - aconfuseddonut (11/21/2012) [-]
User avatar #97 to #93 - mykoira (11/21/2012) [-]
painting inside painting was it so hard?
User avatar #98 to #97 - scumbagposter (11/21/2012) [-]
I thought that the painting in the painting is a painting of another painting
User avatar #90 - mattdoggy (11/21/2012) [-]
Somewhere in the first painting, is a painting, and in that painting there is an artists painting, it is said in his painting is of another painting
User avatar #92 to #90 - toodrunktodrive (11/21/2012) [-]
#89 - wherejohnny (11/21/2012) [-]
Oh 			****
Oh ****
#88 - Soilwork (11/21/2012) [-]
and yet this modern "art" sells for millions
<--sold for 87 million
User avatar #119 to #88 - Riukanojutsu ONLINE (11/21/2012) [-]
heard that alot, but i guess you have no idea what the piece is supoosed to mean.

#128 to #119 - thekieran (11/21/2012) [-]
Oh **** son, someones about to get all pretentious up in here!
User avatar #131 to #128 - Riukanojutsu ONLINE (11/21/2012) [-]
my point being, this piece of art isnt about what you see
its about the message
but you know, youll get it once you grow a lil
User avatar #265 to #131 - chezburgadominator (11/21/2012) [-]
You sound exactly like those pretentious assholes who buy this type of stuff. A message in art is implied, left for our interpretation, that usually means it starts off showing EFFORT and this, looks like **** . Forget the "message" it sends, if you are able to find one then it isn't there, you're just over-analyzing it. Which is what everyone does with art now, they see **** , over-anaylze it to be some genious piece of work, and buy it for a giant sum of cash just because they can have "an original work".
User avatar #328 to #265 - Riukanojutsu ONLINE (11/22/2012) [-]
did i ever said i knew what the message was, but you know, kill the messenger.

disaproving the comercialisation of art is a thing
talking **** about art is another
#132 to #131 - thekieran (11/21/2012) [-]
That's like saying you'll plant a dildo in your front yard instead of a tree. "Nononono you see the dildo is about how I like to go outside in the middle of the night and have sex with my lawn, It's about stopping world hunger"

User avatar #135 to #132 - Riukanojutsu ONLINE (11/21/2012) [-]
thats the problem with your reasoning, there is no link between dildo and world hunger
#136 to #135 - thekieran (11/21/2012) [-]
And what link is there between a bunch of squares and anything else?
User avatar #143 to #136 - Riukanojutsu ONLINE (11/21/2012) [-]
i dont know, but if i had the title of the piece and the social context in wich it was created maybe it would be understandable
User avatar #231 to #203 - Riukanojutsu ONLINE (11/21/2012) [-]
im not saying its a good thing, im just explaining why.

but hey wtf, its Fj i can explain all night long red thumb bangwagon is on the menu tonite
#133 to #132 - thekieran (11/21/2012) [-]
isn't about*
#91 to #88 - orton **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#81 - justbeingcool (11/21/2012) [-]
**justbeingcool rolled a random image posted in comment #1798308 at MLP Friendly Board ** my picture
#74 - Ken M (11/21/2012) [-]
Whoa isn't this the internet? Aren't we supposed to hate on artist and art students? Where are the comments about art students are ******* fags and waste their money on trying to achieve art?
User avatar #87 to #74 - Yardie (11/21/2012) [-]
Who ever said it was a waste?

It's how you use it that counts. Some people aren't cut out for other fields, some people aren't even cut out for college. Those that take art classes should probably know that they won't make much money in the field, but its a field that they enjoy, so why have them try to go into something like engineering where they probably won't even make it?
#84 to #74 - intrepidy (11/21/2012) [-]
No, that is modern art where you have an empty can on a piece of string and sell it for millions. Actual artistic skill we applaud.
User avatar #76 to #74 - anonymouzx (11/21/2012) [-]
#71 - olesc (11/21/2012) [-]
User avatar #151 to #71 - parradox (11/21/2012) [-]
thats what she said......or is that the joke?
#178 to #151 - anonhaterrr (11/21/2012) [-]
It's not.
 Friends (0)