Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#276 - riefenstahl
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
I never though I would find people who appreciate art in Funnyjunk. Not as if I'm a big art fan but hey, good for everyone here!!
#275 - skinnyalbert
Reply +10
(11/21/2012) [-]
I thought it was a conspiracy theory/Washington Monument & Pentagon reference

I'm ******* retarded
#274 - ridiculousjoe
Reply -1
(11/21/2012) [-]
his face
#273 - aswimmingnigger
Reply +1
(11/21/2012) [-]
does anyone know what that painting is called?
#267 - brinden
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
Salvadore dali did something similar.

It may have been the pic attached (or another one with a melting clock) but I remember that one of these works is a a really tiny canvas size but the detail is amazing.
#264 - lolfire
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#261 - thumbsfourme
Reply -1
(11/21/2012) [-]
LMAO NICE
#260 - organicglory
Reply +11
(11/21/2012) [-]
#281 to #260 - anthonyh
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
Yo, I heard you like art, so we put art inside your art inside your art.
#285 to #281 - organicglory
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
yup
#257 - anon
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
Paintception?
#259 to #257 - travismackie
Reply -26
(11/21/2012) [-]
whoops, forgot to log in before adding this comment
#271 to #259 - ebperik
Reply +14
(11/21/2012) [-]
Why the **** would anyone care?
Why the **** would anyone care?
#296 to #271 - travismackie
Reply -5
(11/21/2012) [-]
No, I was the anonymous comment... I forgot to log in before making the comment.
#304 to #296 - feffog ONLINE
Reply +2
(11/21/2012) [-]
did you even READ his comment?
#321 to #304 - travismackie
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
Because people are usually dicks to the anonymous, but I guess people just hate me. oh well.
#269 to #259 - ebperik
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#256 - makintosh
Reply +6
(11/21/2012) [-]
still  very impressive, but the actual canvas of that painting is absolutely ENORMOUS   
(taller than me, and I'm 6 foot)
still very impressive, but the actual canvas of that painting is absolutely ENORMOUS
(taller than me, and I'm 6 foot)
#252 - jalthelas
Reply +1
(11/21/2012) [-]
This painting might be rather large, and just seems small in this picture.
#258 to #252 - gragasvlad
Reply +1
(11/21/2012) [-]
it is large... it's just that painting it with those small paintings in them is hard and would be impossible for most people... and also it's real art, unlike the stuff we see today.
#266 to #258 - jalthelas
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
True. The pieces I've seen in The Louvre, the Sistine Chapel, and the Palace of Versailles when I went to Europe are amazing. The attention to detail and beauty of each work is incredible.
#251 - anon
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
I explain it the way i unterstand it:
He draws so good that even the background picture looks like a real picture
#244 - hakeo
Reply +26
(11/21/2012) [-]
#242 - rachelrayinator
Reply +1
(11/21/2012) [-]
Statues eyes are a bit derpy
#241 - baine ONLINE
Reply +2
(11/21/2012) [-]
#240 - julpiter
Reply +2
(11/21/2012) [-]
can someone please explain this?
please don't red me to oblivion for my ignorance
#253 to #240 - crispylove
Reply +1
(11/21/2012) [-]
I believe the OP is showing his amazement at the incredible detail of the paintings within the original painting
#248 to #240 - jalthelas
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
I believe it's showing the incredible detail of the other paintings within the painting itself.
#247 to #240 - fezzo
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
It's a painting... what is there to explain?
#246 to #240 - douevensax
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
It's saying how much skill this artist has, making a really good miniscule painting inside a really good normal sized painting. Hence the "Incredible".
#249 to #246 - julpiter
Reply +4
(11/21/2012) [-]
thank you good sir
#245 to #240 - waffies ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
this person painted a larg number of fantstic works of art WITHIN a fantastic work of art
#250 to #245 - douevensax
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
Is this how's its gonna be?
#325 to #250 - waffies ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
huh? how what's gonna be?
#327 to #325 - douevensax
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
nvm
#239 - anon
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 583** TRIPS MOTHER ******
#237 - fannypackattack
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
Am I missing something?
#234 - anon
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 11** dubs, check em' fags
#268 to #234 - anon
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 508** I forgot to turn off my swag
#263 to #234 - anon
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 03** Moar Dubs
#255 to #234 - anon
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 19** Anons ******* rule.
#236 to #234 - SgtBaha
Reply -2
(11/21/2012) [-]
not bad, anonymous
#233 - anon
Reply 0
(11/21/2012) [-]
Most of these are just things I have seen on Reddit a few days ago.