Clinton actually saved our ass

You remind me of my Uncle.His name was Tom.

>His name was Tom
>His name was
>name was
>was

He died, didn't he?

He's calling you an Uncle Tom. You know,like a black person who's overly sympathetic to white people.

He died before the 20th century.

Umm....hes given implicit consent on it several times. He even admitted to smoking in high school and college

. . . to people sucking Obama dick?

Unfortunately, yep. Way up north near Greeley.

Reporting in from Parker, CO the mountains today were hazy as fuck and there was a fire that started but cause was unknown.

yeah, the Kim jong Il comparison completely Nullifies any point you may have otherwise made

actually i didnt do it, the word a-d-m-i-n-s-t-r-a-t-i-o-n was autochanged nice try though

It took me a bit to understand what the fuck you were doing, and I have to say, it might not work out for you.

Hold on... We hold Kennedy responsible for the Boy of Pigs Invasion failure. Why is it suddenly wrong to allow the leader to take responsibility when something good happens?

Well, in regards to the gay rights, he simply didn't enforce the dreaded DOMA. So he did actually do something, but not doing anything, if that makes sense. As for the weed thing, I cannot stand his continued support of the drug was. That's one thing that I REALLY dislike about his policies.

It boggles my mind how people give him credit for absolutely everything. I wasn't in favor of Health Care Reform, but at least he tried to push it through. Well, he tired, then gave up, and hasn't done anything with it since.

He hasn't shown any inkling of interest in giving gays rights. He never said anything about legalizing weed. I didn't agree with Romney on a lot of social issues, but it didn't seem like we were getting them from Obama, either.

Oh I agree about the weed, absolutely. In regards to gay marriage, it seems to be happening without federal help. Frankly, if it goes state by state then we don't have the eternal butthurt from the states that didn't want it in the first place. If you ask me, everything social should be state by state. The government should only guarentee basic liberties, such as civil rights. One could argue that gay marriage is a civil right, which I would agree with, but I'd rather that my state have it and the one that doesn't want it don't, that way there's less resentment. And yes, I support gay marriage all the way. It is true though that Obama has backed out on many promises like the drug war, and that pisses me off.

he also gave the order to kill a 16 year old american citizen with a drone just because he had the wrong dad though there was no evidence of the son ever doing anything wrong

source or it didn't happen.

google Abdulrahman al-Awlaki and research it for your self. dont try the argument "well his dad is a terrorist" because we let the bin laden family off for what their son/brother did

1. Don't assume what arguments I plan on using, it's unbecoming of you.
2. Two officials stated that the intended target was Ibrahim al-Banna, the supposed senior operative in the Arabian Peninsula.
Seems like you might've benefited from some research yourself. I'll concede that some unmentioned officials tried to pawn him off as in his mid 20's, but if you want to sit there and claim it was a deliberate strike, go ahead. I'll just sit here without a tin foil hat.

I don't see how Romney was against women. In fact, I think he got more of their vote than Obama. That's not to say I liked Romney as a politican.

Also, I don't like how everyone gives Obama full credit. Yes, it was a smart move, but there were years of searching and intelligence-gathering before he was even in office. They make it sound like he did everything on his own.

I'd reread my comment if I were you.

Are young going to make a point and have a discussion with me, or just try to point out flaws that aren't there? I said " the two states that have established these already did it of their own accord."

1) Meaning yes, I know they just happened.
2) It's not a contradiction, I'm saying THEY DID IT THEMSELVES.

Then what was the point of you saying "What makes you think he'll do them now?" when a) the "them" in question were already done, and b) you were just going to admit that later on in the comment?

Yeah I'm not gonna even bother reading whatever dribble you're writing this time.

So you don't even know. At least admit it when you say shit you don't mean to say.

yes increased gas prices are the presidents fault

there's a tax on it so the government does control it just not the president

Or it's just supply and demand, or if what you say is true then when did the president control the government? i believe its the other way around, to an extent at least

it is partially supply and demand but the government still makes a lot money

yeah the tax is a few cents. you do know we import most of our oil right..

only 42% is imported
www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-23/u-s-oil-imports-to-seen-hitting-20-year -low-42-of-use.html

so you think it's a good idea to lower prices on a non renewable source of energy?

I think its good to keep it low so people can afford more in general however that could also lead to a gas crisis both points have ups and downs