| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Comments(344):

< 1 2 3 4 5 > >> [ 344 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
#172 - skatehead (09/07/2012) [-]
Guys, DLC has always been a way to make extra money off the game, that isn't the problem. The problem is the quality of said DLC.

Take for example, Call of Duty. Pay $15 for a map pack, of which you'll probably only like one or two anyway, and there'll normally be three or four per game. The sad part is, many players who can play it on PC can get community maps for free (This goes for most PC games as well) so this is a pretty cheap way to create new content, but it's still content.

Then you have guys like Valve and works like TF2. The items you see in the store, 95% of those you can get on your own, WITHOUT buying them. If you do buy them, it's just an easier way to get something you want at less time, for a price. There's also items such as Keys and Tickets needed to get special items, but they certainly aren't required, and you aren't missing much if you don't get them. You can take it or leave it, and there's no real harm either way.

Finally, there's people like Bethesda, and I'm talking DLC the likes of Fallout: New Vegas. These are literal game expansions, creating both more story, characters, locations, weaponry, enemies, and the like. A more recent example could also be Dawnguard for Skyrim. This is where it's like you're buying a mini-video game, and if done right, can easily be well worth the price, or more.

So, yeah, some DLC is just bullshit developers push for extra money, and sometimes it's something amazing you wouldn't wanna go without.

DLC should NOT, however, be something that's required to play the GOD DAMN GAME IN THE FIRST PLACE.
#314 to #172 - N. Korean citizen (09/07/2012) [-]
This motherfucker has his shit together
User avatar #278 to #172 - cossackwhoop ONLINE (09/07/2012) [-]
like an internet key for bf3.
#216 to #172 - BastianKaid (09/07/2012) [-]
You are completely right. Honestly, I think Bethesda and Valve are the only ones who do DLC correctly anymore...
User avatar #328 to #216 - boogyshadow (09/07/2012) [-]
What DLC did Bethesda release that wasn't just a short quest mod ._.

I've seen better free mods for their games, all of them.

Also done with half the time Bethesda had and half the team of PAID people.
User avatar #330 to #328 - boogyshadow (09/07/2012) [-]
Shivering Isles was probably the only DLC that they've recently (I guess) released that was good.
User avatar #175 to #172 - reican (09/07/2012) [-]
not just that, Bethesda also let people create mods to add that may work as DLC's like people. towns, weapons and places.
#171 - hipsterbs (09/07/2012) [-]
Anyone here thinks that EA shitted on BF3 by trying to imitate COD. I wanted bad company not some pussy shit. I lost my shit when i found out you cant even destroy buildings.Fucking COD and its gold made the BF team cock hungry. Turned a great series into shit for the sake of a gun game
#177 to #171 - skatehead (09/07/2012) [-]
Not sure if stupid, or trolling.

BF3 has destructible buildings, among a bunch of other cool shit.
#179 to #177 - hipsterbs (09/07/2012) [-]
lol you clear are a fan boy of it then. You cant bring down buildings, the sniping was simplified to cod standards and they took out a bunch of cool shit like mortar strikes.
BF3 copied Black ops story with the flashbacks and shit.
User avatar #180 to #179 - skatehead (09/07/2012) [-]
Not exactly a fan boy, I haven't owned a Battlefield game since the original Bad Company.

And to be fair, they did add stuff too.

Also, I believe COD and BF3 would both be copying Tarantino-style story telling of constant flashbacks/timeskips, not BF3 copying COD.
#181 to #180 - hipsterbs (09/07/2012) [-]
Ya but i loved BF2 and i was really sad when they made BF3 with a different story and a different multiplayer
User avatar #182 to #181 - skatehead (09/07/2012) [-]
Well, that's understandable. I was certainly hoping for some kind of finality on Marlowe and the crew's story, but it seems we'll have to wait. Even if they took some stuff out, they did put a lot of stuff in it too, and there's no reason you can't enjoy the game for what it is.

Have a nice day.
#166 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
Game-$60
Elite-$60
Xbox live subscription-$60
about 200 dollars,for a 60 dollar game.
I'm not saying I hate it,but I think they're money whores.
#208 to #166 - fuckewe (09/07/2012) [-]
1. nobody forced you to buy the game, let alone brand new at 60 bones.
2. nobody forced you to get elite, see a pattern forming?
3.You don't have to have xbox live to play the game only to gank other people online so again thats an extra you wanted to buy that you guessed it, nobody forced you to buy...
User avatar #209 to #208 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
Listen bro,I'm a CoDfanboy!
No need to get mad,I love everygame.
But I love CoD because it's simple and has a couple of game modes other games don't have.
I just don't buy DLC for MW3,since I don't care about maps or faceoff.
but BO1 DLC was awsome because of zombies.
See my profile picture?
It's forth prestige in MW3.
So,Yeah I guess you're right.
But I'm not paying for MW3 DLC.
#217 to #209 - fuckewe (09/07/2012) [-]
why are you telling me no need to get mad, i ain't mad if i want a game i buy it, if i want the dlc for it, you guessed it, i buy it. I don't cry online about how game companies are this or that because they are just smart business men/women. if folks like us didn't buy the dlc they would stop doing it. anyway my point was if anyones mad its you bro.
User avatar #221 to #217 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
I'm not mad,I was trying to stop YOU from getting mad.
I'm not crying about it,I'm just saying I don't feel like i'm getting my moneys worth in MW3 DLC.
Survival gets boring,face off is stupid,
Spec ops is a one time thing,
And why get MORE MP maps?
User avatar #197 to #193 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
I like xbox xP
User avatar #198 to #197 - alexzerian (09/07/2012) [-]
Atleast their games are easier to make then PS3, thats a good thing about XBOX but ps3 has better hardware and its free... Trying not to start a console war but Games are expensive as they are
#200 to #198 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
KK,
Xbox fags and PS3 fags can both agree.
The wii sucks.
#261 to #200 - iron **User deleted account** (09/07/2012) [-]
pc is master race
#204 to #200 - N. Korean citizen (09/07/2012) [-]
pic unrelated?
User avatar #205 to #204 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
Yes.I just love Zacky.
Sorry for the confusion,anon.
#202 to #200 - alexzerian (09/07/2012) [-]
PC MASTER RACE REPORTING IN!
#203 to #202 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
Welcome to the gaming family.
#183 to #166 - N. Korean citizen (09/07/2012) [-]
Ok, heres what you do. Dont buy Mw3 dlc because it sucks dick, most dlc does. Dont buy elite.

Or if you got the hardened edition like i did(which is the only reason why i have elite) then elite and all dlc is free. The only game ive ever bought dlc for was halo 3 and i can honestly say its worth it.

60$ for a fucking year of online gameplay really isnt that bad
User avatar #184 to #183 - wtfisthesun (09/07/2012) [-]
And i forgot to log in
User avatar #186 to #184 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
lol,I only bought black ops and WaW DLC because who doesn't like zombies?
User avatar #188 to #186 - wtfisthesun (09/07/2012) [-]
This is true, but ehh most people i knew played on the original maps in the first place:p i didnt have WaW though
User avatar #190 to #188 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
WaW has a great campain,but CoD4 has the best campain.
I personaly only buy trearch games for zombies >:D
User avatar #170 to #166 - retardizard (09/07/2012) [-]
Elite, even though I think it's pointless, does give you 3-4 dlc each priced at 15$ a piece So it technically pays for itself if you were going to buy the dlc anyways.
User avatar #168 to #166 - chaosengine (09/07/2012) [-]
You're adding 20, which is a decent amount, also.. It'd be 120 if you got a playstation 3. =]
User avatar #169 to #168 - dragonzard (09/07/2012) [-]
Yeah,but most of my buddys got xbox.
So I got the same.
#164 - N. Korean citizen (09/07/2012) [-]
this is why i love minecraft =D
User avatar #162 - anog (09/07/2012) [-]
This DLC is making me hungry.
User avatar #159 - jakerfv (09/07/2012) [-]
Now they got "Season Passes" which usually involve releasing about 4 pieces of dlc and you can pay 30 dollars before hand or buy it individually for 40 dollars that probably should have been put into the game in the first place.

100 dollars per game.
#157 - potatosx **User deleted account** (09/07/2012) [-]
I DON'T HAVE THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE VALVE IS AWESOME ! FUCK YEAH VALVE !
#155 - ZakuMagician (09/07/2012) [-]
<Couldn't help but think of this.
#151 - alikesfood (09/07/2012) [-]
Worst 60$ spent ever
#233 to #151 - N. Korean citizen (09/07/2012) [-]
I remember when I bought this for PC, I thought it was alright, but then after I beat the game, unlocked all the weapons, and tried to log in to my Windows Live account the next day, it wouldn't let me..

NEVER AGAIN CAPCOM!! NEVER! AGAIN!

At least until Resident Evil 6
User avatar #160 to #151 - nyangiraffe (09/07/2012) [-]
I got it for $10 yesterday from a friend. and I still felt ripped off.
User avatar #152 to #151 - holycrapimacupcake (09/07/2012) [-]
You poor soul.
User avatar #147 - ritzrules (09/07/2012) [-]
shit, man...

i'm still scared as all fuck from that ice cream cone
#150 to #147 - deeznuttz (09/07/2012) [-]
ME TOO...me too
User avatar #143 - darkjustifier (09/07/2012) [-]
My game is not edible.
User avatar #142 - Crusader (09/07/2012) [-]
I really don't know any games like that.
Any game is still playable without DLC, the DLC is like the toppings on a pizza.
#148 to #142 - reaperboy (09/07/2012) [-]
what about what capcom did. the put all the content on the disk and then you had to unlock most of it by buying dlc
User avatar #141 - dementedllama (09/07/2012) [-]
Hearthfire may be interesting, and creative, but it's a load of shit. Dawnguard was let-down too. Where's the next Shivering Isles? Where's the DLC that gives you an entirely new world to explore? They've got all that misty empty space on the edges of the map and the Cyrodiil area south of Skyrim. Fucking use it.

tl;dr Skryim is now Sims.
User avatar #145 to #141 - Crusader (09/07/2012) [-]
Well, they said that the DLC would be more like Fallout, where instead of a bunch of little stuff, and a giant thing, it is going to be a series of medium stuff.
Hearthfire is good, but it's background stuff.
User avatar #158 to #145 - neoexdeath ONLINE (09/07/2012) [-]
Hearthfire is all of five dollars. Its not like they're asking for a lot for that, and its hardly gamechanging if you don't want it.
User avatar #146 to #145 - dementedllama (09/07/2012) [-]
But it was all new, interesting stuff in New Vegas DLC. And makes fans want to play longer.

Hearthfire just gives you responsibilities as a parent and homeowner.
#140 - xxscopemanxx (09/07/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#139 - kramchaos (09/07/2012) [-]
how fitting that the add was for BF3 premium DLC when i opened this page.
BF3 (at release) = $59.99
BF3 Premium DLC = $49.99
BF3 Total = $109.98

Conclusion? Fuck you EA, FUCK YOU
#144 to #139 - conorpadraic (09/07/2012) [-]
Cost of individual DLC - $14.99
Total cost of all DLC (excluding worth of unobtainables by not subscribing to Premium) - $74.95
BF3 Premium DLC - $49.99

So, spend less, to get more, sooner than everyone else, especially if I personally consider the DLC to be worth it. That's the idea behind Premium.
#137 - certifiedidiot ONLINE (09/07/2012) [-]
Kinda hard what to say on this, with the ability for gaming companies to just update their games, think of it like WoW, it's a continuation of the story, but they've got the basics perfect, now I'm not saying how good a game WoW is, but just how it's being operated   
   
With online games specificly, either they keep updating it or they make the other stuff into a seperate game, which would also split the online audience and pretty much kill one of the other games in the process   
   
But also an other thing I noticed, games are made in a short time span after each other, which makes the graphical difference smaller and smaller, if not invisible and you start to question, why not just make it into the original game   
   
The thing is.. We've never tried this before, what, not even doing it for 10 years, it's a new era and the basics are still being made, goes for alot of things lately, Bruce Willis reason to consider sueing Apple, Megaupload and so on.   
   
I'm just hoping this comes out okay these things, in a way that'll benefit the the costumers without destroying companies.
Kinda hard what to say on this, with the ability for gaming companies to just update their games, think of it like WoW, it's a continuation of the story, but they've got the basics perfect, now I'm not saying how good a game WoW is, but just how it's being operated

With online games specificly, either they keep updating it or they make the other stuff into a seperate game, which would also split the online audience and pretty much kill one of the other games in the process

But also an other thing I noticed, games are made in a short time span after each other, which makes the graphical difference smaller and smaller, if not invisible and you start to question, why not just make it into the original game

The thing is.. We've never tried this before, what, not even doing it for 10 years, it's a new era and the basics are still being made, goes for alot of things lately, Bruce Willis reason to consider sueing Apple, Megaupload and so on.

I'm just hoping this comes out okay these things, in a way that'll benefit the the costumers without destroying companies.
#135 - chaosscope (09/07/2012) [-]
So DLC should be healthy for you?
User avatar #132 - littlenish (09/07/2012) [-]
The fact that developers don't release the whole game, pisses me off. I have just payed $60 for a cake that's only 30% there. When I buy that cake, I expect the other 70%. I want to enjoy the whole game, not go out and buy 3 hours worth of game play 6 months later. When I purchase DLC, I want another whole chapter into the game (Dawngaurd). When you make an online game, you don't break it up in tiny pieces and overprice a small piece of cake, you give the buyer what they want: A chilled black forest cake complete with Hershey chocolate shavings, and chocolate chips (Skyrim). Not some shitty carrot cake with deer poop laced with glitches that ruin the game for everyone (BF3,MW3). Whenever you release a very successful game in a series, you have to iron out all the bugs before the game is released, it doesn't matter how many teams you use, make the game playable when it comes out.

TL;DR Developers need to get their shit together.
#131 - Lijiah (09/07/2012) [-]
More developers need to learn to DLC like these guys.
#227 to #226 - Lijiah (09/07/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #189 to #131 - hateandwhiskey (09/07/2012) [-]
This, I can agree with.
User avatar #192 to #189 - Lijiah (09/07/2012) [-]
You? Agreeing? I never thought I'd see the day.
User avatar #196 to #192 - hateandwhiskey (09/07/2012) [-]
Calm those tits, it's only because Fallout is involved.
#129 - N. Korean citizen (09/07/2012) [-]
Saw this shit on reddit. Fucking A this website is like a subreddit.
User avatar #130 to #129 - vilememory (09/07/2012) [-]
Maybe the person that posted it on Reddit also posted it here. Or vice versa, or maybe they realize that not everybody has the time to go to twelve different web sites to find all this shit.
 Friends (0)