| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#9
-
N. Korean citizen (08/19/2012) [-]
Technically isn't the steam "polluting" the air with radiation now?
There is no radiation except for in the core. If people would allow for them to properly store the nuclear waste in the mountain designed to hold it. Then there would be no pollution.
If you want to speak of pollution The russians have been known to dump radiation in the ocean and have also sent down "sealed" container full of radioactive material into the ocean.
If you want to speak of pollution The russians have been known to dump radiation in the ocean and have also sent down "sealed" container full of radioactive material into the ocean.
yeah :/ once again it comes down to the uneducated majority giving the government no other choice than to hush up and dump it in the ocean, all the time thinking they're saving people from the yucca mountain site. I am rather concerned about the one in the English channel though, I live near that, I don't particularly want to eat radioactive fish :L
#4
-
N. Korean citizen (08/19/2012) [-]
implying steam doesn't cause global warming...
ITT: people thinking a not too clever person is stupid to make themselves feel better
ITT: people thinking a not too clever person is stupid to make themselves feel better
But it won't make a difference.
Like I said in reply to the other comment. saturation.
NO more steam can be added, so it will simply cause more clouds,
Anon is technically right, he was implying that adding more steam will make the situation worse, which it won't.
Like I said in reply to the other comment. saturation.
NO more steam can be added, so it will simply cause more clouds,
Anon is technically right, he was implying that adding more steam will make the situation worse, which it won't.
#52 to #39
-
N. Korean citizen (08/20/2012) [-]
so you think that the amount of steam in the atmosphere is constantly at saturation and that increasing the temperature won't allow for more water to be saturated,
the point i am trying to make (badly) is that all these facebook posts mocking people's intelligence are simply ridiculous everyone says stupid things every now and then and this one wasn't even that stupid
the point i am trying to make (badly) is that all these facebook posts mocking people's intelligence are simply ridiculous everyone says stupid things every now and then and this one wasn't even that stupid
#28 to #7
-
bcmn (08/20/2012) [-]
Yes, it's "just water", but water is a greenhouse gas, which definitely contributes to global warming. And no he's not "essentially saying clouds cause global warming" The water vapor that exists in the air is totally different from the concept of "clouds." One is a greenhouse gas (that contributes to global warming), and the other is condensed water vapor
hold on, let me go ask my mother who has her doctorate in environmental engineering and makes a living by making sure nuclear power plants are up to code.
she says bullshit, and that nuclear energy is actually safer for the environment than wind turbines.
she says bullshit, and that nuclear energy is actually safer for the environment than wind turbines.
Well yeah, I wouldn't argue with you on that at all. That's fact.
I just suppose your comment may have implied that adding more made it worse, or maybe some people just plain out took it the wrong way. Eh, I thumbed you up one anyway. Whatever difference that'll make I suppose!
I just suppose your comment may have implied that adding more made it worse, or maybe some people just plain out took it the wrong way. Eh, I thumbed you up one anyway. Whatever difference that'll make I suppose!
#3
-
backforjustice (08/19/2012) [-]
people tend to not have this little thing called common sense which is now a super power in this era ....
#1
-
N. Korean citizen (08/19/2012) [-]
In my town im Massachusetts we have 2 of those. People used to think the same thing.