Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#417 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
replace black people with dinosaurs, OOH this is like mad libs :3
#469 to #417 - missylyn
Reply +1
(08/03/2012) [-]
lol
#326 - MikeyA
Reply +1
(08/03/2012) [-]
I'm going to get some Chick-Fil-A tomorrow.....
#115 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
Black Jesus?
#173 to #115 - aimszo
Reply +1
(08/03/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#65 - nudnud
Reply -1
(08/03/2012) [-]
This guy has no reason to call others ignorant.   
The Old Testament may have said something similar to other, non-jewish, nations as "not pure and should stay segregated", but in the new Testament, the Early Christians were told to start preaching to the gentiles (non-Jewish people) so thats wrong. Adam and Eve would probably not have been white, they would have been, not black, but of darker skin. "Scientific Knowledge"? It's based on morals, not science. AND not many people (because lets face it, retards are in the world) think that being gay should be illegal, just that there shouldn't be gay marriage.   
   
I am a Christian but I don't hate gays. The Bible disapproves of "men lying with men", but if your not Christian, why should you follow what the Bible says? I'm just saying this guy is as ignorant of the Christians he is making fun of.
This guy has no reason to call others ignorant.
The Old Testament may have said something similar to other, non-jewish, nations as "not pure and should stay segregated", but in the new Testament, the Early Christians were told to start preaching to the gentiles (non-Jewish people) so thats wrong. Adam and Eve would probably not have been white, they would have been, not black, but of darker skin. "Scientific Knowledge"? It's based on morals, not science. AND not many people (because lets face it, retards are in the world) think that being gay should be illegal, just that there shouldn't be gay marriage.

I am a Christian but I don't hate gays. The Bible disapproves of "men lying with men", but if your not Christian, why should you follow what the Bible says? I'm just saying this guy is as ignorant of the Christians he is making fun of.
#97 to #65 - lijda
Reply +1
(08/03/2012) [-]
I don't know about the world, but research has shown that 59% of people in America believe that marriage should only be between a man and a woman.

I don't know if he is going after all Christians, it's just that it's mostly Christians in the news who are arguing against same-sex marriage who use the bible to validate their point. It's just easier to make fun of that when that argument is used so much.
There are many Christian denominations and people such as yourself who do in fact support gay marriage. I can't really speak for what the poster was going for, but I don't believe he was targeting Christians in general.
#476 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
Neat - Although i kinda think making Adam and Eve gay woudl not have been the best of starts
#443 - yaarun
Reply -5
(08/03/2012) [-]
i don't find them offensive, it's just not natural. also, nature made sure they can't reproduce, so you can't say it is natural and i'm wrong.
#451 to #443 - nephritho
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
This image has expired
in the animal kingdom rats dogs and many more animals can go gay
when rats get in heat they would **** the same sex even dogs can have sex with male cats
it's just us humans that we mostly stop responding to pheromones and are able to mate when we want
it's just as natural as you being born retarded
#466 to #451 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
Also a fun fact in the animal kingdom same sex "interactions" are not based on sexual preference. That's what gay is all about. You can't use the excuse that it's genetics. If it were genetics evolution would've eliminated any gay genes since they hinder the specie's chance of survival. If it was genetics people wouldn't change their preference in a few years or even months... they wouldn't change it at all.... and animals don't have sex with the same gender because they prefer it... they pretty much have sex regardless of gender and species.. .they're just programmed to reproduce and cannot think beyond that point. Do a little research will you?
#474 to #466 - nephritho
Reply -2
(08/03/2012) [-]
This image has expired
let's think for a bit
some time ago most gay people were scared for being known as a gay person so they had wife and kids so no one would suspect them for being gay
that means your precious gay gene was indeed passed on
some other gay people have sex with womans just to have a kid of their own
your argument is invalid
#501 to #474 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
How many gay people do you think went to bed with a woman(excuse me womans*) for the sake of passing on their gay genes... if that were true we'd literally have a ridiculously small amount of gay people. Most gay couples adopt kids. How many were actually hiding they were gay.. .how many of them would supposedly go against their nature and marry a woman out of cowardice? And lets bring back the other question how people change their sexual preference if their genes strictly state they should be gay/straight? Completely ignoring the fact that your animal theory is not really true?You seem to have a very selective memory and no real facts to back up your arguments.
#541 to #501 - nephritho
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
in 1950 the gay people in America and even in the U.K were frown at as it was even a criminal offence even by the pressure by the parents and religion had a big influence as they would be banished from their families and even church
http://cowboyfrank.net/archive/ComingOut/02.htm
goaskalice.columbia.edu/gay-men-having-sex-women
wiki.answers.com/Q/How_were_gay_people_treated_during_the_1950%27s_in_New_York
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23168113/ns/health-behavior/t/i-married-gay-man/#.UBvwfqAn1SE (not really proof)
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx
here is your ******* proof
#526 to #443 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
The computer you're typing on isn't natural either but you don't seem to have a problem with that.
The computer you're typing on isn't natural either but you don't seem to have a problem with that.
#527 to #526 - yaarun
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
my computer doesn't have free will
#418 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
**** you megusters
#436 to #418 - colox
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
wut?
#410 - toodamnlazy
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
Replace black people with prostitues
#363 - mintless
Reply -3
(08/03/2012) [-]
So to make the sentence sound ignorant all I have to do is replace "black people" with "gays"... I see... so up until that point the sentence was fine? Yeah I'm sorry, but the person who wrote this is a complete moron.
#399 to #363 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
Youre missing the point completely. The sentence is ignorant in both situations, the difference is that most people would condemn the "black people" version, but for some reason theres still many people that are okay with the "gay" version because.... well theyre ignorant.
#414 to #399 - mintless
Reply -2
(08/03/2012) [-]
I'm not missing the point, Captain Obvious. If you look closely the text is suggesting exactly what I wrote, regardless of the fact that the writer didn't intend it. I'm calling him a moron not racist based on what he wrote not what he meant... learn to english for gods sake.

also You're*
#245 - jgk **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#153 - Soilwork
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#150 - boomdady
Reply -1
(08/03/2012) [-]
Being Gay isn't illegal though... Marriage is.

If you think you have it so hard why not move the another country? Maybe you can live in one where you're persecuted and killed for being gay.

Would you like that?
#257 to #150 - theexo
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
that's not the point. the point is that this is the land of the free, but lately it's been only the land of the free if we agree with it
#109 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolled a random image posted in comment #324 at /b/ being /b/ ** y u so dumb dude??
#104 - insanitydriven **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#103 - insanitydriven **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#83 - iNirvana
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#93 to #83 - hackettmob
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
...why do I do this
#95 to #83 - fargone
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
This thread is not the appropriate environment for Hanako.
#111 to #83 - dustyshane
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
What's the name of that game? I keep meaning to play it.
#117 to #111 - ronyx
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
Katawa Shoujo
#52 - anon
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
ivoryhammer, Ecchi, newwavebossanova, ikronic, lazynachos, derpmageddon, patriotpenguin, 6(sic)6, minionofdolan, jollypiratedonut, thebaest, deadbeatswagg, bitchimawesome, razorhawkzor, chrisfloyd, ebbiecandie, payhemseht, ktsuchiya, wieseldiesel, kneetothearrow, BooScary, ***************, tankerdude, traviver, loopylorna, triggathepirate, tkgm, adrenacrome, lucalucone, voltkills, viatio, dramallama, tobiaswhelan, swizzzy, doctordavidtennant, shogg, llamaninja, shoryuken, grahamsayshi, furryflava, furryflava, lolfire, europe, oddesy, ismet, spazzin, bujinkan, harshy, couchpillow, thunderdownunder, couchpillow, couchpillow, Foxroty, lfbatman, varrensage, sterlingarcher, sourkid, massi, nitroglycerin, mydogizmexican, alphajunk, *********, *********, NoYouCantEatThat, someanon, itskillingme, Psychotic, hauntzor, arabic, tempman, tempman, froggerfromspace, zeruaargi, GoodGood, theflamingotrigger, URLOCKER, funnyjunkforlife, orangemars, Hanx, catnutsack, thevinnieteam, swordman, dsouder, potados, silentscreams, arnoldnorris, demonatatoo, Her, Thehomelessman, housted, haxorman, tailsx, exorbis, littlebigbaby, killerkreate, failwhaleftwtoo, espegaaaa, eraq, gwankwo, lotlizard, devilspecter, stuffir, skarloth, chrislafff, bogbean, fakkabakka, novacane, nasharoo, Raggz,esaidiaz wildberk, opsdildo, littlehaz, demonicchimera, boxdweller, chrisruler, malizlewaaCOCKS!!!!
#54 to #52 - arnoldnorris
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
no u
#46 - ellwood
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
how can you call a person who doesn't support gay marriage intolerant, if you can't even tolerate their opinion?
#22 - zackstheman
Reply 0
(08/03/2012) [-]
**zackstheman rolled a random image posted in comment #284 at What? I don't even **

all full of butthurt