| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
User avatar #209 - shortbusterrorist (08/03/2012) [-]
Replace "black people" with Keanu Reeves...
User avatar #206 - valabigballs ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
that wouldn't make sense cause adams a guy and eves a girl so they cant be gay
User avatar #195 - inkigay (08/03/2012) [-]
Now. Replace "black people" with phone...
User avatar #203 to #195 - LeSquirt (08/03/2012) [-]
but who was god..
#185 - austinschut (08/03/2012) [-]
Ok, I know I'm going to get thumbed down to hell for saying this, but didn't Martin Luther King say "Not to judge someone by the color of their skin but the content of their character"?

The character of almost every gay guy I know is to act like a priss and wear pink. They hang out with all the slutty girls to make themselves feel better. Maybe if all the people I know who were gay were actually cool maybe I'd give a damn, but frankly they're all stuck up pricks.

And all the non-teenage gay guys I know are sex offenders or drag queens.

Also, I'm not against gay rights, I just think people should stop acting like gay people are victims, when in reality the media celebrates them and they make themselves out to be victims.
User avatar #400 to #185 - RandomAnonGuy (08/03/2012) [-]
I didn't know my mate was gay until he asked me out.
Apparently everyone thought I was the gay of the group and was surprised when it turned out that I was straight and he was gay.
#247 to #185 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
you sir.... obviously have been hanging around the wrong gay people...... not ALL of them are that obvious....and the ones that dont tell you unless you ask are the cool ones..... but then again...... when would you think to ask if you couldnt already tell, right?
User avatar #211 to #185 - Kaiserlome (08/03/2012) [-]
That's the difference between faggots and gays.
#356 to #211 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
Just like there's a difference between niggers and black people.
#202 to #185 - penguinthegreat ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
well you probably know more gay people than you think
they are just not shoving it in your face
#218 to #202 - austinschut (08/03/2012) [-]
There's also a lot more black people than I may think, they just aren't robbing from my grandparents.
#183 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
But, no one wants to make being gay illegal, just marriage...
#176 - aimszo (08/03/2012) [-]
thats soooo fucking retarded....!! did he even read it before he posted it or does he always say spastic things like that?? or is he the biggest racist and homophobe EVER?!?!?!
thats soooo fucking retarded....!! did he even read it before he posted it or does he always say spastic things like that?? or is he the biggest racist and homophobe EVER?!?!?!
#159 - thehornedking (08/03/2012) [-]
What conservatives say: I believe gay people have the right to be together, but I think that marriage should be between a man and a woman."   
   
What the liberals hear: "I hate gay people and demand they not be aloud to act gay in public."
What conservatives say: I believe gay people have the right to be together, but I think that marriage should be between a man and a woman."

What the liberals hear: "I hate gay people and demand they not be aloud to act gay in public."
#254 to #159 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
marriage shouldnt be a legal institution in the first place.

love is a feeling shared between 2 "or in some cases more than 2) people...... not between 2 people and their government
User avatar #222 to #159 - RequieminMortis (08/03/2012) [-]
Still homophobic in nature. It's just more passive-aggressive in nature, which makes me less prone to want to bash the speaker's skull in for their idiocy the way I do blatant homophobes, but it's still wrong.
#197 to #159 - commonatrix (08/03/2012) [-]
So you're saying either way they still get fucked in the ass.
User avatar #164 to #159 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
maybe something ad nauseum...
User avatar #162 to #159 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
yes.

I forget the term, something ex nihilo? Where you extend the opponent's argument to an idiotic scale beyond the context... like... "I think taxation should be reduced to increase corporate growth and create more jobs" is turned into "TAXES ARE FOR COMMUNISTS"

Something like that... I need to brush up on debate lingo... Though I have to ask, are you against civil union or holy union or just using the word marriage to describe civil union?
User avatar #297 to #162 - taxation (08/03/2012) [-]
taxation say what?
But at least this isn't another name-list for no reason.
User avatar #299 to #297 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
I'm finding all the people with the best usernames tonight!

Hey thumbs, chuckbob! Meet Taxi over here :D
User avatar #552 to #299 - thumbs (08/03/2012) [-]
hey :) Hi taxation... it is taking me a long time to get through all these notifications
User avatar #540 to #299 - chuckbob ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Hello Sethorein o.o Hi taxation, neat to meet you
User avatar #548 to #540 - taxation (08/03/2012) [-]
Oh hi! Nice to meet you too!
User avatar #306 to #299 - taxation (08/03/2012) [-]
I'd not be surprised if they're users too.
And it might just be something about economic theories that brings out all the best funnyjunk has to offer. In which case, how the hell did I end up in this mix?
User avatar #335 to #306 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
I have no idea o.O

But yeah, those two are users, we've been calling on each other for the past day for the shits 'n giggles... I think we're the only users who actually found a way to enjoy the new notifications...
User avatar #343 to #335 - taxation (08/03/2012) [-]
Well that's a good thing for you, because out of about 50 notifications, you're the only one that's not a name list. Damn those things, at least you have something good coming from this name-in-a-post shit.
User avatar #344 to #343 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
there should just be a filter. You choose which users you want to be able to notify you... derp....
User avatar #351 to #344 - taxation (08/03/2012) [-]
Or just choose not to have the notifications in my case. I hardly talk with anyone on here, just lurking so when out of nowhere OH YOUR NAME'S ON SOME DOUCHE WHO DELETED HIS ACCOUNT'S LIST, it gets to be a bit annoying. However, a good bit with a civilised person like yourself, I don't mind every once in a while. Thanks for this!
User avatar #178 to #162 - corporate (08/03/2012) [-]
Did you call me..
User avatar #184 to #178 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
yes :|
User avatar #188 to #184 - corporate (08/03/2012) [-]
I feel special :D
User avatar #191 to #188 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
and it wasn't one of those lists of 500 names neither :D
User avatar #193 to #191 - corporate (08/03/2012) [-]
Woohoo! but i've also had my name called like 100 times today. corporate is actually a pretty popular word.
User avatar #198 to #193 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
I feel like on funnyjunk corparate (misspelled so you don't get a double notif) is rarely used in pleasant conversation xD
User avatar #199 to #198 - corporate (08/03/2012) [-]
A;ways about something that has to do with some special shit most of the time noone actually gives a shit about.. no offense..
User avatar #204 to #199 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
none taken xD
#208 to #204 - corporate (08/03/2012) [-]
here i made this for you on your other comment
User avatar #213 to #208 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
:D
User avatar #215 to #213 - corporate (08/03/2012) [-]
That picture actually might come in handy :D
User avatar #174 to #162 - wisdombranch (08/03/2012) [-]
Ex nihilo ---> "out of nothing" ||| Creationists believe that all matter of the universe was created by God, ex nihilo.

The phrase you are thinking of is closer to "ad infinum" I think.


User avatar #180 to #174 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
dang, I was just grasping at straws xD
User avatar #168 to #162 - thehornedking (08/03/2012) [-]
I'm using it as in civil union between two parties. It seems today that so many people turn a simple answer to a question about beliefs stemming from religion (the Chick-fil-a CEO) and turning it into a nationwide scandal, especially when there are a lot of people who would give the same answer. I personally don't believe in gay marriage, but I'm not gonna run around crashing their wedding if it's legal. I also think everyone has the right to be happy about who they are.
User avatar #179 to #168 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
I say, civil union, A-OK, holy union... a little less OK...

I mean a civil union has nothing to do with God, it's just about having "spouse" on your identification and being able to be considered next of kin at important junctures.

It's a little dicier when people try to validate a homosexual holy union since that really is kinda spitting in the face of religion...

Chik-fil-a CEO has every right to be a homophobe and the people of that city have every right not to eat at his store. The Mayor of Boston had no place condemning the CEO for having a personal view that was not in line with the general population. This is America, the land of the free. Everyone has a right to freedom of speech and expression and so long as that CEO was not infringing on the rights of the homosexual community the local government had no right to get involved in his personal affairs.
User avatar #189 to #179 - thehornedking (08/03/2012) [-]
Exactly! Nobody is forcing the gay people to go eat there, and nobody is saying gay people can't go there and enjoy a sandwich. Just because he has a personal, religious view doesn't make him any sort of evil guy hell bent on destroying homosexuality.
#200 to #189 - femalealert (08/03/2012) [-]
Not saying I'm one of those "OMG CHICKFILA SHOULD DIE" people but i want to point out that they aren't just saying they dislike gay people. The CEO takes a good bit of the profit the company makes and uses it to fund anti gay things. So by buying a sandwich there you are indirectly funding homophobia
User avatar #205 to #200 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
K. So don't buy a sandwich there.
#207 to #205 - femalealert (08/03/2012) [-]
I quite enjoy cheap delicious sandwiches so I'm not stopping eating there anytime soon, i was just pointing out that you were mildly incorrect
User avatar #212 to #207 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
don't complain if you're still gonna indirectly fund him xD Otherwise that makes you kinda a hypocrite... He can do with his money what he wants, and you can do the same...
#216 to #212 - femalealert (08/03/2012) [-]
I wasn't complaining, just stating a fact. Its whatevs though. I don't care enough either way to have an opinion on the matter
User avatar #192 to #189 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Having opinions in real life is just as dangerous as having them on funnyjunk... go figure...
#154 - conaby (08/03/2012) [-]
Yes lets get up in arms about something that affects only a minute amount of people. "But conaby what about the failing economy and increasing tension between the United States and Iran?" Fuck that shit, its not important... See how dumb bitching about gay rights is? And I want to point out that I am not hating I have no problem with gay people and they should have the right to be happy with anyone they want but for fucks sake, we need to stop pretending its the biggest issue in this country at the moment >.>
User avatar #158 to #154 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Lichtenstein has 3x the GDP of America per capita... wut o_O
User avatar #232 to #158 - CakeOrDeath (08/03/2012) [-]
According to the World Bank in 2010:
(In Millions of US$)
United States GDP: 15,094,000
Liechtenstein GDP: 5,101

I really don't think that statistic matters quite as much as the total does .. Im just saying.
User avatar #233 to #232 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
per capita is the key word.

America has a huge population, so obviously with a lower GDP per capita it can still throw its weight around...
User avatar #236 to #233 - CakeOrDeath (08/03/2012) [-]
Oh I understand the per capita side of it, its just that 300 millionish people live in the US, and like, 5 people live in Liechtenstein. haha
User avatar #238 to #236 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Hey, I'm fine living in a tiny country if I get 148k a year working there! xD
User avatar #239 to #238 - CakeOrDeath (08/03/2012) [-]
Well you can pull 148k in the US, you just have to do this crazy thing called work hard... Something about 85.57939374923452435211111111assplay1723841lol275% of people in this lovely country have never heard of.
User avatar #242 to #239 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
... I'm going into medicine... yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay :D
User avatar #243 to #242 - CakeOrDeath (08/03/2012) [-]
I wish you the best sir, but I must be off to my chamber of sleep, because fuck me I stay up way to late pretty much everyday. haha
0
#153 - Soilwork has deleted their comment. [-]
#150 - boomdady (08/03/2012) [-]
Being Gay isn't illegal though... Marriage is.

If you think you have it so hard why not move the another country? Maybe you can live in one where you're persecuted and killed for being gay.

Would you like that?
User avatar #257 to #150 - theexo ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
that's not the point. the point is that this is the land of the free, but lately it's been only the land of the free if we agree with it
User avatar #142 - poophaspooped ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Yeah except people are born black and everyone knows you're black the moment you're born
There is no evidence yet that proves you're born gay or not....at least none that I've heard of
User avatar #146 to #142 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
they found hormonal differences between gay people and straight people that could account for their sexual nature :\
#165 to #146 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
So then scientists are probably working on a medication to fix the hormonal imbalance like they've done with so many other defects. Yay science!
User avatar #151 to #146 - poophaspooped ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Yeah but they is still just a surface study. I still believe it's a developmental issue. This is coming from a guy who's mother is gay
#163 to #151 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
Why is your computer in the kitchen?
User avatar #167 to #163 - poophaspooped ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
it's not lol where are you going with this?
User avatar #157 to #151 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
eh, why can't it be both? I find it hard to believe it's completely their choice to be social pariahs...
User avatar #166 to #157 - poophaspooped ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Well it's like any issue people develop in their lives
I'm not saying it's a choose, it's more like something in
their life or multiple things that lead them to seek comfort in unusual things.
In all truth Guys don't choose to be attracted to breasts, but we are because
they were our life source in our most earliest years and it gives us great comfort
I've been studying a bit of it on my own and I am very open to opinions
User avatar #172 to #166 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
epigenetic*
#171 to #166 - wolfymcfyou (08/03/2012) [-]
Actually, tits are supposed to emulate ass. Science! :3
User avatar #170 to #166 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Well I'm a strong proponent for a genetic and epicgenetic determinancy for actions... I mean, there are things you can choose... but your genetics are what provide your bias... I've always figured that situations are sort of an augment to what genetics already decide. Genetics decide that you're a born athlete, but if you're fed mcDonalds all day that could impede on your natural affinity... Similarly, you're either gay or straight, but some environments would make you feel more comfortable being one or the other... So people who were gay in the 50's would use all their willpower to restrain themselves because they were in an environment that wasn't accepting of that life, but nowadays they don't have to because of the acceptance so what is already programmed into them can manifest itself without repercussion.
User avatar #187 to #170 - poophaspooped ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
I can accept that
and yet I can't...my mind can never made up...this is truly a frustrating topic
User avatar #152 to #151 - poophaspooped ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
that*
#139 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
yep... this country is going to shit... turning into a laissez-faire
#133 - hwdge (08/03/2012) [-]
see this is why drugs are illegal
everyone thinks that this was the byproduct of being on drugs
not a product of world's first single digit IQ score
User avatar #131 - conquer (08/03/2012) [-]
but gays arent segregated...
#125 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
Now. replace "gays" with niggers and just look on how /b/ will be.
#124 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
Fuck all gays for they will burn in the sulfur pits of hell where they were created!
#123 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
except you missed the part where the bible doesn't prohibit being black
User avatar #135 to #123 - xxxdemongirl (08/03/2012) [-]
It's actually widely accepted by Biblical scholars that the "mark" that God placed upon Cain, so that he would effectively be ostracized by everyone, is dark brown skin.
User avatar #144 to #135 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
I thought the mark was a mark of protection. People would have murdered Cain outright for his murder, that mark was saying "STEP OFF, GOD IS HERE"

might be wrong though... or maybe people were just really afraid of black guys at the beginning of time o.o
User avatar #147 to #144 - xxxdemongirl (08/03/2012) [-]
That's also an interpretation, but the one that priests use in family-friendly settings. It's actually not what most people who study the Bible think it means.
User avatar #149 to #147 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/03/2012) [-]
Why would biblical scholars be offered two completely legitimate interpretations and decide to follow the bigoted one... Do they WANT society to hate them? :\
User avatar #156 to #149 - xxxdemongirl (08/03/2012) [-]
It's kind of like the "8 out of 10 doctors recommend" thing. I'm not sure what the figures are, but there's one group that believes one way, and another that believes the other way. Churches tend to use the latter
#143 to #135 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
its also widely accepted that the term "widely accepted" doesnt mean its a fact
User avatar #145 to #143 - xxxdemongirl (08/03/2012) [-]
True, it doesn't mean it's a fact, but that's what the majority believes. Nothing in the Bible is absolute fact, except that you should love your neighbor as yourself, and try to live your life as a good person
User avatar #129 to #123 - evilanakie (08/03/2012) [-]
GASP
they stole that part to
#128 to #123 - drasticdragon (08/03/2012) [-]
Did...you read the whole post?
#127 to #123 - Deemreo (08/03/2012) [-]
Yeah... that's kind of important.
Yeah... that's kind of important.
#118 - spidahridah (08/03/2012) [-]
Fucking genius.
Fucking genius.
User avatar #169 to #118 - aimszo (08/03/2012) [-]
i hope your being sarcastic!!
#116 - N. Korean citizen (08/03/2012) [-]
Comparing blacks to gays.
 Friends (0)