Can't tell if you're joking, but "the gay community" isn't based on any particular beliefs. They're just people who are gay. And they try to cram their cocks down your throat just as much as heterosexual men do to women. You don't see it happening in the streets too often, do you?

*cough* like religious fucks? *cough*

eh, go watch harry potter

No he doesn't...

ok...maybe he looks like him because i am drunk xD

You... you're seriously talking about political correctness on the Internet?

Political correctness seems relevant to me when speaking about gay rights.

Gay rights isn't an issue of political correctness, calling somebody a faggot is an issue of political correctness.

I know it isn't directly related, just relevant

I can't see anything. Only thing I can see is the French flag

And here we have the proof of his existence

if you're an atheist that's fine,but the historical Jesus DID exist. To state otherwise has about as much logic behind it as a christian not believing in evolution. I'm sorry,but I dont understand how this comment got so many green thumbs.

Idiot fishing for thumbs. hurr durr god didn't exist. Jesus was the most influential and prominent figure in probably all of history, proof of his existence is undeniable. if you're going to flaunt your atheism, at least attempt to be intelligent with it.

Calm down. Isaac Newton was an amazing man (fun fact, he was a devout Christian), there is absolutely no denying that, perhaps one of the greatest innovators and free thinkers ever, alongside Leibniz. Einstein, on the other hand, is the most over-hyped man in the history of science, he had a couple theories that were interesting, but are being disproved one by one, all in all, not even on the same level as Jesus if we're measuring overall influence on the course of history. Galileo is right alongside Newton in his discoveries and accomplishments. Saying that Jesus didn't exist is such a ludicrous claim; proof of his existence is evident everywhere. Let's see... Something like THE CALENDAR. Jesus' existence is undeniable, you may not need to believe that he was truly the son of god, but that is an entirely a different discussion. The fact remains that the man lived, and still inspires BILLIONS of people TWO THOUSAND YEARS later. Saying that someone of that magnitude didn't exist is simply blind stupidity. Also, stop the hypocrisy... "shut your cristian face retard " two seconds later: "if you messure measure peoples intelligent by a single post you should see a doctor"

the bible was written a few hunderd years after ''jesus'' died how in the word should that be any accurate? explain please. ohh, and the calandar is based on the bible so how is that any evidence ?

So in your opinion, we should disregard every single biography if it's not written exactly when the person lived? Your arguments are based completely off of opinion, and possess an enormous lack of objectivity. Society tells you that atheism is for smart people and that Christianity makes you a babbling moron. So you follow it like a sheep, doing exactly what you say you despise: "blind faith"
inb4 I BELIEVE IN SCIENCE
unfortunately, you possess the intellectual capacity of a 12 year old as is rather evident by your spelling, saying that you believe in science is an insult to the pure art.

i'm not english that why, and no we should not disregard every singe biography. the bible is written at least 200 years after ''jesus'' so the only thing they had where stories and books as source. opinion? how is any of my above an opinion?

believe in science? Scienece is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.

just because i don't agree with your believe does not make me a moron and neither a sheep.

Not 200 years. Perhaps a few decades passed, but there were still people who had personally met Jesus at that time. The whole point, though, is that I am not arguing beliefs. Whether you believe that Jesus was holy and/or the son of god is largely inconsequential in this argument. Jesus Christ, the man, existed. That is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, and is not a belief. Just fact. Unless you want to argue that knowledge of Newton's, or Hitler's, or Obama's existence is a "belief"

w/e man, Don't get me wrong i'm open minded and all, but if i see the evidence.. i don't really find it any solid, but anyway whatever float your boat.. and read this :

The Bible was written over a period of 1400 to 1800 years by more than 40 different authors. The Bible is a compilation of 66 separate books, divided into two primary divisions: the Old Testament (containing 39 books) and the New Testament (containing 27 books). It is believed that all of the books of the Bible were written under inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

Please drink bleach so we don't have to worry about hearing you speak anymore.

ohh sorry did i insult you?

No. You're just a fucking moron.

ok and that is based on what? your religion?

No. Not my religion.
You're a moron for trying to an internet badass and call others stupid BASED on a religion. Just because someone has faith in a religion doesn't make them stupid. But you sir, are one dumb cunt.

btw genieus i wasn't bashing on the fact he is religion (idc about that)
> ''Idiot fishing for thumbs. hurr durr god didn't exist. ''
that was the reason i replied in the first place. so read before comment next time.

Based on my opion you think im a dumb cunt?
how ironic...
i'm not trieing to be badass in anyway?
Btw call me more names, will make you look alot cooler

There we go.

Shut the fuck up, you ignorant prick. I normally don't swear when it comes to telling people to stop talking, but that is out of order. Could you please explain what makes him a "retard" for having faith in something? Although I don't agree with him either, you were the worse out of you both.

i called him a retard since i believe jesus is a fiction caracter, therefore calling a fictional caracter ''the most influential and prominent figure in probably all of history'' is in my face as stupid as trieing to build a spaceship powered by jelly fish.
that's why.

Yes but calling someone a retard because of their beliefs is just wrong, I am an Atheist too y'know, I don't believe he existed, yet I respect the fact people can believe what they want.

indeed you are right, kinda got enraged by the fact calling me an idiot for not believing in god.. but indeed i should'nt call someone a tard for his believes..

To be quite honest, he seems like someone with a whole lot of blind faith, and you sound like an ignorant sceptic. As I said before, respect you being atheist, respect him being Christian, but don't insult people for it, be tolerant.

I feel like a parent

will leave him alone for now ^^
ignorant? nah
headstrong maybe :)

Who?

And yeah, you are ignorant, there's no denying that

But there is more historical proof that Jesus existed then Julius Caesar or Alexander the Great, yet you don't see anyone denying them.

And here come the red thumbs. I don't care.

Like?

"Jesus drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles," and "Pilate had condemned him to the cross." (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 18.63-64)

Josephus was not even alive in the time when Jesus allegedly lived... Why wold he be considered a reliable source on Jesus?

Yeah, but you could also say the same about Cinderella.....

No, he was just stating facts.

there are writen records of Alexander in every ancient civilisation....even in modern day Afganistan they have folk talles about him. Guy that takes over half of know world will leave a mark. Ptolemy and Selucid empires just popped in existence? etc etc

well caesar didn't claim to walk on water ^^

Caesar didn't claim to walk on water but he did claim to be a god. The legions carried pictures of him looking god like.

Proof of existence and proof of having magical powers are a bit different though.

Of course, but that is a matter of faith. We're talking about his excitence, not if he managed to walk on water or make zombies

Incest is scientifically harmful for the offspring. It has a reason of not being accepted, compared to homosexuality.

Roughly the same chance for a defect as a woman aged forty years.

*First cousins

But if you continue it the chances greatly increase.

How so? Having a child does not affect your DNA in the slightest.

I am talking about incest. If it continues through the children the risks greatly increase for each generation of children.

Oh, I thought you meant the same generation. That makes a lot more sense now.

Without protection, ANY sex can be harmful. Your point?

But incest is just plain wrong.

i'm not picking a side here,but isn't it a bit hypocritical to call people who support incest "plain wrong" while calling those who oppose gay marriage "bigots" (i'm not saying you said that,just a summary of FJ's opinion). I mean brother and sister marriage is a consensual union between two adults that doesn't affect other people's marriages,so why is that different from gay marriage?

I didn't say that a brother and sister marrying is wrong (creepy though), but a brother and sister having sex just ain't right. You know, genes and stuff.

and some may say that children growing up with gay parents might effect them mentally.I'm not saying its true though.

Flash glare may have made it difficult to see. There's a little glare on the bottom of his sign.

No... he means that since the glare was there, it would be illegible if OP hadn't edited it.

they need to spead the good word of butsex to all the ladies

found someone on fj that's not retarded. FINALLY.

by force do you mean rape? cuz wants you get raped by me. a girl will never be able to pleasure you the same HAHAHAHA.... fuck forgot about strap-ons....

Actually they're one of the few groups that doesn't tell you you should be a certain way.

Excuse me sir, do you have a moment for gay?

Why the fuck would they do that?

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.

**demcomments rolled a random image posted in comment #7367919 at FJ Pony Thread **

Why not? People always like to push things on others if they aren't like them.

FUCK EVERY THING.

When have you ever seen gay people try and force being gay on other people?

Sauce please..

Why do I want sauce so bad?

Fuck yeah, Clutterbuck.

Lesbians

they make good porn

they make good movies