| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
Comments(541):
How about we stop reproducing and let animals resume their natural rolls. Then we wouldn't have a problem with uneven distribution.
#287
-
N. Korean citizen (07/25/2012) [-]
eagles are endangered. there are 8 billion fucking people on this planet.
i don't (and no one should) give a shit if we kill unborn babies.
how often does even one of them amount to something that can benefit this failed species.
we're piles of shit. this generation and all next generations are fucked. humanity has failed
i don't (and no one should) give a shit if we kill unborn babies.
how often does even one of them amount to something that can benefit this failed species.
we're piles of shit. this generation and all next generations are fucked. humanity has failed
Population demographics is what you fail to understand. Places like Africa and Asia are extremely populated, but that is not where most of US are.
A typical Western woman on the otherhand is not having nearly enough babies. In many countries, the native population is literally going extinct (See: Japan and Germany)
A typical Western woman on the otherhand is not having nearly enough babies. In many countries, the native population is literally going extinct (See: Japan and Germany)
#281
-
Griffino (07/25/2012) [-]
If someone asked you to shoot your baby in the head with a gun or step on a eagle egg, which would you choose?
Because I'm sure the Eagle consented to having its eggs smashed... this is such a fucking stupid argument.
Maybe because Bald Eagles are endangered? And there are a few million pregnant women on the fucking planet?
Well bald eagles are an endangered species, there are billions of people...
#258
-
redthumbsstation (07/25/2012) [-]
THIS IS A RED THUMB STATION, THUMB THIS DOWN TO VENT YOUR ANGER
i support abortion because it's the womans right to choose and no one of religion or government should dictate that right.
The difference: One is an endangered species, and the other is overpopulating the earth.
#237
-
alucardshellhound (07/25/2012) [-]
**alucardshellhound rolled a random image posted in comment #7159672 at FJ Pony Thread **
#216
-
twystedtail (07/25/2012) [-]
Just gonna go list form here.
1) It's a choice. The eagle doesn't come up to you and say 'Yes, I'd like for you to smash up my egg, thanks.' And if an eagle goes 'Fuck this' and breaks the egg, nobody's gonna give a damn.
2) Eagles are endangered. Humans are the definition of overpopulation.
3) The eagle egg doesn't belong to the human destroying it. It's like shoving a clothes hanger up a pregnant woman's hoo-hah and making a fetus puree.
4) The kid could be an accident or the result of unwanted sexual activity. I doubt that, should an unwanted kid be born, or should an unprepared mother should have one, the kid would have a good life.
1) It's a choice. The eagle doesn't come up to you and say 'Yes, I'd like for you to smash up my egg, thanks.' And if an eagle goes 'Fuck this' and breaks the egg, nobody's gonna give a damn.
2) Eagles are endangered. Humans are the definition of overpopulation.
3) The eagle egg doesn't belong to the human destroying it. It's like shoving a clothes hanger up a pregnant woman's hoo-hah and making a fetus puree.
4) The kid could be an accident or the result of unwanted sexual activity. I doubt that, should an unwanted kid be born, or should an unprepared mother should have one, the kid would have a good life.
#213
-
N. Korean citizen (07/25/2012) [-]
I'm against abortion, unless if the birth of the baby endangers the mother or rape, just some extreme cases like these.
If you don't want a baby, that is totally fine; but you should use protection. Once a baby is conceived, however, I think it's wrong. Many biologists agree that life begins at conception, just look it up.
When we look for life on other planets, scientists are looking for cells. Why aren't the cells growing and replicating and sharing our traits not considered life here?
It's not that much a question of overpopulation, except for some countries like China and India, but how we use the resources on Earth. Instead of having three cars for example, why not taking the bus? Just by living more responsibly, it would take a load off the earth, but it probably won't be happening anytime soon.
Anyway, just my opinion. No need to insult me just because I have my own opinion.
If you don't want a baby, that is totally fine; but you should use protection. Once a baby is conceived, however, I think it's wrong. Many biologists agree that life begins at conception, just look it up.
When we look for life on other planets, scientists are looking for cells. Why aren't the cells growing and replicating and sharing our traits not considered life here?
It's not that much a question of overpopulation, except for some countries like China and India, but how we use the resources on Earth. Instead of having three cars for example, why not taking the bus? Just by living more responsibly, it would take a load off the earth, but it probably won't be happening anytime soon.
Anyway, just my opinion. No need to insult me just because I have my own opinion.