| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
#531 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
Fuck your stupidass, bullshit, post with a pointless cereal guy thrown in it. And OC my ass.
#561 to #531 - hybridtroll (07/11/2012) [-]
My Thumbs vs yours. :-P.
#528 - boges (07/11/2012) [-]
Actually, there are 0 elctrons in the known universe.
#518 - ednaeoj (07/11/2012) [-]
**ednaeoj rolled a random image posted in comment #9 at the fuck spongebob. . . **
#517 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
Black holes are also so powerful that not even _ light_ can escape.
User avatar #508 - awesomenessdefined (07/11/2012) [-]
Black holes absorb all light coming towards them. That glow is the light from a star behind the black hole bending towards you.
User avatar #502 - ipodforlife **User deleted account** (07/11/2012) [-]
User avatar #523 to #502 - demandsgayversion (07/11/2012) [-]
Guys, don't click this
#545 to #523 - lukeharris **User deleted account** (07/11/2012) [-]
Curiosity > You
Curiosity > You
#492 - vparrish (07/11/2012) [-]
That top one is wrong. it doesn't take into account specific gravity. Not only does the earth exert gravity on the bowling ball and feather, but they exert gravity on the earth, so while the difference might be very small, the bowling ball will build up speed faster than the feather. sorry meant to leave that on my account, forgot I wasn't logged in,
User avatar #607 to #492 - aerialz (07/11/2012) [-]
It never said the earth, it can be assumed that the mass that they are being attracted to is so infinite that they have an equal force exerted upon them as each other, thus, without an atmosphere, they would have the same acceleration
User avatar #576 to #492 - ewkkua (07/11/2012) [-]
Yet the Bowling Ball has more mass, requireing more force to reach the same velocity as the feather.
more simply; ignore the feather; have two identical balls (therefore they must fall at the same rate); no cut one in half, u gunna tell me that the 2 halfs will fall slower than the whole one? {maintaining the "in a vacume" hypothisis"}
The Top One Is Correct.
#724 to #576 - vparrish (07/11/2012) [-]
Yes I am going to tell you that the two halves will fall more slowly.. Microscopically but yes. Otherwise all objects would be attracted all other objects at the exact same speed which isn't true.
#534 to #492 - rottengrits **User deleted account** (07/11/2012) [-]
Not to mention the single electron one has been proven wrong too
#491 - Lulzilla (07/11/2012) [-]
  ▲
▲ ▲
#532 to #491 - tartar (07/11/2012) [-]
*triforce*
#533 to #532 - tartar (07/11/2012) [-]
=[
honestly idk what I was expecting
#530 to #491 - notheoneandtheonly (07/11/2012) [-]
  ▲
▲ ▲
#527 to #491 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]

▲ ▲
#519 to #491 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
Faggot
#524 to #519 - Lulzilla (07/11/2012) [-]
That's MAMA Luigi to you!!!
#529 to #524 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
Nope your still just a big as a faggot you were 20mins ago Faggot
User avatar #509 to #491 - messerauditore (07/11/2012) [-]
i still don't know how. but then again i havent tried, for fear of looking like a newfag...
#522 to #509 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
Find someone who has triforced.

Copy/paste. Thats how you newfag.

▲ ▲
User avatar #525 to #522 - messerauditore (07/11/2012) [-]
I'm the newfag? total fail on your part bitch.
0
#505 to #491 - likeaderp has deleted their comment. [-]
#504 to #491 - sdevmanny **User deleted account** (07/11/2012) [-]
#500 to #491 - chodes (07/11/2012) [-]
  ▲
▲ ▲
#489 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
That top one is wrong. it doesn't take into account specific gravity. Not only does the earth exert gravity on the bowling ball and feather, but they exert gravity on the earth, so while the difference might be very small, the bowling ball will build up speed faster than the feather.
User avatar #488 - DANEATSfatKIDS (07/11/2012) [-]
I understand the rest of them but explain the fact of how the future can effect the past.
#589 to #488 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
This assertion takes into account quantum time theory and operates under the assumption that time exists as a 'fourth' dimension above the three that we are accustomed to. Consider time therefore as a superpositional expression of the changing relativistic states of matter. Operating under this consideration, if one were to observe a single type or form of matter as at it moves through its higher dimension (its change in relativistic position in relation to time) it can be modeled as a line through which the specific type of matter traveled within this dimension. The concept of the future affecting the past is derived from the theory (which is not nearly proven by any means) that this representative line can be bent or otherwise altered to intersect itself at some prior point.
User avatar #597 to #589 - DANEATSfatKIDS (07/11/2012) [-]
So by means of physics time isn't straight its wibbly wobbly and intersecting so that energy we release in what we do now can directly influence the past?
#499 to #488 - pedobearson (07/11/2012) [-]
because science.
User avatar #507 to #499 - DANEATSfatKIDS (07/11/2012) [-]
ooooohhhhh
#510 to #507 - pedobearson (07/11/2012) [-]
But really the closest thing I know about this subject is spiderman shattered dimensions.
User avatar #511 to #510 - DANEATSfatKIDS (07/11/2012) [-]
Well when cyclops uses his eyes hes really shooting a rift between dimensions at people.
#581 to #511 - pedobearson (07/11/2012) [-]
Not shattered dimensions i meant edge of time
User avatar #485 - zembrache (07/11/2012) [-]
If u drop the feather and the bowling ball on the MOON at the same time, they both make it to the bottom at the same time. But you seeeeee, there is a matter of air resistance on Earth, making the feather float and make it to the bottom last.
User avatar #484 - saxophan (07/11/2012) [-]
>Make a numbered list
>List a couple facts
>Make up several more "facts" that sound interesting or revolutionary
>???
>THUMBS
User avatar #481 - Blargosnarf (07/11/2012) [-]
Nice contradiction there, bro...
User avatar #477 - Nameloc (07/11/2012) [-]
Yes and if you got a piece of DNA from every single person alive today and every person that has ever lived you could fit it all inside of a Thimble and still have room.
#475 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
Someone has Netflix. Someone watched Stephen Hawking's Adventure into the Universe. And if Anon is wrong, then someone should.
#470 - atinybug (07/11/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #506 to #470 - slumberdonkey (07/11/2012) [-]
No, it's true because it has been proven by countless people doing countless experiments and, countlessly, getting the exact same data.
#537 to #506 - rottengrits **User deleted account** (07/11/2012) [-]
It's a good thing that the one about one electron is wrong
User avatar #539 to #537 - slumberdonkey (07/11/2012) [-]
I'm not saying every one of those is true, op is a fucktard for thinking so, but most of those are at least accurate
#513 to #506 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
How many people do you know who have done countless experiments on a black hole?
User avatar #515 to #513 - slumberdonkey (07/11/2012) [-]
Stephen Hawking, Brian Greene. Although they didn't do physical experiments, they did the math behind it using equations we are already aware of.
#469 - therealredhood (07/11/2012) [-]
I think OP got these "facts" from his black hole
#463 - awesomebubbles (07/11/2012) [-]
i've told kids at my shcool the one about past present and future a million times and everytime the get all mentally handicapped on me. hur dur how do we know about the past then dur
#460 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
the reason that A feather falls slower than a bowling ball is because of wind resistance if you tried that on the moon it would work
Black holes do not "give off light" they suck it in with there powerful gravity so the the light you see from black holes are other stars light being sucked in.
#459 - N. Korean citizen (07/11/2012) [-]
B.U.L.S.H.I.T.
User avatar #608 to #459 - aerialz (07/11/2012) [-]
S.P.E.L.L.I.N.G.
 Friends (0)