| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
Comments(407):
#456 to #454
-
creaturecat (07/11/2012) [-]
yeah i really enjoyed all of those routes but i enjoy them for different reasons for instance lilly's is very romantic and passionate,emi's is funny and also sad,and hanako's is just sad but also has its very nice sweet and happy moments
#428 to #11
-
thereforeiamnot (07/10/2012) [-]
I'm thinking this girl has got some crazy emotional issues there. She should stop blogging and get those sorted out before she gets shot. Part of me thinks this is one big trolling attempt.
I'm glad to know not everyone's crazy like that girl, cause "castration day" sounds pretty fucked up...
I'm glad to know not everyone's crazy like that girl, cause "castration day" sounds pretty fucked up...
I have no where else to say this so I guess I'll do it here. I read the blog. And I don't know why, but I'm upset. I laugh at everything from hitler jokes to gore. I mean I'm one of you guys, I should go to hell for what I think is funny. But this. I don't know why, but it hurts. I read this and in the entire time in my head I was scared, not for it to happen, but to think some individuals think like this. I feel so bad for her. And she really made me sad to think she would do that to people. You think about Hitler and go "he killed 11 million people, whatta dick". But when I think about her and her vision for things, I think of the personal humiliation of hundreds of thousands of men naked in the street while the woman cheer. And even see little tiny children go through this. Then to go home to be beaten and subjected to work and serve. I'm a 16 year old dude who honestly wish she'd just understand not everyone is like that. I respect woman and every girlfriend I've had said I was patient and kind. And I know so many others like that. I can honestly say she is the next hitler. sdifsljfls.
"Counter proposal:
After women rise up(trying to make this a reality) and are utterly crushed by men, as a reminder of their insolence, make sandwiches for all the men of the world. It will be a day long, world-wide sandwich festival. The privileged few women, who will be selected by popular vote, will get to model in the nude, for the our viewing pleasure as we eat our sandwiches.
What a glorious day it will be"
Best comment ever.
After women rise up(trying to make this a reality) and are utterly crushed by men, as a reminder of their insolence, make sandwiches for all the men of the world. It will be a day long, world-wide sandwich festival. The privileged few women, who will be selected by popular vote, will get to model in the nude, for the our viewing pleasure as we eat our sandwiches.
What a glorious day it will be"
Best comment ever.
I had this idea that as a consuquence of rape the person should have their balls removed. But this girl is just a bitch making it mandatory and calling it equal rights... If all men need to have their balls removed then all woman should lose their uterus
Now before you guys get your collective titties in a twist, I'm a guy. I'm going to go step through step into her argument and try and cool some of your rage.
Now, obviously castration day will never happen; there's nothing to indicate that society will gravitate to a highly organized and domineering matriarchal method any time soon. Personally, I would enjoy such a society if males still retained equal rights, although the author seems to feel that men deserve less privileges as human beings.
She is correct in that testicles are the main source of testosterone, and that their removal prolongs life and voids certain cancers. I believe the number is roughly 18 extra years on your life after the removal of your testicles.
The next couple of paragraphs describing the preparation of 'Castration Day' are rather ludicrous in their ideas; girls of a young age would probably be emotionally damaged from witnessing the procedure, as it bloody, and there is a small chance that the subject will die. A day off from labor worldwide seems irresponsible; after all, I get the feeling the author wants her 'utopian' society to be greater than the male-dominated one before it. Now, I know the comparison is over used, but marching a section of your population into squares, naked, and subjecting them to the will of the ruling class/party smacks of fascism.
The tenth paragraph, dealing with getting to know their castrator is personally offensive. The assumption that you could know everything important about an individual in an hour is preposterous, and it would only serve to compound the males' trauma, if in fact they were unwilling. That is to say, they would get to know a person that they found agreeable, and then that person would strip them of an important part, seemingly without remorse, to the cheers and goading of thousands of fervored people.
Continued in reply.
Now, obviously castration day will never happen; there's nothing to indicate that society will gravitate to a highly organized and domineering matriarchal method any time soon. Personally, I would enjoy such a society if males still retained equal rights, although the author seems to feel that men deserve less privileges as human beings.
She is correct in that testicles are the main source of testosterone, and that their removal prolongs life and voids certain cancers. I believe the number is roughly 18 extra years on your life after the removal of your testicles.
The next couple of paragraphs describing the preparation of 'Castration Day' are rather ludicrous in their ideas; girls of a young age would probably be emotionally damaged from witnessing the procedure, as it bloody, and there is a small chance that the subject will die. A day off from labor worldwide seems irresponsible; after all, I get the feeling the author wants her 'utopian' society to be greater than the male-dominated one before it. Now, I know the comparison is over used, but marching a section of your population into squares, naked, and subjecting them to the will of the ruling class/party smacks of fascism.
The tenth paragraph, dealing with getting to know their castrator is personally offensive. The assumption that you could know everything important about an individual in an hour is preposterous, and it would only serve to compound the males' trauma, if in fact they were unwilling. That is to say, they would get to know a person that they found agreeable, and then that person would strip them of an important part, seemingly without remorse, to the cheers and goading of thousands of fervored people.
Continued in reply.
#418 to #52
-
N. Korean citizen (07/10/2012) [-]
I respect your opinion Badger and you seem like a very intelligent human. That being said, you stated that you do not get out much and are as suave as sandpaper, I think you are letting those to things get to your thinking process too much. Start by getting out more. At least give life with balls a try one more time. I really think you would regret castration for many reasons.
The clause about males too young to produce gametes is logical, if cold. The anesthetics are at least merciful, but the shame a man would feel as a woman propped his legs open and cut away at his 'ball-sack'(rather demeaning choice of words) would be enormous, not to mention that he would be helpless to stop her. Thirty minutes is far less time than what is needed to recover from surgery, especially in an area where so many blood vessels are concentrated; walking home, perhaps for great distances would almost definitely botch the stitching of the scrotum, and opening up the wound to all sorts of infection. It appears that the author reserves public transportation for females only; as such her 'equality' seems to be based on a female-dominated society where males must pay constant societal reparations (i.e. must walk to ceremony naked, public transportation is reserved for those who deserve it, etc.).
No comment on the rejoicing of women after returning to work.
Murdering a male who refuses to attend C-Day is perhaps the most illogical of all the authors premises. I find it hard to believe that women could so influence the male population that they would all willingly march nude to their castrations; I would assume that males would either commit mass suicide by cop/soldier, or form a gender-based rebellion, and in all three cases, huge chunks of the male population would be exterminated, not only limiting the gene pool from which women could draw, but also creating similarly huge sanitation problems. Forcing them to attend regardless of age is slightly more merciful, but imagine the trauma a three year old would experience if he was placed in a ring, with women cheering as he was castrated, a procedure he would have no understanding of. By only supplying psychiatrists to females unwilling to watch the procedure, the author dooms vast portions of society to emotional and psychological ruin.
Continued in reply.
No comment on the rejoicing of women after returning to work.
Murdering a male who refuses to attend C-Day is perhaps the most illogical of all the authors premises. I find it hard to believe that women could so influence the male population that they would all willingly march nude to their castrations; I would assume that males would either commit mass suicide by cop/soldier, or form a gender-based rebellion, and in all three cases, huge chunks of the male population would be exterminated, not only limiting the gene pool from which women could draw, but also creating similarly huge sanitation problems. Forcing them to attend regardless of age is slightly more merciful, but imagine the trauma a three year old would experience if he was placed in a ring, with women cheering as he was castrated, a procedure he would have no understanding of. By only supplying psychiatrists to females unwilling to watch the procedure, the author dooms vast portions of society to emotional and psychological ruin.
Continued in reply.
Replacing Father's Day, the only holiday that men can enjoy as men seems excessively cruel. Her assumption that all violence would end with the elimination of male testosterone from the human race is absurd. Not only do women produce testosterone (in lower levels of course), but just because males will be calmer does not mean that it will end conflict entirely. Take for instance, a woman who physically assaults another for a cosmetic product, something that would occur whether or not a male was involved.
Men existing to breed, labor, serve, and die is basically correct. Her forcefulness is unnecessary, but that's besides the point. A child's psychological development is based greatly on their father's support, and if male gametes are simply 'milked' and handed out, a child will have no father figure, which predisposes them to a plethora of psychological issues. If by some miracle they are in close proximity to their father, he would presumably be either too busy 'laboring' and 'serving' his female charges, or he would be purposefully segregated away from his child. That of course, is conjecture, as the author does not go into it in this article. She seems to take pleasure in the fact that the males would inevitably die, which doesn't exactly bode well for her mental state.
The next paragraph is true, if a bit scathing. Less testosterone would mean less aggressive behavior, which includes rape amongst other things, and it would mean that a women would not have to go through the added trauma of bearing her rapist's child. It would directly benefit a male's physical health, but the removal of the testes usually causes depression, and in a society where men's rights are so few, would probably mean a large number of suicides.
I feel that not 'all' will benefit from such a practice as C-Day, but it probably true that the ruling women in the author's 'utopia' would feel better if such a practice was implemented.
Continued a final time in reply.
Men existing to breed, labor, serve, and die is basically correct. Her forcefulness is unnecessary, but that's besides the point. A child's psychological development is based greatly on their father's support, and if male gametes are simply 'milked' and handed out, a child will have no father figure, which predisposes them to a plethora of psychological issues. If by some miracle they are in close proximity to their father, he would presumably be either too busy 'laboring' and 'serving' his female charges, or he would be purposefully segregated away from his child. That of course, is conjecture, as the author does not go into it in this article. She seems to take pleasure in the fact that the males would inevitably die, which doesn't exactly bode well for her mental state.
The next paragraph is true, if a bit scathing. Less testosterone would mean less aggressive behavior, which includes rape amongst other things, and it would mean that a women would not have to go through the added trauma of bearing her rapist's child. It would directly benefit a male's physical health, but the removal of the testes usually causes depression, and in a society where men's rights are so few, would probably mean a large number of suicides.
I feel that not 'all' will benefit from such a practice as C-Day, but it probably true that the ruling women in the author's 'utopia' would feel better if such a practice was implemented.
Continued a final time in reply.
Now, I know most men will be angered by the author's presumptions, occasional ignorance, and overall threatening, confrontational tone, but you must bear in mind that her ideas are probably based on some sort of trauma. Perhaps she was jilted by a man who she felt was her soul mate, perhaps she or someone close to her was raped, or physically abused by a spouse. Maybe she had a parent who punished her for interacting with males of her own age; I don't know. The point is, getting angry at her is tantamount to getting angry at someone with multiple personality disorder, because one of their personalities called you a faggot. Both are caused by trauma, and getting angry at the individual will serve no purpose rather than to raise your blood pressure. She needs counseling above anything else, but for now the diplomatic thing to do is ignore her.
I realize my position is a unique one, as I've scheduled my own castration and the donation of the parts to a transgender individual; as such my views on castration in and of itself are perhaps more lax than the average male. This in mind, my argument may be coming from a direction not synonymous with the majority of human males. If you feel that this is true, please comment with your personal take, or pose questions about aspects of my argument.
I realize my position is a unique one, as I've scheduled my own castration and the donation of the parts to a transgender individual; as such my views on castration in and of itself are perhaps more lax than the average male. This in mind, my argument may be coming from a direction not synonymous with the majority of human males. If you feel that this is true, please comment with your personal take, or pose questions about aspects of my argument.
#23 to #11
-
Venedlor (07/10/2012) [-]
At first I thought that this woman was a troll, however after reading her blog I have decided that she truly thinks this way.
If she were to pass quietly into the black I would not shed a tear over her at all. We can not reason with people like this. And killing them often produces a martyr for their cause. Best for her to just quietly go away. To Laona Lake, where is the fuckin Di-Lee?
If she were to pass quietly into the black I would not shed a tear over her at all. We can not reason with people like this. And killing them often produces a martyr for their cause. Best for her to just quietly go away. To Laona Lake, where is the fuckin Di-Lee?