Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #63835 - schnizel (05/18/2014) [-]
Pebar, should food prices be regulated?
#63837 to #63835 - pebar ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
Definitely not. When the government says a company cannot charge more than X amount, companies have no reason to provide the food because it is not profitable. It creates a shortage.
If the government wants to subsidize food, then that's fine as long as it's done right.
User avatar #63847 to #63837 - schnizel (05/19/2014) [-]
But the food prices have been regulated in yugoslavia and the people were happy about it. And now everything is going up, a fucking candle is 2,5 KM.
#63826 - ribocoon ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
**ribocoon rolled user flutterway **
User avatar #63833 to #63832 - pebar ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
You're forgetting about competition.
You're implying that all private companies are monopolies.
User avatar #63834 to #63833 - schnizel (05/18/2014) [-]
Men desire for dominance, that is in our nature, but the state has the monopoly on (insert name here) so they keep it in check.
User avatar #63838 to #63834 - pebar ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
All monopolies, even government ones, are horribly inefficient. They provide a low quality product at a high price because they have no incentive to do better.
A great example is America's public school system. It is shit.

Companies desire to dominate a market because it is profitable. But in a competitive market, the only way to dominate is to produce a better product for the same price, or the same product at a lower price.
User avatar #63846 to #63838 - schnizel (05/19/2014) [-]
Can the goverment regulate prices?
User avatar #63848 to #63846 - pebar ONLINE (05/19/2014) [-]
With a monopoly to an extent, but it may be unwise because other companies would no longer be motivated to join the market and break the monopoly.
#63825 - Womens Study Major (05/18/2014) [-]
Can anyone summarize the Thai political crisis?
User avatar #63827 to #63825 - sirlancealotofhoes ONLINE (05/18/2014) [-]
typical aristocratic monarchy
new monarch is not supporting the royal party or whatever its called - he supports the left wingers
the aristocrats doesn't like it, they start claiming that he is not the legitimate heir and want his younger sister to take the throne

im not sure if this is 100%, been a few months since I read up on it, but thats about the main points.. Aristocracy v monarch
#63821 - economicfreedom (05/17/2014) [-]
It sounds like you guys need some freedom
#63806 - heyhowsitgoin (05/17/2014) [-]
At this point, what do you guys think is the most probable outcome of the Syrian Civil war?
#63823 to #63806 - byposted (05/18/2014) [-]
The Axis of Resistance will live on.

شديت الهجن.......سوريا الأسد
#63815 to #63806 - minibeep (05/17/2014) [-]
america attacks syria
iran protect syria because of they promise to protect
america goes into iran and takes their stuff and bombs a few more weddings
#63811 to #63806 - repostsrepost (05/17/2014) [-]
Assad loses eventually, they vote in(or not) an equally if not more oppressive government dictator. Rinse and Repeat.
#63822 to #63811 - byposted (05/18/2014) [-]
Excluding the increasingly unlikely prospects for Western intervention (with Erdogan being placated, in part due to increasing economic ties with Iran, and an Obama reluctant from the beginning), Damascus will not capitulate. Homs, or what remains of it, was recently liberated, and Dera is on its way -- both cities having been "protest" centers in 2011.

It is safe to say that Assad will be reelected as President in the national vote, three weeks from now, and that the dynasty will survive the so-called "Arab spring." Such is not to say that there will not be trouble ahead; Syria will need at least a half-century to recover from the destruction of half a decade and, within that unstable period, anything can happen.
#63824 to #63822 - repostsrepost (05/18/2014) [-]
An oppressive dictatorship is not an avoidable outcome in Syria or in most muslim countries for that matter. The best we can hope for is that it's not the Muslim Brotherhood or their kind who start to gain influence like in Egypt and Libya.
User avatar #63804 - revengeforfreeze (05/17/2014) [-]
ITT: Most jingoistic countries? I'd say Sweden, any balkan country, USA and Canada are pretty good candidates
User avatar #63805 to #63804 - revengeforfreeze (05/17/2014) [-]
Scratch that. Most jinogistic members of the countries online.
User avatar #63840 to #63805 - feelythefeel (05/18/2014) [-]
jin·go·ism
ˈjiNGgōˌizəm/Submit
nounderogatory
extreme patriotism, especially in the form of aggressive or warlike foreign policy.

Half of those countries haven't started a war in decades, if ever.
User avatar #63842 to #63840 - revengeforfreeze (05/18/2014) [-]
Especially, bot solely
User avatar #63856 to #63843 - revengeforfreeze (05/19/2014) [-]
Especially, not solely
User avatar #63863 to #63860 - revengeforfreeze (05/19/2014) [-]
Cmon. "Extreme patriotism especially in the form of aggressions
Not
solely in the form of aggression. Which means it COULD mean they are war mongerers but it could also mean they are simply belligerent and nationalist-chauvanistic, get it?
User avatar #63870 to #63863 - feelythefeel (05/19/2014) [-]
I don't think most of those countries are jingoistic when the word is used to describe the kind of people who use nationalism to justify wars left and right.
User avatar #63871 to #63870 - revengeforfreeze (05/19/2014) [-]
Fine, only Serbians are. Not because they use it to justify war, but it can also be defined as their attitude towards other countries. Which is not really that 'good'
User avatar #63872 to #63871 - feelythefeel (05/19/2014) [-]
USA's kinda like that, maybe Russia, a bit China too.
User avatar #63874 to #63872 - revengeforfreeze (05/19/2014) [-]
I see.. yeah
But what would you call the way people post "le suges prom0tes jelozy" and the people who go "le kenediens r so match najser den you r00d bstids evin dou we maik giant raiots wen our hocki tim loses"?
Ethno-supremacy?
User avatar #63876 to #63874 - feelythefeel (05/19/2014) [-]
That's not very extreme patriotism, that's kinda just standard patriotism mixed with being retarded.
User avatar #63878 to #63876 - revengeforfreeze (05/19/2014) [-]
Yeah, makes sense. Sorry 'bout the missunderstandings
User avatar #63877 to #63876 - revengeforfreeze (05/19/2014) [-]
I see. Alright
User avatar #63792 - feelythefeel (05/16/2014) [-]
>try for lower strata job
>job stolen by Mexicans
Fuck.


>try for higher strata job
>job stolen by Chinese
Fuck +$25,000 student debt.

Mega-fuck.
User avatar #63798 to #63792 - hawaiianhappysauce (05/17/2014) [-]
Yup, I feel you man. All of the jobs are moving overseas. All job applications should say at the top:
Americans need not apply.

No company wants to hire american workers simply because the world thinks Americans are idiots.
User avatar #63799 to #63798 - feelythefeel (05/17/2014) [-]
Nigga I'm Canadian and mostly kidding.
User avatar #63800 to #63799 - hawaiianhappysauce (05/17/2014) [-]
Oh, well... it is true.
User avatar #63776 - schnizel (05/16/2014) [-]
jewishcommunazi
What's the goal of communism?
User avatar #63807 to #63776 - beatmasterz (05/17/2014) [-]
Crippling the population of a country and suppress them enough to be able to command them.
#63812 to #63807 - jewishcommunazi (05/17/2014) [-]
And force people to worship Satan and make parents sacrifice their first-born child in the name of Stalin.
User avatar #63817 to #63812 - beatmasterz (05/17/2014) [-]
exactly
User avatar #63777 to #63776 - jewishcommunazi (05/16/2014) [-]
Emancipation of the working classes worldwide, through the estabilishment of stateless, classless and moneyless societies in which the means of production are commonly owned.
User avatar #63778 to #63777 - schnizel (05/16/2014) [-]
>Stateless
Trireme without a captain.
>Classless
Everyone is given that same?
>Moneyless
Why?
User avatar #63779 to #63778 - jewishcommunazi (05/16/2014) [-]
>Stateless:
It's not exactly chaos, there are sorts of bodies that replace the state, they're just not top-down, hierarchical, etc.

Classless:
It's moneyless, so no one actually gets money, but we don't distinguish classes according to how much people receive anyway, it's through the relation to the means of production.

Moneyless:
Because money has no use in a communist society.
User avatar #63783 to #63779 - schnizel (05/16/2014) [-]
So, Africa 2.0?
User avatar #63785 to #63784 - schnizel (05/16/2014) [-]
No form of goverment, everyone can do what they want, the "land" will be in control by local warlords with no loyalty to the warlord on the left and right, everything will be given on how much people need, not how much they deserve and to much equalization will make men into people from Wall-e.
All people need a day is a cuple of sticks of butter and a potato.
User avatar #63791 to #63785 - jewishcommunazi (05/16/2014) [-]
We still have communes, councils, etc., we can have popular militias enforcing civil laws and the "people from Wall-E" in real life would probably start getting some fucked up mental issues as a result of their lifestyle.
User avatar #63803 to #63791 - schnizel (05/17/2014) [-]
Trust me, if they are lazy they shall continue being lazy, so Barcelona 2.0?
User avatar #63813 to #63803 - jewishcommunazi (05/17/2014) [-]
I think we can handle a few lazy people fine.
User avatar #63814 to #63813 - schnizel (05/17/2014) [-]
A few?
It's like saying we can handle a cuple of ebola infected people.
#63789 to #63785 - Womens Study Major (05/16/2014) [-]
WHY SETTLE WITH STICKS OF BUTTER AND A POTATO WHEN YOU CAN GIVE THEM FAT BEN'S POOP??????
User avatar #63768 - teocherries (05/16/2014) [-]
Can someone explain oligarchy to me
User avatar #63831 to #63768 - alimais (05/18/2014) [-]
Oligarchs are rich people with power and one of the biggest ex-oligarchs of Russia (exiled/had to flee by/because of Putin) said "Politics is were the business is at"
User avatar #63772 to #63768 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (05/16/2014) [-]
It's basically a form of authority where the power isn't in the hands of elected representatives but in the hands of a small elite with social ties.
User avatar #63793 to #63772 - hawaiianhappysauce (05/16/2014) [-]
In short, basically every political system in a developed country.
User avatar #63808 to #63793 - beatmasterz (05/17/2014) [-]
wow
much cynisicm
so smart
User avatar #63771 to #63768 - jewishcommunazi (05/16/2014) [-]
It's a system ruled by a few, pretty much what's in between autocracy and democracy. Western-style democracy is sort of oligarchic, but the best example is probably the current chinese government system.
#63773 to #63771 - Womens Study Major (05/16/2014) [-]
*jew
User avatar #63767 - teocherries (05/16/2014) [-]
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2629504/Grammar-school-headmaster-apologises-tweeting-picture-pupils-blackface-dressed-Jamaican-bobsleigh-team-fancy-dress-party.html

So this happened at my school, literally every major news site has reported on it, slow news day, huh. The article isn't even right, they aren't year 11 they're year 13, every leavers day the year 13s dress up, this years theme was movies. But there is no humour for PC drones.
User avatar #63794 to #63767 - hawaiianhappysauce (05/16/2014) [-]
I don't get it. I've seen Dave Chapelle make his face white for the sake of making jokes that are meant to be politically incorrect, but I don't get offended by that. If anything it's hilarious. I don't see how this is a big deal.
User avatar #63795 to #63794 - teocherries (05/16/2014) [-]
Google the movie "white chicks"

how is that acceptable when this isn't?
User avatar #63796 to #63795 - hawaiianhappysauce (05/16/2014) [-]
I'm agreeing with you. The movie doesn't insult me because the guys are wearing makeup, it insults my intelligence though.
User avatar #63762 - jewishcommunazi (05/16/2014) [-]
What's the difference between classical liberalism and neoliberalism?
User avatar #63766 to #63762 - pebar ONLINE (05/16/2014) [-]
classical liberalism includes the social side of personal freedom
neoliberalism focuses mostly on just the economic side
User avatar #63763 to #63762 - jewishcommunazi (05/16/2014) [-]
Aside from one being the old and the other being the new, of course.
#63760 - alimais (05/16/2014) [-]
www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/05/14/362592/us-rabbi-charged-with-stealing-124-mn/

>New York rabbi Samuel Hiller and three others have been indicted for stealing over $12.4 million in public aid for disabled children.

>The charges include grand larceny, identity theft, and falsifying business records at one of the city's largest providers of special education services for disabled children, according to a news release issued Tuesday by Queens County District Attorney Richard Brown.
User avatar #63797 to #63760 - feelythefeel (05/17/2014) [-]
Anyone remember that Christian guy who killed millions of people and helped destabilized the world in a way that wouldn't be recovered from for decades and still continues to cause implications?

Fuck all Christians apparently.
User avatar #63788 to #63760 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/16/2014) [-]
1 rabbi did a bad thing -----> all jews are bad

Yep, solid logic there. If you didn't mean that then you shouldn't have included the picture.
User avatar #63830 to #63788 - alimais (05/18/2014) [-]
I just posted an article for stereotypical fun,

You are hella uptight for your name.
#63758 - commission (05/16/2014) [-]
Metal Gear Solid 4 - Cinematic Opening [HQ]

Metal Gear Solid 4, a game released in 2008, that takes place in 2014, which is the present year. The game is very physiological. One of the main ideas of the game is that War has change, to the point beyong reason, and it is all about profit.

I believe that the story of the game has come true, that war is just about making a profit, proxy battles day and night, not for an idea, but for money.

I think Ukraine is a fine example of this.

As said in the game, "War, has changed."

User avatar #63759 to #63758 - pebar ONLINE (05/16/2014) [-]
It's always been about money. The reason the US got involved in WW1 was to defend its investment; the allies owed them a lot of money.
#63757 - pebar ONLINE (05/16/2014) [-]
Thoughts on this?
User avatar #63790 to #63757 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/16/2014) [-]
Yeah what the guy below me said V V V
#63780 to #63757 - radiserne (05/16/2014) [-]
**radiserne rolled image** So basically hell is reserved for swedish and swiss people
User avatar #63774 to #63757 - hoodedmetal (05/16/2014) [-]
If an group has a view they feel is morally right, then they generally understand their position and framework of their morality, understanding its pros and cons when applied, and would accept the consequences and rewards of their mindset.

Some one who is maintaining their neutrality, probably have reasons to do so, be it morale on a different aspect or conflicts that would arise from them participating. By demanding someone out of their chosen neutrality, you force them to make decisions they never wanted to do in the first place. You can persuade someone to choose a side but only if they decide to do it themselves.
#63755 - commission (05/16/2014) [-]
> US Intervenes Ukraine crisis with military force
User avatar #63754 - pebar ONLINE (05/16/2014) [-]
America history explained by way of snacks - United Snacks of America by Ryan Singer Comedian tells the history of America
#63753 - Womens Study Major (05/16/2014) [-]
I remember q while ago, someone here posted a video, with a person explaining that violence is sometimes the answer, and that you ned to stand up for yourself, man the fuck up.

He gave an example of saying "what if your neighbor decides he wants to hurt you"

and he said "what are you going to do to stop him? " Are you going to file a court order against him? That won't stop him from hurting you, are you going to call the police? He would be finished with you by the time they arive. YOu got to stand up for your self, prepare for war"

Not exact words, but if anyone knows the video, can they please link it?
#63751 - alimais (05/15/2014) [-]
This picture show two things :
USA vs Russia would be fun to watch
That US/UK/China/Pakistan/Saudi turned the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan into the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
#63748 - alimais (05/15/2014) [-]
LoL, most direct videos filmed by people in the Ukraine get deleted on Youtube because of copyright claims.   
   
Also have this list with some videos deleted.   
   
pastebin.com/u30ThbJv
LoL, most direct videos filmed by people in the Ukraine get deleted on Youtube because of copyright claims.

Also have this list with some videos deleted.

pastebin.com/u30ThbJv
#63749 to #63748 - alimais (05/15/2014) [-]
I wish those boards wouldn't be SFW, I have so many good .gifs about this conflict
I wish those boards wouldn't be SFW, I have so many good .gifs about this conflict
#63744 - Womens Study Major (05/15/2014) [-]
Kill all faggots. Every last one. Single bullet to the brain, bodies in a shipping crate, cover in lye, bury in a ditch. Erase them from human history. Queers have the same rights as the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement: none whatsoever. Any government that is not actively working to remove threats to humanity itself does not deserve its station.

In before “HURR EDGY”
In before “HURR INSECURE”
In before “HURR BIGOT”
In before "HURR BURGER"
None of those refute the fact that queers have revoked their human rights.
 Friends (0)