x
Click to expand
Latest users (4): kanadetenshi, klowserpok, marinepenguin, redandgreen, anonymous(21).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#71343 - feelythefeel (10/31/2014) [-]
Remember, the new left isn't evil.

They just think they own your soul.
User avatar #71353 to #71343 - jewishcommunazi (10/31/2014) [-]
What's your opinion on the good old hardcore left?
User avatar #71362 to #71353 - feelythefeel (10/31/2014) [-]
They're gradually becoming the sole reason for my growingly incessant cynicism.
User avatar #71485 to #71427 - feelythefeel (11/01/2014) [-]
Because they've proven time and time again how they really are, yet it doesn't seem to matter to anyone. There are no lows that these people can sink to and have meaningful consequences for their actions.
#71346 to #71343 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
I'd like to hope that one day you'll come to realize your folly and abandon your progressive liberal ways and embrace the truth that is fascism, and maybe, just maybe on that day we can share a drink (no more vegan milk for you) as brothers.

But until that day you will always be a nerd.
User avatar #71365 to #71346 - feelythefeel (10/31/2014) [-]
Yeah, just because I'm left means I'm progressive liberal.

Of course.
#71366 to #71365 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
You know and I both know what you are, denying it won't fool anyone.
0
#71345 to #71343 - youregaylol has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #71321 - darealsnooki ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
I say abortion should be legal.

1. For any Christian opposing this, let them keep opposing. Gay marriage is becoming majorly legal, so why not abortion?

2. It's not like this world needs anymore people anyway. Certain Americans need to realize that even though people have abortions, the world will keep on turning. Life will be taken, and given frequently
#71351 to #71321 - dehumanizer (10/31/2014) [-]
Yeah you're right, I mean if you dont like abortion, just dont get aborted!
User avatar #71425 to #71351 - darealsnooki ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
Kek
User avatar #71333 to #71321 - princessren (10/31/2014) [-]
is abortion...not legal?
User avatar #71334 to #71333 - darealsnooki ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
I'm sure a lot of places have it illegal, but I'm just trying to prove why there should be a 'separation between church and state'
User avatar #71324 to #71321 - ecomp (10/31/2014) [-]
How is abortion a religious stance? One side says "Let the woman do what she wants with her body" The other side says "Don't kill living humans". I'm all for letting women doing what they want with their body, but a baby that consists of both a man's and a woman's DNA is not hers. It's not the mans. It's the baby's.
User avatar #71337 to #71335 - ecomp (10/31/2014) [-]
with jews you lose :^)
User avatar #71338 to #71337 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/31/2014) [-]
When shit hits the fan in your preferred universe what happens to me? : ^ |
User avatar #71341 to #71340 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/31/2014) [-]
What a fucking stupid song.
User avatar #71342 to #71341 - ecomp (10/31/2014) [-]
Yeah.
User avatar #71325 to #71324 - darealsnooki ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
All throughout the time I've been into this subject of abortion, in my opinion, only 40% of the argument I heard is non-religious.

As for whichever parent wants to take care of the baby, that would put purpose towards having the kid. For all we know, during our lifetime, there could be someone who raped a woman, and somehow got custody of his child because that is all he ever wanted, a child. But keep in mind, that it was a prediction, because life can get pretty weird
User avatar #71326 to #71325 - ecomp (10/31/2014) [-]
How can it be religious? Seriously what are you talking about?

Also, I'm pretty damn sure that a RAPIST will not get custody of a child no matter what. This is also usually the only exception in the Pro-Life group.
#71328 to #71326 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
a lot of liberals have this idea that only religious people care about moral standards and social ethics

it's retarded, but as you can see that belief is there
User avatar #71329 to #71328 - darealsnooki ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
^
User avatar #71322 to #71321 - ablueguy (10/31/2014) [-]
2. From what I understood of what you said, you're thinking something along the lines of: "people die anyway and there's lots of us, lets kill unborn children".

I actually support abortion, though only in the case that women were raped or it will be born deformed/retarded

Also, granting homos marriage rights =/= abortion. Why compare the two?
User avatar #71336 to #71322 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/31/2014) [-]
I thought you'd be the kind of guy to be pro-choice
User avatar #71405 to #71336 - ablueguy (10/31/2014) [-]
Why?
#71407 to #71405 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/31/2014) [-]
Because its the right choice
Because its the right choice
User avatar #71520 to #71516 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/01/2014) [-]
God dammit I hadn't even realized.
User avatar #71323 to #71322 - darealsnooki ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
Comparing them two because they both have something in common: religion.

It is no secret that religion has interfered with politics a lot. The whole gay marriage and abortion deal has always been frowned upon because of religion
#71327 to #71323 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
or because people find both disgusting and believe that they have a negeative impact on society

im not religious at all and i oppose gay "marriage" and only support abortion as a means of controlling undesirables, not as an inherent right.
#71505 to #71327 - anonymous (11/01/2014) [-]
Can you provide a link to show how gay people having the same rights as every other citizen in a state/province or country will have a negative impact on society?
#71506 to #71505 - youregaylol (11/01/2014) [-]
>implying being called married by the state is an inherent right
>implying gay culture is a positive thing
>implying theres a way to measure overall negative impact on culture
User avatar #71339 to #71327 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/31/2014) [-]
No one understands how valuable abortion is, there will be less Shaniqwaz out there.
User avatar #71330 to #71327 - darealsnooki ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
Anyone can believe what they want, including you.

I am all for freedom, and inb4 a baby is worthy of freedom... I believe that, too, but whatever the mother chooses, is her decision. Personally, I don't want to put it that way, but politically, I have to
#71331 to #71330 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
freedom is subjective
User avatar #71332 to #71331 - darealsnooki ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
True
#71279 - youregaylol (10/30/2014) [-]
Hanging, firing squad, electric chair, lethal injection, guillotine, or burning?

I prefer firing squad. Quick, efficient, affordable, and stylish.
User avatar #71357 to #71279 - schnizel (10/31/2014) [-]
Gassing is expensive and slow.
Chair is also expensive.
Injection is slow and expensive.
Guillotine is slow.
Burning is good after you kill.
Hang is slow.
Firing squad with knives, no bullet waste.
#71358 to #71357 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
has a knife gun been invented yet?

i guess a crossbow could work but it's not as flashy and dramatic as a firing squad with rifles
User avatar #71359 to #71358 - schnizel (10/31/2014) [-]
Money beats drama.
#71360 to #71359 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
capitalist swine
User avatar #71307 to #71279 - pebar ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
the cost of the actual method are nothing next to the court costs

If anything, lethal injection, but I'm not really in favor of the death penalty anyway.
#71318 to #71307 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
commie
User avatar #71319 to #71318 - pebar ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
For thinking the government shouldn't be allowed to kill people it doesn't like?
That sounds very un-communist actually.
User avatar #71354 to #71319 - jewishcommunazi (10/31/2014) [-]
It was actually the communists who got rid of the death penalty in Portugal. I'd appreciate if they didn't though. We have a history of rejecting it before the communists though, we were the first to abolish it, so it wasn't motivated by communism at all.
#71320 to #71319 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
thats just what a commie would say
#71303 to #71279 - anonymous (10/31/2014) [-]
The death penalty has never worked as a deterrent against any major crimes and it's impossible to bring some one back from the dead if you found out they were innocent after the fact (unlike life in prison). So my choice would be life in prison.
#71317 to #71303 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
that wasn't a choice you hippie fuck
User avatar #71291 to #71279 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
Back to the head like a jew...
#71288 to #71279 - anonymous (10/30/2014) [-]
George Carlin - Death Penalty
User avatar #71287 to #71279 - ablueguy (10/30/2014) [-]
Firing Squad.
User avatar #71284 to #71279 - jewishcommunazi (10/30/2014) [-]
None of those. I'd prefer bullet in the head like you, but each individual at a time, not firing squad.
#71285 to #71284 - youregaylol (10/30/2014) [-]
more bullets=less chance of survival

unless you want to put one behind the ear, but thats kinda gross and you might get brains on you.
User avatar #71290 to #71285 - jewishcommunazi (10/30/2014) [-]
I was thinking about point blank on the back of the head with a typical handgun.
User avatar #71286 to #71285 - alimais (10/30/2014) [-]
Depends on the caliber of the bullet
User avatar #71282 to #71279 - feelythefeel (10/30/2014) [-]
If you have to have the death penalty, I'd prefer lethal injection. It's the least needlessly cruel option. Having them killed should be more than enough punishment anyways.
User avatar #71293 to #71282 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
The opposite I would say, killing them is almost like not enough but I would not advise torture. Lethal injection costs too much and is stupid, back of the head seems barbaric but just better in cost and time efficiency.
#71283 to #71282 - youregaylol (10/30/2014) [-]
except when they fuck it up, then its one of the most painful ways to go.
0
#71281 to #71279 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #71265 - feelythefeel (10/30/2014) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_Wave

So many things started to make sense.
#71273 to #71265 - youregaylol (10/30/2014) [-]
It actually sounds like the movement was a broad success. Students felt camaraderie with each other, their grades and enthusiasm improved, the classroom became much more efficient, classroom buffoonery disappeared, each student felt like he was part of something big and important, and they all felt like they belonged.

Improved grades, less roughhousing, and a sense of community. All ruined by "muh evil nazi" rhetoric by the professor. This doesn't prove anything except that leftists will always be ignorant of progress and will always try to bring down those who are succeeding.
User avatar #71280 to #71273 - feelythefeel (10/30/2014) [-]
I didn't mean to make a comment on that, I suppose I meant to say "Radicalized groups" instead of fascists.
User avatar #71268 to #71267 - feelythefeel (10/30/2014) [-]
Have you even read the article? It's about a social experiment that details how fascists can take over a democracy. Specifically, it explains a lot about GamerGate's radfem problems.
User avatar #71269 to #71268 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
Acta non verba feely.
User avatar #71270 to #71269 - feelythefeel (10/30/2014) [-]
How do you acta on this?
User avatar #71271 to #71270 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
If I told you, I would have to kill you.
;)
User avatar #71250 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Apple's CEO just came out as gay.

Let the SJW circle jerk begin
User avatar #71263 to #71250 - alimais (10/30/2014) [-]
Apple, YES
User avatar #71292 to #71263 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
NO, that's not good. Apple is already a symbol of stupid leftist hipsters in North America. Now its only worse, "deh ceo is le ghey apul is very moden n gud ; )"
User avatar #71297 to #71292 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Now if you buy a PC, you are a homophobe I bet.
User avatar #71260 to #71250 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
GOD DAMMIT. GOD FUCKING DAMMIT.
User avatar #71253 to #71250 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
hue
#71236 - anonymous (10/30/2014) [-]
What you discover in a democracy is that it is difficult to build a house when each nail has an opinion.
User avatar #71244 to #71236 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
10/10
User avatar #71243 to #71236 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
piss off, commie scum
User avatar #71245 to #71243 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
Commies are egalitarian and democratic-ish.
#71274 to #71245 - youregaylol (10/30/2014) [-]
A nation run by peasants will find a dictator.
User avatar #71347 to #71274 - jewishcommunazi (10/31/2014) [-]
It's usually the bureacrats who turn despotic, the peasants did quite alright the only time the peasants got to rule the country through communism I can think of.
#71348 to #71347 - youregaylol (10/31/2014) [-]
peasants can't run shit because they're uneducated simpletons who believe that sucking on a baby's penis will cure it's illnesses (true story, soviets were degenerate as fuck, look it up)

for anything to get done they would need a mustached mass murderer to take control of their lives to redistribute their 4 carrots and 2 potatoes to the masses.
User avatar #71349 to #71348 - jewishcommunazi (10/31/2014) [-]
"Peasants can't run shit because they're uneducated simpletons who believe that sucking on a baby's penis will cure it's illnesses (true story, soviets were degenerate as fuck, look it up)"
I do believed it. I was thinking of Maoist China rather than Stalinist Russia because Maoist China actually transferred the class struggle from the urban proletariat to the peasants because that's what applied to China's conditions whereas Russia focused more on proletarians. When the CCP took control, it took care of educating the uneducated peasants. The already educated ones were the ones that initially led the revolution, that's what the vanguard party is for. Maoist China, although authoritarian was very democratic-ish for most of the time.
User avatar #71350 to #71349 - jewishcommunazi (10/31/2014) [-]
*Believe.
User avatar #71275 to #71274 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
hue
User avatar #71247 to #71245 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
commies don't care about the individual; they care about the collective
#71254 to #71251 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
This is what happens to individuals when they go against the collective.
they simply refused to work
User avatar #71256 to #71254 - jewishcommunazi (10/30/2014) [-]
What's the context?
User avatar #71258 to #71256 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
Evil capitalist with suits and big bags of money with the $ on it got liberated and all of their stolen goods returned to the people.
User avatar #71262 to #71258 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
You can clearly see all the money. These men were obviously rich, look at their amazing suits! Moron.
User avatar #71261 to #71258 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
10/10 Not biased at all
User avatar #71252 to #71251 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Workers are merely tools of production; they're not allowed to have free will.
Dissenting opinions are not allowed.
Free movement of resources are not allowed.
User avatar #71298 to #71252 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Sounds like my old job, hue
User avatar #71304 to #71298 - pebar ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
but there you would be free to not work
User avatar #71309 to #71304 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
not really. Here is a story

One day I had to do a mandatory 12 hour shift...2pm to 2am with no breaks...just a lunch hour which was effectively 20 minutes. I get home and go straight to bed...I get a call at 5am telling me to come in for another mandatory 12 hour shift starting at 6am. I tell them I'm sleeping and I just got off a 12 hour shift, and they threatened me with termination. So I was not free to not work.
User avatar #71312 to #71309 - pebar ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
The ability to quit is still more than what you would have under communism
User avatar #71315 to #71312 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
They have you by the balls. Work a shitty job and get money, or have no money...or you can keep yourself open to new employment at all times.

But yes, it is better than communism...but not by much. Any company that tells you that you are just property is just garbage.
User avatar #71255 to #71252 - jewishcommunazi (10/30/2014) [-]
Workers are at last not actually coerced by economic conditions to become tools of production. Something you rarely see under capitalism;
Not only allowed, but encouraged;
We want "free movement of resources". We were never ideologically isolationist, but we have to resist imperialism.
User avatar #71259 to #71255 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Free movement of resources, meaning private trade, not just international trade.
If I have something you want and you're willing to pay for it, you shouldn't need permission from the government to do that.
User avatar #71266 to #71259 - jewishcommunazi (10/30/2014) [-]
Sure, our system will get rid of those kinds of things by making them irrelevant, but your lemonade stand won't pose much of a threat to our goals.
User avatar #71257 to #71255 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
> but we have to resist imperialism.
By imperialism, and not being what you said.
User avatar #71249 to #71247 - schnizel (10/30/2014) [-]
Well, and all you care about is yourself. But to be honest, all they care is their ideology, if the collective is not with them they will kill it.
#71235 - youregaylol (10/30/2014) [-]
if your county isn't 90% percent white you don't live in america
#71246 to #71235 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
91.2%
91.2%
#71248 to #71246 - youregaylol (10/30/2014) [-]
midwestern bastard

ill be coming there when shit hits the fan
User avatar #71230 to #71228 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
I forgot u exist
User avatar #71232 to #71230 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Yeh i've been mostly hanging around on 8chan's /pol/
User avatar #71233 to #71232 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
You? You've never come across as anyone that would enjoy what /pol/ would have.
Also use 4 > 8
User avatar #71234 to #71233 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
I love the dark humor and aside from the Stormfront people there's also a notable group of Libertarians. I like 8chan because of it's feature that allows you to make your own board.
User avatar #71238 to #71234 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
4 /pol/ is compromised of mostly extreme right wing, christians or norse god believers with some liberterians and others
User avatar #71239 to #71238 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Lel sounds pretty much like Metapedia.
User avatar #71240 to #71239 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
Well do you classify yourself as libertarian, obviously your not right wing tranny so how could you enjoy a place like that if everyone is pretty much on the opposite side of your opinion, unless 8chan has a much more pussified /pol/ that doesnt lean right.
User avatar #71241 to #71240 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
I'm not right-wing in terms of the authoritarian right that's true. But i'm definitely right leaning.

There's pretty much two reasons why i go on /pol/. First It's pretty much the only decent politics board there with the other two being /leftypol/ which is filled with socialists and /anarcho/ which is just a massive bitchfest battlefield between Anarcho-Capitalists and Anarco-Syndicalists. And second i just really respect the board because it dares to be politically incorrect and pro free speech.
#71229 to #71223 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Blocking Access to Birth Control?! ‌‌ - Lee Doren Holy shit......
User avatar #71301 to #71229 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
I remember when it was common for people to have a job that provided insurance and benefits...but since some states are busting unions and we have right to work laws, and at will termination laws....it seems like we are being conditioned to accept shittier jobs with shittier pay till we get down to shit-tier jobs for all, with shit-tier pay for all....



And everyone will blame Obama.
User avatar #71305 to #71301 - pebar ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
Milton Friedman - The Real World Effects Of Unions the benefits of unions are oversold
User avatar #71308 to #71305 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
well because of unions we have holiday pay, the 5 day work week, 8 hour days, OSHA, wages (for the most part, workers were paid in company vouchers instead of money). Actual workers rights.

Do you think we'd be able to keep them if collective bargaining rights were abolished?
User avatar #71311 to #71308 - pebar ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
I am not in favor of abolishing unions, I just don't think they should get special privileges from government.

But I also do not believe unions are to thank for the things you said. Capital accumulation does way more to improve the standard of living of a society than simply restricting the supply of labor.
User avatar #71313 to #71311 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
None of those things existed en mass before unions.

My grandpa remembers the first time he was paid in money instead of vouchers, the first thing he did was get a hot meal for his wife at the time and himself.
User avatar #71314 to #71313 - pebar ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
But they still exist in places where unions barely play any role
User avatar #71316 to #71314 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/31/2014) [-]
Because of laws.

You can't not pay people.

In many states you can't be forced to work for more than 12 hours per shift in some industries (I work in manufacturing, and it's defiantly an issue). Safety standards are national with OSHA, and even states that don't have unions have minimum wage.

Workers unions help protect those, even if they aren't part of the union.
User avatar #71209 - undeadwill (10/30/2014) [-]
Great to be back guys.
User avatar #71213 to #71209 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
Jesus christ, are you actually staying or are you gonna torture yourself on tumblr you fucking dunce.
User avatar #71215 to #71213 - undeadwill (10/30/2014) [-]
I am staying while still fighting the good fight on the front lines
User avatar #71216 to #71215 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
No, you are in the enemy lines shooting chickens in the forest, useless.
User avatar #71217 to #71216 - undeadwill (10/30/2014) [-]
>Says the coward.
The stupid SJW's need a circle jerk to function.
User avatar #71218 to #71217 - undeadwill (10/30/2014) [-]
I deny them that forcing them to retreat from what is a site for young users and keep them from their propaganda center
User avatar #71219 to #71218 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
I'll give you that. Progressiveness is a institutional machine now present in education.
#71204 - anonymous (10/30/2014) [-]
A country with more goats in relation to people is less likely to get into a thermal nuclear war.

Proof:
Goats are usually the livestock of poorer people thus suggesting a larger stock of farmers and poor people.
Poor people and young farm hands get drafted,
They hold a particular military advantage over city or middle class soldiers in morale, shooting skills, and etc.
These countries have a better fighting force and therefore know that they do not need to relay on nuclear arms in defense
Thus a nation will be less likely to have nukes (poorer population) as well will not need them with a better fighting force.
#71203 - ribocoon (10/30/2014) [-]
I love living in Georgia
User avatar #71214 to #71203 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
Confirmed for FPS Kyle/Russia
User avatar #71211 to #71203 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
The US state or Russia's anus?
User avatar #71212 to #71211 - ribocoon (10/30/2014) [-]
US anus
#71199 - anonymous (10/29/2014) [-]
How does the free market fix Islam ?    
   
Islam - 1    
   
Libtards - 0
How does the free market fix Islam ?

Islam - 1

Libtards - 0
User avatar #71200 to #71199 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
sharia would not be enforceable
User avatar #71205 to #71200 - undeadwill (10/30/2014) [-]
Rekt.
#71197 - anonymous (10/29/2014) [-]
How does the free market fix feminism ?     
   
Feminists - 1    
   
Libtards - 0
How does the free market fix feminism ?

Feminists - 1

Libtards - 0
User avatar #71201 to #71197 - pebar ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
feminist bitching means nothing when they don't get special privileges from government
User avatar #71181 - feelythefeel (10/29/2014) [-]
Fun fact, transsexualism is a mental disability. It's a kind of dissociative identity disorder known as gender dysphoria, and it's a primary subject of research for Johns Hopkins University, which is an authority on dissociative disorders (They commonly treat people who, say, believe that they're clinically dead or that their arm belongs to someone else). They also pioneered transition surgery. They don't do it anymore, because they found that reinforcing the patient's delusions doesn't help solve them and in many cases only makes them worse, sometimes leading to suicide.

tl:dr Transsexuals are mentally ill and LGBTQ or whatever is only making it worse. Like the whole headmates thing x1000.
User avatar #71220 to #71181 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
princessren, say something about this
#71222 to #71220 - princessren (10/30/2014) [-]
uuuugh
>replying to this on a board where everyone thinks trans people are degenerates
fine
I have heard of studies saying MtFs who get SRS suicide rates go up, I guess because the technology is still pretty bad or something, I dunno
but also that most Doctors still recommend other parts of transition like estrogen and what not, as well as most MtFs saying transitioning in that way makes them feel better/less depressed and suicidal

now please leave me alone
User avatar #71224 to #71222 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
I just wanted to make you slightly sad if possible, really the point of feely's post was to state that what you have is something like a mental disorder. You got the wrong kind of autism in you, sweet-it (I'd call you sweetheart but I'd prefer to refer to you as a non-human)
User avatar #71227 to #71224 - feelythefeel (10/30/2014) [-]
Okay, I wouldn't go that far. That's r00d.
User avatar #71225 to #71224 - princessren (10/30/2014) [-]
<3
I don't think I ever disagreed that there is something wrong with my head
User avatar #71210 to #71181 - akkere (10/30/2014) [-]
I think the biggest problem is when the LGBBQ community takes the parenting side to extremes where they'll enforce their "gender neutrality" to the extent that they dictate what gender their children actually are (i.e. You're not male because you have a penis, you're female because that's different and different is good. Yaaayy different~". Having more parents willing to adopt is necessary to help unload from the dysfunctional system that is the foster care system, but placing children in a new form of psychological abuse is an entirely different dilemma entirely.
#71195 to #71181 - anonymous (10/29/2014) [-]
it's all a conspiracy to lower the population.
#71193 to #71181 - youregaylol (10/29/2014) [-]
I just thought it was funny that as soon as Dr.Paul McHugh called it a mental disorder LGBT types labeled him a quake, despite him having 100+ peer reviewed medical articles and 6 books under his belt.

As soon as you disagree with the mainstream everything you accomplish is destroyed.
#71198 to #71193 - youregaylol (10/29/2014) [-]
princessren
User avatar #71182 to #71181 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/29/2014) [-]
I'm proud of you this time.

also princessren
User avatar #71183 to #71182 - feelythefeel (10/29/2014) [-]
I'm starting to call myself a pragmatic democrat. A democrat with logical cessions to the right.
User avatar #71184 to #71183 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/29/2014) [-]
Is there any other term you could use? Once you call yourself democrat you basically hand over your opinions to whatever that party believes and does, same for republican.
User avatar #71185 to #71184 - feelythefeel (10/29/2014) [-]
Pragmatic Leftism? That's the only other term I could come up with.
User avatar #71186 to #71185 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/29/2014) [-]
They all sound horrible. What makes you label yourself left again?
Like I believe in universal healthcare at the minimum but I don't call myself left or democrat.
User avatar #71187 to #71186 - feelythefeel (10/29/2014) [-]
I agree with a lot of ideas of the left, such as universal (Or at least subsidized) healthcare, welfare just high enough to sustain life and just low enough to incentivize actual work and effort, sexual rights (In most cases), government funded secular education, etc etc. I probably wouldn't even be making cessions to the right if it weren't for modern leftism fucking everything.
User avatar #71189 to #71187 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/29/2014) [-]
I'd agree with everything, even welfare in some cases (its too lenient in Canada for sure) and immigrants should not be allowed to go on welfare.
The sexual rights and secular education thing is kinda obvious and shouldnt really be seen as a left thing. Most people on here that are right, are "progressive" on social issues. I don't really think that's what sets left and right apart. I think it should mainly be about foreign and economic decisions.
User avatar #71190 to #71189 - feelythefeel (10/29/2014) [-]
List some things that would be considered "Right" in those areas.
User avatar #71221 to #71190 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
Topics to determine for me whether someone is right/left are:
immigration
welfare
budget/tax of different classes
attitude towards corporations
attitude of government
gun issue

i like to put social issues into another place. But it is really common that leftist economics and social leftism go hand in hand, on the right it's kinda different. you have conservatism (republicans), libertarianism, nat soc (which is socialism with nationalism so why is it even right) /facism which all have kinda different views on culture and economics but they still get sent to this side.
User avatar #71226 to #71221 - feelythefeel (10/30/2014) [-]
Immigration should be focused on incentivising valuable foreign labour to contribute to your economy.
Welfare should be given to people in an amount enough to support life, but still just little enough to incentivize actual work and effort.
I believe in a light progressive tax. Not enough to destroy your market competitiveness, though.
Limitations should be put on corporations to prevent circumstances that are bad for the country (Such as monopolies or business practices that can negatively affect or even harm their consumers), but again, not enough to destroy your market competitiveness.
"The government" is pretty broad, I have a hard time answering that.
Regulation should be in place for firearms (Such as required training and/or testing, civilian sector bans on ridiculously destructive weapons, etc etc), but as long as the regulation is strict enough to ensure that people with legal firearms are generally people who can be trusted with firearms, I agree with the right to bear arms.
User avatar #71231 to #71226 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/30/2014) [-]
All of these are easier said then done though.
User avatar #71237 to #71231 - feelythefeel (10/30/2014) [-]
Well that's just how I believe it should be.
User avatar #71191 to #71190 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/29/2014) [-]
When I get back ill try
User avatar #71196 to #71168 - mixednuts (10/29/2014) [-]
This is a bit outdated, same sex marriage is legal in about 37 states now.
User avatar #71171 to #71168 - levvy ONLINE (10/29/2014) [-]
Less degenerate regions then I thought.
#71177 to #71169 - anonymous (10/29/2014) [-]
...so?
User avatar #71180 to #71177 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/29/2014) [-]
Just sharing info.
User avatar #71170 to #71169 - lulzformalaysiaair (10/29/2014) [-]
So easy to see patterns.
#71156 - ronjeremysweiner (10/29/2014) [-]
TLDR ten year old afghan girl wins rape case against
www.cosmopolitan.co.uk/reports/news/a30751/prison-for-afghan-mullah-who-raped-a-10-year-old-girl-inside-his-mosque/
saw on reddit thought it was cool, sad at the end though
User avatar #71174 to #71156 - levvy ONLINE (10/29/2014) [-]
A religion that raped someone...

This is not a new thing - isn't it kind of a joke now?
#71289 to #71174 - ronjeremysweiner (10/30/2014) [-]
its interesting b/c the women won the case even though its in Afghanistan
#71151 - anonymous (10/28/2014) [-]
Does stigmatizing or flat out prohibiting something make it more desirable?
User avatar #71153 to #71151 - feelythefeel (10/28/2014) [-]
At the very least outlawing something makes it more dangerous to attain without effectively lessening it's desirability.
User avatar #71152 to #71151 - pebar ONLINE (10/28/2014) [-]
It can potentially have an effect, yes.
User avatar #71206 to #71132 - undeadwill (10/30/2014) [-]
This is most posts on the subject matter on tumblr.
User avatar #71172 to #71132 - levvy ONLINE (10/29/2014) [-]
XDDDDDD
User avatar #71299 to #71125 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (10/30/2014) [-]
Except the proposed voter ID laws are similar to Jim Crow voting laws. Making it harder to vote. Sure everyone was subject to the law, but some people had an easier time getting by it due to social status...same with proposed voter ID laws. The new laws target the elderly, minorities, and college students...groups that tend to vote democrat, making it harder for them to vote.

Now if it was a proper voter ID instead of using the drivers license (or if you could put it on your license like the organ donor sticky), and make it easier to register to vote without the need of an ID but still provide proof or residency it would get the job done, but not be supression of votes.
User avatar #71134 to #71125 - leadstriker (10/28/2014) [-]
look up poll tax
#71143 to #71134 - anonymous (10/28/2014) [-]
it's not a tax, though
 Friends (0)