Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#59710 - byposted (03/14/2014) [-]
You need to login to view this link

“We are sorry to note that yesterday there were a lot of non-Ukrainian citizens in Donetsk”, said Mr. Taruta.

I'm sorry to note that Taruta is a kike. Serhiy Taruta, pictured, is actually the same Jewish oligarch who bankrupted the Gdansk ship yards, a historically symbolic industrial area of Poland, after years of neglect and misconduct. He received the governorship of Donetsk, Ukraine after the so-called "fascist" Revolution.

Mr. Taruta promised to take every step to ensure Donbas also becomes the center of reforms.

Assassination of enemies is something typically seen when oligarchs come to have such brazen control over a nation. I'm sure Taruta has a band of armed thugs ready to enforce his "reforms," which will gravitate around filling his pockets.
#59653 - byposted (03/14/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=geaQeXTmWuA
"Mr. President, it's all about the freedom. We fight for our freedom, we fight for our independence, we fight for our sovereignty and we will never surrender." - Arseniy Yatsenyuk ()

Yatsenyuk, who is the Ukrainian Provisional Government's PM, was a US favorite well before the coup:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL_GShyGv3o&t=0m59s

Such comes not as a surprise given his connections. The German Marshal Fund, which is a listed sponsor of Yatsenyuk's organization, was founded by Guido Goldman, () whose father, Nahum Goldman, was a prominent Zionist.

Nahum Goldman was, more specifically, co-founder of the World Jewish Congress. Today, the WJC's Vice President is Joseph Zissels, a "Ukrainian-Jew" who has never left his home country's political scene. He addressed Ukrainian protestors in December of last year:

"The government [of Yuschenko] knows of our weaknesses, of our eternal problem of choice, and wants to attract us to its side again, to scare us with “nationalists and Fascists"...The government uses different ruses and provocations to force us to remain in our Eurasian past." - Joseph Zissels ()
openukraine.org/en/about/partners
You need to login to view this link
ukma.edu.ua/eng/index.php/news/482-speech-of-josef-zissels-at-euromaidan

In order to perpetuate the myth that what has occurred in Ukraine was a "fascist takeover," leftists continue to cite the role of Vice PM being in the hands of Oleksandr Sych, but ignore two things: the insignificance of this post within the state and the entirely counter-fascist Jewish PM, who, in fact, brought the All-Ukrainian Union within the Opposition Coalition precisely in order to steer developments in a kosher direction.

tl;dr Western Jewry has succeeded
User avatar #59654 to #59653 - byposted (03/14/2014) [-]
of Yanukovych*
0
#59652 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#59650 - pebar ONLINE (03/13/2014) [-]
www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/03/13/the-real-reason-why-the-obama-administration-has-not-released-pictures-of-osama-bin-ladens-corpse/   
   
The “real reason” the White House has yet to release photos of Osama bin Laden’s corpse is because U.S. troops “took turns dumping magazines-worth of ammunition” into the terror leader’s body, according to a new SOFREP report. Citing unnamed sources within the special ops community, the report alleges bin Laden “had over a hundred bullets in him, by the most conservative estimate.”
www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/03/13/the-real-reason-why-the-obama-administration-has-not-released-pictures-of-osama-bin-ladens-corpse/

The “real reason” the White House has yet to release photos of Osama bin Laden’s corpse is because U.S. troops “took turns dumping magazines-worth of ammunition” into the terror leader’s body, according to a new SOFREP report. Citing unnamed sources within the special ops community, the report alleges bin Laden “had over a hundred bullets in him, by the most conservative estimate.”
User avatar #59711 to #59650 - revengeforfreeze (03/14/2014) [-]
Brock don't spaz the fuck on cum kids since the gelatin still fucks people
#59661 to #59650 - dehumanizer (03/14/2014) [-]
>implying they actualy killed Osama
>implying they didnt lie so that Obama can get more votes
>implying i dont consider Osama a personal hero
User avatar #59665 to #59661 - hawaiianhappysauce (03/14/2014) [-]
Thought that picture would support that claim, now I'm disappointed.
0
#59645 - zev has deleted their comment [-]
#59638 - schnizel (03/13/2014) [-]
>mfw my teacher is a nationalist
User avatar #59642 to #59638 - teoragnar (03/13/2014) [-]
Are you using this pic for everything?
User avatar #59643 to #59642 - schnizel (03/13/2014) [-]
Yep.
User avatar #59644 to #59643 - teoragnar (03/13/2014) [-]
I am disappointed that you didn't used it as reply to me
User avatar #59640 to #59638 - pebar ONLINE (03/13/2014) [-]
Like "dah ebil joooz" kind
or "I'll support my country in desperate times" kind?
User avatar #59641 to #59640 - schnizel (03/13/2014) [-]
In the middle.
User avatar #59639 to #59637 - schnizel (03/13/2014) [-]
Damn.
#59635 - anonymous (03/13/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOubzHCUt48

Not sure where to put this, but I reckon here would be the only place to discuss conspiracy theories as well

I never believed in this illuminati bullshit, but to be honest, the uhm.. The star, while not being a pentagram, and the random triangles throughout the video are making me kinda itchy. Has anyone ever found evidence that the Illuminati exists or anything like it?

Also, how does the rumour go, is it supposed to be illuminati that is controlling the Jews or the other way around?
#59629 - pebar ONLINE (03/13/2014) [-]
Do you ever wonder... maybe the other side is right?

maybe a mixed economy with multiple welfare services is better than laissez-faire.......
#59706 to #59629 - jewishcommunazi (03/14/2014) [-]
Maybe the free market will fix it!
User avatar #59668 to #59629 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
You question because deep down you know you really want a system that improves the lives of everyone. You want people to be better off and it is a major point of why we believe in the free market at our hearts we want to help people and so we research and study to find a solution that benefits everyone involved.
User avatar #59655 to #59629 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
All the time but then I stop doing so much cocaine.

(But yeah I do.)
User avatar #59651 to #59629 - jewishcommunazi (03/13/2014) [-]
I think about it sometimes.
User avatar #59633 to #59629 - schnizel (03/13/2014) [-]
> laissez-faire
Works only with everyone knowing what to do, I mean everyone.
Better safe than sorry.
User avatar #59656 to #59633 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
>implying people need to be told what to do
User avatar #59707 to #59656 - teoragnar (03/14/2014) [-]
Ah, yes, they do.
User avatar #59663 to #59656 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
Hey son, we got a new order from a custo.......
Don't tell me what to do!!!!
User avatar #59667 to #59663 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
That is shit posting to the extreme.

And doesn't really make sense.
User avatar #59669 to #59667 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
>implying people need to be told what to do
>Hey son, we got a new order from a custo.......
Don't tell me what to do!!!!

It was an example of people that don't need to be told what to do.
User avatar #59670 to #59669 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
You were saying that the STATE should be the one to tell them what to do.

>Hey son I got an order for these parts , can you go get them?
>I don't want to.
>Then you won't be paid for the parts.
>If you want the money get the parts.

That is how is works. You don't need to tell people what to do backed up with force.
All you need is incentives.
User avatar #59675 to #59670 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
And with what do you have a problem?
User avatar #59677 to #59675 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
I like to know where it is you find the faults with capitalism.
User avatar #59672 to #59670 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
Even good people need laws.
And who is the state, a group of people sworn to serve the people.
What about the all tax is theft and there should be no goverment?
User avatar #59678 to #59672 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
You are confused on what libertarianism is, because it is not anarchy. Especially because this is an debate over economics and you continue to make viewpoints over the place and power of the government rather than economics. Just like every SJW and Progressive.

"a group of people sworn to serve the people. " lol k. Swore by what? What is keeping them from abusing their power? Nothing at all.

All tax is theft, that is a fact however
User avatar #59682 to #59678 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
They can be useful for paying for the military and the police which everyone is happy to pay into.
User avatar #59684 to #59682 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
>which everyone is happy to pay into
So it's a tax but with a smile on their face?
Same as that there should be no punishment for not obeying the law, since people are glad to follow it.
User avatar #59681 to #59678 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
>libertarianism is, because it is not anarchy
Well, my experience says otherwise.
>What is keeping them from abusing their power?
Their own loyalty and law, if no that, a gun if they don't work for the people then they will serve on the fireing line.
How is all tax theft?
How are people supposed to pay for roads, police, firefighters, army, etc....
User avatar #59685 to #59681 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
Explain.

What loyalty? What makes you think they will respect the law? What hol

We don't pay for firefighters, we pay for equipment, as many are volunteer fire fighters which the free market has been proven to be far better at.
Roads paid by toll roads.
Army and police are paid by the government through taxation.
User avatar #59687 to #59685 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]

loyalty
Use Loyalty in a sentence
loy·al·ty
[loi-uhl-tee] Show IPA
noun, plural loy·al·ties.
1.
the state or quality of being loyal; faithfulness to commitments or obligations.
2.
faithful adherence to a sovereign, government, leader, cause, etc.
3.
an example or instance of faithfulness, adherence, or the like: a man with fierce loyalties.
User avatar #59689 to #59687 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
I did not question the definition but the existence of that in a politician
User avatar #59690 to #59689 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
Then what makes a good man?
User avatar #59691 to #59690 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
irrelevant.
User avatar #59693 to #59691 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
Not irrelevant.
I asked you what makes a good man? Since you implied by your answers that no man is good enough to lead and not loyal enough to fight for the people.
User avatar #59695 to #59693 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
I want to hear you tell me what makes a good leader, and how do you find it
#59698 to #59695 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
You are born with it.
A feeling of eternal duty and loyalty to your people.
User avatar #59700 to #59698 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
lol k.
#59704 to #59700 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
Man>Money.
But for you it goes like this?
Money>Man?
User avatar #59702 to #59700 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
Just because you stand for nothing and has not higher purpose in life than money does not mean other people are the same.
User avatar #59703 to #59702 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
"No higher purpose other than money"

Wow. Pebar schizel has reach a new low.
User avatar #59686 to #59685 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
>Army and police are paid by the government through taxation.
Taxation is theft.
>What loyalty? What makes you think they will respect the law?
What makes you think you are going to respect the law?
>We don't pay for firefighters, we pay for equipment, as many are volunteer fire fighters which the free market has been proven to be far better at.
Instead of trained pros you get 18-yearold kids who want to be firefighters?
>Roads paid by toll roads.
Which need to be on a road in the first place, and isn't that tax?
User avatar #59688 to #59686 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
Yes and war is murder but that doesn't stop army b from committing it.

Consequences which for a ruler their are none.

>implying the private fire stations don't hire trained pros

You are really push the tard button hard.
User avatar #59692 to #59688 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
>many are volunteer fire fighters which the free market has been proven to be far better at
Volunteer=/=Trained professional
And how are these private owned fire stations going to be paid for, I will extinguish the fire, but first, I want some green on the table?
>Yes and war is murder but that doesn't stop army b from committing it.
War is a matter of interest and you are a fool to think that people go to war just to kill others. Do you even know why a nation goes to war?
>Consequences which for a ruler their are none.
So once people get power they will become greedy?
User avatar #59694 to #59692 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
I said the privatized fire fighters were better than the volunteers.

Same with the system we have now.

Its been known to happen.
User avatar #59696 to #59694 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
You say but with no explenation and you avoid answering my questions.
User avatar #59697 to #59696 - undeadwill ONLINE (03/14/2014) [-]
You have avoided mine the entire time. So I'm getting off now
User avatar #59705 to #59697 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
All respect I have had for you is now gone.
User avatar #59701 to #59697 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
Do you even read what I said?
User avatar #59699 to #59697 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
What questions?
User avatar #59634 to #59633 - Shiny (03/13/2014) [-]
Everyone has their own definition of what a "free market" is. Some people literally think that it requires the government to not exist.
User avatar #59664 to #59634 - schnizel (03/14/2014) [-]
Explain.
User avatar #59841 to #59664 - johnstuartmill (03/18/2014) [-]
Its plainly obvious what he means.... Some people have a more lenient opinions on how much government can interfere in the marketplace and still call it a free market.
User avatar #59632 to #59629 - Shiny (03/13/2014) [-]
Often, but that's a great thing. Challenging one's own beliefs is important.
#59630 to #59629 - nigeltheoutlaw ONLINE (03/13/2014) [-]
Wow, I am surprised to see this from you. I personally think that it is right, but that's just me.
User avatar #59628 - jewishcommunazi (03/12/2014) [-]
Because we have relatively new members, what are your political views (and why, in case you want to go that way)?
User avatar #59825 to #59628 - johnstuartmill (03/17/2014) [-]
Add a tally to the Libertarians! I would say because of Ayn Rand, but then I would be lying to you.
#59625 - anonymous (03/12/2014) [-]
"Political correctness is a war against awareness"
#59631 to #59625 - anonymous (03/13/2014) [-]
Political correctness is a buzzword that's not even strong enough to have weight
#59636 to #59631 - anonymous (03/13/2014) [-]
Yes, a buzzword used by liberals to signify "muh feelings have been hurt".
User avatar #59620 - pebar ONLINE (03/12/2014) [-]
John Stossel - Europe's Privilege Class
#59614 - pebar ONLINE (03/11/2014) [-]
www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/us-usa-cia-interrogations-idUSBREA2A0XY20140311
Senators tend to get bitchy when they're the ones being spied on

It says the.... *gasp*... constitution might have been violated
User avatar #59621 to #59614 - azumeow (03/12/2014) [-]
They might actually do something about it now.

Haha no, not really.
User avatar #59616 to #59614 - schnizel (03/11/2014) [-]
'merica
User avatar #59617 to #59613 - schnizel (03/11/2014) [-]
'krain
User avatar #59626 to #59617 - revengeforfreeze (03/12/2014) [-]
Hahahaha
#59610 to #59603 - anonymous (03/10/2014) [-]
it's so hard being oppressed
User avatar #59585 to #59584 - schnizel (03/10/2014) [-]
FJ name or ban
User avatar #59591 to #59585 - teoragnar (03/10/2014) [-]
Are you gonna do anything or what?
User avatar #59593 to #59591 - schnizel (03/10/2014) [-]
its over
User avatar #59594 to #59593 - teoragnar (03/10/2014) [-]
it's never ogre.
User avatar #59596 to #59594 - schnizel (03/10/2014) [-]
we will continue tomorrow
User avatar #59597 to #59596 - teoragnar (03/10/2014) [-]
fuq u fgt
#59576 - pebar ONLINE (03/10/2014) [-]
Even the unions hate it   
www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/10/obamacare-will-hasten-income-inequality-union-report-says/   
   
A new report from a major U.S. union says ObamaCare will hasten income inequality.   
   
Although it defends the intent behind the Affordable Care Act, the report, entitled “The Irony of ObamaCare: Making inequality worse,” concludes that the law will transfer a billion dollars in wealth to insurance companies, uneven the playing field in the market, force employers to cut back on hours and result in pay decreases, Ralston Reports said.   
   
“The promise of Obamacare was the right one and the hope for extending healthcare coverage to the un-and under-insured a step in the right direction,” the report says. “Yet the unintended consequences will hit the average, hard-working American where it hurts: in the wallet.”
Even the unions hate it
www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/10/obamacare-will-hasten-income-inequality-union-report-says/

A new report from a major U.S. union says ObamaCare will hasten income inequality.

Although it defends the intent behind the Affordable Care Act, the report, entitled “The Irony of ObamaCare: Making inequality worse,” concludes that the law will transfer a billion dollars in wealth to insurance companies, uneven the playing field in the market, force employers to cut back on hours and result in pay decreases, Ralston Reports said.

“The promise of Obamacare was the right one and the hope for extending healthcare coverage to the un-and under-insured a step in the right direction,” the report says. “Yet the unintended consequences will hit the average, hard-working American where it hurts: in the wallet.”
User avatar #59595 to #59576 - Shiny (03/10/2014) [-]
"concludes that the law will transfer a billion dollars in wealth to insurance companies, uneven the playing field in the market, force employers to cut back on hours and result in pay decreases"

Hold on a second. I'm no fan of the ACA, but all this is saying is that more people will have health insurance and thus be paying for it. It's a clever play on language that heavily implies that companies will, or even should, resort directly to layoffs at even the slightest expense increase.
User avatar #59602 to #59595 - pebar ONLINE (03/10/2014) [-]
If it becomes too expensive to hire a new worker, companies are less likely to do it.
If a worker is so expensive that they are detrimental to the company, that worker will likely lose their job.
People are always complaining about how much unemployment we have so making it so it's no cost effective to hire people is the last thing you want to do.
User avatar #59607 to #59602 - Shiny (03/10/2014) [-]
Well, yes, but the intent of the article was obviously to make the report sound conspiratory and communistic.
User avatar #59589 to #59576 - Shiny (03/10/2014) [-]
I don't get why people continue to defend a practically ineffective bill just because it had a good intention.
 Friends (0)