Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (2): figatron, pebar, anonymous(6).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#117171 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
#117178 to #117171 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
>Have iPod Classic
>have pain in asshole neighbor Apu
>Apu only has iPod Nano
>Buttblasted nigger accuses me of child rape
>"Don't worry, there's no evidence"
>wrongfully convicted because justice system is stone-age tier
>balls removed
>get in prison
>months later, sentence is revoked
>"Oh well, at least I'll get paid damages"
>Show up at court clerk, bout to get that money
>remember I live in shithole
>"here's your compensation"

Such is life in Indonesia.

Also pretty ironic law coming from a country that practically worships a child rapist
#117172 to #117171 - indonesia
Reply +2
(05/26/2016) [-]
too bad you can't visit indonesia now
#117163 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
According to Associated Press, Trump has 1,238 delegates.
Not necessarily big news anymore, but at least it's official now.
#117166 to #117163 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
dope
#117156 - lotengo
Reply +3
(05/26/2016) [-]
IT"S

GOING

DOWN
#117220 to #117156 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
This is good for both of them.
Sanders is smart. He knows debating Trump will make him seem better in the eyes of hillary voters, hence swaying commifornia his direction.
Trump may, by being extra good in the debate, or even friendly, attract the anti-establishment part of the bernie voters given hillary wins, which is very likely.

Even if either part loses the debate massively, no one will care as long as they have, in fact, debated.
#117206 to #117156 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
god bless my son Bernie
#117164 to #117156 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Bernie will win because Trump doesn't know how to debate
#117177 to #117164 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Interesting.

Do you believe that Hilary is a better debater than the entire republican line up that Trump has defeated?

Because Hilary has defeated Bernie many times.

Do you believe that Bernie is second to Hilary yet greater than all the other republicans?

Seems a little far fetched.

Trump has won all of his debates, Bernie has mostly lost his. I don't see how Bernie can beat Trump when he can't even beat scandal clad Hillary.
#117207 to #117177 - shyyguy
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
Sorry, but when someone says "X candidate has won all of the debates", that's entirely up to each person's opinion. To me, Trump won the name-calling and buzzword contest. His stances lack substance, and he's not consistent.
#117168 to #117167 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
#117165 to #117164 - lotengo
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
#117169 to #117165 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
we're gonna build a wall; we're gonna make the mexicans pay for it
I know this one guy; he's a really great guy
I'm doing great in the polls; I just got the nomination
#117170 to #117169 - lotengo
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
I bet you didn't read the art of the deal.
In the primary elections its important to not get to technical. Just get the word out there, tell people who you are and what you stand for.
And he can defend the stances he takes very well.

Feel free to check this and debate me on it.
Donald Trumps Debates 5 Mental Tricks You Didnt Notice
#117159 to #117156 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
oh man, I'm pretty nervous about this one. Trump isn't really the substance-type.
#117160 to #117159 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
Thus far has hasn't been. But ever since he became the nominee he's become more and more "reliable". I think he can clutch a substance debate.
#117187 to #117160 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
reasonable doubt/10
#117157 to #117156 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Almost like he knows they won't be able to debate after the primaries.
#117151 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
does Bernie bern down the economy Sanders have a chance at winning the nomination?
#117208 to #117151 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
If Hill Dog gets arrested, then yeah. Her delegates can switch anytime.
#117173 to #117151 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
No.
#117155 to #117151 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Hillary's total delegate count is 2,282, she only needs 102 delegates to clinch the nomination. 102! Sanders needs 842.

Even if by miracle Sanders won all the delegates 100% from the Virgin Island, Puerto Rico, and all the non-Cali states Clinton would still clinch the nomination by winning at least over 21.47% in California.

But that's with superdelegates which could change their minds, what if we take those out of the picture?

Clinton has 1770 pledged delegates, Sanders has 1500. There's 761 remaining delegates left. If he got 521 delegates of these delegates and Clinton got the rest then he would beat her with 11 pledged delegates sitting at 2021 delegates.

Which means he would have to win 68% of all remaining delegates.

Which means in order to beat Hillary Clinton in pledged delegates he would have to win 68% of all remaining pledged delegates AND THEN he still would not have a majority meaning he would have to convince over 50% of superdelegates to vote for him and considering Clinton already has 72% of superdelegates and Sander has 6% he would need to convince 200 of superdelegates already supporting Clinton to get on his side.

So basically for Bernie Sanders to win he needs to:

- Get 68% of the remaining delegates
- Get 50% of the superdelegates, most of them already supporting Clinton

In other words: He's fucked.
#117162 to #117155 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Basically this. Getting 60% isn't necessarily uncommon for Sanders, he's done it in 9 states, but he can't possibly outpace Hillary to the nomination. Hillary's had 400 of the superdelegates on her side since early March, there's no way they're gonna dump her now if they've had the opportunity to over the last 3 months.
#117152 to #117151 - anon
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
I think he'd have to get like 70% in California.
#117135 - anon
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
#117141 to #117135 - kanadetenshi
Reply +2
(05/26/2016) [-]
My favorite part of the new Angry Birds movie is when the red bird calls the green Muslim pig a "tool of the kikes"
#117137 to #117135 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
wat
#117142 to #117137 - akkere
Reply +2
(05/26/2016) [-]
People think a spin-off of a smartphone game is an intelligent political commentary.
#117174 to #117142 - anon
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Sometimes I wonder if theism and youregaylol are the same person just self bickering themselves.
#117214 to #117174 - anon
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
they're two spurned lovers
#117158 to #117142 - youregaylol
Reply -1
(05/26/2016) [-]
I say the same thing when people talk about animal farm like it has any political message

like gawd, there are farm animals in it, wtf lmao
#117175 to #117158 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Allegorical novella written with political intent =/= tie in movie for a smartphone game
#117176 to #117175 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Nice damage control.

There is nothing preventing a tie in movie for a smartphone game having a deeper political message.

Your argument is basically "it's silly, so theres no way theres anything to it and if you do see something you're just a paranoid evil right wing fascist."

It's like me saying "lol you think zootopia is a commentary on race? It has a fucking talking bunny in it lmao leftist manchild."

Basically, you're wrong. Apologize pls.
#117179 to #117176 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
It's like you all don't know what that means. It's like when preteens on tumblr use quantum as a substitute for actual scientific knowledge.

No, my point is that your comparison is retarded. If you want to defend the movie you should try to quantify the statement.
#117180 to #117179 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Don't know what what means? Try and be a little coherent.

Yes, you know words like quantum and quantify, but when we get passed the pseudo intellectual pretense the facts are the same.

Movies with absurd premises can have deeper political messages. It's just that simple.
#117181 to #117180 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
It's perfectly coherent but I'll try to bring it down to your level. You're using the phrase wrong. It doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.

Yes, but the tie in movie for a mainstream smartphone game typically won't take a radical political stance. Maybe you'd like to support your argument based on this movie.
#117182 to #117181 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Oh you meant "damage control", be more specific next time, I'd rather not have to search for hours in a general direction to find the shit you threw across the room.

You realized me pointing out animal farm blew up your point, which caused you to grasp at straws. Hence, damage control. Simple.

I'm pretty sure this is the first tie in movie from a mainstream smartphone game dummy, nothing is typical. Animated films have had political messages for years, all the way back to Dumbo. Border control isn't a radical political stance.

You lose. Try again.
#117185 to #117182 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Although looking into it there does seem to be a political messages. Hopefully the actual movie is more intelligent than the summary I read implies but "immigrants will eat your babies so bomb them" may at least attract one crowd.
#117186 to #117185 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
dvd rip You need to login to view this link

as a movie, it's meh but not near as bad as you'd expect

as a movie with a message, its pretty good
#117183 to #117182 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
It's funny that you think a counterargument is grasping at straws. You realize you actually have to try to make people as delusional as you.

But yes, animated films can have political messages, that doesn't mean that all of them do. You could demonstrate why this one does but obviously that's not something you're capable of.

And I'm almost certain your version of border control isn't going to help a major motion picture a whole lot of traction.
#117184 to #117183 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
No no, I think that your response was grasping at straws because it was pathetic. I don't have to try to make you look delusional. You pull it off all on your own.

I'm glad you've conceded that "its just dumb cuz its dumb movie" point is stupid. The obvious political overtones in the movie are apparent in the same way zootopia pulls it off, subtly and in your face at various times. The conversation between the main character and the owl judge is a better example, with the angry bird pointing out that the other birds aren't asking obvious questions about the pig invaders and then the hyproctical raging from the owl bird.

The obvious passive nature of the populace as the pigs invade them, as well as the group think that causes them to be persuaded by the pigs sob story. Also "Hamnesty International." Really bruh.

One could argue that zootopia didn't need the overt racial elements to gain traction either. Nevertheless, they were there.
#117144 to #117142 - theism
Reply -1
(05/26/2016) [-]
Well to this sort of person it probably is.
#117130 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +2
(05/25/2016) [-]
Trump called Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas
#117161 to #117130 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
I prefer Faux-cahontas
#117134 to #117130 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
youre behind the times, he's been calling her that for a few weeks
#117117 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Update: I didn't realize I had to petition for the Spanish class so I signed up for the Nazi class in the meantime
But my current Spanish professor is gonna help me get into the class
#117122 to #117117 - whoozy
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
What on Earth is a "nazi class"?
#117123 to #117122 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
its a history class called "Nazi science, medicine, and technology"

it sounds cool so it was my backup class
#117125 to #117123 - whoozy
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
Nazi science, medicine and technology...
Oh God what the heck

That's some history lessions you got going for you. If someone opened a class like that in Germany I honestly believe people would try to burn the school down.
#117126 to #117125 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
isnt teaching the holocaust mandatory in germany

or is it only denying it is illegal
#117127 to #117126 - whoozy
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Teaching it yes, but having an entire class dedicated to Nazi science is unheard of to me at least.

But yes, denying the holocaust is illegal in Germany and Israel
#117128 to #117127 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Yea I just took a class on the holocaust
It sounds fascinating tho
I dont really have time to take it next year or junior year but i hope i can senior year
#117129 to #117128 - whoozy
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
I get what you mean.
It still is sort of a taboo topic to talk about so taking a class on it would be interresting.
In my opinion it's a lot better to learn about it than trying to forget it happened.
After all, that's what's going to prevent it from happening again.
#117119 to #117117 - PopcornViking
Reply +2
(05/25/2016) [-]
Update: Got into Spanish

Nigga we made it
#117120 to #117119 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
cool teacher.
#117111 - mixednuts
Reply +2
(05/25/2016) [-]
>Democrats and Republicans set stringent ballot access laws that make it difficult for candidates who aren't Democrats or Republicans to compete
>Democrats and Republicans complain about entryists in their parties
#117101 - theism
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
In a world where unskilled labor becomes unnecessary, should unskilled laborers be expected to starve?
#117145 to #117101 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
they should be expected to not be parasites
#117146 to #117145 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
So they should starve if they can't produce?
#117147 to #117146 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
you'd have to be very very useless for that to happen
#117148 to #117147 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
With the way technology is going human labor in many fields will no longer be viable.
#117149 to #117148 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
luddite fallacy
people have been saying that for centuries
#117150 to #117149 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
Machine learning is recent. Technology always required human input, not any more.
#117153 to #117150 - undeadwill
Reply +1
(05/26/2016) [-]
Nope because there are some thing people wont pay for
#117116 to #117101 - anon
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
They would have to live on welfare.
#117105 to #117101 - lotengo
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
They should be expected to get skilled.
#117110 to #117105 - Shiny
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
Then we have the problem of oversaturation. Labor supply will become so plentiful that jobs will rapidly go down in pay.
#117102 to #117101 - redandgreen
Reply -5
(05/25/2016) [-]
No.
#117118 to #117102 - theism
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Apparently unforgivensoul thinks people should be forced to starve.
#117139 to #117118 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
He's so butthurt it's unbelievable.
#117109 to #117102 - theism
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
How do you prevent it?
#117138 to #117109 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
I think they should be given unemployment benefits and assistance in retraining until they can get a new job.
#117143 to #117138 - theism
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
What money should we use?
#117190 to #117143 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
Money collected through progressive taxation.
#117191 to #117190 - theism
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
So then these people live off the effort of others? How do you incentivize productivity?
#117193 to #117191 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
If you want to look at it that way, yes. Society can take more from those who, for whatever reason, have more and use that to help the less fortunate.

If benefits meet basic needs such as food and shelter and business is required to pay a sensible minimum wage, which provides more than just survival, productivity will be incentivised.
#117209 to #117193 - theism
Reply 0
(05/27/2016) [-]
Then the only incentive is access to luxuries.
#117082 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Apparently Milo was threatened by a man who ran on the stage at a university and the school security refused to stop him even though Milo paid for them.

Fun fun.
#117091 to #117082 - kanadetenshi
Reply +6
(05/25/2016) [-]
He should've paid for zookeepers instead.
#117085 to #117082 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Black Lives Matter Activist Takes A Swing At Milo


You rage, you lose.
#117106 to #117085 - lotengo
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
what the hel is ghettica?
Is that her name?
#117095 to #117085 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Yo, I would have bench press that bitch in the air and throw her in the crowd.
I got angry when I saw that shit. Bitch wanna act tough. That white dude had no balls.
#117087 to #117085 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Also I like how its always the blacks doing that. Way to perpetuate the stereotype, stupid dindus.
#117086 to #117085 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
wtf, can I get any context?
#117089 to #117086 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
They're Black Lives Matter protesters and they're hearing opinions they don't like. No context needed, really.
#117090 to #117089 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
But like why is the stage facing the opposite way?
How did they manage to get on stage?
Who is the male black guy?
What are they yelling in the background, did he stumble into a stage full of protesters or fans...?
#117112 to #117090 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
The male protester is a dindu who charged the stage with his nigress after Milo said "Micro aggression don't exist.".
That's it.
That's the line that instigated everything.
#117092 to #117090 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
The people on the front row are protesters.
They got on stage because security flat out refused to stop them.
Just some protester.
As far as I can tell, they're yelling "GET A JOB" at the protesters.
#117094 to #117092 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Oh wait, according to Breitbart, they're shouting "DO YOUR JOB" at security, who was refusing to remove the two protesters from the stage.
#117107 to #117094 - lotengo
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
I tought they where screaming ghettica or something like that
#117081 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Are private schools in America good? Because the public ones might as well just be demolished.
#117115 to #117081 - PopcornViking
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
The memes are becoming sentient dude

This past weekend was alumni weekend at my college
And there were fireworks
So me and my friends sat down in the grass to get ready to watch them
And this alumni with a scraggly beard and long greasy hair walked by with his 2/10 girlfriend, pointed at an open area on the field, and said - "let's sit over there, away from the normies."
#117080 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
So what do you guys do for extra money? I want to get a second job delivering pizza, but I'm not sure my new work schedule will allow it cause it's unpredictable.
#117140 to #117080 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
I work in a coffee stand for extra money.
#117108 to #117080 - lotengo
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
autismbux
#117097 to #117080 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
I buy and sell gaming supplies. Goodwill is my hunting ground.
#117088 to #117080 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
I work part time in produce at a grocery store. I invest money in the stock market.
#117133 to #117088 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Ooh, who do you have stocks with? I got a couple with Vista Outdoor just in case Hillary wins.
#117136 to #117133 - anon
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
INSY
XXII
GPL
-Currently on phone
#117084 to #117080 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Will your current job not allow you to go full time?
#117113 to #117084 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
I already am full time
#117121 to #117113 - Zaxplab
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
Well shit, what are you spending all your money on?
#117131 to #117121 - canyou
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
Recently I've been saving it. It's not like I'm broke or anything, I'm just trying to pay off the rest of my debts quickly.
#117132 to #117131 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Nightshift at the grocery store and just sleep during the day.
#117083 to #117080 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
I breed cats.
#117100 to #117083 - theism
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Only way to get pussy these days.
#117069 - asotil
Reply -1
(05/24/2016) [-]
go.berniesanders.com/page/content/phonebank

>Priority states today: New Jersey
#117065 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36367843

I don't know why but I really like him. I think they had to say something, according to the remit of the bank.
#117077 to #117065 - valeriya
Reply +1
(05/25/2016) [-]
Probably because he's saying what you want him to say.
#117104 to #117077 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(05/25/2016) [-]
I'm sure there's some truth in that. I do feel he's more trustworthy than some of the politicians I tend to agree with as well though.
#117103 to #117077 - redandgreen
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#117055 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
Trudeau has actually earned a little bit of my respect after that elbow incident. Nice to know the man has a shred of masculinity to him.
#117074 to #117055 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
What even happened? No matter how many times I watched the video, I couldn't see anything happening.
#117075 to #117074 - unforgivensoul
Reply +3
(05/24/2016) [-]
He bumped slightly into a women with his elbow, and the world feigned outrage.
#117057 to #117055 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Isn't he a boxer?
#117045 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I select my classes for the fall term tomorrow
The math class I wanted to take is full so I need a plan B class

I can either take the next level up of Spanish (Im considering minoring in Spanish but still not sure)
Or a history class
The history classes that sound interesting are "Nazi Science, Medicine, & Technology" and "The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Union"

Which one of the 3 should I take?
#117064 to #117045 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Spanish
#117067 to #117064 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
yea thats what i think im gonna do
the nazi science class while interesting, doesnt fill any requirement i havent already met
and if i save the spanish minor requirements for senior year its gonna be a clusterfuck of classes i still need to take

ill save some of the interesting classes for senior year
#117068 to #117067 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Yeah, bro. Learn to communicate with countries than learning about Nazis and history. Save those other good stuff near the end.
#117054 to #117045 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
The Nazi one sounds awesome.
#117046 to #117045 - akkere
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
What are you planning on majoring in/ entering a field in, and would this class be considered a [social] elective (which leads to the question of whether or not you're already taking an elective of the same degree)?
#117049 to #117046 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
the other 2 classes im gonna take are political science
this is for my 3rd class
#117047 to #117046 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Im a political science major
But my dad is pretty gonna make me go to law school and get a professional degree regardless
#117050 to #117047 - akkere
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
Building a minor in Spanish might compliment a Law professional degree nicely, though is there any other option for a professional degree you want to consider (something on the technical side, for instance) that you might cast the extra class towards? A sort of "sampling the waters" kind of class, if you will.
Personally I'd be interested in "Nazi Science, Medicine, & Technology", as it would likely further expound the world of advancement uncovered out of ethics equating to atrocity.
#117053 to #117050 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
theres only 12/25 spots left in the nazi class
hopefully when its my time slot theres still a spot
if not ill just take spanish
#117051 to #117050 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
i suck at math
i never even took precalc or physics in high school
i finished with an 87 average and got into a school where the average accepted student has a 93 average cause I played to my strengths really well

The math class I wanted to take is on the math involved in elections but all the applied math courses like that one say theres specifically no calc or advanced statistics involved

The Nazi Science course is history and not science but I get what youre saying
Technology just isnt my thing
#117026 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Kaoma  Lambada Official Video 1989 HD bet this triggers all the right wingers
#117066 to #117026 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(05/24/2016) [-]
Why would it?
#117043 to #117026 - Zaxplab
Reply +4
(05/24/2016) [-]
#117036 to #117026 - canyou
Reply +4
(05/24/2016) [-]
Right wingers don't get triggered, they just angrier and angrier until a school shooting happens
#117037 to #117036 - anon
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
So when they get triggered people die.
Sounds about right.
#117059 to #117037 - theism
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
It's the guns that get triggered.
#117073 to #117059 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Thats the joke retard.
#117093 to #117073 - theism
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
You said it bad.
#117098 to #117093 - anon
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
No he didn't you autist
#117099 to #117098 - theism
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
He did a different joke good, or that joke bad. Pick one.
#117021 - newbtwo
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
who will win
#117061 to #117021 - theism
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
ISIS
#117033 to #117021 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Trump, what a dumb question.
#117060 to #117033 - newbtwo
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
really?
#117062 to #117060 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Yep.
#117063 to #117062 - newbtwo
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
dont all the polls say hillary will win
#117070 to #117063 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
...no
#117071 to #117070 - newbtwo
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
wont she win anyway because jews?
#117096 to #117071 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
yes
#117024 to #117021 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
8===>
This chode
#117023 to #117021 - marinepenguin
Reply +3
(05/24/2016) [-]
The Jews
#117018 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Eventually the EU will be disbanded, however I would prefer a much more just conclusion. The day of the rope should come to every single EU bureaucrat. There should be violent revolutions in the streets of Europe. That is how I want this to end, I want the people to learn, I want their children to remember this and speak of it throughout the history books of Europe.

It would be an unjust conclusion to mankind for this not to end in violence, sometimes violence is deserved. The french revolution got it right, lets modernize it. The Europeans need their own 1776.
#117038 to #117018 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Easier still to simply purge the civil service wing and the legistature, and I must say you've got your head in some weird clouds right now.

Best way to think of this in a historical context starting from the french revolution
French revolution fucks up the balance of power in Europe, leading to whole napoleon deal, and then to the congress of vienna which essentially established a balance of power to prevent a major european war and various other congresses were called to deal with problems like expanding Russian power, and the state of the ottoman empire etc etc until Bismarck being removed from power in Germany and WWI formally crushing it.

After WWI there was a failure to set up anything like the congress of vienna to create a lasting peace, that being the major factor in the start of WW2.

After that you had the european steel and coal community which was basically tying the economy of germany to the western allies, This would later become the EU and is the status quo we have today, keeping peace in europe by making it economic suicide to do anything radical outside of being a liberal democracy of some description.
#117039 to #117038 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
....where's the pro-EU argument again? Or are you saying your argument is "either it rules them all or we have massive chaos and ww3" which is totally retarded and a false dichotomy.
#117048 to #117039 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I'm not arguing for the EU nor am I arguing for the EU to exercise complete control over constituent nations...
I'm explaining to you, since you don't seem to have a very good grasp of European history, how and why the EU came to exist, and it's main function previously was, prevention of a single hegemonic state in europe arising and establishing lasting peace. Which it has done.

To say the EU needs to burn in revolutionary fire is simply put, delusional, when you think that there are a lot of binding treaties that these countries signed into with very few having opt outs for certain clauses, often consulting via referendums without the past 10-20 years depending on the treaty well it'd reflect very poorly in geopolitical context for these countries to try pull out of the EU. Putting it simply I very much doubt the EU is going anywhere anytime soon.
#117052 to #117048 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Thank you for teaching me common sense history that I already know, your argument is stupid. I've already explained why above.

Just because there will be short-term confusion and a lack of economic progress doesn't mean it outweighs the long-term social benefit of getting rid of the EU. And before you bring up the "leave and it will cause untold chaos", if that is your faith in the humanity of Europe, then its destined to fail to begin with. However we've come to far in terms of globalism and progressivism to have some European war, even without the EU the countries have very close economic ties that will continue. Your argument is just plain stupid, I'm sorry but its literally fear mongering.
#117056 to #117052 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
"Faith in the humanity of Europe" Ha, no, I see people break their legs on falling off a roof not wearing correct equipment. People are not clever and for the most part don't know their interests, without an institution like the EU to offset the national governments self interest, but making it in their interest to not kill themselves essentially. Well peace has a hilarious side effect of making people think stupidly, like thinking the EU has any interests in social policy aside from that weird liberal democratic back drop of basic human rights and liberties.

It's not scaremongering. It's simply how things are. You sign a contract for a loan with your bank, you then break that contract other banks are not likely to lend to you on favourable terms. Same applies when you sign a treaty with and country or entity and break it. It sinks your reputation, like with the UK leaving the EU essentially stabs their soft power in the knee, it's a stupid move from a geopolitical pov hence why the incumbent government in the UK is backing it despite internal oppasition from his own party. Because it's geopolitical suicide they shoot their soft power in the leg essentially. Address the points don't just dismiss them as "fearmongering".
#117072 to #117056 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I've literally addressed your points, you have restated them. Please reread what I said before. Long term benefit outweighs short term.

All of your pro-NWO, pro-authoritarian propaganda makes sense when i remember that you are a communist sympathizer after all.
#117076 to #117072 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
You only said, that short term confusion and lack of economic progress, doesn't outweight the long term social benefit of getting rid of the EU, without stating any hows or why's. You're speculating aimlessly, whilst I've gone and looked at what has happened previously which you havn't actually addressed at all, you've just said "Nah that won't happen, it'll be k"
#117079 to #117076 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
>without stating any hows or why's
What hows or whys do you need? The long term social benefit is democracy, being able to make your own decisions, not being pressured into doing something you don't want just because of the EU like taking massive amounts of refugees, the crisis which the EU singlehandedly engineered. Yes I would gladly go through a recession to end such tyranny, just like I'd go through a revolution to end communism.

>You're speculating aimlessly
You're literally doing the same thing, you seem to be predicting another world war or economic collapse. Your doing massive fear-mongering, the same thing the campaigners use. Instead of defending the idea, you scare people. Free trade and open-ish borders can exist without such a super-state cesspool of garbage, aka 4th reich 2.0.

>"Nah that won't happen, it'll be k
Yeah your prediction is far more believable.
#117114 to #117079 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Finally points I can address, I don't think democracy brings much of a social benefit aside from a belief of control and accountability freedom in Europe has never really been an absolute as it has in the US. To be honest with regards to the issue on refugees, 60%+ of eu nations were involved in Iraq and helped destablize the region, most of them have stood idle whilst Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Russia, UK etc etc power play over Syria and let it burn, so they do have a degree of responsibility for the current migrant problem. Another thing to bare in mind the EU in it's current form was agreed upon by the member states, they govern by consent for the most part, and when necessary executive, since often well when shit hits the fan you don't have time to ask permission, you can only ask for forgiveness later.

My prediction is based upon what happened the last time there was no institution or system to secure a lack of hegemony in Europe Call it fearmongering if it makes you happy, but it's the reality of the situation , or when Europe relied on another system I very much doubt we've made so much progress that a war in Europe is impossible, that is what they thought when the balklans exploded on themselves, since it shocked everyone at how essentially powerless the UN and world was to do anything , since you could argue they relied on the whole league of nations idea, which quickly went down the drain and proved helpless to stop anything.
#117029 to #117018 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
You probably need a lie down or something.
#117030 to #117029 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Sometimes violent revolutions are necessary, European people shouldn't be forced to take this shit lying down. They should be rioting in the streets like the Ukrainians did in Maidan Square.
#117035 to #117030 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
>Sometimes violent revolutions are necessary
Why?
#117040 to #117035 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Because it is unjust not to end the regime and it is unjust not to punish them. What a stupid question.
#117044 to #117040 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Jews are a little slow.
You never think about what comes after.
#117022 to #117018 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(05/24/2016) [-]
That seems pretty counter productive. You're exaggerating the problems EU is causing, albeit they're serious.
#117031 to #117022 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Exaggerating the problems? Dood the EU IS LITERALLY FORCING COUNTRIES to take in refugees they don't want. Now they're trying to meddle and influence the politics of countries to their own benefit. That's just half of the harm they've done to Europe. This is incredibly serious shit and worthy of riots and violence.
#117020 to #117018 - marinepenguin
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
The more I've learned about the EU, the more I've realized its just the opposite reaction to the authoritarianism of the second World War.
#117028 to #117020 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(05/24/2016) [-]
That's definitely how it started out. It was supposed to prevent another big European war by tying economies together through trade.
#117019 to #117018 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I don't really think the people of Slovenia need that right now after having independence for like 15 years