Upload
Login or register
Newest
Realtime Comments: On
Online User List [+] Online: (4): feelythefeel, pebar, theism, tyrano, anonymous(2).
asd
User avatar #131993 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
FUCK
Trumps odds on bovada went down from +350 to +300, and it was +400 last week
Will it go back up or should i bet now?
User avatar #132002 to #131993 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
I'd like to bet $2 on McMullen. His payout would be ridiculous
User avatar #132001 to #131993 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
How small can you bet?
User avatar #132051 to #132001 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
idk i go big or go home
User avatar #131992 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
If the jews want to destroy the white race then why dont they release the cure for aids? Checkmate anti semites
User avatar #131978 - votehillary
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
I'm gonna break character just this once. I am not actually a Hillary supporter, but I don't see how you guys jerking off to these "Trumper Comps" is any different than Liberals watching CNN/MSNBC/FOXNEWS. You're both being pandered to in equal measure and you are just ignoring anything Anti-Trump just because you think all legitimate media are shills.
User avatar #132000 to #131978 - youregaylol
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
even the liberal shitposters are lazy
User avatar #131996 to #131978 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
Both sides are equally worse.
You're literally the same.
Yadayadayada.
User avatar #131988 to #131978 - marinepenguin
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
The media is largely shilling for Hillary though, that's hardly even debatable and wikileaks confirms that the Hillary campaign colludes with a lot of media sources.

That being said, I have many many serious issues with Trump as the possible President and I call him out when it's fair to do so. But I think Hillary would be far more devastating as a President.
User avatar #131989 to #131988 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
I think his point is the Trump comps and the majority of Trump content on this site is straight up garbage that only gets thumbs because people agree with it.
User avatar #131990 to #131989 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
Which is true, this site and it's community is not very friendly towards criticisms of Trump
User avatar #131987 to #131978 - canyou
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
THANK YOU. God it's so embarrassing to see funnyjunkers say "Newt Gingrich is based."
User avatar #131985 to #131978 - nigalthornberry
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
I like the tits and dank memes
If cnn had that wed be watching it too
User avatar #131982 to #131978 - pebar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
Media is corrupt though.
That is true
User avatar #131983 to #131982 - votehillary
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
what about the media where you get your anti-Hillary info from? They aren't in bed with the special interests?
User avatar #131984 to #131983 - pebar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
Of course they have a bias
You'll have a hard time finding a single outlet that doesnt
#131981 to #131978 - pebar
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
His policy on trade is batshit retarded
I don't know if any one on the board actuall agrees with him on it

And a lot of the trump comps aren't even about trump. They're just leftists being dumb or women in bikinis
User avatar #131986 to #131981 - theism
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
Thumbfortrump seems to but he hasn't explained why.
User avatar #131995 to #131986 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
I have on multiple occasions since I joined this board but people seem to forget it.
#132007 to #131995 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
tell me it's not true
User avatar #132010 to #132007 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
it's free real estate and also true
#132016 to #132010 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
What could possibly be your justification?
User avatar #131997 to #131995 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
No I don't think you have.
User avatar #131998 to #131997 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
I'm gonna check my comment history just for you. big guy
#132012 to #131998 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
4 u
User avatar #131979 to #131978 - woozuh
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
We're the good guys
User avatar #131977 - canyou
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
"We shouldn't elect someone who can be baited by a tweet"

"Let's fucking invade Russia."
#131980 to #131977 - woozuh
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
User avatar #132013 to #131980 - asotil
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
Tell me these are real
User avatar #132048 to #132013 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
these are real
User avatar #131976 - youregaylol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
now that anons have ID's i wonder if i should show anon comments here again, i havent seen one in a year

the board has been wonderful, but i miss fat ben
#131961 - feelythefeel
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
In case you were demoralized by the polls or suffering from chronic low energy, just remember that the same people telling us how president Hillary is a "Done deal" gave us this gem of speculative analysis a few months ago.
#131962 to #131961 - Elk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
GIF
**Elk used "*roll picture*"**
**Elk rolled image** They didn't say that he had ZERO percent chance.
#131957 - shekelnator
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
PC thread?

post your newest result? and the guy who made our total result i think he was pebar or someone else update it.
www.politicalcompass.org/test
#131975 to #131957 - whoozy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
#131960 to #131957 - anon id: 1652dcdf
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
#131959 to #131957 - feelythefeel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
#131958 to #131957 - Elk
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
User avatar #131991 to #131958 - woozuh
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/28/2016) [-]
True conservative
10/10
#131941 - shekelnator
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
www.rt.com/usa/364462-north-dakota-camp-removed/

the land of the "Free" and "Democracy"
More like the land of owning your ass from bankers and corporations
#131946 to #131941 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Really, you're going to criticize how our government handles protests.

Please refresh my mind, how did Assad react to this?
#131956 to #131946 - shekelnator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
yes give alqaeda freedom!.
User avatar #131955 to #131946 - theism
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Especially ironic considering he's citing the Kremlin propaganda rag.
#131940 - nerduin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
just gonna leave this here for you
User avatar #131923 - marinepenguin
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
So Kaine held a rally in Florida where maybe 30 people showed up.

Pence held one in North Carolina the same day that drew over 500.

I know rallies aren't a great measure of overall popularity, but I mean seriously? There has to be a point where one candidate clearly just doesn't have the support they claim.
User avatar #131963 to #131923 - nigalthornberry
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I think that its the energy behind the candidates voters
Alot of clintons are just anti trump and chances are they wont even vote
User avatar #131943 to #131923 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I wouldn't consider rally attendance a good metric. Both campaigns approach events very differently, Trump intentionally bringing in as many people as possible, clinton focusing on smaller groups at a time.
User avatar #131944 to #131943 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I'm not claiming it's a good metric. But you can't deny that someone who is unpopular will receive less support at rally's compared to someone who is popular. "Enthusiasm" definitely plays in, but I don't think that such a substantial percentage of Trump supporters are as enthusiastic as people claim, I actually think fewer people are enthusiastic about Trump than we say.

And while Hillary does tend to go towards smaller audiences, it still doesn't match up. Trump has no problem filling stadiums to Max capacity, while Hillary can barely ever get people to come to her speeches in high school gyms.

The polls show either a tight race or Hillary leading. Yet I see zero tangible evidence for this throughout my daily life. In 08 and 12 I could see that my community and even family was split between the candidates, that is completely absent this election. These are not great examples of the overall election, but things aren't matching up here.
User avatar #131945 to #131944 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I think poor attendance at clinton events is exaggerated based on a few notable examples however I think it's important to note the different approaches. The Trump campaign invests heavily in drawing people in and generating hype for events. Clinton doesn't really do the same.
User avatar #131949 to #131945 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Just to get it out in the open. What candidate do ypu support?
User avatar #131951 to #131949 - theism
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I don't plan on voting honestly but between the two I'd rather not see a trump presidency.
User avatar #131964 to #131951 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
#I'mwithher confirmed

In all honesty though. It dissapoints me that you're willing to choose systematic evil
User avatar #131965 to #131964 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I think you've got that backwards.
User avatar #131966 to #131965 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Trump is anything but systematic
User avatar #131967 to #131966 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
It's a little closer to chaotic evil.
User avatar #131968 to #131967 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Basically
A narcissistic maniac or a systematic psychopath

I'm willing to do anything to avoid nuclear war
User avatar #131969 to #131968 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I see you've drunk the Kool aid too.
User avatar #131970 to #131969 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
No

I looked a bit deeper

I don't want Hillary for president. I'm surprised you do.
User avatar #131971 to #131970 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
No you're buying into the dominant narrative presented to you. Lots of people do that though.
User avatar #131972 to #131971 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
The dominant narrative? The media is in Hillarys pocket and I rarely visit this place.
User avatar #131973 to #131972 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I see you here pretty often, you're not American and I presume you browse funnyjunk with some regularity.
User avatar #131974 to #131973 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Two times a week
Most of my coverage comes from liberal media
User avatar #131924 to #131923 - whoozy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Trump voters are very enthusiastic.
Media is good at slamming Trump all day, but they fail miserably at presenting Hillary as a likeable candidate.
User avatar #131927 to #131924 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I was also listening to I think Ben Shapiro talking about media bias. And if I remember right they took a composite of segments from CNN and a couple other news outlets and found that 90% of coverage was on Trump and it was all negative. While the 10% talking about Hillary was 50/50 good and bad
User avatar #131930 to #131927 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Yeah
They said the same on Politico
User avatar #131926 to #131924 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
So the argument is that Trump supporters are always 10% or so fewer than Hillary supporters, yet they consistently show up to rallies in numbers that are 10x greater than anything Hillary van scrounge up? I just can't put that up to solely "enthusiasm".
User avatar #131929 to #131926 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
If the republicans had went with Rubio instead for example, Hillary wouldn't have stood a chance.
#131931 to #131929 - Elk
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Let's dispel with this fiction that Marco Rubio would have beaten Hillary Clinton. He would not have beaten Hillary Clinton.
User avatar #131947 to #131931 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Man, he looks so uncomfortable lol.
User avatar #131948 to #131947 - Elk
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
He probably needed water.
User avatar #131928 to #131926 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I think a lot of people that vote Hillary do so not because they're enthusiastic about her, but because she appears like a solid minded moderate politician compared to Trump.

They think hes a racist and sexist madman because it's what they're being told. They vote for her to stop Trump. I have yet to see more than a marginal minority that's happy with the policies of Obama and the Democrats as it sits now.
User avatar #131933 to #131928 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I have held that opinion for a long time. I've just recently begun to think there's more to it than that.
User avatar #131936 to #131933 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
We'll see
I hope you can do it
User avatar #131937 to #131936 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
You hope I can do what?
User avatar #131938 to #131937 - whoozy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Get Trump elected
I say "you" because I'm not American
User avatar #131939 to #131938 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Ahh. I understand now.
User avatar #131921 - canyou
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
*new wikileaks comes out*

OMG. THEY ADMITTED THEY CHEATED BERNIE SANDERS AGAIN
SOMEONE CALLED VOTERS STUPID
SOMEONE CALLED BILL CLINTON A PERVERT

It feels like most of these are have 0 impact.
User avatar #131922 to #131921 - marinepenguin
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
The shitty thing is that in any other election most of these wiki leaks would have ended a campaign.
User avatar #131925 to #131922 - thumbfortrump
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
But Trump kissed a girl and now has cooties, so he's unfit to be president
#131918 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
"NATO is the aggressor"
#131919 to #131918 - shekelnator
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
takbeer my friend
#131917 - shekelnator
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#131903 - thumbfortrump
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#131900 - woozuh
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#131890 - Zaxplab
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#131885 - canyou
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #131867 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Imagine if we listened to MacArthur during Korea and use tactical nukes on massed Chinese positions?

You could almost argue that the world would be better off.
User avatar #131873 to #131867 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Be a whole lot less human organ harvesting.
User avatar #131874 to #131873 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
The best part is that during Korea we had a couple dozen nukes and no one else had any yet. So essentially there would have been no retaliation.

Also no North Korea and probably never a communist Vietnam.
User avatar #131875 to #131874 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I think in the end we made the right decision however..
Imagine relations if we fucked China?
Imagine how much mileage they would get out of that?
User avatar #131876 to #131875 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Probably be like Japan if they collapsed and became democratic. Depends a lot on how a loss like that would effect China, and who knows what would have happened to places like India and Pakistan if we created the precedent of using low yield nuclear weapons on military targets.

But the best case scenario is if we went through with it, and MAD still occurred with other powers and communism was immediately halted with Russia.

I sometimes lie in bed and wonder what the world would have been like if Patton didn't die. Maybe it would have been for the best, maybe it would have ended in inevitable nuclear fire. We'll never know.
User avatar #131877 to #131876 - undeadwill
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
So often the dreams and regrets of today are the gambles of yesterday.
User avatar #131878 to #131877 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I'm glad you came back
User avatar #131884 to #131878 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
User avatar #131886 to #131884 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I've seen a bunch of their videos actually. It's a good channel.
User avatar #131889 to #131886 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I've been beige watching it lately.
User avatar #131880 to #131878 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
As am I.

Danny Schmidt  This Too Shall Pass
User avatar #131854 - marinepenguin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton  Epic Rap Battles of History
User avatar #131901 to #131854 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
They wont do Jesus vs Muhammad
User avatar #131881 to #131854 - canyou
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
That was garbage. All "Trump" did was talk about was talk about his sex scandals, say he wanted to tear down mosques, insult mexicans, and imply obama was a nigger. Then abraham slaps him twice and tells him to accept it when she wins. This is even worse then the Romney one.
User avatar #131883 to #131881 - marinepenguin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I thought so too, but I wanted to see if someone else pointed it out to confirm that I wasn't being biased in my observation.

That aside I actually enjoyed it.
User avatar #131887 to #131883 - canyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
No, the abraham double slap is a direct confirmation of bias. Even the Obama Romney one had abraham slapping each one once. He didn't even touch hillary.
User avatar #131888 to #131887 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Yeah I thought Abraham saying that Hillary needs to beat Trump and that Trump should just accept the result was the biggest giveaway. Even though Al Gore fought the 2000 election results in court for months and the Democrats were supporting that.
User avatar #131932 to #131888 - Elk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
You can't hit a girl.
User avatar #131952 to #131932 - asotil
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Then explain why kids used to hit you
#131953 to #131952 - Elk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
GIF
**Elk used "*roll picture*"**
**Elk rolled image** Girls used to actually beat me a lot. :')
User avatar #131935 to #131932 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Also Hillary is more of a soul eating vampiress that slumbered for thousands of years in Arkansas until Bill summoned her through a demonic ritual.
User avatar #131934 to #131932 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
I totally could
User avatar #131840 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
God doesnt call gays just detestable or sinful
He calls it an abomination
User avatar #131852 to #131840 - uglychino
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
This is politics, pull up to relgion and we`ll discuss it.
User avatar #131853 to #131852 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Gay is politics thats why crooked hillary says she will enforce lgbtqia rights
User avatar #131856 to #131853 - uglychino
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
-listening to a satanist who flip flops more than a pancake.
User avatar #131842 to #131840 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Which is great and all but in America we have something called the rule of law and universal rights.
User avatar #131843 to #131842 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Its fucking wild I know.
User avatar #131844 to #131843 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
And?
User avatar #131845 to #131844 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
You can't exactly just decide that a nation based on a secular rule of law to suddenly start enforcing laws on the basis of religion.
User avatar #131846 to #131845 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Where did I say to enforce religious laws?
User avatar #131847 to #131846 - undeadwill
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
This is a political board. About politics

You know

Government stuff.

Where there is a more popular religious board you can go.

So I am to assume you wish to discuss the political implications of your faith
User avatar #131851 to #131847 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Gay is political
User avatar #131857 to #131851 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
So what policy changes would you like?
User avatar #131859 to #131857 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Gender identity shouldnt be on the list of stuff you cant discriminate
Gay marriage should be decided with the 10th ammendment
User avatar #131861 to #131859 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
For what reasons?

And it was for a while.
But the supreme court defines the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land.
User avatar #131865 to #131861 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
The supreme court interprets the constitution
Anything not defined in the constitution is up to the states
User avatar #131868 to #131865 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/27/2016) [-]
Except national law.
This isn't 1800's anymore states have much fewer rights.