Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (1): pebar, anonymous(12).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #62424 - philliyoMLB ONLINE (04/23/2014) [-]
So, I live in Kansas City, Kansas and if you've heard Michelle Obama accepted an invitation to go speak at a Topeka high school's graduation. Instead she is being met with some criticism because she might take the kid's spotlight, here is a bullshit left-nutjob's blog on it: www.huffingtonpost.com/jerome-halligan/michelle-obama-topeka-graduation-satire_b_5186937.html

Now, I'm a senior and I'll be graduating soon also from the number 1 school academically in the state of Kansas which is a public school. And tons of people are inviting her to come speak at our school. And of course since I'm one of the few white people in my class I am being called racist for this reaction to the idea of Michelle Obama speaking at our graduation.
I wouldn't wanna go to that graduation because her husband is trying to get everyone to sign up for this huuuuuug healthcare plan and their main problem is that young people are not signing up for it, you think she just wants to speak at high schools just to inspire some kids? No, she's a politician just like her husband and I don't wanna sit through a long speech telling us why we should sign up for Obamacare. I mean to have the first lady there would be awesome, but please, that day is for us, not politics.
what you thing /pol/?
User avatar #62428 to #62424 - netzjager (04/24/2014) [-]
Agreed with Akkere, it would be politically damaging to speak about Healthcare to graduates and completely backwards to lecture If it is the #1 high school in Kansas, than I'll assume they are college bound college students about eating healthy that Ramen Diet . It would be best for her to just visit and say a few words of congratulations 2 sentences at most and not a whole speech. That way, she visited and did not take away from the student's event and would not have the opportunity to place anything political in her speech.
User avatar #62425 to #62424 - akkere ONLINE (04/23/2014) [-]
While it's usually expected to have some kind of famous guest speaker appear for a given graduation, I'm not sure if it's really ideal to have one of a political nature, especially one that wasn't so much as a local resident of that area. And the amount of race-baiting in this issue is rather irritating.

That being said, I doubt she'll take the spotlight and try to actively convince graduates to sign up for Obamacare, knowing full well she'd receive a fair shotgun blast of backlash from the parents, and any education officials that prefer to not have a partisan pea in a non-partisan soup. The closest thing she'll talk about is something relating to her health meal shtick, and how the graduates should totally let that influence their eating habits as they transcend into adulthood.

Either way, there are certain zones in my opinion that should be isolate from any and all outside influences, especially political and religious, and I'd think Graduation ceremonies would be one of them. It'd be more understandable if Michelle Obama was say... a graduate of that high school, or even was simply a resident of the town for some time in her youth, but I don't even think she was born in the state.
#62402 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
ONE DAY, SCHNIZEL PUSHED THE FAT BEN'S POOP BUTTON

O!!!!!!! M!!!!!!!!!!! F!!!!!!!!!!!!!! G!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar #62390 - revengeforfreeze (04/23/2014) [-]
I heard an American say "pretty good" the other day on a restaurant. My life is complete.
User avatar #62396 to #62391 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I am confused.
#62389 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
daily reminder
#62431 to #62389 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
Daily reminder that buildings post-chechen war is bult to last. Note the chechen wars officially ended in 2009, but there are still a few skirmishes in the deep caucasus.
Daily reminder that the north and south towers Way more taller and made in the 70s was hit with a fucking plane.
Ask for WTC7, too mutch shit for me to dig into right now.
#62432 to #62431 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
Scrash post chechen wars, Russian architecture.
User avatar #62394 to #62389 - kanadetenshi (04/23/2014) [-]
It was hit by the large perimeter columns of the Tower collapse. It was 400 ft away but the towers were more than 1300 ft tall. As the tower peeled open, it easily tilted over to reach building 7.
#62433 to #62394 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
yeah, keep telling yourself that.
User avatar #62392 to #62389 - pebar (04/23/2014) [-]
Did it have a plane crash into the top of it?
Did you learn about torque in high school?
#62393 to #62392 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
MUH WIND   
MUH BUILDINGS FALL DOWN LIKE A DECK OF CARDS BECAUSE OF A PLANE BUT NOT BECAUSE IT WAS DESTROYED FROM THE INSIDE
MUH WIND
MUH BUILDINGS FALL DOWN LIKE A DECK OF CARDS BECAUSE OF A PLANE BUT NOT BECAUSE IT WAS DESTROYED FROM THE INSIDE
User avatar #62399 to #62393 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Well lets do some logic.
1. A plane hits a tower.
2. The plane penetrates the towers walls.
3. The plane crash weakens the structural integrity.
4. The tower, not being built to take a plane to the face, loses its ability to hold the upper floors.
5. The upper floors collapse in on itself bringing the whole tower down.

#62434 to #62399 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
yeah, keep telling yourself that.
User avatar #62400 to #62399 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Yes, but not enough to destroy the entire tower.
Also
>Believes what the US gov said
User avatar #62404 to #62400 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I am not going to do the physics now but the planes were going about 300 mph minimum and the planes weighs on average 1,900 pounds so I would say 1 plane is more than enough to bring the structural integrity down enough to collapse the building.
#62435 to #62404 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
yeah, keep telling yourself that.
User avatar #62411 to #62405 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
That gif is hilarious just saying.
1. NIST investigates lied. Ok I will play along. Does that give me proof that the building can withstand a Boeing going at 300 mph? No, all it says is 2 things: A cover up or lack of competence. Knowing the U.S. Government I would say the latter, but the former is a possibility.

2. Molten steel and underground fire. What does this prove? Besides the fact that the NIST spokesman lied, It was extremely hot above the ground floors. How did I come to this conclusion? "It was like molten steel running down the channel ways" Key word "running down" (1:00-1:12). The underground fires came from the molten steel just to point that out.
User avatar #62413 to #62411 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
> A cover up
They are to smart to fuck it up.
User avatar #62412 to #62411 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
The fire from the plane could not been high enough to melt steel.
Hitting it with a plane would be like throwing a granade on a tank.
User avatar #62414 to #62412 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Why would they purposefully allow a fuck up? What do they gain?

The fuel would lower the integrity of the steel by 60%-80% allowing for the building to collapse and then from there you have a huge furnace which would allow the fire to increase into temperature.

What gain comes from this overall scheme?
User avatar #62415 to #62414 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
No.
The fuel needs to be duble the heat from the flame to even start to melt it.
War, and with war profit.
And a ritual :^)
User avatar #62416 to #62415 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Fuel has around 1700 degress while steel needs 2500 but when the heat and fire are contained underground the temperature goes up it is like an oven.

That was actually really obvious....

Which one?
User avatar #62417 to #62416 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
It didn't go that much, the elevators snapped the beams are cut and the sections were blow one by on or the building would have collapsed around NY.
IT was a controled demolition.

IDK man my friend from the hmmm said it's about the burning of the three towers and some kind of link betwen god and men was broken or some shit.
User avatar #62418 to #62417 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I find it hard to believe it was a controlled demolition but I got to go so I am cutting this short.

Ya you might want to get him checked out... that is kind of weird
User avatar #62419 to #62418 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
Nope, he is from the club.
And no goy, trust your goverment.
No building falls like that if it isn't demolished by pros and done by a procedure.
User avatar #62420 to #62419 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I do not even trust the government to tell me what food is healthy. I am just not convinced the WTC was an inside job, or an outside job for that matter.
#69047 to #69046 - johnstuartmill (09/08/2014) [-]
This may not completely convince me, but it is more respectable than many of the other theories I have heard and is worth my time to check out.
This may not completely convince me, but it is more respectable than many of the other theories I have heard and is worth my time to check out.
User avatar #69049 to #69047 - schnizel (09/08/2014) [-]
But look at it like this,
They manage to blow it up
>Sandniggers
The best terrorist attack ever made
>Sandniggers
Shitting in buckets and fucking goats.
Also the taliban and Sadam Husein both condemmed the attack as coward like and unislamic and the Yanks attack the Taliban, the same people that fought against the commies with Americans and they attack a man that kept the middle east in order.
I'm no Goethe, but it stinks like fish.
User avatar #69050 to #69049 - johnstuartmill (09/08/2014) [-]
That would be one hell of a switch up though. But I am 100% sure that Congress will not re-investigate 9/11 and instead pretend like it never happened like Benghazi or the IRS e-mails that just "fell of the face of the earth".
User avatar #69051 to #69050 - schnizel (09/08/2014) [-]
true
all lost in the sands of time
#69048 to #69047 - schnizel (09/08/2014) [-]
You can trust me, not the jews.
You can trust me, not the jews.

#62401 to #62400 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
you skipped 4 and 5
User avatar #62403 to #62401 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
3 needs to be proven in order to go to 4 and 5.
#62436 to #62407 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
nice bomb hole
User avatar #62408 to #62407 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
Oh look, a hole in a building.
#62410 to #62409 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
5 years under constant artillery and air barrages.
I've got no speakers.
#62386 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
This board in a nut shell.  I am surprised that I have not seen this posted regularly here
This board in a nut shell. I am surprised that I have not seen this posted regularly here
#62440 to #62386 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
more like your mom in a nutshell, fgt
#62384 - feelythefeel ONLINE (04/23/2014) [-]
An alternate answer is "Post secondary education in fields that aren't literally worthless".
User avatar #62385 to #62384 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
We are looking at you Woman Studies. This degree heavily implies that it is possible to understand women
User avatar #62387 to #62385 - pebar (04/23/2014) [-]
www.ndsu.edu/majors/womnstud/
My uni says it should be taken along with something else as a double major.
User avatar #62388 to #62387 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I do not see the practical application of majoring in it, even if you are double majoring.
User avatar #62376 - feelythefeel ONLINE (04/23/2014) [-]
Who is your favourite political figure and why is it Aberdolf Lincler?
User avatar #62381 to #62376 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Calvin Coolidge, not because of his policies but mainly because he is a president that would be awesome to have.
#62377 to #62376 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
2525
User avatar #62367 to #62363 - johnstuartmill (04/22/2014) [-]
Equilibrium of equality maintained
User avatar #62366 to #62363 - Shiny (04/22/2014) [-]
Finally.
#62352 - pebar (04/22/2014) [-]
90% of blacks consistently vote democrat
99% of blacks voted for Obama

Rand Paul is trying to capture more of the black community's votes.
How do you think he will do?
#62374 to #62352 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
100% OF FAT BENS VOTE FOR FAT BEN'S POOP
User avatar #62371 to #62352 - akkere ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
At this rate, not optimal.
He will have to seperate himself from the party he's running on the ballot with (Republican, unless he's running Libertarian with heavy endorsement through Republican networks) by giving more bi-partisan talks on certain civil rights issues (stop and frisk of New York, perhaps), something that shouldn't be terribly difficult given his stance in the Libertarian party. For maximum effect, he might want to find a way to acquire endorsement from Condoleeza Rice if possible (maybe even make her a VP), something I'm not sure the former Republican nominees McCain or Romney sought to do. Especially if Obama does the same thing with Hillary or Biden (I doubt he will be chosen as a VP, however).

Otherwise, he might as well calibrate the campaign to simply focusing on the general population, rather than attempting to target minorities specifically. The Democrats are heavily dug in, and he'd have to take big leaps that may prove to be simple gambles in time and money which could prove essential to his campaign in the long run.
#62353 to #62352 - johnstuartmill (04/22/2014) [-]
Can I get a citation? It is hard to believe your statistics when they are that high.

I think he may be successful in alluring more black people to vote for him but I would not think it would be a lot.
User avatar #62365 to #62364 - johnstuartmill (04/22/2014) [-]
Well damn... That is surprisingly shocking.
#62347 - netzjager (04/22/2014) [-]
So are we just going to keep shit posting or is there going to be some real haha real politics on this board any time soon?
#62373 to #62347 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
FAT BEN'S POOP IS REAL POLITICS
User avatar #62378 to #62373 - netzjager (04/23/2014) [-]
That is about as real as politics get
0
#62316 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#62312 - pebar (04/21/2014) [-]
Schnizel,
Let's say it's true that some races are better than others. Does that mean they should be treated differently under the law?
If so, why?
User avatar #62348 to #62312 - schnizel (04/22/2014) [-]
Depends, to each their own.
Germans live in their land and in their land Germans come first then come the Aryans even tho others can serve as Auxilia for either military or other purposes.
User avatar #62349 to #62348 - pebar (04/22/2014) [-]
So would a German retard be more valuable than a black genius?
User avatar #62351 to #62349 - schnizel (04/22/2014) [-]
As I said, it's right to learn, even from the enemy.
#62350 to #62349 - schnizel (04/22/2014) [-]
German retards are hard to find, same as a black genius.
#62359 to #62350 - anonymous (04/22/2014) [-]
i 100% agree
User avatar #62355 to #62350 - johnstuartmill (04/22/2014) [-]
How do you come to this conclusion?
#62356 to #62355 - schnizel (04/22/2014) [-]
Statistics.
User avatar #62357 to #62356 - johnstuartmill (04/22/2014) [-]
Love me some statistics but there is a difference between a mentally handicap person and a person who is not very smart. If we are talking the former then I would wager the chances of both a German and a black having the around the same chance of producing a mentally handicap child. If we are just using the word retard in the sense of the slow witted and dumb then we can see that whites Pretty broad interpretation in my opinion in general produce more intelligent offspring, if we trust the NLSY's statistical integrity.
User avatar #62358 to #62357 - schnizel (04/22/2014) [-]
BRAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WHITES AND BLACKS
pastebin.com/qNBiUfmk

RACE AND INTELLIGENCE
pastebin.com/E5atUMwS

BEHAVIOUR AND DEVELOPMENT - IMPACT OF RACE
pastebin.com/Liycd3BQ

RACE DIFFERENCES START IN THE WOMB
pastebin.com/viJfV22W

SOCIAL SUCCESS -- RACE, GENDER, ETC.
pastebin.com/4QmjfW9S

MULTICULTURALISM
pastebin.com/QBg5CVXa

CRIME
pastebin.com/WME5Ca3c

RAPE AND RACE
pastebin.com/SCtuPik9
User avatar #62360 to #62358 - johnstuartmill (04/22/2014) [-]
Since I did not see any data on mental handicap rates between races I guess you do not trust NLSY's statistical integrity. I skimmed since 99% of the actual data is cited and going through 80+ links would be overkill I will save it for when I am bored but If I do agree with the data how should I see Blacks in respect to other races?
User avatar #62361 to #62360 - schnizel (04/22/2014) [-]
See them for who they are.
"Education, sir, is the development of that which is. Since the dawn of history the negro has owned the continent of Africa--rich beyond the dream of poet's fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare black feet. Yet he never picked one up from the dust until a white man showed to him its glittering light. His land swarmed with powerful and docile animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or sled. A hunter by necessity, he never made an axe, spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the moment of its use. He lived as an ox, content to graze for an hour. In a land of stone and timber he never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or built a house save of broken sticks and mud. With league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland seas, for four thousand years he watched their surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him to worlds that lie beyond, and yet he never dreamed a sail! He lived as his fathers lived--stole his food, worked his wife, sold his children, ate his brother, content to drink, sing, dance, and sport as the ape!

"And this creature, half child, half animal, the sport of impulse, whim, and conceit, 'pleased with a rattle, tickled with a straw,' a being who, left to his will, roams at night and sleeps in the day, whose speech knows no word of love, whose passions, once aroused, are as the fury of the tiger--they have set this thing to rule over the Southern people----"
User avatar #62369 to #62361 - arrowhead ONLINE (04/22/2014) [-]
Jesus fuck can you stop getting in these debates I'm getting sick of these notifications from you quoting the same paragraph over and over again.
User avatar #62379 to #62369 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Then take mentioning off your name. It is that simple.
User avatar #62362 to #62361 - johnstuartmill (04/22/2014) [-]
So like Pebar said, under law would they be treated different because of this? You gave the example that in Germany: German> Aryan> Black, if I am correct. Under law I see this as an issue Similar to Affirmative Action? , but if this was a cultural phenomenon then I could let is slide.
#62307 - anonymous (04/21/2014) [-]
#62314 to #62307 - anonymous (04/21/2014) [-]
>Takes dick pic on my website
>Bitches about it when i turn you inn.
#62313 to #62307 - kanadetenshi (04/21/2014) [-]
My dog could make a better conspiracy theory than that.
#62308 to #62307 - dehumanizer (04/21/2014) [-]
**dehumanizer rolls 53**
#62306 - anonymous (04/21/2014) [-]
#62305 - anonymous (04/21/2014) [-]
#62304 - anonymous (04/21/2014) [-]
#62287 - kanadetenshi (04/21/2014) [-]
Oh how things have changed.
#62309 to #62287 - dehumanizer (04/21/2014) [-]
But what is the next step?
But what is the next step?
#62311 to #62309 - anonymous (04/21/2014) [-]
User avatar #62310 to #62309 - kanadetenshi (04/21/2014) [-]
Guns and Ron Paul circlejerk IV: A new Paul
#62293 to #62287 - pebar (04/21/2014) [-]
I liked the commies more than these nazis...
User avatar #62395 to #62293 - undeadwill ONLINE (04/23/2014) [-]
Same here...
#62303 to #62293 - anonymous (04/21/2014) [-]
too bad, abraham...
User avatar #62294 to #62293 - feelythefeel ONLINE (04/21/2014) [-]
Me too to be honest. Maybe I'm a bit biased because I was one of them, but still.
User avatar #62295 to #62294 - Shiny (04/21/2014) [-]
I'm hardly a commie, but at least they discuss politics instead of "joooooos".
User avatar #62301 to #62298 - Shiny (04/21/2014) [-]
Y'all and byposted are cool though.
User avatar #62291 to #62287 - revengeforfreeze (04/21/2014) [-]
Who drew this xd?
#62290 to #62287 - anonymous (04/21/2014) [-]
I miss all the other Reds on this board.
User avatar #62315 to #62299 - hawaiianhappysauce (04/21/2014) [-]
You are sort of the harbinger of this change to pol 2.0. I give you most credit.
User avatar #62292 to #62290 - feelythefeel ONLINE (04/21/2014) [-]
I'm still here. I'm a democratic socialist now, though.
User avatar #62289 to #62287 - jewishcommunazi (04/21/2014) [-]
I still think the cold war stage was fun.
#62275 - byposted (04/20/2014) [-]
www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/20/us-syria-crisis-easter-idUSBREA3J09A20140420

Assad visits the Christian town of Maaloula, where NATO terrorists used to kidnap nuns and rape the livestock, in time for Easter.

Related news: Bill Clinton is fulfilling his destiny by having a Jewish grandson. How fitting for a president whose administration was dominated by Zionists! The gem I found below corrects the deeming of Obama as the "first Jewish President" – that was obviously Clinton, for the Jews never wielded such brazen control over the political structure until he came along.

www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/post/bill-clinton-americas-first-jewish-president/2012/02/05/gIQAJ5lusQ_blog.html
User avatar #62280 to #62275 - Shiny (04/20/2014) [-]
What would you describe as not a "Zionist" US president, dare I ask?
User avatar #62281 to #62280 - byposted (04/20/2014) [-]
One who is free from the grip of Jewish financing. Not since JFK, I believe, have we seen such a president. Even Nixon, who was unique in that he recognized the Jewish problem, did nothing to fight it - allowing the Zionist Jews Schlesinger and Kissinger to form an Israel-first foreign policy.

Obama has certainly used his "King Negro" position to the benefit of the Palestinians, but I'm certain that the next president will jump back into line. The Republican Party will undoubtedly nominate an Israel-firster, which would leave Ms. Clinton, whose sympathies are already known, on the other side.
User avatar #62282 to #62281 - Shiny (04/20/2014) [-]
"Not since JFK, I believe, have we seen such a president."
Which is hilarious, since everyone thought electing a Catholic would lead to America becoming another Vatican.
"Obama has certainly used his "King Negro" position to the benefit of the Palestinians, but I'm certain that the next president will jump back into line. The Republican Party will undoubtedly nominate an Israel-firster, which would leave Ms. Clinton, whose sympathies are already known, on the other side."
Sounds about right... it's sad how the Democrats have pretty much given up their Israel skepticism (which is odd, since they've owned the Jewish demographic in America long before that), leaving the GOP to indulge their fantasies of an impenetrable Jerusalem.
#62277 to #62275 - byposted (04/20/2014) [-]
tinyurl.com/mhkjkq6
Not surprisingly, Stormfront, the anti-Semitic website, does recognize the child as a Jew, as evidenced by its charming headline: “Chelsea Clinton pregnant with jew spawn.”
User avatar #62256 - revengeforfreeze (04/20/2014) [-]
Schnizel
I need the picture with a Jew holding leashes to various people, femen members, some nerdy new atheist guy and a nigger or something.
User avatar #62264 to #62259 - revengeforfreeze (04/20/2014) [-]
Thanks man.
User avatar #62257 to #62256 - schnizel (04/20/2014) [-]
I don't have it, I think dehumanizer has them.
#62249 - dehumanizer (04/20/2014) [-]
Happy Hitler day everyone!
User avatar #62274 to #62249 - byposted (04/20/2014) [-]
♫ SS-Marschiert in Feindesland ♫.flv
Rammstein Sonne SS Version
Landser - Adolf Hitler unser Führer
>that feel when no united German/Polish/Rumanian policy in the Ukraine
feels batman
User avatar #62253 to #62249 - schnizel (04/20/2014) [-]
Happy birthday!
User avatar #62252 to #62249 - Shiny (04/20/2014) [-]
420 gas it ubermensch
User avatar #62255 to #62251 - revengeforfreeze (04/20/2014) [-]
Shut up pc robot
User avatar #62254 to #62251 - schnizel (04/20/2014) [-]
Why?
#62260 to #62254 - pebar (04/20/2014) [-]
Really?
You can't figure it out?
User avatar #62265 to #62260 - schnizel (04/20/2014) [-]
Tell me.
Why did you post that gif.
User avatar #62266 to #62265 - pebar (04/20/2014) [-]
Because I think it's childish to celebrate Hitler's birthday.
User avatar #62267 to #62266 - schnizel (04/20/2014) [-]
Why?
User avatar #62268 to #62267 - pebar (04/20/2014) [-]
Why would you celebrate a dead guy's birthday?
User avatar #62273 to #62268 - byposted (04/20/2014) [-]
Because He will rise and put a stake into the Jew's heart.

Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah - Jesus son of Mary
0
#62272 to #62268 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #62270 to #62269 - pebar (04/20/2014) [-]
I fucking knew this would happen.....

People celebrate that because it represents God keeping his promise.
User avatar #62286 to #62270 - johnstuartmill (04/21/2014) [-]
You are talking about Christmas right?
User avatar #62271 to #62270 - schnizel (04/20/2014) [-]
So do we.....
User avatar #62261 to #62260 - revengeforfreeze (04/20/2014) [-]
Oy vey, yes, quantum physics is bullshit. Don't believe in antisemitic lies like the uncertainty principle!
User avatar #62262 to #62261 - pebar (04/20/2014) [-]
Fun fact: Einstein hated the uncertainty principle because he couldn't accept that there was inherent randomness in the Universe.
User avatar #62263 to #62262 - revengeforfreeze (04/20/2014) [-]
I know. Dice and all
 Friends (0)