| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
Comments(26380):
Did they really have more money, though? In the US in particular, wages stagnated and debt rose above 100% of household income. The lower class lost wealth after the 70s, and the middle class made meager gains, only be women entering the workforce and doubling household income.
#29156 to #29154
-
oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
Indeed. But that's where borrowing and loans come into it. Richard Wolff gives a great overview of what happened during the GFC. A teacher gave me his name only yesterday and I've already gone out and ordered one of his books ^.^
Here's his talk on it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGOA2WedIQo
And pic is somewhat related.
Here's his talk on it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGOA2WedIQo
And pic is somewhat related.
thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/299403-feds-seize-reporters-phone-records
Michael Rivero - "The DOJ wanted AP to know their phones were being accessed. Obama just sent a message to the corporate media; "WE ARE WATCHING YOU!" And it is no coincidence that this very chilling message for the media to be careful who they are talking to gets sent just as Benghazi-gate and IRS-gate explode into view! "
Michael Rivero - "The DOJ wanted AP to know their phones were being accessed. Obama just sent a message to the corporate media; "WE ARE WATCHING YOU!" And it is no coincidence that this very chilling message for the media to be careful who they are talking to gets sent just as Benghazi-gate and IRS-gate explode into view! "
#29134
-
N. Korean citizen (05/13/2013) [-]
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
I just heard about the basketball player admitting he's gay, or something in america, it just showed how some people can be hypocritical as fuck.
-"OMG guise, it doesn't matter if someone is gay or not, stay out of it, it's none of our business!"
-"OMG, that guy admitted he's gay, let's all pay attention to him because that totally matters to us! What an inspiration he is!"
-"OMG guise, it doesn't matter if someone is gay or not, stay out of it, it's none of our business!"
-"OMG, that guy admitted he's gay, let's all pay attention to him because that totally matters to us! What an inspiration he is!"
If their own fellow players really would bully him for that, then that's different, I wasn't aware of it and they should eat shit and die, I just assumed they would behave as the adults they're supposed to be in cases like this, but I'm still skeptic that they really would outright bully him.
It's kind of similar to what happened to certain communist parties around the world during the cold war, they stopped actually caring about communism and became "Russia's little bitch" parties and actual communists on those parties were purged or something similar. It was a bloodless form of stalinism, but still stalinism.
#29116
-
N. Korean citizen (05/13/2013) [-]
You: hi
Stranger: m gay fox 25
You: OMH
You: same here
Stranger: mhm
You: I am the dominate one btw
Stranger: if you say so
You: Muahhhahaa!!! :D He's a masonic zionist troll I guess, furries are fucking bitch ass cunts...
LOL TF! If he's Iranian or not thees epic man ;) Anyway sub scribed ur channell ;) ;) ;)
Stranger: m gay fox 25
You: OMH
You: same here
Stranger: mhm
You: I am the dominate one btw
Stranger: if you say so
You: Muahhhahaa!!! :D He's a masonic zionist troll I guess, furries are fucking bitch ass cunts...
LOL TF! If he's Iranian or not thees epic man ;) Anyway sub scribed ur channell ;) ;) ;)
#29115
-
tredbear (05/13/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3J8kK0N72M&list=PLnYY9qf0dhv8ivyMmenLEXVPCHREuGbDW&index=15
I miss the soviet Union
I miss the soviet Union
#29095
-
walkingdisaster (05/12/2013) [-]
rt.com/usa/new-orleans-parade-shooting-179/
Great, another round of the gun debate looms on the horizon.
Will this shit ever end?
Great, another round of the gun debate looms on the horizon.
Will this shit ever end?
#29099 to #29095
-
thechurchchurch (05/12/2013) [-]
I moved past all of this trivial back and forth of one day my rights are secured and the next they're up for grabs.
It's time to find a way to void the gun debate through technology. Cody wilson created a printable gun from his own in less than a year,and now that they have 3d printers that can manufacture with metal,I really dont see how they can control this in the future without stepping over that line where free nations a dictatorships meet.
The future doesnt have time for gun control.
It's time to find a way to void the gun debate through technology. Cody wilson created a printable gun from his own in less than a year,and now that they have 3d printers that can manufacture with metal,I really dont see how they can control this in the future without stepping over that line where free nations a dictatorships meet.
The future doesnt have time for gun control.
The whole point of political discussions is to debate about eachother's opinions. If you just throw out "that's just your opinion" then there is no debate, there is no understanding, there is no compromise, and there is no benefit to anyone. People will remain divided and society will tear itself apart.
#29082
-
N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
The government of the people, by the people, versus the people.
#29059
-
N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
Are there honestly still people that don't favor a mixed economy?
I cannot name one command or market economy in history that has left most of it's population with a decent standard of living. Yet in much of the western world today more people have weather proof houses than those who don't, indoor plumbing, electricity, internet, and we have more opportunities for leisure than almost any other society in history. I say we live quite comfortably. I don't understand why there are so many radicals today who have the time to discuss politics on the internet from their comfy home that want to change this. Instead they could be working all day then come home to, clean up their own fecal matter, fetch and boil their water, farm their own food, and end their day on some uncomfortable bed unable to keep the harsh cold away.
I cannot name one command or market economy in history that has left most of it's population with a decent standard of living. Yet in much of the western world today more people have weather proof houses than those who don't, indoor plumbing, electricity, internet, and we have more opportunities for leisure than almost any other society in history. I say we live quite comfortably. I don't understand why there are so many radicals today who have the time to discuss politics on the internet from their comfy home that want to change this. Instead they could be working all day then come home to, clean up their own fecal matter, fetch and boil their water, farm their own food, and end their day on some uncomfortable bed unable to keep the harsh cold away.
Mixed economies vs Command economies is one thing. I won't discuss that. But market economies are fucking retarded. Not one state has ever developed industry with a full market economy. All industrial development has been done involving government direction and/or protectionism.
'Yet we’ve also always had gun control. The Founding Fathers instituted gun laws so intrusive that, were they running for office today, the NRA would not endorse them. While they did not care to completely disarm the citizenry, the founding generation denied gun ownership to many people: not only slaves and free blacks, but law-abiding white men who refused to swear loyalty to the Revolution. '
Thoughts?
Source: www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-of-guns/308608/
Thoughts?
Source: www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-of-guns/308608/
#29089 to #29056
-
N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
Well, denying those groups is understandable (though not necessarily right). For slaves, the reason should be obvious. Give any slave a gun and he has the power to say no to those who seek to control him. For freed blacks, denying them gun ownership was most likely done in fear that they'd try to seek revenge for being formerly held as slaves.
For the last one, it's typical of any revolution for there to be precautionary measures taken against the threat of counterrevolutionaries.
For the last one, it's typical of any revolution for there to be precautionary measures taken against the threat of counterrevolutionaries.
#29062 to #29056
-
thechurchchurch (05/12/2013) [-]
It was also believed at the time of our founding fathers that the only ones entitled to vote were white men.
As time goes by the right to vote has expanded to all races and genders. Now this didnt mean that the founding fathers were anti voting, they were just for the voting rights of all those considered "people" back then,just like we defend the voting rights of all those considered "people" now,just not felons.
It's the spirit of the law that matters.
As time goes by the right to vote has expanded to all races and genders. Now this didnt mean that the founding fathers were anti voting, they were just for the voting rights of all those considered "people" back then,just like we defend the voting rights of all those considered "people" now,just not felons.
It's the spirit of the law that matters.
Can I please get a bias-free summary of what is happening with Benghazi right now? I thought this thing was over.
>Imperialists imperialise Libya
>Imperialists get buttimperialised when their embassy is attacked
>Imperialists blame other imperialists in a shitty two-party system because half of the imperialists are still buttimperialised about Obama
Oh, you said bias-free. Sorry.
I honestly just wanted to use 'buttimperialised' a few times.
>Imperialists get buttimperialised when their embassy is attacked
>Imperialists blame other imperialists in a shitty two-party system because half of the imperialists are still buttimperialised about Obama
Oh, you said bias-free. Sorry.
I honestly just wanted to use 'buttimperialised' a few times.
Terrorists attacked a US embassy and killed 4 Americans including the ambassador. Not much else to say about the actual attack; it's the political war that's significant.
The Obama ad.ministration screwed up then lied about to make themselves look better. The republicans found out and are using it to try and knock Hillary Clinton out of the presidential race of 2016 because she'd probably win the democratic primaries.
The Obama ad.ministration screwed up then lied about to make themselves look better. The republicans found out and are using it to try and knock Hillary Clinton out of the presidential race of 2016 because she'd probably win the democratic primaries.
The bureaucrats in the state department dismissed the act as a disorderly protest against a movie, (The Innocence of Muslims) which is shown by them having edited the talking points for Benghazi via email to erase any mention of terrorism. Of course, that movie was a non-issue in Libya, despite its offensive portrayal of Islam by a Jewish director. After the attack, at great risk to his own life, the Libyan President went to Benghazi to affirm that it was indeed a terrorist attack, although Rice would have none of it and insulted him on the national stage. This helped the election of Obama because it prevented immediate controversy. Mitt Romney was unable to bring up the attack in the last debate because of how it was portrayed as being void of organized terrorism.
They lied about not being able to send military personal to Benghazi, which would have been able to get there in 3 hours from mainland Europe at command; the attack lasted 6-8 hours or so. Fundamentally, they did nothing as the consulat was under attack. Obama, when he heard of what was transpiring, did not take interest and instead told his cabinet to head operations, which is now known (despite the fact that the White House released a supposed photo of Obama reacting to the attack by sitting on a couch with a frown). The next day he went to Las Vegas for a campaign fundraiser.
They lied about not being able to send military personal to Benghazi, which would have been able to get there in 3 hours from mainland Europe at command; the attack lasted 6-8 hours or so. Fundamentally, they did nothing as the consulat was under attack. Obama, when he heard of what was transpiring, did not take interest and instead told his cabinet to head operations, which is now known (despite the fact that the White House released a supposed photo of Obama reacting to the attack by sitting on a couch with a frown). The next day he went to Las Vegas for a campaign fundraiser.
Apparently it came out of somebody's ass. Hicks, deputy chief of mission in Libya during the attacks, testified less than a week ago that the video was a non-issue in Libya.
Hicks, who had a demotion in ranking, claims that the Obama DJ 4DM1Nistration is punishing him for whistleblowing.
Hicks, who had a demotion in ranking, claims that the Obama DJ 4DM1Nistration is punishing him for whistleblowing.