| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
#29148 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #29150 to #29148 - oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
It's not like the people had much money today anyway, that was the issue.
User avatar #29151 to #29150 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Even if the people have more money now, it shouldn't be used on bailouts for corrupt companies.
User avatar #29152 to #29151 - oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
Did they really have more money, though? In the US in particular, wages stagnated and debt rose above 100% of household income. The lower class lost wealth after the 70s, and the middle class made meager gains, only be women entering the workforce and doubling household income.
User avatar #29154 to #29152 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
I should've thought of that, but living conditions still improved a little for the middle class, and maybe the lower aswell, or at least that's the idea I have.
#29156 to #29154 - oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
Indeed. But that's where borrowing and loans come into it. Richard Wolff gives a great overview of what happened during the GFC. A teacher gave me his name only yesterday and I've already gone out and ordered one of his books ^.^

Here's his talk on it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGOA2WedIQo

And pic is somewhat related.
User avatar #29157 to #29156 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
I'll check it when I get home, right now, I'm on a terrible computer.
User avatar #29158 to #29157 - oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
No rush, friend.

The same sentiment shared by my local bookstore, it seems, considering it'll take three weeks for my order to get in ^.^ I should've ordered a few others whilst there.
User avatar #29149 to #29148 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Oh, it saved as a gif. Thanks a lot, Obama.
User avatar #29153 to #29149 - oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
Armindo, your avatar is making it difficult for me to recognise myself ^.^
User avatar #29155 to #29153 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
I almost replied to myself thinking it was you on a few occasions.Le laughing face.
#29141 - N. Korean citizen (05/14/2013) [-]
YALL MOTHAFUCKAS NEED PONIES
#29177 to #29141 - niggernazi (05/14/2013) [-]
the only thing we need is breivik
#29180 to #29179 - niggernazi (05/14/2013) [-]
he learned me how to swim
#29172 to #29141 - N. Korean citizen (05/14/2013) [-]
Well, I am running a little short on glue...
User avatar #29160 to #29141 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Lol no.
#29146 to #29144 - oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
Forgot I had this.
User avatar #29135 - eight (05/14/2013) [-]
thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/299403-feds-seize-reporters-phone-records

Michael Rivero - "The DOJ wanted AP to know their phones were being accessed. Obama just sent a message to the corporate media; "WE ARE WATCHING YOU!" And it is no coincidence that this very chilling message for the media to be careful who they are talking to gets sent just as Benghazi-gate and IRS-gate explode into view! "
#29134 - N. Korean citizen (05/13/2013) [-]

FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
FAT BEN MADE POOP
User avatar #29139 to #29134 - medewu (05/14/2013) [-]
I give you credit sure it is spam, but it's spam that is nicely put together.
#29173 to #29139 - N. Korean citizen (05/14/2013) [-]
卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐
卐HEIL HITLER 卐
卐HEIL HITLER 卐
卐HEIL HITLER 卐
卐HEIL HITLER 卐
卐HEIL HITLER 卐
卐HEIL HITLER 卐
卐HEIL HITLER 卐
卐HEIL HITLER 卐
卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐
User avatar #29131 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
I just heard about the basketball player admitting he's gay, or something in america, it just showed how some people can be hypocritical as fuck.

-"OMG guise, it doesn't matter if someone is gay or not, stay out of it, it's none of our business!"

-"OMG, that guy admitted he's gay, let's all pay attention to him because that totally matters to us! What an inspiration he is!"
User avatar #29136 to #29131 - teoberry ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Different people have different opinions lil guy. Most of the people saying it's personal business probably aren't the people talking about Collins being gay.
User avatar #29147 to #29136 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Some of them are, that's what I was trying to say. I'm all for gay rights myself, but I don't think people should make much of a deal when someone admits being gay.
User avatar #29161 to #29147 - teoberry ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Yeah, but in the NBA and most pro sports leagues for that matter, a gay player is likely to get bullied in the locker room, so it is a big deal in that cases
User avatar #29163 to #29161 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
If their own fellow players really would bully him for that, then that's different, I wasn't aware of it and they should eat shit and die, I just assumed they would behave as the adults they're supposed to be in cases like this, but I'm still skeptic that they really would outright bully him.
User avatar #29164 to #29163 - teoberry ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
A few might, but they'd probably get shit after a while. Charles Barkley even said that he played with many gay guys, so I'm guessing it's not a big deal anymore
User avatar #29162 to #29161 - teoberry ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
*case
User avatar #29132 to #29131 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
Three typos in a row, I'm a failure.
0
#29130 - commiejewnazi has deleted their comment. [-]
0
#29129 - commiejewnazi has deleted their comment. [-]
#29128 - roliga (05/13/2013) [-]
So the IRS just accidentally'd the whole everything...
User avatar #29145 to #29128 - oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
I hate that women so much. Dirty hippie.
User avatar #29159 to #29145 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
I'm kind of ok with hippies, even though almost nobody seems to like them. They're kind of stupid sometimes, but they still seem like cool guys.
User avatar #29208 to #29159 - oxan (05/15/2013) [-]
As valeriya said, they're the lumpen of the lumpen. The bourgeoisie aren't going to surrender the MoP if we all sit down in a drum circle.
User avatar #29193 to #29159 - pebar ONLINE (05/15/2013) [-]
they're short-sighted idealists
#29166 to #29159 - valeriya (05/14/2013) [-]
>Hippies
>Ever good.

Excuse me what backwards place are you from, hippies are probably the most lumpen of the lumpen and that takes lumpenness to a whole new level.
User avatar #29196 to #29166 - arisaka (05/15/2013) [-]
Hippies also didn't kill millions of people, so there's that.

I don't like hippies either but hey, at least they're not Stalinists...
User avatar #29216 to #29196 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/15/2013) [-]
Yes, this was more or less the point I was trying to make. They're idiots, but they're harmless idiots.
User avatar #29238 to #29216 - arisaka (05/15/2013) [-]
There were actually a lot of great 60's radical groups but they were sadly outshined by the rise of Bolshevik supporters in NATO countries, which I think is a shame.
User avatar #29240 to #29238 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/15/2013) [-]
It's kind of similar to what happened to certain communist parties around the world during the cold war, they stopped actually caring about communism and became "Russia's little bitch" parties and actual communists on those parties were purged or something similar. It was a bloodless form of stalinism, but still stalinism.
User avatar #29241 to #29240 - arisaka (05/15/2013) [-]
Well everyone had thought the Russian Revolution was some kind of victory for the working class so they all thought Bolshevism was the future.
User avatar #29167 to #29166 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Many of them, yes, I just don't think they're too bad.
#29116 - N. Korean citizen (05/13/2013) [-]
You: hi
Stranger: m gay fox 25
You: OMH
You: same here
Stranger: mhm
You: I am the dominate one btw
Stranger: if you say so
You: Muahhhahaa!!! :D He's a masonic zionist troll I guess, furries are fucking bitch ass cunts...
LOL TF! If he's Iranian or not thees epic man ;) Anyway sub scribed ur channell ;) ;) ;)
#29118 to #29115 - oxan (05/13/2013) [-]
Guard Song is still best Soviet song.
#29095 - walkingdisaster (05/12/2013) [-]
rt.com/usa/new-orleans-parade-shooting-179/

Great, another round of the gun debate looms on the horizon.
Will this shit ever end?
User avatar #29127 to #29095 - roliga (05/13/2013) [-]
Nigger gonna nig.


And the longer niggers nig like this the longer it's going to take me to find some nice cheap .223...
#29109 to #29095 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
New Orleans is a nigger haven. It's no surprise a shootout happened there.
#29099 to #29095 - thechurchchurch (05/12/2013) [-]
I moved past all of this trivial back and forth of one day my rights are secured and the next they're up for grabs.

It's time to find a way to void the gun debate through technology. Cody wilson created a printable gun from his own in less than a year,and now that they have 3d printers that can manufacture with metal,I really dont see how they can control this in the future without stepping over that line where free nations a dictatorships meet.

The future doesnt have time for gun control.
#29096 to #29095 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
Not until we reopen the mental asylums and find a way to accurately identify lunatics before they go on a spree.
User avatar #29101 to #29096 - takamori (05/12/2013) [-]
The problem is you can't.
User avatar #29110 to #29101 - oxan (05/13/2013) [-]
Mandatory testing at a certain age? Could filter some people, at least.
User avatar #29137 to #29110 - teoberry ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
ACLU might bitch tho
User avatar #29124 to #29110 - takamori (05/13/2013) [-]
Explain.
User avatar #29142 to #29124 - oxan (05/14/2013) [-]
At a certain age - say sixteen for example - you're required to undergo a basic psychological examination.
#29087 to #29086 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
opinion on what...?
#29091 to #29087 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
OPINION ON FAT BEN'S POOP
User avatar #29088 to #29087 - garymotherfingoak ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
It's just a related picture. people have different opinions about politics is all. is that so hard to grasp?
User avatar #29093 to #29088 - pebar ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
The whole point of political discussions is to debate about eachother's opinions. If you just throw out "that's just your opinion" then there is no debate, there is no understanding, there is no compromise, and there is no benefit to anyone. People will remain divided and society will tear itself apart.
User avatar #29100 to #29093 - garymotherfingoak ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
well i hadn't thought about it that deeply. you're right though.
#29094 to #29093 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
#3deep   
   
But, yeah, you're right.
#3deep

But, yeah, you're right.
#29082 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
The government of the people, by the people, versus the people.
#29097 to #29082 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
The government of the people, by the people, VERSUS FAT BEN'S POOP
#29074 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
In case someone shows up in here, what's your opinion on Hugo Chávez?
User avatar #29122 to #29074 - commiejewnazi ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
Since nobody is answering, I'll just say that he was a pretty cool guy.
0
#29073 - commiejewnazi has deleted their comment. [-]
#29059 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
Are there honestly still people that don't favor a mixed economy?
I cannot name one command or market economy in history that has left most of it's population with a decent standard of living. Yet in much of the western world today more people have weather proof houses than those who don't, indoor plumbing, electricity, internet, and we have more opportunities for leisure than almost any other society in history. I say we live quite comfortably. I don't understand why there are so many radicals today who have the time to discuss politics on the internet from their comfy home that want to change this. Instead they could be working all day then come home to, clean up their own fecal matter, fetch and boil their water, farm their own food, and end their day on some uncomfortable bed unable to keep the harsh cold away.
User avatar #29061 to #29059 - oxan (05/12/2013) [-]
Mixed economies vs Command economies is one thing. I won't discuss that. But market economies are fucking retarded. Not one state has ever developed industry with a full market economy. All industrial development has been done involving government direction and/or protectionism.
User avatar #29056 - oxan (05/12/2013) [-]
'Yet we’ve also always had gun control. The Founding Fathers instituted gun laws so intrusive that, were they running for office today, the NRA would not endorse them. While they did not care to completely disarm the citizenry, the founding generation denied gun ownership to many people: not only slaves and free blacks, but law-abiding white men who refused to swear loyalty to the Revolution. '

Thoughts?

Source: www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-of-guns/308608/
#29089 to #29056 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
Well, denying those groups is understandable (though not necessarily right). For slaves, the reason should be obvious. Give any slave a gun and he has the power to say no to those who seek to control him. For freed blacks, denying them gun ownership was most likely done in fear that they'd try to seek revenge for being formerly held as slaves.

For the last one, it's typical of any revolution for there to be precautionary measures taken against the threat of counterrevolutionaries.
#29062 to #29056 - thechurchchurch (05/12/2013) [-]
It was also believed at the time of our founding fathers that the only ones entitled to vote were white men.

As time goes by the right to vote has expanded to all races and genders. Now this didnt mean that the founding fathers were anti voting, they were just for the voting rights of all those considered "people" back then,just like we defend the voting rights of all those considered "people" now,just not felons.

It's the spirit of the law that matters.
User avatar #29033 - walkingdisaster (05/12/2013) [-]
Can I please get a bias-free summary of what is happening with Benghazi right now? I thought this thing was over.
User avatar #29049 to #29033 - oxan (05/12/2013) [-]
>Imperialists imperialise Libya
>Imperialists get buttimperialised when their embassy is attacked
>Imperialists blame other imperialists in a shitty two-party system because half of the imperialists are still buttimperialised about Obama

Oh, you said bias-free. Sorry.

I honestly just wanted to use 'buttimperialised' a few times.
#29052 to #29049 - valeriya (05/12/2013) [-]
And that is why you shouldn't get involved in countries that function perfectly fine.
User avatar #29053 to #29052 - oxan (05/12/2013) [-]
Eh, I wouldn't say Libya was fine. But the intervention was shitty, and the 'support for a popular uprising against tyranny' or whatever the fuck was simply a cover for an economic agenda.
#29054 to #29053 - valeriya (05/12/2013) [-]
It was a lot better off before that's for certain, all this gold dinar probably upset murrica enough, it's funny they've pretty much degenerated back to warring tribes level, all because they believed some stupid notions of liberty.
User avatar #29038 to #29033 - pebar ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
Terrorists attacked a US embassy and killed 4 Americans including the ambassador. Not much else to say about the actual attack; it's the political war that's significant.

The Obama ad.ministration screwed up then lied about to make themselves look better. The republicans found out and are using it to try and knock Hillary Clinton out of the presidential race of 2016 because she'd probably win the democratic primaries.
User avatar #29040 to #29038 - walkingdisaster (05/12/2013) [-]
How'd they lie?
User avatar #29072 to #29040 - byposted (05/12/2013) [-]
The bureaucrats in the state department dismissed the act as a disorderly protest against a movie, (The Innocence of Muslims) which is shown by them having edited the talking points for Benghazi via email to erase any mention of terrorism. Of course, that movie was a non-issue in Libya, despite its offensive portrayal of Islam by a Jewish director. After the attack, at great risk to his own life, the Libyan President went to Benghazi to affirm that it was indeed a terrorist attack, although Rice would have none of it and insulted him on the national stage. This helped the election of Obama because it prevented immediate controversy. Mitt Romney was unable to bring up the attack in the last debate because of how it was portrayed as being void of organized terrorism.

They lied about not being able to send military personal to Benghazi, which would have been able to get there in 3 hours from mainland Europe at command; the attack lasted 6-8 hours or so. Fundamentally, they did nothing as the consulat was under attack. Obama, when he heard of what was transpiring, did not take interest and instead told his cabinet to head operations, which is now known (despite the fact that the White House released a supposed photo of Obama reacting to the attack by sitting on a couch with a frown). The next day he went to Las Vegas for a campaign fundraiser.
User avatar #29092 to #29072 - Ruspanic (05/12/2013) [-]
I haven't been following the issue, but I thought there were actual protests against the movie which happened to coincide with the terrorist attack on the embassy. Am I wrong?
User avatar #29098 to #29092 - byposted (05/12/2013) [-]
Apparently it came out of somebody's ass. Hicks, deputy chief of mission in Libya during the attacks, testified less than a week ago that the video was a non-issue in Libya.

Hicks, who had a demotion in ranking, claims that the Obama DJ 4DM1Nistration is punishing him for whistleblowing.

User avatar #29081 to #29072 - europe (05/12/2013) [-]
Ohai.
0
#29071 to #29040 - byposted has deleted their comment. [-]
#29029 - levchenko ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
When ever i think of nuclear war i think of the agreement that the United States and the Soviet Union (more powerful at the time) made to never use our nuclear arms on each other...

Like the USA would fallow that now, traders...
#29039 to #29029 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
traitors*
User avatar #29036 to #29029 - CapnInterwebz ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
Why would we nuke the Soviet Union Russia? Or anyone for that matter?
User avatar #29042 to #29036 - oxan (05/12/2013) [-]
NATO refused to sign a treaty saying they'd never fire nukes first, because they were concerned about being overwhelmed by the Warsaw Pact. The Warsaw Pact states had a much larger combined military force than NATO at the time.
#29030 to #29029 - N. Korean citizen (05/12/2013) [-]
Yes, we do trade quite a lot.
User avatar #29031 to #29030 - levchenko ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
I fucked my ass there...
 Friends (0)