Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #68518 - feelythefeel (08/26/2014) [-]
Black Friday Store Stampede! [Compilation] Is materialism like this synonymous with a successful capitalist system? Or are people just materialist by nature?

Also, funny video of people acting like apes over cheap IPhones.
#68592 to #68518 - cabbagemayhem (08/27/2014) [-]
Capitalism is only one ingredient. You can't have a proper meal without the cook, Jesus Christ. "Thou shalt not covet and stampede over thine neighbor to be the first to get to the X-Box One's."
User avatar #68553 to #68518 - byposted (08/27/2014) [-]
A successful capitalist system would be maintained by an intelligent workforce and relatively frugal consumers. A population of apes, which cannot properly asses its means, does not serve anyone but creditors - usurers who threaten economic stability.

Have some Mark Dice.

Ridiculing Shoppers in Line on Black Friday at the Entrance of Best Buy
User avatar #68555 to #68553 - feelythefeel (08/27/2014) [-]
Also, that video is funny (Although that horde wasn't even too bad).
User avatar #68554 to #68553 - feelythefeel (08/27/2014) [-]
All I was referring to when I said "Successful capitalist system" is a system where everyone isn't starving to death. I wasn't making a comment on sustainability or anything else.
User avatar #68556 to #68554 - byposted (08/27/2014) [-]
You may not have made a comment on sustainability, but the question, which I responded to, encompasses that concept.

Those who trample each other to get their hands on the new Iphone already live under a "successful capitalist system," by your definition. They are well fed, if not obese, but imperil their livelihoods with an unhealthy consumerism.
User avatar #68557 to #68556 - feelythefeel (08/27/2014) [-]
That isn't my personal definition of a perfectly successful capitalist system, that's just what I was referring to in the original comment.
User avatar #68530 to #68518 - alimais (08/26/2014) [-]
Step it up

YUROPOOR PRESENTS: AMERICANS CLAPPING V - THE RETURN OF THE CLAPBURGERS
User avatar #68528 to #68518 - schnizel (08/26/2014) [-]
>capitalism
#68527 to #68518 - anonymous (08/26/2014) [-]
I knew it was bad but not THIS bad.
User avatar #68519 to #68518 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/26/2014) [-]
Sheep in front of an Apple Store watching the video makes those people no different to the sheep in this video

they are just a waste of human DNA
#68513 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/26/2014) [-]
oh wow, so now Israel also admits supporting the terrorist in syria

alimais this is amazing situation right? the countries that fight terrorists supports the terrorists
#68593 to #68513 - cabbagemayhem (08/27/2014) [-]
That's the FSA - not quite the same as terrorists.
#68594 to #68593 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/27/2014) [-]
>FSA
>not terrorists

#68589 to #68513 - anonymous (08/27/2014) [-]
>Wikipedia
#68590 to #68589 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/27/2014) [-]
>anonymous
>anonymous
User avatar #68529 to #68513 - alimais (08/26/2014) [-]
MS Paint 4 life
User avatar #68520 to #68513 - alimais (08/26/2014) [-]
Isnt new, they always did
0
#68521 to #68520 - syrianassassin has deleted their comment [-]
#68510 - youregaylol (08/26/2014) [-]
The Fights That Got Me Fired (ATL Security Guard) Part 2
This video gives me hope. One black man fighting against the hordes of the negro scourge. Now of course he's not as professional as one one hope, and he still uses the vernacular of one cursed with jungle fever, but it's still a sight to see.

I think that training civic minded blacks (there are admittedly few), preferably former military, and unleashing them in heavily black areas would be a good idea. It's clear that leftists have manipulated the inner city negro against white authoritarians. Better that they be beaten by those of their own race.

And these black authorities would serve as examples to the rest of their race. Lets face facts,blacks will conform to white society, but they can be controlled. Out of all te races the blacks have been the most easily manipulated, from slavery to unknowing shill they are born followers. If it is possible to insure that competent blacks have dominion over the rest then I believe that their negative influence on society can be curved.

Ideally we should also attempt some sort of isolation between them and the rest of the races, but that seems unlikely in america. I think Malcolm X had a good plan in his "New Africa" separatism, though I doubt any blacks would want to leave their "oppressors" as they know that their own people aren't capable of governing. Then of course we get back to the problem of the absence of capable black leadership.

So in short train capable blacks to lord over their people and brutalize the degenerates, establish reservations not unlike the indian territories where the blacks have pseudo autonomy, and give them an incentive to relocate. I'd happily pay more in taxes to see a new nation for the former slaves. I think it will be better for both races.
User avatar #68515 to #68510 - feelythefeel (08/26/2014) [-]
Or, or, and get this,

a security guard that got into some fights happened to be black. It's crazy, I know, but I've got a hunch.
#68516 to #68515 - youregaylol (08/26/2014) [-]
I witnessed something and it caused me to think, I'm sorry if that upsets you.

gg tho
User avatar #68517 to #68516 - feelythefeel (08/26/2014) [-]
Admittedly, it's in a very bad neighborhood.
#68511 to #68510 - liberalgodess (08/26/2014) [-]
It's almost as if black people aren't as degenerate as you think.
#68522 to #68511 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/26/2014) [-]
>liberal
>saying others are degenerate

arent you and your kind degenerate?

oh wait i forgot you are all just a waste of human DNA
User avatar #68532 to #68522 - feelythefeel (08/26/2014) [-]
He said the opposite, actually.
#68524 to #68522 - anonymous (08/26/2014) [-]
says the mudslime
says the mudslime
#68526 to #68524 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/26/2014) [-]
i expected you
User avatar #68514 to #68511 - schnizel (08/26/2014) [-]
Back to the oven troll
The nig nog has white genes in him
User avatar #68523 to #68514 - liberalgodess (08/26/2014) [-]
"mixed race kids are worse"
--schnizel

why can't you be consistent
User avatar #68525 to #68523 - schnizel (08/26/2014) [-]
Worse by %, but there are always some that stand out.
Also, never claimed that all are worse.
#68512 to #68511 - youregaylol (08/26/2014) [-]
I think they are exactly as degenerate as I think, that's why I think what I think, maybe if you would think about what I think your thought's about my thoughts would be the same as I what I think.

tl;dr stfu scrub.
#68496 - anonymous (08/24/2014) [-]
www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/23/ferguson-officer-relieved-duty-video-racist-remarks

Ferguson officer relieved of duty after controversial remarks at an Oath Keepers meeting. I'm a little concerned this man was a cop for almost 30 years.
User avatar #68501 to #68496 - schnizel (08/24/2014) [-]
Niggers keeping the white man down.
User avatar #68502 to #68495 - schnizel (08/24/2014) [-]
lel
#68489 - anonymous (08/24/2014) [-]
Why aren't we talking about Benghazi?????
User avatar #68494 to #68489 - feelythefeel (08/24/2014) [-]
If it means so much to you, why aren't you?
User avatar #68490 to #68489 - pebar (08/24/2014) [-]
Why would we be?
User avatar #68485 - hawaiianhappysauce (08/24/2014) [-]
I argue that most women should not have the right to vote. I think that people who are registered in the draft / are currently serving / have served in the military should have that right.

When will my right to vote be threatened? Answer: When there is such a war where a draft will be highly probable. Therefore I am a possible candidate who will have to defend my right to vote (and other rights obviously). Women are not in the draft and therefore do not necessarily have to defend their right to vote. So basically, if Russia decides to start WW3, and I am drafted, and I get shot in the head, I did that to defend the rights of my homeland, even though I never had any interest in doing so. Oh, and if I don't do it, it's treason and I face charges / lose citizenship.

So because I'm a male, I may in the distant future end up drafted. I will be sent to another country and I might get killed. No woman has to deal with that because they are a woman.

#68488 to #68485 - economicfreedom (08/24/2014) [-]
The draft only applies to people between the ages of 18 and 25. You would lose the right to vote when you turn 26.
The draft only applies to people between the ages of 18 and 25. You would lose the right to vote when you turn 26.
User avatar #68491 to #68488 - hawaiianhappysauce (08/24/2014) [-]
and women need not apply.
#68497 to #68491 - anonymous (08/24/2014) [-]
You realize you'd essentially restrict the right of enfranchisement and representative decision of the country to less than 15% According to Census Statistics which account for both male and female www.marketingcharts.com/traditional/so-how-many-millennials-are-there-in-the-us-anyway-30401/ ? By instilling such a criteria, you'd end up wtih one of three effects

1. Best Case Scenario: The Draft is "officially" tossed and written out of legislation.
2. Realistic Scenario: Motions are given to extend the military even further by lowering the standard of combat training and allowing women to enter the military and guarantee they can do so without strain.
3. Worst Case Scenario: The draft is extended age-wise and the possibility of a military state becomes even more plausible.

... Also, considering most politicians are 40+, I don't think anyone of them would even come to write an Amendment killer doomed to fail from the start.
User avatar #68498 to #68497 - akkere (08/24/2014) [-]
Annnd, forgot to login
User avatar #68493 to #68491 - economicfreedom (08/24/2014) [-]
You're still putting the fate of our country in the hands of college students.
User avatar #68503 to #68493 - hawaiianhappysauce (08/24/2014) [-]
I'm referring to people who are currently / were eligible for the draft and people who are serving / were serving.
User avatar #68504 to #68503 - economicfreedom (08/25/2014) [-]
But once you reach a certain age, you will never be called for the draft so there's no risk and your logic falls apart.
User avatar #68505 to #68504 - hawaiianhappysauce (08/25/2014) [-]
But at a certain point there was a risk, at ages 18-25. Whereas for women, there was a risk at ages... never.
#68506 to #68505 - economicfreedom (08/25/2014) [-]
Even though public policy, which is a WAAAAAY bigger threat to our rights, also affects women?
User avatar #68507 to #68506 - hawaiianhappysauce (08/25/2014) [-]
Which you can thank the feminazis for.
User avatar #68486 to #68485 - pebar (08/24/2014) [-]
For all practical purposes, the draft does not exist. So TBH, that's kind of stupid reasoning.
User avatar #68492 to #68486 - hawaiianhappysauce (08/24/2014) [-]
It does exist, we just never needed to use it. The fact remains that there exists a chance that young men will have to go to war no matter what, whereas women will never have to deal with that ever.
#68483 - anonymous (08/24/2014) [-]
DEFEND KEBAB ( actual video with english subtitles)






serbs are christian TERRORITS who love only raping girls and women ,war,killings,GENOCIDE,serbs are not people at all,ALL christians that support serbs and lick theyre asses,ARE JUST AS EVIL......but no love between MUSLIMS and christians,it cant happen,all christians support evil serbian pigs and what they done to innocent Muslims............so fuck all of u motherfuckers,KOSOVO IS ALBANIAN,Bosniaks kicked the serbs army ass,they are cowards!
User avatar #68480 - tredbear (08/24/2014) [-]
Do you guys think that a Service by requirement ordeal would issue more pros than cons?

"Service guarantees citizenship"
User avatar #68481 to #68480 - feelythefeel (08/24/2014) [-]
A better army is almost always bigger than a bigger army, especially in modern times. A professional volunteer army is pretty much objectively the best way to go.
User avatar #68482 to #68481 - feelythefeel (08/24/2014) [-]
*better than a bigger army
#68475 - anonymous (08/23/2014) [-]
Look at the current situation in Egypt and Libya

How have we not learned from the decolonization of Africa that the shift to an all inclusive democracy should be gradual and not happen all at once?
0
#68471 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
#68456 - anonymous (08/23/2014) [-]
نشيد جهادي جميل = لبيك اسلام Top Jihad Nasheed   YouTube
#68435 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
I'm just wondering if anybody here honestly believes the US benefits from the black population. I want to understand the reasoning behind the idea that blacks contribute anything to society.
User avatar #68581 to #68435 - jewishcommunazi (08/27/2014) [-]
They contribute to society the same way people in general contribute to society, I guess...
User avatar #68500 to #68435 - beatmasterz (08/24/2014) [-]
You can replace 'black' with anything else.
User avatar #68470 to #68435 - schnizel (08/23/2014) [-]
Muh slavery and He didn du nutin
User avatar #68468 to #68435 - akkere (08/23/2014) [-]
A problem that exists within the black population of the US is the imbued hostility that stems from a misapplied knowledge of history which breeds a paranoia that in turn breeds a hostile sentiment to all things authority, which in turns breeds counterproductive measures of social disintegration.
Now, a major component to this problem, and possibly a larger problem in itself, is the consistently low economic bracket many African American communities have found themselves in, due largely to a "poor hand given" from historical background, and solidified by this hostile sentiment.

The reason why I think the US can benefit from the population is simply that this is something that can be cured, by utilizing popular figures from the black community to put a call to end the hostility. Bill Cosby, for instance, releases a book called "Come On People" that essentially tells the black community to cut the shit, work a job, and stop blaming people who were only born in recent decades for something that happened centuries ago. He received controversy for it, but he also left a significant impact in other areas of the community that caused some people to "wake up".

Out of curiosity without any intent for inflammatory backfire, when you look at "the black community", do you also consider those that do receive an education, a career, and a legitimately successful living as a partial representation, or do you primarily look at the ghettos and poorer economic bracket which admittedly makes a larger part and think that is the sole representation of the race?
#68452 to #68435 - cabbagemayhem (08/23/2014) [-]
Here's a serious answer without the silly "Jews are responsible for everything that could possibly go wrong." First, I'd like to point out that it's not because of race, but because of culture. European culture (where most white Americans originate) and other matured Christian cultures have pervasive work ethic, accepting of responsibility, and peace-keeping qualities, with values of respect and nobility over power and intimidation.

I'm 30 years old now, and I've been noticing some patterns in black culture. They are caught up thinking the rest of society owes them and it's someone else's fault that they are disadvantaged. That kind of thinking just gives them an excuse not to try and, of course, you get what they put in. I also notice they are taught racism at an early age. I see them dividing whites from blacks constantly in their language, and I've even heard them telling their kids about the "whites" before they're even old enough to make up their own mind.

To answer your question plainly, from my observations traditional black culture has little interest in contributing to society except in-so-much that they must. That said, I also see many black people that do contribute and are respectable, so I don't draw the line on color but on culture and individual integrity.
#68455 to #68452 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
Who created "white culture" and who created "black culture"?

Also thank you for answering the question and not being an impotent douche bag.
#68461 to #68455 - cabbagemayhem (08/23/2014) [-]
Cultures develop through a long history of major events in society and story-telling, as well as general philosophy and religious beliefs. For example, when the cure to the Black Plague was discovered to be soap, regular hand-washing became a part of our culture.

Every culture has a list of stories told, and memes if you will, that express their values. For example, we have a lot of stories that show forgiveness, enemies ultimately becoming friends, and love triumphing over all. Our economic values are shown when we give infamy to our inventors and most contributive businessmen, as well as when we promote strong work ethics.
#68462 to #68461 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
That's true, but surely race played a pert in the formation of cultures as well, after all people are responsible for what they create.
User avatar #68469 to #68462 - economicfreedom (08/23/2014) [-]
Nonsense.
Cultures are formed through a very long history of events.
#68465 to #68462 - cabbagemayhem (08/23/2014) [-]
People are responsible for what they create, but it's based more on choices than race. The difference between different races is too miniscule to consider. Every man is greatly inferior to his creator, but no man is too stupid to make the right choices if he tries. Abraham chose to believe in God and so was considered righteous. Not because he was smarter than everyone else, but because he made a choice, and very good choice.
User avatar #68436 to #68435 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
Race relations are not a contest.
#68437 to #68436 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
Didn't answer my question, and I think I know why.
User avatar #68438 to #68437 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
Jew brainwashing? :^)
#68439 to #68438 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
Denial.
User avatar #68440 to #68439 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
Considering the socioeconomic dynamics of a very large nation to be more complex than the phenotypes of its three hundred million residents is not denial.
#68441 to #68440 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
Still not answering my question. I wonder how long you can dodge the main point.
User avatar #68442 to #68441 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
I already tackled the main point. I don't need to play along with something if I preemptively point out how absurd it is.
#68443 to #68442 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
You didn't tackle shit, the question was "Does the black population benefit the US", not "What are some excuses for why the black population doesn't benefit from the US."

Does anybody have the balls to answer this question or do I have to coddle Shiny all day?
User avatar #68444 to #68443 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
Yes, I did, sobbing about it doesn't change it. Your question was the kind of retardation I can expect from someone that picks a forum username like "yourgaylol".

If you want to be spoonfed logic, let's analyze your question. The United States is not a single homogenous person as much as it is the collective designation of a few hundred million individuals living in the same geographic region, abiding by the same general set of societal rules and regulations agreed upon by social contract. As such, if one group of people has been at a historical disadvantage socially and economically, this has essentially no bearing on anyone but themselves. This can be observed both a priori and a positori.

Quite simply, your question is very loaded and begs the question. It is meant to be unanswerable on any terms but your own, a sly and deceitful tactic to get people to agree to your nonsensically extremist views that try to pin the world's convoluted and oft confusing issues on convenient scapegoats.
#68445 to #68444 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
blah blah blah ur crying cuz im so smurt
blah blah blah ur dumb cuz ur name is dumb
blah blah blah oppression
blah blah blah institutionalized racism

I don't give a shit about your soapbox, the answer is a straightforward one. Does the black race, regardless of any past or current historical oppression, contribute to the US in ant meaningful way. Your whole bullshit is focused on "why" they don't contribute, which is not my point, I'm asking "if" they contribute.

If you refuse to answer it again and go on another left wing cry fest I'm just going to assume that you're too much of a coward to answer honestly.
User avatar #68448 to #68445 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
So, you're dodging my criticism, painting me as a tired SJW strawman and babbling about leftie weiners or whatever. Sad, I expected at least a half hearted response.

The black race cannot contribute to the United States because the black race is not a hivemind of genetically, culturally, economically and ideologically homogenous individuals. It's like asking what trapezoids do to contribute to geometry. No one race has contributed to American society, because your phenotype does not automatically determine whether you contribute to society. You might have a point if literally every black person was unemployed, mentally retarded and had a criminal history, but alas, whether you are politically correct or incorrect doesn't impact whether you are logically coherent or spewing diarrhea.
#68449 to #68448 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
"The black race cannot contribute to the United States" = "The black race does not contribute to the United States"

Took you long enough. I'm not reading the rest of your dribble, I don't gain anything from talking to you and I just wanted an answer, not your crying.

K bye.
#68451 to #68449 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
"Quite simply, your question is very loaded and begs the question. It is meant to be unanswerable on any terms but your own, a sly and deceitful tactic to get people to agree to your nonsensically extremist views that try to pin the world's convoluted and oft confusing issues on convenient scapegoats."

Some things are so predictable that you can set a clock to them.
#68453 to #68451 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
"If I answer the question honestly I'll betray my progressive masters, better dodge the question and pretend that I'm right."

This is why you can't talk to leftists, they are retarded.
User avatar #68454 to #68453 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
"better dodge the question"

"blah blah blah ur crying cuz im so smurt"
"I'm not reading the rest of your dribble"

The sad part is that you're aware of what a cognitive dissonant idiot you are.
#68457 to #68454 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
>So do black people contribute to society guys?
>"Black people are oppressed"
>Okay, but do they contribute to society?
>"I just told you black people are oppressed"
>But that's not my question
>"I already answered your question"
>No you didn't
>"Read my rants"
>Why should I, you're not staying on topic
>"You just can't handle how smart I am I won"

You're cancer, please kill yourself.
User avatar #68458 to #68457 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
At no point used the oppressed in this discussion, even once. You're just filtering me through the stupid useful idiot caricature that only exists in your head. You've done nothing but confirm what started off as a humble accusation of mine.

This is a discussion board and I'm discussing things. If you want everyone to blindly agree with you, go back to Tumblr.

#68460 to #68458 - youregaylol (08/23/2014) [-]
Seriously, how retarded can you be? You don't have to use the word "oppressed" if you're talking about socio economics and institutionalized racism, it's implied you dumbfuck.   
   
You are a stupid caricature, the little weeing in the corner of the classroom who hijacks discussions because he's  not intelligent enough to stay on topic.   
   
This is a discussion board but only retards hijack threads, if you want to discuss why the blacks don't contribute anything to society start your own thread, I wanted to hear a rational person give me a straightforward answer and explain why they came to that conclusion (see cabbage for an example), I never said that they had to agree with me you nutsack. The funny thing is Tumblr is filled with retarded progressives like yourself, go over there and tell them about how the fascist is so cruel to the poor blacks.   
   
Seriously, you aren't clever, you're uninspired, you're moronic, and you're boring. That's probably the worst part of it all, you just bore me to no end.   
   
Ok, thats it. Final response. Give me your final cry baby huff and then storm off to jack off to furry porn.
Seriously, how retarded can you be? You don't have to use the word "oppressed" if you're talking about socio economics and institutionalized racism, it's implied you dumbfuck.

You are a stupid caricature, the little weeing in the corner of the classroom who hijacks discussions because he's not intelligent enough to stay on topic.

This is a discussion board but only retards hijack threads, if you want to discuss why the blacks don't contribute anything to society start your own thread, I wanted to hear a rational person give me a straightforward answer and explain why they came to that conclusion (see cabbage for an example), I never said that they had to agree with me you nutsack. The funny thing is Tumblr is filled with retarded progressives like yourself, go over there and tell them about how the fascist is so cruel to the poor blacks.

Seriously, you aren't clever, you're uninspired, you're moronic, and you're boring. That's probably the worst part of it all, you just bore me to no end.

Ok, thats it. Final response. Give me your final cry baby huff and then storm off to jack off to furry porn.
User avatar #68467 to #68460 - Shiny ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
"You don't have to use the word "oppressed" if you're talking about socio economics and institutionalized racism, it's implied you dumbfuck."

I never said institutionalized racism, either. I didn't say racism at all. The fact that blacks are typically poorer and more likely to be criminals can be explained a million different ways, and I hadn't even elaborated on mine. You're putting words in my mouth and calling me a hypocrite because I'm not the straw man you're trying to shoehorn me into.

I came up with at least three replies to your original point that fit within your desired response criteria, I didn't post them because your question was completely fucking stupid to begin with. It probably wouldn't have been stupid it came from one of the numerous other national socialists on this board.

Way to take your insults with thick skin, though. No, really. Maybe I should make a folder full of passive aggressive animated gifs, too.
#68432 - ribocoon (08/23/2014) [-]
This is the future you chose
This is the future you chose
#68424 - dehumanizer (08/23/2014) [-]
Is Al-Jazeera international a reliable juden free media?


Pic somewhat relevant.
#68447 to #68424 - anonymous (08/23/2014) [-]
It's pretty left-wing for being funded by an Islamic Monarchy that abuses migrant workers.
User avatar #68425 to #68424 - schnizel (08/23/2014) [-]
It's not jew but still has the same effects as them.
>muh muslims
>muh didn du nutin
>islam in europe is a good thing
etc
#68426 to #68425 - dehumanizer (08/23/2014) [-]
I'll take that every day.
User avatar #68427 to #68426 - schnizel (08/23/2014) [-]
Y shure?
User avatar #68429 to #68428 - schnizel (08/23/2014) [-]
I wouldn't.
Nigga, they waged recorded 550 battles against non-muslims up until the 20th century, do you think that they will ever stop?
User avatar #68411 - feelythefeel (08/23/2014) [-]
So recently 4chan's been mutilated. Kinda curious how /pol/ is holding up, what with it's new SJW overlords.
User avatar #68422 to #68411 - schnizel (08/23/2014) [-]
lel
Nigga we rekt those goys
User avatar #68415 to #68411 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/23/2014) [-]
Explain?

I was on there a couple hours ago and it seems totally fine.
User avatar #68416 to #68415 - feelythefeel (08/23/2014) [-]
Moot pulled a Great Purge on almost all of the mods and replaced them with SJWs.
User avatar #68418 to #68416 - akkere (08/23/2014) [-]
That "the one chick who committed suicide in that tumblr raid happened to be the daughter of a Gawker Publisher whom managed to intimidate the owner of a site that's notorious for suicides?"

I think it'd be more likely;
A. Moderators got bribed to delete SJW stuff because their bitcoin farms weren't bringing in as much dosh as they'd like to think
B. Whoever Zoe screwed to Dox that one charity event for women developers turned their heads to moderator accounts of popular sites and used scripts to auto-delete keywords remotely relating to SJWs (or they just simply lurked really hard, probably both)
User avatar #68419 to #68418 - feelythefeel (08/23/2014) [-]
Either way, where there once standard fare 4chan mods there are now SJWs. All I was saying was that /pol/ probably seemed like the kind of board that would take that harder than most.
User avatar #68420 to #68419 - akkere (08/23/2014) [-]
/pol/ actually somehow slipped through the cracks sooner than the rest of the boards did. They at one point got blockaded but somehow managed to lift the SJW veil and were able to consistently make Quinn threads while /v/ and /b/ were still in "hide SJW threads" mode
User avatar #68421 to #68420 - feelythefeel (08/23/2014) [-]
So are they still affected at all?
User avatar #68423 to #68421 - akkere (08/23/2014) [-]
From what I've heard, nope. At least, not outside of the occasional shitposter, which is usual, and puts severe doubt that Moot axe'd the moderators and replaced with a full force of SJWs that simply give up when confronted for a few hours.
User avatar #68417 to #68416 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/23/2014) [-]
Kinda doubt it, /b/ & /pol/ haven't been effected as I have seen.
User avatar #68409 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/23/2014) [-]
Red Army Choir Katusha Only Real Russians.
User avatar #68476 to #68474 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/24/2014) [-]
I listened to it already cuz I'm a real rusky unlike you.
User avatar #68477 to #68476 - tredbear (08/24/2014) [-]
okay?
User avatar #68478 to #68477 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/24/2014) [-]
hahahaahahah tupoy americanizt
User avatar #68479 to #68478 - tredbear (08/24/2014) [-]
I don't even know.
User avatar #68410 to #68409 - feelythefeel (08/23/2014) [-]
Dmitri Shostakovich -  Waltz No. 2 That's some good shit, comrade.
User avatar #68413 to #68410 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/23/2014) [-]
Your god damn right. Stalin nash geeroy navsikdah.
User avatar #68412 to #68407 - feelythefeel (08/23/2014) [-]
Context?
#68459 to #68412 - byposted (08/23/2014) [-]
Oorah's Fiveish Gets Attacked In Mea Shearim - SHOCKING FOOTAGE!!!
Fiveish, a five dollar bill, is the mascot of the Jewish charity known as Oorah - literally "awaken and bring in those who are far" - whose mission is to "reach out to Jewish families everywhere with life-enhancing learning opportunities, resources and programs." www.oorah.org/who-we-are/ourmission.asp

A subsidiary of Oorah is Joy for Our Youth, commonly known as Kars4Kids, which has had a relentless presence in radio advertising for years. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybJ6fS7ruuo According to its tax returns, nearly all donated assets get funneled into Oorah - a fact that is not disclaimed in the advertising. www.dailyfinance.com/2009/11/20/kars4kids-steers-donors-in-the-wrong-direction/

While the organization insists that is not trying to dupe potential donors, the findings of two suits, one in Oregon and another in Pennsylvania, have found otherwise. In both settlements, Kars4Kids was forced to hand over $65,000 each. www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090415/NEWS/904150343 www.pottsmerc.com/article/20090130/NEWS01/301309969/nonprofits-for-kids-accused-of-misleading-donors
User avatar #68466 to #68459 - byposted (08/23/2014) [-]
Fiveish Accepts the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge!

Kars4Kids' most common ploy is to donate a few thousand dollars worth of winter coats in a depressed, heavily minority area - such as inner city Newark, New Jersey - but stage the undertaking as a public spectacle, with hundreds of often desperate, impoverished gentiles lined up outside in inclement weather, vying for the small supply of coats which Kars4Kids has allotted. A similar variation includes giving out backpacks www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXTxJ2vh2BM

Local politicians, often unaware of Kars4Kids' history, are poised to visit the giveaway. The media covers it, and for a tiny amount of money relative to what Kars4Kids takes in every year, In 2007, they brought in $16.2 million, according to their tax returns the organization receives a massive dose of free publicity.

Joy for Our Youth also achieves something much more important - protection against lawsuits brought by state attorney generals.

A source told Failed Messiah last year that many of the coats Kars4Kids gives away in such operations are actually donated to it by a non-Jewish charity. If this is true, then the small amount of revenue disbursed to needy non-Jews by Kars4Kids would be even more miniscule. failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2014/06/haredi-charity-to-issue-free-smartphone-app-to-help-prevent-caregivers-from-accidentally-leaving-kids-cars-567.html
User avatar #68472 to #68466 - feelythefeel (08/23/2014) [-]
So why are Jews chasing a mascot?
User avatar #68550 to #68472 - byposted (08/26/2014) [-]
It may have been a Jew Brother's War, as such. The Hasidic and the Ashkenazim are not the best of friends.
User avatar #68549 to #68472 - byposted (08/26/2014) [-]
Presumably, Fiveish was directing traffic when he was spotted by a gang of Hasidic Jews. They proceeded to intimidate him.
0
#68464 to #68459 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
0
#68463 to #68459 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #68414 to #68412 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/23/2014) [-]
Nooooooo fucking clue.
User avatar #68408 to #68407 - levvy ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
Got to have shekels.
 Friends (0)