x
FJ should now work well with mobile. Try it out on your mobile/tablet browser!
Click to expand
Latest users (4): jewishcommunazi, pebar, redandgreen, thekame, anonymous(9).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#78818 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
How to make this place more like /pol/:

1. Joos did it
2. you disagree with me, you must be a shill!
3. You do things I don't like, your a cuck lol
4. JEWS!
5. Your talking about things I don't know about and am unable to see the relevancy of them, you must be a JIDF.
User avatar #78789 - garymotherfingoak (02/27/2015) [-]
Excerpt:

"yeah but now they have full control the the internet the FCC that is, this was a catch 22 we where fucked either way just one little example

"Section 223:

Whoever in interstate or foreign communications by means of a telecommunications device knowingly makes, creates, or solicits, and initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or indecent, with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass another person shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

layman terms something as simple as say trolling is pretty much illegal"

Do you think this'll actually be enforced or abused?

User avatar #78812 to #78789 - akkere (02/27/2015) [-]
cpsr.org/prevsite/cpsr/nii/cyber-rights/web/cda/cda.final.html/
This, right?
Would it be enforced? Quite likely, at least to the extent that the abusive content was presented to someone who had something to do with a politically connected individual.
Would it be abused? Not without severe risk on the FCC's part, and if anything it should be possible to petition Congress to remove amendments like these, but not without risk that the congressional represenatives try to push side notes that remove the enforcements against the networking companies at the same time.

Whoever made the post "it's a catch 22" was very much correct, but that's why it's urgent we need to recognize issues like these as more than just "push in one direction and hope it works". If the Net Neutrality groups (like FFTF) continue to view any attempt to edit the FCC regulation for the better as a front against NN, then we'll just leave ourselves open to another problem. If we just remove the amendments entirely, we'll be back to phase 1 with problematic networking companies.
User avatar #78813 to #78812 - garymotherfingoak (02/27/2015) [-]
well damn...
and not like a fine print statement such as this will make mainstream news for others to know, let alone enough to make a sizable petition, let alone have that petition listened to.
User avatar #78819 to #78813 - akkere (02/28/2015) [-]
It's unlikely either of the left-wing or even the right-wing mainstream media might report on the single line of the regulation, not without an abuse of enforcement already occurring for it to bounce off of.
Alternatively, if this and a compilation of other questionable lines of the new FCC regs was posted and spread about the Internet, it would be start. There's things that can be done, but nothing that can warrant an instantaneous change at the moment.
User avatar #78755 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13931204001534
Iraqi Army Downs 2 UK Planes Carrying Weapons for ISIL
User avatar #78792 to #78755 - garymotherfingoak (02/27/2015) [-]
well that's unnerving. what do the US/Europe have to gain from supplying ISIL?
#78823 to #78792 - cabbagemayhem (02/28/2015) [-]
It would be nice if there was something to gain, and ISIS was more of a puppet than an enemy, but that article is full of nothing but allegations and the allusion of evidence. Don't believe everything you read in the media.
User avatar #78824 to #78823 - garymotherfingoak (02/28/2015) [-]
I normally wouldn't, especially since it's from one of the more avid anti semitics, but this isn't the only news source that points to the US possibly giving weapons to ISIL.
#78827 to #78824 - cabbagemayhem (02/28/2015) [-]
If it's all hearsay and no evidence, I wouldn't believe it if it came from all of the antisemitic propagandists at once.
User avatar #78828 to #78827 - garymotherfingoak (02/28/2015) [-]
hue i thought you said heresy
#78829 to #78828 - cabbagemayhem (02/28/2015) [-]
That works too
User avatar #78830 to #78829 - garymotherfingoak (02/28/2015) [-]
eeehhhh.....
#78831 to #78830 - cabbagemayhem (02/28/2015) [-]
I'm just kidding. Why so serious?
User avatar #78832 to #78831 - garymotherfingoak (02/28/2015) [-]
People on this board usually take stuff too seriously
#78796 to #78792 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
yes yes goy what will they gain?????   
   
   
   
to shatter what is shattered. to break what is broken.
yes yes goy what will they gain?????



to shatter what is shattered. to break what is broken.
User avatar #78794 to #78792 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Chaos in the middle east, the more unstable the muslims are the stronger Israel is.
User avatar #78802 to #78794 - garymotherfingoak (02/27/2015) [-]
How does Islamic stability weaken Israel though? I'm not trying to be a kike, I'm genuinely curious.
User avatar #78804 to #78802 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Islam=Strong then Jews=Weak
Jews=Strong then Islam=Weak
They are natural enemies like fire an water.
User avatar #78807 to #78804 - garymotherfingoak (02/27/2015) [-]
Why now incite chaos though? Why didn't israeli politics if they truly have a hand in this keep the US from trying to stabilize parts of the region between 2001-2010?
#78808 to #78807 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Warm up the iron, strike it, cool it down, and strike it again,.....
And you will shape it into a big gigant fucked up nation. They have done nothing useful but put fuel to the fire.
#78825 to #78808 - cabbagemayhem (02/28/2015) [-]
Can you image how much more peaceful the Middle East would be if it look like that? lol
User avatar #78809 to #78808 - garymotherfingoak (02/27/2015) [-]
Wouldn't it be easier to just keep the iron hot? feels like a waste of resources to keep order for 10 years and spend hundreds of billions overseas when you could just fuel the weakest side of a conflict until they get stronger, go to the next weakest, until it's a continuous stalemate.
User avatar #78810 to #78809 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
They tried that with HAMAS and it backfire, as long as muslims are killing eachother the jews will be happy.
User avatar #78797 to #78794 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
you know ISIS isnt new thing right??
User avatar #78787 to #78755 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
cafeteria here gives me 50% discount.

im also working another job so i can handle the fees of this family or i will be bankrupt
#78788 to #78787 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Got bless islamig gomjunism.
#78790 to #78788 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
so its true what they say. you are raised by a communist party?
User avatar #78791 to #78790 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Hell no nigger, I'm reactionary.
User avatar #78793 to #78791 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
so you are into traditions and culture.
User avatar #78795 to #78793 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Pretty much.
User avatar #78799 to #78795 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
what traditions and culture you follow?
User avatar #78801 to #78799 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Trying to recreate them, and soon to become the ultimate hispter.
User avatar #78803 to #78801 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
yeah what is it exactly???

for me i follow my own religious/political traditions
User avatar #78805 to #78803 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Will explain tomorrow, gtg now, bye.
User avatar #78767 to #78755 - Shiny ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
Ahaha britbongs
User avatar #78756 to #78755 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
looks like UK should answer some questions..
User avatar #78768 to #78763 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
This fits perfectly.
User avatar #78771 to #78768 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
your name is bluer
User avatar #78772 to #78771 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
I'm an olderfag.
#78773 to #78772 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
not older than me stupid goy
User avatar #78774 to #78773 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
How's life in Syria?
User avatar #78775 to #78774 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
i live in kuwait
User avatar #78776 to #78775 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Didn't you move to Syria?
User avatar #78777 to #78776 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
nooo but i went there for my passport. or did you forget??
User avatar #78778 to #78777 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Yes, forgot about it. Did you get your college degree?
User avatar #78779 to #78778 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
im still studying
User avatar #78780 to #78779 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Noice, how many months left?
User avatar #78781 to #78780 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
ehhhh

its how many credit hours left. probably 103 credits
User avatar #78782 to #78781 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Where are you going to work after that?
User avatar #78783 to #78782 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
idk. maybe i will be still working in the same university with better monthly wage.
User avatar #78784 to #78783 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Can't you find a better job in an IT section of a firm?
User avatar #78785 to #78784 - syrianassassin (02/27/2015) [-]
snigga i am working in a good job but not good payment.

i get free study in the university and work with the best directors in the world in this university.
User avatar #78786 to #78785 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
And free food?
#78746 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
Are ISIS really just the greatest trolls ever in existence, with the sole purpose of rustling our jimmies? I can't think of anyone who managed to make literally every single nation on the face of the earth hate them.
User avatar #78762 to #78746 - Shiny ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
That's all terrorism is. Political trolling.
User avatar #78744 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
So the government now has control over the internet with 300 page undisclosed regulations all because some internet faggots tries to solve a problem that was never a problem in the first place. Congrats, you just supported a SOPA like bill without fucking realizing it.
User avatar #78764 to #78744 - Shiny ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
The government had control over the Internet to begin with. State monopolies and NSA data mining. It's really as bad as it can get, sadly.
User avatar #78754 to #78744 - akkere (02/27/2015) [-]
Internet and phone companies especially are notorious for not providing the service their clients agreed to, only demanding that they pay more money for service they should've already had. It was a problem that existed, I'm not sure why people don't realize this.

And it's not in effect, yet. Congress can still vote to pass bills to undermine and move around the FCC regulation, and it likely will pass if the FCC doesn't release the full documentation in the first place. In the mean time, the FCC has released an introductory document regarding the order with references to sections to immediately look onto for the full text when the regulation is posted.
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-331869A1.pdf
#78745 to #78744 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
Obama Change
#78742 - radiserne (02/27/2015) [-]
Stumbled upon this in one of my books today
0
#78741 - radiserne has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #78740 - takamori (02/27/2015) [-]

freeman in court - judge bows to Sovereign - Canada
What are your views on Freemen/Sovereign citizens?
User avatar #79021 to #78837 - takamori (03/02/2015) [-]
Ugh really?
User avatar #78736 - lulzformalaysiaair (02/27/2015) [-]
>Economics class,
>Talkin about government intervention
>Topic comes to affirmative action
>Class is divided
This is how you know who to respect and not.
#78729 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
Are you prepared?
User avatar #78731 to #78729 - lulzformalaysiaair (02/27/2015) [-]
Jesus fucking christ.
#78730 to #78729 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
No, because I always found painted nails unappealing regardless of the person's sex. I don't want to see MORE painted nails.
#78708 - pebar ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
It seems net neutrality is a thing now

TBH I don't think I ever heard what the opposing argument was besides the generic, but still classic, "government fucks things up all the time"
User avatar #78723 to #78708 - AreyouSerious ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
People were scared the FCC chairman would side with the internet service providers since it greatly benefits them and he was a former lobbyist for them. After months of fighting and useless online petitions he backed out.

I personally think it was a sensationalized issue to have other laws passed under the public's radar.
#78737 to #78723 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
They're distracting us from BENGHAZI!!!!!!!
#78691 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
Where do religious niggers go to eat on Sunday?

Church's Chicken

HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
User avatar #78690 - schnizel (02/26/2015) [-]
ISIS DESTROYING STATUES AND IDOLS OF THE INFIDEL MOSUL MUSEUM
Assyrian statues and artifacts destroyed by kebab.
User avatar #78743 to #78690 - takamori (02/27/2015) [-]
I wonder what kind of school trips they have in Mosul.
User avatar #78725 to #78690 - AreyouSerious ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
I remember when the Iraq war happened and most of the museums in Iraq were destroyed. But at least Iraqis had the decency to steal it and sell it.
#78712 to #78690 - radiserne (02/26/2015) [-]
Stop being intolerant, remember it is the evil West's fault, the middle East would be peace, love and real democracy if we hadn't invaded Iraq.
User avatar #78695 to #78690 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
What is it with reactionaries and statues? You can almost instantly discern the slant of a political blog if they have these ancient statues of people featured somewhere on the front page. It's really creepy.
User avatar #78698 to #78697 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
Uh, yes. And?
User avatar #78699 to #78698 - schnizel (02/26/2015) [-]
We like to keep the memories of the past.
User avatar #78700 to #78699 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
Emotionally appealing artwork is not "the past".
User avatar #78702 to #78700 - schnizel (02/26/2015) [-]
But I forget that I'm talking to a person that supports a regime that cuts through culture like a hot knife through butter.
User avatar #78704 to #78702 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
"supports a regime"

I get the feeling that you've decided all of my opinions for me before I've even opened my proverbial mouth. Since otherwise I might be right about at least one thing.
User avatar #78751 to #78704 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
You talk when I say you can talk.
#78849 to #78751 - anonexplains (02/28/2015) [-]
#78701 to #78700 - schnizel (02/26/2015) [-]
YOU FUCKING SHITFACE, THOSE SANDNIGGERS DESTROYED STATUES AND ARTIFACTS OF THE ASSYRIAN CIVILIZATION AND THE STATUES THEMSELVES ARE MORE THAN 3000 YEARS OLD! IT'S NOT JUST DESTROYING ART BUT DESTROYING PIECES OF HISTORY! I'M TALKING ABOUT THE SAME PEOPLE THAT RAZED ALEXANDRIA!
User avatar #78703 to #78701 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
So murdering people is glorious but breaking pretty rocks and metal hunks that look like people is an unthinkable crime?
User avatar #78749 to #78703 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
>So murdering people is glorious
>From a communist
User avatar #78761 to #78749 - Shiny ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
You do know that I've never once shared what I am on this board aside from that dumb compass test pic, right?
User avatar #78822 to #78761 - Shiny ONLINE (02/28/2015) [-]
Okay, so link to when I said I supported a far left revolution or even said "means of production".
#78817 to #78761 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
actions speak louder than words

or in this case your words speak louder than what you label yourself as
#78710 to #78703 - radiserne (02/26/2015) [-]
Killing some people, like ISIS, is glorious, and "breaking pretty rocks and metal hunks that look like people" is in some cases, such as this, an unthinkable crime. We're talking historic and cultural treasures here, it is what defines societies.
User avatar #78711 to #78710 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
Culture is not defined by pretty objects.
User avatar #78715 to #78711 - klowserpok (02/26/2015) [-]
>Art
>Not part of culture

I'm almost convinced you're just "trolling", now...
User avatar #78717 to #78715 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
Culture makes pieces of art, and makes new ones when the old ones tear and crumble. Not the reverse.
User avatar #78748 to #78717 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
Your spaghetti is showing again.
User avatar #78757 to #78748 - Shiny ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
I stand by what I said. Effects are not causes.
User avatar #78732 to #78717 - lulzformalaysiaair (02/27/2015) [-]
Actually the two are totally interchangeable. Art creates culture, culture creates art.
#78713 to #78711 - radiserne (02/26/2015) [-]
There's no word in English for how incredibly stupid you manage to sound at times.
User avatar #78714 to #78713 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
I'd be willing to post a lot less if you just admitted that a board where everyone agrees with what you think is more fun.
#78753 to #78714 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
Maybe people aren't shitting on you because of a circlejerk, maybe you're just retarded.

Nah, couldn't be.
User avatar #78765 to #78753 - Shiny ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
Expressing your disproportionally strong hatred of my posts is an awful way to deter them.
User avatar #78733 to #78714 - lulzformalaysiaair (02/27/2015) [-]
No don't, it really wouldn't be. If I wanted nazi circlejerks I'd go on /pol/.
#78719 to #78714 - radiserne (02/26/2015) [-]
Fun perhaps, but not interesting, and I'm not here for a circle-jerk, but to get opinions that you are not likely to hear in public, because everyone is too damn afraid of what others think of them. I'd go on Facebook if wanted to see the popular opinions, but I find them incredibly dull.
User avatar #78720 to #78719 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
It's a little mean to assume me leaning left means I'm a California college liberal stereotype.
User avatar #78734 to #78720 - lulzformalaysiaair (02/27/2015) [-]
But... you are though right?
#78724 to #78720 - radiserne (02/26/2015) [-]
I wouldn't assume that, since I'm quite aware you're not stupid. Which is why I'm baffled that you consider thousands of years old historical artifacts to be nothing but pretty rocks. We wouldn't know anything about ancient civilizations if it wasn't the preservation of artifacts like these. To consider the destruction of these as misdemeanors would be to say that history is pointless. This is no better than the nazi book burnings.
#78752 to #78724 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
"since I'm quite aware you're not stupid."

if you haven't realized how dumb he is by now you might be as retarded as him, if not worse
User avatar #78726 to #78724 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
I didn't say they were just pretty rocks. All I'm implying is that they aren't as important as those obsessed with the past make them out to be. History is important, but so is letting go of it instead of holding grudges over it.
User avatar #78750 to #78726 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
How about I fuck you and your whole family in the ass and nail you to a cross, and please don't hold a grudge over it.
#78850 to #78750 - anonexplains (02/28/2015) [-]
User avatar #78857 to #78850 - schnizel (02/28/2015) [-]
Not Autismus Maximus but Brutus Extraordinarii.
User avatar #78759 to #78758 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
I see you take it in the ass like a champ.
User avatar #78769 to #78759 - Shiny ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
You think about gay sex a lot, don't you?
User avatar #78770 to #78769 - schnizel (02/27/2015) [-]
Only with you.
#78685 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
Is it a violation of the NAP to pressure my child to work in the coal mines to bring in another source of income for this family?
User avatar #78694 to #78685 - pebar ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
the existence of children really fucks up ethics like that

However, there is an assumption that parents will try to do what is best for their children. If their country is at such a low stage of economic development that children work, I'd say no.
#78684 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
Welcome to OBAMAnet people!!!11!
#78686 to #78684 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
It's not obamanet until you have to pay more money for less service and get penalized for not using approved ISPs.
User avatar #78696 to #78686 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
Net neutrality is only necessary to compensate for the countless regional monopolies held by only a few nationwide ISPs.
#78705 to #78696 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
"necessary"

have you been affected by the past policies?
do you know anyone who has said "omg i my internet is shit because the FCC isnt regulating the internet"?

this was a solution to a problem that didn't exist, and now the solution could have really shitty repercussions down the line.
User avatar #78721 to #78705 - akkere (02/26/2015) [-]
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-331869A1.pdf
The source documents make it pretty clear.
There's no forced rate regulation, no additional taxes or fees to burden the corporations, no exaggerated bureaucratic slowdown that's commonly associated with other poorer examples of regulation.
It's merely the prohibition of key problems regarding the failure to provide service consumers paid for with their networks, such as phone companies throttling customers who are taking full advantage of the promised "unlimited data" they had signed up and purchased for (something I have personally had happen to me, among other things, if that answers your belief that no one has ever been affected by poor business practices of the companies).

This of course doesn't mean we shouldn't be watchful of other regulations the FCC may put in place as tiny notes, such as outright commanding the traffic that is directed in the place of guaranteeing it being free and open. But while we should be watchful of tedious regulation, we should also address problems that do consistently happen with the networking companies, both phone and internet.
#78856 to #78721 - anonexplains (02/28/2015) [-]
4 page propaganda piece= 300 pages of unknown regulation

so far those are pretty shitty reasons to allow the FCC full regulatory powers over the internet.

definitely not worth it.
User avatar #78876 to #78856 - akkere (02/28/2015) [-]
They're not unknown, the amendments have been posted through edits of the current FCC code.
cpsr.org/prevsite/cpsr/nii/cyber-rights/web/cda/cda.final.html/
The FCC's regulatory power can be challenged in Congress, as it is currently being done now in any case.
It was necessary to expand a review of client's cases in the poor business practices of the networking companies and it took time to address an issue that went on for decades. It will take an even sorter amount of time to minimize the FCC's regulation through proper trial of Congress, until we have preferable solutions to both issues at hand.
User avatar #78706 to #78705 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
"do you know anyone who has said..."

No, in fact, I don't give two flying fucks about the opinions of the willfully uninformed. The Internet already falls under the first C in FCC, net neutrality is solely a matter of consumer protection.

Shit eating little weasels like Cruz are more than happy to give antisocial companies like Comcast unfair advantages to "protect the job creators" or some other nonsense, but god forbid the principle of fair competition apply to them, too.
#78707 to #78706 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
nice liberal whining, but why dont you answer the question

have you, or anyone that you know of, been adversely affected by the past policy?

do you have any evidence that any consumer experienced meaningful suffering from the past policy, besides anecdotes?

it begs the question if it's not broke why "fix" it?

this sounds like yet another case of shit headed libs like yourself charging forth for another moral crusade against a non issue, which somehow always ends up with the government with more power.

when your entire argument is based on "muh ebil coporasins" you dont have an argument.
User avatar #78709 to #78707 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
"have you, or anyone that you know of, been adversely affected by the past policy?"

Yes, in fact, many people have. Comcast has a long track record of a fuck-you attitude toward its own customers simply because nobody can legally incentivize them to offer better service. www.cracked.com/article_21756_5-reasons-working-comcast-worse-than-you-think.html is a great example of the kind of BS that affects my family, my mom regularly goes nearly broke from Comcast randomly hiking up her cable and internet costs and applying bullshit fees that she doesn't have the time or lawyer backing to fight much of the time, and she can't drop them outright because she needs their cable Internet access. Random services and channels randomly get dropped and her connection speed is usually very unreliable because Comcast blatantly lies about the actual bandwidth she gets.

And you know why they get away with this? Because most people don't know the fine details of how computers and networking, and thus the Internet, work. This includes the state and local politicians that eagerly give in to demands for state monopolization. The digital age advances faster than people can catch up with it, so the common consumer will invariably need a little extra protection.

So get fucked with your "liberal" straw men. I have literally never once described myself as a "liberal" on this site, so excuse me if I get a little pissed when I get brushed off with the usual "bawww cry more poor loser" rhetoric.
#78716 to #78709 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
lol, you realize that these new FCC regs will do nothing about that right?
User avatar #78718 to #78716 - Shiny ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
The new FCC regs will prevent ISPs from arbitrary throttling data based on what they think is profitable. Because they do not survive based on consumer preference, it can thus be inferred that their impact on other industries related to their own, like media streaming, is detrimental to the basic principles of a capitalist economy.
#78747 to #78718 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
" prevent ISPs from arbitrary throttling data based on what they think is profitable."

that still wont do anything to prevent comcast from being your only choice in the area you dolt, everything you bitched about would still be happeneing

and when have you ever felt the effect of them arbitrary throttling data?

oh thats right, you haven't, you just think they will at some point, but the gov is so much more trustworthy so why not just give them the internet.

its fools like you that allow govs to buttfuck citizens.
User avatar #78766 to #78747 - Shiny ONLINE (02/27/2015) [-]
You still have done nothing to refute my core reasoning.
#78816 to #78766 - anonexplains (02/27/2015) [-]
so far you've complained about issues that have nothing to do with the FCC regs, proving that you have no idea what these regs mean.

you refuted your own reasoning.
User avatar #78821 to #78816 - Shiny ONLINE (02/28/2015) [-]
You moved the goal posts to "lol why u even curr", I played along and now you're pretending I did so.

The new FCC regs will prevent ISPs from arbitrary throttling data based on what they think is profitable. Because they do not survive based on consumer preference, it can thus be inferred that their impact on other industries related to their own, like media streaming, is detrimental to the basic principles of a capitalist economy.
#78855 to #78821 - anonexplains (02/28/2015) [-]
ill take anecdotal evidence for 500

because why base power grabbing decisions on silly things like "facts" when you have scary "what ifs?"
User avatar #78864 to #78855 - Shiny ONLINE (02/28/2015) [-]

The new FCC regs will prevent ISPs from arbitrary throttling data based on what they think is profitable. Because they do not survive based on consumer preference, it can thus be inferred that their impact on other industries related to their own, like media streaming, is detrimental to the basic principles of a capitalist economy.
#78919 to #78864 - anonexplains (03/01/2015) [-]
ill take anecdotal evidence for 500

because why base power grabbing decisions on silly things like "facts" when you have scary "what ifs?"
#78680 - schnizel (02/26/2015) [-]
This man is your friend, he fights the jews.
This man is your friend, he fights the jews.
User avatar #78735 to #78680 - lulzformalaysiaair (02/27/2015) [-]
Okay. Try not to shitpost though.
#78683 to #78680 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
This man is a Jew. He fights your friends and tries to convince you he is your real friend.
User avatar #78687 to #78679 - marinepenguin ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
They're basically just saying that they won't include race in descriptions of suspects until they're 100% sure the person is that color. You'd think that someone's race would be one of the first things you'd be sure of.
User avatar #78674 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (02/26/2015) [-]
Either the wage gap is because of discrimination meaning that Clinton has actively discriminated against women or the wage gap is due to different work hours, experiences, ect which means that Clinton has committed statistical fraud and misinformation. Wonder how feminists will worm themselves out of this one.

freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clintons-war-on-women/
#78676 to #78674 - radiserne (02/26/2015) [-]
That would require them to start caring about facts instead of feelings.
#78681 to #78676 - anonexplains (02/26/2015) [-]
Feelings and facts are one and the same to these people.
 Friends (0)