Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (1): akkere, anonymous(13).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#42786 - anonymous (07/23/2013) [-]
gay nigger ducks
#42740 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
There are a few cops and an ambulance outside; apparently my neighbor tried to kill himself. No idea if he's ok or not.   
Anyway, it got me thinking... Does a person of sound mind have the right to choose whether or not they want to live and should the state respect that decision?
There are a few cops and an ambulance outside; apparently my neighbor tried to kill himself. No idea if he's ok or not.
Anyway, it got me thinking... Does a person of sound mind have the right to choose whether or not they want to live and should the state respect that decision?
User avatar #42778 to #42740 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
I'm for euthanasia, but that's a little different than trying to kill yourself because of depression. I think the state has a responsibility to help those people.
User avatar #42773 to #42740 - byposted (07/23/2013) [-]
All you have to do when committing suicide to avoid state intrusion is to do it right. Do not swallow pills, for instance. Most people who do take pills are not solidified and are taking a gamble of life. These are the type of people who can and should be helped. I'm not necessarily talking about taking them to the psych-ward, because nobody except the mentally insane and the most dire cases should ever have to go to that place.

The above is why people who try to jump off of buildings get attention from law enforcement. They don't really want to commit suicide and are just looking for attention.

If you want to kill yourself without the big-bad state coming for you, shoot yourself. Unless you're a complete retard, a bullet to the temple will take you out in a second. The repercussions for being a retard in this task, though, will probably literally make you into a retard. Know what you're doing before you do it.
User avatar #42772 to #42740 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
If the person is sane, the state should stay out of it, I guess.
User avatar #42774 to #42772 - byposted (07/23/2013) [-]
Most would argue that people who have suicidal tendencies are not "sane."
User avatar #42766 to #42740 - undeadwill (07/23/2013) [-]
Its like someone about to jump and cop saying "stop or I'll shoot"
#42745 to #42740 - valeriya (07/23/2013) [-]
Eh, can we be more specific because when it comes to say physical illnesses I'd say it's always better to try cure before we just roll over and allow death to occur, I'd say it's wrong to allow someone to end their own life, when you can potentially learn from them for improve the lives of others or them, I'm also of the opinion that suicide is incredibly... Selfish? (For want of a better word)
User avatar #42795 to #42711 - azumeow (07/24/2013) [-]
Kill the niggers, since they CAUSE so much war.
#42776 to #42711 - anonymous (07/23/2013) [-]
I choose to kill the race...NASCAR!

HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
#42790 to #42779 - anonymous (07/23/2013) [-]
Now it's even funnier.

And sources are saying nobody was injured, so I can laugh at it without gaining an Evil Point!
#42765 to #42711 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
"You don't have to press this button. / You know you want to."
User avatar #42734 to #42711 - undeadwill (07/23/2013) [-]
Nope I like war keeps things interesting
User avatar #42719 to #42711 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
but..... this is a win/win
#42720 to #42719 - maddboiy (07/23/2013) [-]
exactly
exactly
#42716 to #42711 - valeriya (07/23/2013) [-]
Yes, Georgians.
User avatar #42717 to #42716 - maddboiy (07/23/2013) [-]
for me, it'd be the 100 meters

or the jews
User avatar #42722 to #42717 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
100 meters?
User avatar #42724 to #42722 - maddboiy (07/23/2013) [-]
kill one race, geddit, 100 meters is a race
User avatar #42728 to #42724 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
Homer Simpson - I Get Jokes
I get it... keyans and jamaicans have the habit of winning races of those kinds so I thought you were referring to one of them...
User avatar #42723 to #42722 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
Jamaicans? Kenyans?
#42718 to #42717 - valeriya (07/23/2013) [-]
Jews I can stand, Georgians nope.
User avatar #42729 to #42718 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
Not liking people based on nationality doesn't seem too revolutionary.
#42730 to #42729 - valeriya (07/23/2013) [-]
Well forgive me for disliking a people who were hell set to support their government on a genocide.
User avatar #42665 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
非洲小伙好弟唱红歌到无法自拔(合集).mp4 There's more. 2:52.
User avatar #42701 to #42665 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
I'd never know someone could point a gun at me in such a friendly way.
User avatar #42666 to #42665 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
I wish I knew what the fuck I was watching.
User avatar #42698 to #42666 - undeadwill (07/23/2013) [-]
Communism pride. Yeah its that weird.
User avatar #42704 to #42698 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
Or he could be proud of his chinese heritage.
User avatar #42705 to #42704 - undeadwill (07/23/2013) [-]
Nigga..... that's a nigga
User avatar #42721 to #42705 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
He might only be 100% nigga instead of being 200% nigga.
User avatar #42725 to #42721 - undeadwill (07/23/2013) [-]
Its 200%
User avatar #42672 to #42666 - niggernazi (07/23/2013) [-]
some chinese hip hop
#42636 - anonymous (07/23/2013) [-]
phanact is fart
#42620 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
ITT: Opinions on Canadian politics, culture and other things of note. For example, do you agree with the melting pot approach to immigration that we have? What about FPTP? Do you oppose or support the general left leaning of the populace? Whatever you want to say about Canada, get it out here and now.
User avatar #43816 to #42620 - teoberry (08/05/2013) [-]
>melting pot
meh, there's really no way to stop it now. most immigrants are really grateful and love us, so idgaf
>first past the post
don't care
>left leaning
lol, alberta
User avatar #42688 to #42620 - undeadwill (07/23/2013) [-]
Why are you always trying to copy us Canada?
#42654 to #42620 - anonymous (07/23/2013) [-]
I know little about canadian politics, are canadian commies cool?
User avatar #42660 to #42654 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
I regularly speak to one. She is.
User avatar #42661 to #42660 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
What kind of commie is she?
Also, I was anon.
User avatar #42662 to #42661 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
Marxist-Leninist, like me. She defends the DPRK, but because she genuinely approves of them, not just because of anti-imperialism. Haha.
Then who was phone.
User avatar #42663 to #42662 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
"She defends the DPRK, but because she genuinely approves of them..."

Definitely not mah nigga. Also, I have the idea they're more or less like the CPUSA, which wouldn't be a very good thing at all.

Little did you know, you were phone all along.
User avatar #42664 to #42663 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
We rarely discuss the DPRK, all of my M-L friends. She's pretty much alone. Haha.

Now, she's criticised the CPUSA multiple times, and has said that the Canadian CP has done so also. I'm not aware of any condemnations, but I have no reason not to believe her, a party member. I'm sure I could find it if I looked.

CPUSA has long been devoid of revolutionary character. Probably as a result of Stalin's efforts to consolidate socialism following the Great Patriotic War, the CPUSA became rather moderate. Nowadays, it's made some grave ideological mistakes. But all it needs is correction.
User avatar #42638 to #42620 - akkere ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
Canadians Are Weird
I'm not sure about the melting pot approach Canada is performing, or that Canada even had a melting pot approach, but I'd personally think pursuing for a melting pot antic (kept at a moderate level without requiring total assimilation) would be better than a multiculturalistic one, due in part that it ensures all cultures can coexist but communicate evenly through a homogeneous equilibrium, whereas multiculuralism can endanger the well-being of other cultures if one grows too powerful and starts to derail both the "initial standard" and other foreign cultures.

One thing I saw that was perplexing at one point, was that someone posted on this board months ago about an election that had been going on, and one of the things he commented on was about how he was "scared shitless". I *think* the picture he posted along with the thread had something along the lines of "anglecophone" (I really can't remember this) or "anglochophobe" on it, but that's probably just botched memory. I never commented on the thread because I didn't have really much knowledge about the election to contribute, and not too many others did, so there wasn't much else that could be gained from it.
User avatar #42639 to #42638 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
The most recent big election was the B.C. one (As far as I'm aware). Does that ring any bells?
User avatar #42640 to #42639 - akkere ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
I think so, though it doesn't recall me much details to why the person would be "scared shitless". Spooky.

I'm not sure if this would apply to Canada, but I've read news stories before of Right and Left activists actually getting into something of gang fights, especially in countries like France, and I've been wondering if that kind of aspect wouldn't be too far from at least the French-Canadian portion (or, First Nations People of Canada as you mentioned they preferred to be referred to as). I figured that might be unlikely because Canada's populace does lean left, whereas France would be more balanced (in an extreme sense) due to the historical effects on the populace.
User avatar #42641 to #42640 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
First, I was talking about the natives for that first nations bit. I should have specified.

There is a history of rebellion and violence as I've mentioned, but nowadays it's mostly just separatist undertones in certain demographics. I guess I should be glad that they've went from bat-shit insane to just really angry.
User avatar #42646 to #42641 - akkere ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
Interesting, I'll have to read up more on it then and fully understand the political climate that's going on with Canada, maybe even see how it relates to other nations as well.

Maybe I'll also figure out what was going on with that thread beforehand. Thanks!
#42647 to #42646 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
It probably doesn't affect other nations at all, it barely affects distant parts of our own. The only reason I talk about it is because it's an interesting subject.
User avatar #42648 to #42647 - akkere ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
Well I guess I can cross that off on the to-do list and just go straight into reading up on Canadian politics. Though I'll probably read up on it anyway and see how it compares to other native groupings
User avatar #42649 to #42648 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
The French aren't native to here, they're pretty much in the same boat as the English. If you're looking for natives, and example would be the Mohawk people.
User avatar #42671 to #42649 - akkere ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
That's what I meant, I assumed when you said the "natives" that's what you might've meant, though I didn't realize the Mohawk specifically actually lived that farther up north
User avatar #42702 to #42671 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
They were an Iroquois group whose "territory" ranged to southern Quebec and eastern Ontario.
User avatar #42840 to #42702 - akkere ONLINE (07/24/2013) [-]
Ah, for some reason I thought the Mohawk were more towards the Western territory, but that was probably just the Sioux. Didn't realize Mohawk were part of the Iroquois Confederacy.
User avatar #42628 to #42620 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
You guys are nice. I like that you don't really lock your doors.

As for immigration and culture, I disagree that you have assimilation. Multiculturalism, yes, but not assimilation. Anyway, it's something a few Marxist-Leninists I know and I had a conversation about. One of them was a Canadian. The different nations within Canada should have their own right to self determination, perhaps like a federal system.
User avatar #42629 to #42628 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
By "different nations", are you referring to the first nations natives?
User avatar #42632 to #42629 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
I also hope you're actually Canadian, since I've been referring to you as one thus far.
User avatar #42634 to #42632 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
I am, and I can personally vouch that the British Colombian Gulf islands are a veritable paradise.
User avatar #42631 to #42629 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
No, just cultures. So, French Canadians, English Canadians, and then the Native Americans (or First Nations or whatever they call themselves over there).

I'm kind of trying to avoid these sort of topics until I reread Marxism and the National Question but I thought, since one of the M-L that was in the discussion was Canadian, I would contribute just a little bit.
User avatar #42633 to #42631 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
There's a general distaste for giving French-Canadians any ground for power ever since the October Crisis (The only time in Canadian history that the wartime measures act was put into affect during peacetime). Even if people don't know about it, their opinions of Quebec are at least indirectly affected by it.

They prefer to be called the First Nations people of Canada, if you insist on using a blanket term.
User avatar #42635 to #42633 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
Hmm, I've heard there's a degree of ethnic tension especially between French Canadians and other Canadians.

I did just message my Canadian friend. She's a far superior Marxist-Leninist to me, so I think I'll wait for her perspective before forming my opinion and taking this further.
User avatar #42642 to #42635 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
By the way, I was talking about the natives for that first nations bit. I should have specified.
User avatar #42643 to #42642 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
Oh, no, that's fine. I've heard of the term before, but I'm not familiar with Native Americans in Canada.
User avatar #42644 to #42643 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
The ones you hear about the most are the Metis (Part Native and part French), and that's mostly because of the whole Louis Riel debate. Other than that, there are hundreds of small traditional "Territories", with the quotations because they were very vague and undefined due to a lack of the concept of land ownership.
User avatar #42637 to #42635 - feelythefeel ONLINE (07/23/2013) [-]
There is, and to be honest it goes back right to the beginning. A lot of the original British North America act (The document at the core of out constitution that detailed the creation of out federal government) had to be created with Quebec specifically in mind under threat of them not taking part. That is, if I'm remembering my history classes right. There are even issues between English and French here when Canada was still British (Namely the Lower Canada Rebellion).
#42601 - roliga (07/23/2013) [-]
Group of hippies at the mall today with signs saying "Zimmerman is not a hero!" and "Zimmerman still has blood on his hands!" while all wearing hoodies and having Skittles/Tea. Meanwhile I was by wearing a Kel-Tec T-shirt (Kel-Tec PF9 is the gun Invader Zim used to ban TrayTray). Oh the looks, the dirty looks, I feel so dirty and I need to bathe in their tears.
User avatar #42609 to #42601 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
I've heard the PF9 is a really shitty gun
I've heard really good things about Kel-tec, though, but apparently they don't produce enough of their guns to keep up with demand.
User avatar #42602 to #42601 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
We've moved on from the Martin case. No need to tell us how edgy you are.
#42655 to #42602 - anonymous (07/23/2013) [-]
It's unfortunate that America won't be moving on from the case for quite some time. Once the media makes a monster of something here, it tends not to go away any time soon.
User avatar #42656 to #42655 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
Commie friends and myself discussed it at length earlier on. One believed the case was a real race issue that highlighted current race relations and oppression under capitalism. The general consensus amongst us, however, was that the case is insignificant, and it was even suggested that it served as a distraction. The Bradley Manning Case, for example, and, perhaps to a lesser extent, the Snowden Affair.

I raised the theory that could very well be the bourgeoisie seeking to divide the proletariat further on race lines. I think there is a degree of Black racism because of the case, but it was just a thought.

Anyway, tl;dr: insignificant case, exaggerated, potential distraction, potentially increased Black racism, devoid of any revolutionary character.
User avatar #42694 to #42656 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
I think you're making an issue out of something that is not there. Blaming the bourgeoisie for every single tiny thing that goes wrong in a society that just happens to be capitalist, regardless of whether it has to do with economics or not, is just plain demonization and IMO a cheap tactic to advance your cause.
User avatar #42777 to #42694 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
That's what we were trying to answer, if it served a purpose for the bourgeoisie or not.

We concluded it doesn't aid our cause, and could even harm it. For that reason, we're suspicious. We don't agree with the rest of the Left, because we don't see the case as a huge thing, reflective of race relations. Because of that, we didn't blame the bourgeoisie.

But the emphasis put on this case was definitely artificial. While the bourgeoisie didn't cause the shooting directly, they've probably manipulated it for their own ends.
User avatar #42791 to #42787 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
Indeed - just because the bourgeoisie are the same class does not mean they will always cooperate, just as members of the proletariat don't always cooperate with each other.
User avatar #42792 to #42791 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
and it is on that mistrust and lack of cooperation that capitalism is built upon
User avatar #42793 to #42792 - oxan (07/24/2013) [-]
And capitalism intensifies that lack of trust. Divisions within the proletariat are perpetuated by the bourgeoisie, there's no doubt about that. Perhaps not the Martin-Zimmerman case, but in general racial divisions are unnecessarily emphasised, nationalism is encouraged, and collaborating with class enemies becomes the norm.

Common class interests between the bourgeoisie are highlighted, and the conflicts - which are the overwhelming majority of class relations - are ignored. Common interests among the workers of other nationalities are ignored, and the conflicts highlighted. Overreporting of race-on-race crime in the media, the fear cultivated through things like the 'war on terror'.

In Australia, the issue of asylum seekers arriving by boat is a major issue. But why? They account for less than 1% of our annual immigration intake. More people overstay their visas after arriving in the airport. Racist terms such as 'boat people' become the norm, 'fuck off, we're full' becomes the racist rallying cry. People thinly hide their xenophobia with, 'oh, I just don't think we should let illegals in.' What illegals? Refugees are not illegal, and their mode of transport makes no difference. 'We shouldn't have to take them.' Why not? The highest number of refugees come from Afghanistan, a country we helped invade.

/rant.
User avatar #42794 to #42793 - pebar (07/24/2013) [-]
but you can't blame all owners of capital for what the media does
User avatar #42802 to #42794 - oxan (07/24/2013) [-]
Considering the owners of the media are the owners of the capital, and therefore the media serves the bourgeoisie's interests...
User avatar #42803 to #42802 - pebar (07/24/2013) [-]
but only for the news industry
User avatar #42806 to #42803 - oxan (07/24/2013) [-]
Media is used to demonise socialism. Even if their main concern is the media industry, they still indirectly serve the interests of the bourgeoisie.

News Ltd is one of the largest media companies in Australia, and controls about half the market alone. It's agenda? Neoliberalism.
User avatar #42821 to #42806 - pebar (07/24/2013) [-]
so you're telling me..... that all major business owners are secretly collaborating together behind society's back in order to keep themselves wealthy and to keep the masses poor?
User avatar #42785 to #42777 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
You're implying the bourgeoisie have an altruistic interdependent relationship with each other; this not the case. For example, cartels are extremely unstable because people have a predisposition to be self-centered. Each party would be motivated to sacrifice their partners to maximize their own profits.
Imagine 2 cigarette companies each with an option to advertise; if one company advertises, they get way more customers, but if both companies advertise then they cancel each other out and it turns into a huge waste of money. The companies agreed to not advertise at all but eventually someone broke the arrangement. Eventually the companies themselves lobbied to ban cigarette advertisements because they kept screwing up. It's like a game of chicken.
I suppose this example would count as the bourgeoisie using government for their own gain but what you have in mind would be on such a massive scale that it borders on paranoia. People just do not have the ability to cooperate without some kind of government intervention; that's why things like taxes exist in the first place. But I think we both agree that the bigger the government, the more prone to corruption, either from influence by lobbyists or just the selfishness of politicians.
User avatar #42788 to #42785 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
If I was implying such a thing, it was not intentional. There are definitely conflicts within the bourgeoisie class. I have a good article on the matter that I'd like to refer to at the moment, but unfortunately it's saved on my personal computer, not what I'm currently using.

The problem with 'big government' is that it's kind of an undefined term.
User avatar #42596 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
Is it normal for constitutions to prohibit the death sentence?
User avatar #42598 to #42596 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
it's a constitution the limits what a government is allowed to do so... I guess
User avatar #42689 to #42598 - undeadwill (07/23/2013) [-]
Well ours does in the bill of rights now its being used to increase government power
User avatar #42690 to #42586 - undeadwill (07/23/2013) [-]
If the baby is born a boy but mind's is a female it won't fucking matter what they call it at first. You think every drag queen tranny out there parent's didn't at first call them by the gender they psychically were?

The real way to do this is to allow the child to chose for himself one day if he is comfortable with his gender, not give him a choice as he pops out of the womb because any choice he makes before at least 18 will be a stupid one. And because he's royalty lets make it 25. (He might name his self captain underpants. or Steve McCool, Or Samatha Sugertits.)
#42669 to #42586 - maddboiy (07/23/2013) [-]
i am unbelievably angry right now
i am unbelievably angry right now
User avatar #42608 to #42586 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
Oh wow. First: it's not a choice. Second: who gives a shit? Raise the kid according to its sex. Just because gender is independent of sex doesn't mean you go over the top with gender neutrality while it's a baby, goddamn.
User avatar #42612 to #42608 - oxan (07/23/2013) [-]
I'd just like to state that pebar had a good response below:

"If people truly want gender equality, they should leave "boy" and "male" as defining sex and not gender. It's culture's fault for making people think the way they behave has to coincide with a definite label like that; it's culture's fault for making transgender people believe they have to mutilate their body's just so they'll fit in.
Lashing out when people say the sex of a baby is entirely counter-productive because it keeps gender and sex synonyms. "

For the most part, I agree. It's a good assessment.

The best example for the difference of sex and gender is Barbie and Ken. Barbie and Ken are obviously female and male, respectively, but we can tell that without looking at what's between their legs. Once again, I just want to note that just because gender and sex can be different, that doesn't mean we throw gender out the window.

These things are just taken too far. Yes, gender can be different from sex. Yes, having your gender and sex in line is normal. Normal just means the average or common thing. Just because gender dysphoria isn't 'normal' does not mean it's wrong.

Shit.
User avatar #42589 to #42586 - jewishcommunazi (07/22/2013) [-]
Post-modernist pussies, I guess. It's just a fad, it'll eventually die out.
User avatar #42592 to #42589 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
the hippie movement was just a fad and they evolve into democrats; we better be careful
User avatar #42594 to #42592 - jewishcommunazi (07/23/2013) [-]
They became democrats because they became more pussy than they already were, there's no way these guys can get any pussier.
0
#42593 to #42592 - jewishcommunazi has deleted their comment [-]
+2
#42588 to #42586 - amongoeth **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #42597 to #42588 - mykoira (07/23/2013) [-]
*queen
#42591 to #42588 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
banana king
hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue
#42657 to #42591 - junkaccountman (07/23/2013) [-]
Mike Jones approves of the above pic.
User avatar #42590 to #42587 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
If people truly want gender equality, they should leave "boy" and "male" as defining sex and not gender. It's culture's fault for making people think the way they behave has to coincide with a definite label like that; it's culture's fault for making transgender people believe they have to mutilate their body's just so they'll fit in.
Lashing out when people say the sex of a baby is entirely counter-productive because it keeps gender and sex synonyms.
User avatar #42584 - navywannabe (07/22/2013) [-]
Did anyone else hear that Zman cam out of hiding...To help someone in a car collision?
#42585 to #42584 - byposted (07/22/2013) [-]
I bet if it were a black family, he would have pulled out his gun and shot them because the exploding airbags "threatened" him.
#42595 to #42585 - pebar (07/23/2013) [-]
airbags are typically white, though
0
#42573 - undeadwill has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #42561 - roliga (07/22/2013) [-]
I think zman can see the future.

>Panthers come to push his shit in while chimpouts rage
>Panthers wear vests to gain the trayvantage
>ZimZam pulls out his five seven that he loaded with AP and tactically flimflams them
>Al Sharpton has a heart attack
>Zimmerman awarded every medal ever

Calling it.
User avatar #42556 - jewishcommunazi (07/22/2013) [-]
The Internationale

Commie vs. cappie (vs. fascist too, if you fascists want) songs?
#42547 - byposted (07/22/2013) [-]
www.cnn.com/2013/07/22/world/europe/uk-royal-baby/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

In case anybody cares, the royal Shittish babby has been born.
User avatar #42553 to #42547 - byposted (07/22/2013) [-]
The baby's technically a "male" at birth but I can't stand these fucking bigot conservatards calling it a "King." We don't know if zir's gender is contiguous with zir's sex. "He" might be Britain's future Queen.
0
#42551 to #42547 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
0
#42535 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #42513 - roliga (07/22/2013) [-]
Once again, Zimmerman is a hero.He did the right thing and rescuing someone who probably wanted him convicted of a crime he didn't commit. Zimmerman, I salute you for doing the right thing in spite of what the country has done to you.


abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-emerged-hiding-truck-crash-rescue/storynew?id=19735432
User avatar #42533 to #42513 - undeadwill (07/22/2013) [-]
wanna be cop?

More like wanna be a hero and he fucking is a hero.
User avatar #42557 to #42533 - roliga (07/22/2013) [-]
He tutors minority children for free, volunteers to protect his neighborhood, shoots violent criminals, and saves people from life threatening vehicular collisions.
This man needs a medal already. Hes one of the greatest Americans of this generation.
User avatar #42558 to #42557 - undeadwill (07/22/2013) [-]
He kills niggers and isn't afraid of anything.
User avatar #43053 to #42558 - cactaur (07/26/2013) [-]
that shorthand version?
User avatar #43062 to #43053 - undeadwill (07/26/2013) [-]
Nope.
User avatar #42511 - undeadwill (07/22/2013) [-]
The Anti-Americans: vimeo.com/55017531

A love/hate relation.
User avatar #42514 to #42511 - undeadwill (07/22/2013) [-]
Relationship.
#42374 - anonymous (07/21/2013) [-]
**anonymous rolled user keepmeagain ** jew
 Friends (0)