Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Had a small DDOS. We're back now after I nulled some IPs.
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds

Per page:
Latest users (2): akkere, teoanon, anonymous(14).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #44248 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link

I was told this wasn't sexist in the slightest. I WAS LIED TO
User avatar #44299 to #44248 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"9. Walk on the other side of the street when a woman is walking towards you at night."

So wait, you want me to treat you like racists treat black people? A bit odd, but I suppose everyone's got some kink.
User avatar #44301 to #44299 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"14. Listen."
We have penises, not down's syndrome. You don't have to tell us that, slick.
User avatar #44367 to #44301 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
I lol'd.
User avatar #44302 to #44301 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"19. Let yourself cry and be emotional."
What if you can't? I'm not an emotional person, I don't cry. So what, am I banned from interacting with whiteknights and feminazis? I can honestly say that I don't mind.
User avatar #44304 to #44302 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"21. Read websites like Feministing, Colorlines, Jezebel, etc. for your news sources."
I shouldn't have to tell anyone why this is bullshit.
User avatar #44306 to #44304 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"22. Take a Women’s Studies class."
Hierarchy of useless courses:
Philosophy<anything reigious< Women's Studies
User avatar #44307 to #44306 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"25. Pick up a feminist book from your local bookstore to start off."
The day may come where I forgo superior literature in favor or morally decrepit propaganda, but it is not this day!
User avatar #44308 to #44307 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"26. Get involved with school programs and events."
Believe me, I will. Just not yours.
User avatar #44309 to #44308 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"29. Challenge everyday sexism in your life."
Regarding this point's description, you must be fun at parties.
User avatar #44310 to #44309 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"31. Stop telling her you’re “different than other guys.” Don’t speak. Do."
Protip: Watch feminists and their advice; every once in a while they'll give advice that works in the sack.
User avatar #44311 to #44310 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"32. Call out your friends on oppressive behaviors, jokes, or comments."
Again, fun at parties.
User avatar #44368 to #44311 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
See the rule that state "Don't force your opinions on others" Then see trhis

These rules are bullshit
User avatar #44312 to #44311 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"33. Challenge other men to do the same."
"...and receive a free kicking of the balls that you don't have! All for the low price of your dignity!"
User avatar #44313 to #44312 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"35. Strengthen your relationships with other men."
We have penises, not down's syndrome. You don't have to tell us that, slick.
User avatar #44314 to #44313 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"36. Take paternity leave if you’re a father."
I found the rich boy.
User avatar #44315 to #44314 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
"40. Never seek recognition or affirmation."
Stop, I've already found the rich boy. No need to find him again.
#44316 to #44315 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I'm bored with this. If anyone wants to take it from here, be my guest.
User avatar #44336 to #44316 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
I don't know if I can keep reading this pussy's bullshit without cringing, but I'll give it a try.
#44303 to #44302 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #44261 to #44248 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
This is either a joke or simply sad.
User avatar #44263 to #44261 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
It seems legit. Which is very very sad.
User avatar #44264 to #44263 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
The funny thing is that women most likely think the guy who wrote this is a complete admin by the way he behaves ("Walk on the other side of the street when a woman is walking towards you at night.").
User avatar #44266 to #44264 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
I posted "remind anyone of Jimmy crow laws where a black man and a white woman couldn't walk on the same street.
User avatar #44265 to #44264 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44254 to #44248 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
... What's the MRA?
User avatar #44262 to #44254 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Google it mother fucker.

Men's rights activist
User avatar #44328 to #44262 - liberalgodess (08/07/2013) [-]
There's a men's rights group? That's just sad, sad, sad....
At least we know progress is being made if men are on the defensive.
User avatar #44362 to #44328 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
I'm so going to murder you.
User avatar #44270 to #44262 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
I thought that was it, but that didn't make any sense because the comments section consists of men sitting there going "What the fuck?", and women sitting there going "Double what the fuck?", who keep getting called "MRA" by the whacky feminists that regular this... thing.
#44245 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]

Libtard feminist dares to drivel on Micheal Savage's phoneline. Did you know that you can tell an /r/atheism poster just by hearing them?

User avatar #44259 to #44245 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
"The only thing that can save the West is a militant Christianity"
>You will never slay fedoras with Uncle Savage
#44258 to #44245 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #44249 to #44245 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Feminist? Not really.
libtard? yup.

The military base isn't a play ground
User avatar #44250 to #44249 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
Of course she's a feminist, although she didn't make it blatantly clear. You can hear it in her voice and in her argument. How many libtards who talk like that aren't pro-wymyn's activists?
User avatar #44251 to #44250 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Not sure.
User avatar #44252 to #44251 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
All liberal women are feminists. Insofar as they're interested in politics, they are so in feelings and what they view as their interests.

When she hung up after being destroyed by Dr. Savage she started blogging about her vagina while stroking her pet fetus.
User avatar #44229 - djequalizee (08/07/2013) [-]
You're all wonderful people.
User avatar #44247 to #44229 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44206 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Least favorite country?

Mine France. Fucking hate France.
User avatar #44492 to #44206 - mykoira (08/09/2013) [-]
i hate Russia and USA equaly
User avatar #44558 to #44509 - mykoira (08/09/2013) [-]
Usa, becase they think (and kinda are) center of the World. and they utilized it the Snowden thing and it's in the USA where there is the most of idiots of the world (at least the loudest part) Russia because it's all shitty and smelly, but mostly because where i live (finland)
User avatar #44382 to #44206 - fuckya (08/08/2013) [-]
I hate France as well...
An unreasonable amount of dislike.
User avatar #44385 to #44382 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
What's your reason
User avatar #44386 to #44385 - fuckya (08/08/2013) [-]
Be rather proud of my German heritage. They dragged us into Vietnam. The French language is more fucked than American-English. Rather hypocritical about many things, most recently about how they were the loudest about the US spying on ourselves yet they do the same. Constantly trying to make the US look bad as well.
And I'm quite upset with the Twitter thing that happened earlier this year where they are making Twitter conform to their laws.
Plus I'm rather big into military might, and consider them all pussies for WWII.

France just generally pisses me off. (Besides some food and music)
User avatar #44387 to #44386 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
Including being rude fucks about food and music.
User avatar #44388 to #44387 - fuckya (08/08/2013) [-]
Indeed. Did you know that more German POWs died in French hands than French POWs in German hands?
User avatar #44389 to #44388 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
User avatar #44390 to #44389 - fuckya (08/08/2013) [-]
I mean. Fuck. Vietnam and Ho Chi Min got along really well, they adored the US, it was just that they were a French Colony and France didn't want to loose it.
Those. Bastards.
I hold them responsible for every life lost in Vietnam.
User avatar #44438 to #44390 - jewishcommunazi (08/08/2013) [-]
To be fair, some americans involved plus Diem were assholes. And the south vietnamese France puppet whose name I can't remember too.
User avatar #44451 to #44438 - fuckya (08/08/2013) [-]
Diem was instated by the US because the French left and wanted the US to help. Yes, the average American disliked the North cause they were Commies, but the US gov't got along perfectly well with Ho Chi Min before the French threatened to let the US public know that the US, the shining capitol of Freedom and Capitalism, was dealing with Commies.
The US got involved because of the French, and it all went to shit because of that.
User avatar #44496 to #44451 - undeadwill (08/09/2013) [-]
That's it I'm rustled Nuke france.
User avatar #44500 to #44496 - fuckya (08/09/2013) [-]
We almost gave them nukes for that. OP Vulture. Use three tactical nukes to take out Vietnam forces.
User avatar #44504 to #44500 - undeadwill (08/09/2013) [-]
..Nuke all of France those ungrateful bastards
User avatar #44391 to #44390 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
same here. and what did we get for dying in the mud?
User avatar #44392 to #44391 - fuckya (08/08/2013) [-]
Traded a very good economic and military partner who liked us, for one that hates us and wants nothing to do with us.
User avatar #44393 to #44392 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
Fucking dick bags french.
User avatar #44300 to #44206 - roliga (08/07/2013) [-]
The UK
User avatar #44363 to #44358 - roliga (08/08/2013) [-]
Because if you say anything people there don't like you get -
Oi m8 ill gob ye jaw n chop ye a newun!

Then when I get stabbed by a six year old with a kitchen knife and have to wait in line for six months to get treatment
User avatar #44366 to #44363 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
Lol. I loved 4chan post
User avatar #44286 to #44206 - teoberry (08/07/2013) [-]
Tie between UK and Australia
User avatar #44345 to #44286 - oxan (08/08/2013) [-]
W-why Australia?
User avatar #44349 to #44345 - teoberry (08/08/2013) [-]
Idk all the ones i've met are pretentious. I still can't wrap my mind around the fact that you're an aussie, i honestly pictured you wearing a ushanka and ordering vodka by the ton
User avatar #44429 to #44349 - oxan (08/08/2013) [-]
>Idk all the ones i've met are pretentious

Oh, I understand. There's a large degree of cockiness amongst Australians. Unless you live here, it's easy to mistake jokes for someone being a cunt.

Still, some people just take it too far.

> i honestly pictured you wearing a ushanka and ordering vodka by the ton

I don't drink, but I do have a Soviet flag on my wall. Does that count?
User avatar #44441 to #44429 - teoberry (08/08/2013) [-]
It counts, but you're not full soviet yet
User avatar #44276 to #44206 - heyhowsitgoin (08/07/2013) [-]
#44394 to #44364 - heyhowsitgoin (08/08/2013) [-]
Stalinism, spread of Communism, traditionally pathetic (and yet oh so over-hyped) military, their oppression of Eastern Europe, etc.
User avatar #44439 to #44394 - jewishcommunazi (08/08/2013) [-]
Deaths by famine were unintentional and it was only partially the party's/leaders' policies' fault.
#44432 to #44394 - oxan (08/08/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link

It's sourced.

As for the military, they kicked the arse of the Wehrmacht, which was arguably the most effective military force at the time. Disciplined, technologically advanced, and by the time they invaded the USSR, had combat experience.

8,668,400 - Total irrecoverable Soviet losses
6,923,700 - Total irrecoverable Axis losses
- G. I. Krivosheev

Hardly pathetic and overhyped.
User avatar #44442 to #44432 - heyhowsitgoin (08/08/2013) [-]
Im not just talking World War 2, I'm talking about Russia's history as a whole. In the 19th and 20th centuries alone, Russia lost wars against:
-Great Britain
Which wars did they win?
-Ottoman Empire (big whoop)

For the most part when Russia tried fighting without allies, it got its ass kicked.
User avatar #44475 to #44442 - oxan (08/08/2013) [-]
Oh, so the Russian Empire.

I don't care about them.

Carry on.
User avatar #44395 to #44394 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
User avatar #44272 to #44206 - liftplus (08/07/2013) [-]
any african one or russia
User avatar #44440 to #44361 - liftplus (08/08/2013) [-]
they're got shit human rights and are driving there economy into shit
User avatar #44269 to #44206 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
Not very fond of Brazil overall.
User avatar #44425 to #44360 - jewishcommunazi (08/08/2013) [-]
Raw Video: Car Runs Over Bicyclists
Mostly because of its significant amount of assholes.
User avatar #44446 to #44425 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
I can almost hear "Its coming back"

Why did he run them over?
User avatar #44447 to #44446 - jewishcommunazi (08/08/2013) [-]
I think it was just because he was a douche with no patience. Not a good combination.
User avatar #44450 to #44447 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
User avatar #44242 to #44206 - oxan (08/07/2013) [-]
New Zealand.

Should just become a state of Australia already.

No, there's no country that I really hate. I dunno, I guess I'd have to say the United States, but because they're the biggest imperialist state. United Kingdom and France are close behind, so don't take it personally. As Stalin said, 'Hitlers come and go, but the German people remain'. It's only your bourgeoisie leaders that I hate.
User avatar #44243 to #44242 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
We are the biggest only because we are the greatest.
User avatar #44342 to #44243 - oxan (08/07/2013) [-]
Greatest are being imperialists, yeah.

Greatest at basic human decency? Lelno.
User avatar #44359 to #44342 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
Greatest military wise and economically.
User avatar #44430 to #44359 - oxan (08/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, sure, that's expected when your economy is based off the exploitation of the third world.
User avatar #44449 to #44430 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
Not really. We have plenty of steal, coal and etc to stay a world power.
#44235 to #44206 - valeriya (08/07/2013) [-]
#44238 to #44237 - valeriya (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44240 to #44238 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Good reason.
User avatar #44232 to #44206 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
Probably Saudi Arabia; I believe they're the center of OPEC, which is the closet real-world thing to an "illuminati" on the count that they have the world's oil by the balls.

The shit that DeBeers has going on with diamonds is exactly what OPEC does with oil; name any event in which oil spiked up or down after the '70s, and you can be guaranteed they have their names on it.
#44327 to #44232 - valeriya (08/07/2013) [-]
Or Russias, letting people freeze to death in Europe to advance our political ambitions since 1991.
User avatar #44233 to #44232 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Good one.
User avatar #44234 to #44233 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
Why do you hate France so much?
I mean, there's a lot of reasons to hate France, but I think I'd hate Quebec more they're like French people that are closer to your time zone.
User avatar #44239 to #44234 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
(I live in Texas)

France hate the US for the dumbest reason and in their own country like shit. They have their own NSA program while their president criticizes us. Brainwashing children. Riots over stupid things. Oppressive toward people and religions, lazy and rude, economic system is basically "steal all we can from the rich for votes so that the general middle class populace have it easy.
User avatar #44244 to #44239 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
Scariest thing I noticed about France is their politics is pretty... brutal.
I remember reading some articles about how the extreme right and the extreme left get into things that aren't really short of gang wars, where they just outright duke it out and even murder each other. They also have a party that's pretty much a watered down Nazi party that's chaptered in France.
User avatar #44246 to #44244 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
And you have to hate how they go out of their way to try and make the Americans look bad.
User avatar #44241 to #44239 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
And run their own country*
User avatar #44221 to #44206 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
inb4 USA, 4edgy8me
User avatar #44224 to #44221 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
We aren't that bad.
User avatar #44225 to #44224 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
That's why I'm saying inb4, someone will probably say it if you're unlucky enough.
User avatar #44213 to #44206 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
If I were to ignore Israel for just a second, I'd go with Albania. The Serbs should have completely genocided them. Some runner-ups are Turkey, Moldova, and Saudi Arabia.
User avatar #44216 to #44213 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Why Saudi? And Albina?
User avatar #44219 to #44216 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
Albanians don't deserve to be on the European continent. They're just the lowest people. Saudi Arabia I hate for geopolitical reasons.
User avatar #44222 to #44219 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44226 to #44222 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
Shia Muslims are the true successors. Saudi Arabia is America's little bitch and so is Turkey. Hezbollah is a tremendous fighting force.

User avatar #44228 to #44226 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
#44230 to #44228 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
The Jews fear Nasrallah.
#44288 to #44230 - anonymous (08/07/2013) [-]
Oy vay not the Towel heads.
Anything but the Towel heads.
User avatar #44207 to #44206 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
Probably Sudan or some other 3rd world African country that butchers its own people for kicks and giggles.
User avatar #44218 to #44207 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Those too but they have their reasons.
User avatar #44173 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
If find the idea of trying to limit human rights violations in war to be hilarious. Its like what are you going to do against a military force? They are force and therefore are power in order to limit this power you would need to go to war and who would stop them?
User avatar #44197 to #44173 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
Really, what you speak of is only a modern development brought about by first world countries who actually believe that they'll never go to war again and play it dirty. They impose their rules, thus, on lesser countries who don't respect them to begin with.

I remember reading online such "wartime rules." One of them was that you could not desecrate a defeated enemy's flag.
User avatar #44200 to #44197 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
All is fair in love and war. Nothing will stop a man from using tools like the belt buckle gun meant to fire when the hands were above the head ( surrender. ) Or booby trapping a corpse. Because at the end of the day all that remains is the victor.
User avatar #44187 to #44173 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
The above is a great example of what you speak of. Rape has been a tradition in war since what constituted warfare was bashing the top of your enemy's head with a wooden stick. And yet wymyn want to be a part of the frontlines... Only militaristically-speaking third-rate countries like Sweden allow for that.
User avatar #44194 to #44187 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Rape always has been a tool of war the reason we don't allow it is because the population finds it to be brutish and is bad for media.
User avatar #44201 to #44194 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
If you're speaking of modern military operations, of course. But in real warfare, when your defending your people or killing a hated foe, rape's gonna happen when women are found after weeks of unwanted abstinence.
User avatar #44203 to #44201 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44178 to #44173 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Examples: like trying to limit a countries nukes. Once they get them you can't really push them around.
User avatar #44195 to #44178 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
It's actually called mutually assured destruction. Although it doesn't directly limit the making of nukes, it does stop anyone from actually using them. Tell me, if you're thinking of making nukes yet you know you'll never be able to use them, will you go through with it without absolute need (IE to have enough nukes to preserve the mutually assured destruction)?
User avatar #44196 to #44195 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Yes. Why not?
If I am safe due to my allies I am not truly safe.
User avatar #44210 to #44196 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
You're safe in the way that you're not getting blown up, not in the way that you can't get blown up. That should be good enough for most.
User avatar #44211 to #44210 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
I'm not getting blown up today but protectors can easily become oppressors.
User avatar #44215 to #44211 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I'm not saying this is the way it should be, I'm saying its the way it is.
User avatar #44217 to #44215 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Its meh.
User avatar #44154 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
People with serious inheritable disabilities should not be allowed to reproduce.
( )Strongly Disagree
( )Disagree
( )Agree
( )Strongly Agree
User avatar #44428 to #44154 - jadewest (08/08/2013) [-]
Strongly disagree
User avatar #44332 to #44154 - CapnInterwebz (08/07/2013) [-]
Strongly disagree
User avatar #44236 to #44154 - Ruspanic (08/07/2013) [-]
Strongly disagree. No one has any right to "not allow" you to reproduce, any more than they can force you to reproduce. That's between you and your consenting partner.

Although this does call to mind the related issue of whether incest should be legal.
User avatar #44162 to #44154 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Define serious.
User avatar #44189 to #44162 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
like huntington's
User avatar #44190 to #44189 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Those usually die off anyway.
User avatar #44199 to #44190 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
According to my brief wiki search, symptoms start to appear at around age 20 then the person dies 20 years after that; plenty of time to reproduce.
User avatar #44205 to #44199 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Sure but many don't.
User avatar #44166 to #44162 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
Are you afraid that scientists will find out that there's a hereditary aspect to homosexuality, and stop these people from reproducing under the above clause? Would you support such a thing?
User avatar #44171 to #44166 - oxan (08/07/2013) [-]
>Hereditary aspect to homosexuality

I don't see why that would be a concern at all, since homosexuals aren't reproducing.
User avatar #44177 to #44171 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
He's talking about the gay gene.
User avatar #44176 to #44171 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
Exactly, but homosexuals keep being born despite their complete lack of reproduction. Heterosexuals conceive of homosexuals. Perhaps there's a gene of some sort that can be purged from humanity. It's highly unlikely and I believe that it's a disorder that manifests itself before birth, but if it was so...
User avatar #44169 to #44166 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
And no. I prefer human evolution to take place thus keeping us flexible.
User avatar #44168 to #44166 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
I was worried more about autism but sure that's fucked up.
User avatar #44172 to #44168 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I think the level he was talking about was down's syndrome and a history of organ failure.
User avatar #44175 to #44172 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
History of organ failure= will die anyway.
Down syndrome= they mostly interbreed. but I'm sure they wouldn't understand the concept of shooting blanks too well.
User avatar #44179 to #44175 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I mean a family history of organ failure. And I suppose down's syndrome was a bad example, seeing how few cases of it are hereditary.
User avatar #44180 to #44179 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Not really that serious.
User avatar #44184 to #44180 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
It can be. At times, it creates generations of people doomed to die. Another case of highly hereditary disorders is hemophilia (A disorder where blood cannot clot on its own, causing a small cut to cause serious blood loss).
User avatar #44185 to #44184 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Or a generation that just dies.
User avatar #44188 to #44185 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Someone who's prone to organ failure doesn't always immediately express it.
User avatar #44192 to #44188 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Still dies removing himself from the gene pool.
User avatar #44208 to #44192 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Assuming that he actually dies and treatment isn't a thing, he removed himself from the gene pool making future people less likely to contract his disorder.
User avatar #44209 to #44208 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Yup. Besides might be working on a new gene that gives his children a stronger heart
User avatar #44212 to #44209 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
There's no conceivable way to be able to count on that beforehand.
User avatar #44214 to #44212 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
which is why we must allow human evolution to act.
User avatar #44220 to #44214 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Actually, I take back my previous statement. Now that I think about it, there has to be a way to predict genetic traits. Or at the very least, observe positive and hereditary traits.
User avatar #44223 to #44220 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44186 to #44185 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
While the rest of us move on.
User avatar #44174 to #44172 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
As examples.
User avatar #44158 to #44154 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I just realized that I'm a eugenicist, so I guess I agree.
User avatar #44164 to #44158 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
You don't see the slippery slope? The nazis first start out by saying that they'll purge from humanity "serious disabilities" and other inheritable traits that are bad for health, as if they have good intentions in mind! Then they'll say that lower IQ is bad for health by connecting, say, the probability of dying in a car crash to lower IQ, which correlates quite well. This would effectively genocide blacks.
User avatar #44170 to #44164 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I don't believe in actively killing people with undesirable genetic traits, only the limiting of their reproduction. As horrible as that sounds, protecting the human gene pool is worth the sacrifice.
#44082 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]
Ask the dude who got this score on the political compass quiz anything
#44099 to #44082 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Why haven't you been educated.

<political board and Religious board.
User avatar #44139 to #44099 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
le feel when I'm not represented on the blue master square.
User avatar #44141 to #44139 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Master blue square? Don't you mean master purple square?
User avatar #44157 to #44141 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
Purple is like the little cousin of blue. Green, however, is the drunk uncle.
User avatar #44161 to #44157 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Great now I feel like /lgbt/ trying to cozy up to /pol/
User avatar #44159 to #44157 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I prefer the term high.
User avatar #44118 to #44099 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I can't count how many times I've been asked to be added to that. I mean, you have zlamous, and he's been gone for Christ knows how long.
User avatar #44128 to #44118 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
I liked him.
User avatar #44131 to #44128 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Point is, any chance that I could be added?
User avatar #44280 to #44131 - teoberry (08/07/2013) [-]
k ill do it
User avatar #44295 to #44280 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
thx for great justice.
User avatar #44132 to #44131 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
idk ask the guy who made it to start it up again.
User avatar #44135 to #44132 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Who would that be? Does he still frequent the boards?
User avatar #44137 to #44135 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
I think lulz did it.
User avatar #44140 to #44137 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44279 to #44140 - teoberry (08/07/2013) [-]
he got banned
User avatar #44144 to #44142 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
K. That should get his attention.
User avatar #44145 to #44144 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
I haven't seen him in a while.
User avatar #44147 to #44145 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
You know anyone else who could do it?
User avatar #44148 to #44147 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Anyone its not that hard.
User avatar #44149 to #44148 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Then you have no excuse. Get going.
User avatar #44152 to #44149 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
But. You see...

I'm an asshole
User avatar #44155 to #44152 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Dennis Leary  ~ "I'm An Asshole - and Damn Proud of it" Good song.
User avatar #44156 to #44155 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44105 to #44099 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]
Shalom, comrade.
User avatar #44130 to #44105 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]

Excuse me what did you say to me foolish mortal?
User avatar #44134 to #44130 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
He said "shalom comrade".
User avatar #44136 to #44134 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
I know
User avatar #44138 to #44136 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Then why did you ask?
User avatar #44143 to #44138 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Because I'm an asshole .
User avatar #44146 to #44143 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Dennis Leary  ~ "I'm An Asshole - and Damn Proud of it" Good song.
User avatar #44153 to #44146 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
I laugh at my own jokes.
User avatar #44089 to #44082 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
IMO anything in the lower left corner is kind of naive because you're asking people to share their own wealth without being forced by the gov. Only a society with a lot of like minded people would be able to function like that.
User avatar #44297 to #44089 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
Individualist anarchism is most likely located in the far-low; far-left, but I'm not exactly sure of how it really is, just the basic stuff. Also, the far-left ideas usually have the common goal that includes abolishing wealth, not share it.
User avatar #44091 to #44089 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]
I don't ideologically disagree with taxing people. Most hardcore libertarians don't to my knowledge.
User avatar #44096 to #44091 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
most hard core libertarians are further right
User avatar #44097 to #44096 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]
Well im not a hardcore libertarian. I was saying that the lower left quadrant doesn't necessarily imply disagreeing with the government collecting taxes.
#44121 to #44097 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
Not the whole quadrant, just the far lower left corner. The further left you go, the more things are socialized, like public schools and healthcare. If you go way left, the common businesses (let's say shoe makers) will also be socialized. Many cases, socialized businesses are funded by taxes so they are allowed to stay free, the shoe maker would not be bringing in revenue so it would have to work like that. In the most extreme left, communism, all workers work together for the benefit of society as a whole. The farmer raises the cow, the butcher collects the hide, the tanner fixes the leather, the shoe maker creates the shoe, all working together. The communists on this board, like Oxan, would tell you that there would need to be a transition period, a time when capitalist societies are torn down by force and replaced with council managed "soviet" economic planners; this being done because people do not like to share, it's all "mine mine mine".
And that's my point: people are greedy. People do not like being taxed and when taxes are insanely high to fund socialized organizations, you need a big authoritarian government to enforce and collect that tax.
User avatar #44165 to #44121 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]
I don't think that a government needs to be big and authoritarian in order to provide social services. If done intelligently we could design a government that can fulfill its functions without overreach. Just because the government fulfills functions does not mean it has to then tap our phones and be big brother. In the first place I believe the government is obligated to provide services that can't be trusted solely in the hands of private industry. The problem with unregulated capitalism is the inherent greed you can assume will occur in at least enough people. Market forces dictate that those who constrain themselves for the sake of ethics will in many ways be worse off than a competitor who does not care. If you have peoples lives and liberties come down to a profit motive people are going to get hurt, corners will be cut. Because someone somewhere is willing to go that extra sleazy step to make another buck, and not every unethical practice can be illegal. The private industry is meant to run for profit. Government isn't meant to do that, so I believe that it should offer services in industries such as the fire department, police, hospitals, prisons, and so on. This is based on a need to protect people from the malicious practices of business. In my opinion that is what the government is for, to protect people. That being said I don't think its necessary to squeeze out private industry in these functions, and I think that the government should be limited to those functions. There should never be a government run soda company or government run cell phone company. Those are not functions of the economy that if denied to people would necessarily imply victimization and a violation of ones rights. The enforcement of a well built system of law that incapacitates threats to society and the intelligent application of these services could exist with the ideals of personal liberty still intact.
#44084 to #44082 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
How does it feel being me?
User avatar #44296 to #44281 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Thx for great justice.
#44048 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
leave embassies open, get blamed for recklessness when the ambasador is killed   
close embassies when a threat is discovered, get blamed for cowardliness and making us look weak
leave embassies open, get blamed for recklessness when the ambasador is killed
close embassies when a threat is discovered, get blamed for cowardliness and making us look weak
#44030 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Today I realized that:

1.) Ann Coulter exists.
2.) She's a rancid bitch.

You guys learn anything new today?
User avatar #44043 to #44030 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
Coulter has been around for years, she released book like a year ago - what's all the bitching about her now?

If you want to talk about rancid bitches, talk about Hillary, Pelosi, Maddow, and Matthews.
User avatar #44044 to #44043 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I only recently noticed. Doesn't make it any less true, though.
User avatar #44045 to #44044 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
Do explain how you are under the impression she is a rancid bitch.
User avatar #44046 to #44045 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Again, look up "Ann Coulter books".
User avatar #44047 to #44046 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
I have 3 of them. All read many times.

I know what you're talking about, but I don't understand why you think that makes her a rancid bitch.
User avatar #44049 to #44047 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
That she acts like a rancid bitch to people she disagrees with, showing she can't handle anything that isn't her.
User avatar #44050 to #44049 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
...Not... really. You are deliberately misinterpreting what she says in order to confirm your assumptions about her. Coulter is a columnist. She can take criticism, every journalist does. However, Coulter has very sharp wit and can fight back and make jokes, which is what are mistaking from rancid bitchiness.

Clearly, Coulter uses a "shock and awe" factor in her books - the book cover below is an example. SHe's using a blanket statement to draw outrage and get a buzz about her book so it sells more. It's really just basic marketing.

You could replace coulter with maddow, olberman, matthews in your posts and you would accurately described those members of the left.

#44051 to #44050 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Ohohoho so witty.
User avatar #44052 to #44051 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
Did you not read what I said?

She's using SHOCK. It got you pissed off, so I'd say it worked.
User avatar #44054 to #44052 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
If that's journalism, journalism is dead.
User avatar #44056 to #44054 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
That's not journalism. Her columns are not in her books.

So because Ann Coulter calls liberals demonic, journalism is dead, but not because Chris Matthews gets a feeling running up his leg when Obama got elected? Sure a radical opinion is better than an entire network having homoerotic feelings about a president.
User avatar #44058 to #44056 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I never said I was a democrat. American politics are fucked up.
User avatar #44059 to #44058 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
I didn't either. You're a liberal. Progressive. call it what you will.
User avatar #44060 to #44059 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I'm a democratic socialist. I don't associate with your democratic party in any way further than seeing them as the "Lesser of two evils".
User avatar #44061 to #44060 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
So you're worse, eseentially. At least our democrats aren't blatantly socialist. Or weren't before.
User avatar #44337 to #44061 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
"Or weren't before."

They're still very far, socialism doesn't mean abortions and gays getting married.
User avatar #44338 to #44337 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
Not saying that at all.
That's really only what the media shows you.
User avatar #44340 to #44338 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
My mistake, it's just what I assumed. The democrats are still close to social democrats though, and that's also what most european-style "socialist" parties have become anyway, but the abandon of many important socialist ideals by those "socialists" are evident.
User avatar #44062 to #44061 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
essentially. It's late.
User avatar #44063 to #44062 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I don't consider myself worse, but I suppose I'm biased there. Aren't I?
User avatar #44065 to #44063 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
I suppose I am too.

Socialism is something I've looked at, and determined would most likely fail - due to the fact that there are humans involved.
User avatar #44068 to #44065 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
The aristocrats.
User avatar #44071 to #44068 - achimp (08/07/2013) [-]
Sorry, I have no clue what you're talking about.
User avatar #44039 to #44030 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
I don't know anything about Coulter apart from the articles I read from her talking about immigration and race-crime. She has sense in these two issues, at least. What did she do/say?
User avatar #44040 to #44039 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Look up "Ann Coulter books".
User avatar #44038 to #44036 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
And become "moderate Republicans" like the guy below doing ama? No thank you, Coulter.
User avatar #44037 to #44036 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Case in point.
User avatar #43983 - exrflarion (08/07/2013) [-]
██████████████████████████ ███████████
█░░░█░█░█░█░░███░█░░███░░▀ ▀░▀█░█░░░██
██░██░▀░█░█░▀███░█░▀███░▀▄ ░▀░█░██░███
██░██░▄░█░█▄░███░█▄░███░▄▀ ░▄░█░██░███
██░██░█░█░█░░███░█░░███░░▄ ░█░█░██░█░█
██████████████████████████ ███████████
███████▀▀░░░▄███████████▀▀ ▀░░░░░░░▀▀▀
█████▀░░░░▄██████▀▀▀░░░░░▄ ▄▄█████▄▄▄▄
███▀░░▄█▄████▀▀░░░▄▄▄█████ ███████████
███░░█████▀▀░░▄▄██████████ ███▀▀▀▀▀▀▀░
███▄░░░▀▀░░▄▄████████▀▀▀▀░ ░░░░░░░░░░░
██████▄▄▄▄██████▀▀░░░░░░░▄ ░░░░░░░░░░░
██████████████████▄▄▄░░░▀█ ▀░░░░░░░░░░
████████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░
█████████████████░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░
███████████████████▄▄▄░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░
██████████████████████████ ▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░ [/spoiler]
#44001 to #43983 - teoberry has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #43964 - tharealballer (08/07/2013) [-]
trayvon was innocent. if a guy jus tryin to make some grip (michael vick) is guilty but some fuckin cracker who shot a nigga in the back gets off, we know we livin in ameriKKKa
User avatar #44383 to #43964 - fuckya (08/08/2013) [-]
Travyon was innocent, yes. "Stand your ground" doesn't mean if someone is actually committing a crime, simply if you are feeling if your life is threatened and you're not committing a crime yourself. I'm sure Travyon felt threatened himself and by "Stand your ground" he tried to defend himself.
By law, neither one is at fault.
User avatar #44100 to #43964 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Trayvon was shot in the front.
User avatar #44278 to #44100 - tharealballer (08/07/2013) [-]
no his gf said otherwise
User avatar #44357 to #44278 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
Gf was never there doe.
User avatar #44602 to #44357 - tharealballer (08/10/2013) [-]
she wuz on tha phone
User avatar #44603 to #44602 - undeadwill (08/10/2013) [-]
Nigger. Nigger really?
User avatar #45213 to #44603 - tharealballer (08/15/2013) [-]
nigga shut up
User avatar #45244 to #45213 - undeadwill (08/15/2013) [-]
Trayvon got what he deserved.
User avatar #46111 to #45244 - tharealballer (08/27/2013) [-]
fuck u nigga
User avatar #46117 to #46111 - undeadwill (08/27/2013) [-]
The fuck you gonna do about it cock sucker.
User avatar #44604 to #44603 - Nigger (08/10/2013) [-]
User avatar #44605 to #44604 - undeadwill (08/10/2013) [-]
User avatar #43970 to #43966 - tharealballer (08/07/2013) [-]
dat white kkk zimmerman shot the lil nigga trayvon in the back like a fuckin coward and get not guilty but vick a real nigga tryin get outta tha ghetto and they put him in jail? fuckin illuminati racists
User avatar #43974 to #43970 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
michael vick pleaded guilty....
User avatar #43977 to #43974 - tharealballer (08/07/2013) [-]
ya under torture
#43953 - anonymous (08/07/2013) [-]
You're walking down the street one day when suddenly, A N​IGGER JUMPS OUT!


What do you do?
User avatar #44114 to #43953 - oxan (08/07/2013) [-]
Ask the racist man in black face to please leave me alone.
User avatar #44102 to #43953 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
throw it in a pool and watch the nigger drown.
#43942 - thatguyontheright (08/06/2013) [-]
Ask a Moderate Republican anything.
User avatar #44041 to #43942 - byposted (08/07/2013) [-]
Can you post your political compass plos?
User avatar #43963 to #43942 - tharealballer (08/07/2013) [-]
fuckin bigot
User avatar #44103 to #43963 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Oh please little nigger.
User avatar #44277 to #44103 - tharealballer (08/07/2013) [-]
all dese racists doe
User avatar #44356 to #44277 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
What me racist?
User avatar #43961 to #43942 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
How do you feel about the Republican party in its current state, as well as other parties in general (Democrat Party, Green Party, Libertarian Party, etc.)?
User avatar #43965 to #43961 - thatguyontheright (08/07/2013) [-]
Quite frankly, the party has been overrun by people who refuse to compromise, they are very authoritarian, and really act in a way American's should not act.

The Democrats have some good ideas, but poor execution. While I did not like Obama, McCain and Romney were worse choices. Libertarians are just idealists, ideals that would not work. I do not know much about the green party.
User avatar #44104 to #43965 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
"Ideas that do not work"

Okay freedom and capitalism don't work I guess.
User avatar #43986 to #43965 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
Seems like you've attracted a bit of flak from some others with that post.

Truth be told, I really have no idea who the Green Party is either, except a radio interview that was posted on this board a long time ago during the heat of the recent election.

One thing I've noticed a lot with the current republican party is moderation isn't exactly taken with great approval. That being said, in an attempt to ask in a more... lighter tone, why exactly do you consider yourself a moderate Republican and not a moderate Democrat?
User avatar #43995 to #43986 - thatguyontheright (08/07/2013) [-]
I do not support the Tea Party, the current authoritarian and inability to compromise of the modern GOP.

But other things I support.
User avatar #44000 to #43995 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
Is there any particular political figure you would like to see in the next presidential election, as well as congressional and senatorial elections in general?
User avatar #44002 to #44000 - thatguyontheright (08/07/2013) [-]
I wouldn't mind Jeb Bush, he was the smart son in the Bush family, but he doesn't want to run.
User avatar #44012 to #44002 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
Is there any particular issues you're most worried about in terms of how they're being handled (if handled at all) at the current moment with the current administrations of presidential, congressional, and/or senatorial?
User avatar #44015 to #44012 - thatguyontheright (08/07/2013) [-]
The repeal of ACA, it is a waste of time and tax payer money. They know its a waste of time but they attempt it anyway. This is a huge issue. It is politics getting in the way of recovery.
User avatar #44024 to #44015 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
What do you think about the way News is being presented, such as from mainstream media outlets such as CNN, FOX, MSNBC, or web-based outlets like TheBlaze, Huffingtonpost, and so on?
User avatar #44026 to #44024 - thatguyontheright (08/07/2013) [-]
They need to cut out the bias, on both sides. CNN, MSNBC, TYT, ect show an extreme liberal bias. Where as The Blaze and Fox show an extreme Con bias. Both sides tell part of the story, and both need to cut it out. I watch the news for information on what is going on in the world, and I do not want bias.

Also the media needs to cut out the celebrity gossip horse shit. I do not care about the latest tween super star who had a "breakdown" and freaked out in public. This shit isn't news, it should not be presented as news. Also the celebrity dating shit, who the hell cares. I don't need to know when Brad Pitt gets a blumpkin.
User avatar #44271 to #44026 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
If it's any consolation, I believe the topic of Politics really needs more moderates in general, and someone like you is a breath of fresh air.
I tried to ask a lot of neutral questions because I didn't want you to feel that this board was filled with extreme cons that brand you as a... "RINO", for being a moderate (we kind of have a diverse population, well, at least we've been a lot more diverse than we were a year ago). I don't think I've ever heard of a liberal that supported anyone with Bush in their name, let alone knowing who Jeb Bush is, anyway.

Are you planning on regularly coming to this board or was this mostly just a one-time visit?
User avatar #44034 to #44026 - akkere ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
What are your thoughts on the "structure" of elections; the existence of the electoral college, the cost-heavy bill that campaigns carry, the utilization of lobbying, etc.?
User avatar #43954 to #43942 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
also this, it's more specific if you're an american
User avatar #43950 to #43942 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
**your view on the following*
gay marriage
public school vouchers
gun control
affirmative action
social security
foreign policy
socialized health care
Obamacare (it's not the same as above)
lobbying in washington
progressive tax system
government spending
corporate shenanigans
that oil pipeline from Canada
free international trade
term limits
homeland security
welfare/food stamps
government-dictated morality
User avatar #43993 to #43950 - thatguyontheright (08/07/2013) [-]
My answer would be way to long. haha
User avatar #43947 to #43942 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]
take this and post the results
#43939 - anonymous (08/06/2013) [-]
I hear that Asian-Americans are starting to get the short end of the stick when it comes to affirmative action.

Anyone know any more about that?
User avatar #44107 to #43939 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
They don't face oppression economically because they work so hard.
User avatar #44109 to #43934 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Just looked up the sauce.
My rage Is steel bending.
User avatar #44133 to #44109 - pebar (08/07/2013) [-]

sec 2, B, 3, VI

reducing the dropout rate of African American students and helping African American students graduate from high school prepared for college and a career, in part by promoting a positive school climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools, and by supporting successful and innovative dropout prevention and recovery strategies that better engage African American youths in their learning, help them catch up academically, and provide those who have left the educational system with pathways to reentry
User avatar #44160 to #44133 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Okay. We have a racist nigger (I do really mean this word this man is a shame to the black race in leadership) as a president who is always trying to cozy up to democratic socialists in Europe and thus is sinking the economy faster than the titanic.

Great first black president but did we have to get this asshole?
#43938 to #43934 - anonymous (08/06/2013) [-]
Just a ni​gger in political office doing special favors for ni​ggers.
User avatar #43937 to #43934 - byposted (08/06/2013) [-]
Nothing new. Weren't quotas set in some cities so that public schools could only reprimand x number of blacks? What's needed in black schools is more discipline. What's needed in black culture is more discipline. The black community wasn't such a monstrosity before the "Civil Rights movement."
#43912 - blakhawk (08/06/2013) [-]
I believe in strict separation of church and state everywhere the US, where I live. Does anyone have strong views either way (about their country)?
User avatar #44273 to #43912 - liftplus (08/07/2013) [-]
i just want my country to be 100% with out religion and atm it looks like that'll happen between 50-100 years
User avatar #43928 to #43912 - pebar (08/06/2013) [-]
The constitution says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." which basically means people are allowed to believe whatever they want and there's nothing the gov can do about it. As an individualist, I support that.

Now, law historically has deep roots in morality and ethics and religion greatly affects morality so it's nearly impossible to avoid some overlap in politics. Gay marriage and abortion for example... the issue of gay marriage is arguable way more influence by religion than abortion is, and religion is really the only thing standing in the way. Abortion however has more to due with morality. Restricting abortion does not help maintain social order (IMO the primary purpose of government), it is simply imposing a system of right and wrong on the population. If the issue is viewed in that sense, then the gov should be pro-choice. However, it is the gov's obligation to defend people's rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, so if a fetus has those rights, then the gov should be pro-life.

As long as religion exists to such an extent that it does, it will keep influencing government in ways like above. However, the government is barred from restricting religion so I guess we're in a bit of a pickle.

Public institutions like court houses and public schools are under the authority of the gov, however, so the gov should keep them secular to the best of its ability.
#43917 to #43912 - byposted (08/06/2013) [-]
Strict entanglement of Church and State. Fedoras nailed to the cross.
User avatar #44110 to #43917 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Trifias *
#43905 - jewishcommunazi (08/06/2013) [-]
Got this from a Phanact comment, I'm 100.
User avatar #44384 to #43905 - fuckya (08/08/2013) [-]

I just went -100 because Black/White so just said Other.
User avatar #44274 to #43905 - liftplus (08/07/2013) [-]
I'm 85
User avatar #44204 to #43905 - RedJoker ONLINE (08/07/2013) [-]
30... I think i accidentally my calculator or im just an unlucky swab
#44275 to #44117 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
Looks like you need some affirmative action.
User avatar #44355 to #44275 - undeadwill (08/08/2013) [-]
User avatar #44079 to #43905 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]

Reading this pissed me off.
User avatar #44257 to #44079 - jewishcommunazi (08/07/2013) [-]
I think it was just made as some parody.
User avatar #44113 to #44111 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]
I don't like the assumptions it makes.
User avatar #44129 to #44113 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #44181 to #44129 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]
I think it is unfair to say that privilege is calculable, all of these judgements about the degree of privileges are subjective. There is no formula that measures privilege. And the practical differences in treatment change depending on your environment.
User avatar #44183 to #44181 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Well Its mostly a joke
User avatar #44198 to #44183 - mexicoman (08/07/2013) [-]
Well yeah, but the reason it pissed me off was because its indicative of this internet culture that say privilege is something that can be assumed and applied to people based off of how they fit into certain brackets. That kind of mindset poisons the well in how we give merit to people, instead of individuals they are reduced down to how much the people who look like them or act like them are generally treated, and the chart reminds me of how this simplistic world view has permeated the culture.
User avatar #44202 to #44198 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
Feminist race baiter logic..
User avatar #44035 to #43905 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
Assuming I'm in the USA for all intents and purposes (I'm Canadian). I'm at about 55.
#43952 to #43905 - repostsrepost (08/07/2013) [-]
So one of the most libertarian/conservative members here is actually the least privileged. good to know.
#43948 to #43905 - repostsrepost (08/07/2013) [-]
How is Europe more privileged than the USA when America's per capita GDP is much higher?
User avatar #43940 to #43905 - teoberry (08/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #43929 to #43905 - pebar (08/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #43936 to #43929 - byposted (08/06/2013) [-]
A plutocrat libertarian. How fitting...
User avatar #43930 to #43929 - pebar (08/06/2013) [-]
well... 155, I'm sort of non-religious about my christianity.
User avatar #43932 to #43931 - pebar (08/06/2013) [-]
I'm not that.
I guess I'm more agnostic leaning but not as atheist as a lot of other people. If I did believe in a god I'd probably be more deist.
IDK... I'm still thinking about it.
also I didn't see that "if in the US" part so i guess 135
User avatar #43933 to #43932 - jewishcommunazi (08/06/2013) [-]
I just think it's funny that such a thing as that exists. I'd say I'm a fedoraless atheist myself.
#43925 to #43905 - valeriya (08/06/2013) [-]
55, Fuck this test.
User avatar #43927 to #43925 - jewishcommunazi (08/06/2013) [-]
More affirmative action for you.
User avatar #43921 to #43905 - jewishcommunazi (08/06/2013) [-]
I'm actually 125.
#43918 to #43905 - valeriya (08/06/2013) [-]
Was this meant to be a you rage you lose thing? Because I've lost.
User avatar #43916 to #43915 - byposted (08/06/2013) [-]
120-130, actually. I had a problem with the religion section since I'm not a fedora but not religious. I added +5 as such. For attractiveness, I'm not ugly or fat from what I see. I did +5.
#43919 to #43916 - valeriya (08/06/2013) [-]
The last line seems to be a "How highly do you view yourself physically" test.
User avatar #43914 to #43905 - mykoira (08/06/2013) [-]
110 or 100, i'm not sure of my parents earnings
User avatar #43908 to #43905 - assdoreponyfucker (08/06/2013) [-]
115 not bad
#43870 - feelythefeel (08/06/2013) [-]
New question that I'll check on when I wake up. So here's a mental exercise: Your country of residence is split up into halves: Monarchism and Communism (I know it sounds ridiculous but bear with me). For the sake of yourself and those important to you, you must choose a side.

So whats it going to be? Monarchism or Communism?
User avatar #44125 to #43870 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]
But that is impossible since communism requires that their be no other state other than itself it will turn into a another power crazed USSR or North Korea socialist nation or fail economically and become something else.

So monarchy sounds decent.
User avatar #44115 to #43870 - oxan (08/07/2013) [-]
I'm presuming you mean socialism... socialism.
User avatar #44123 to #44120 - oxan (08/07/2013) [-]
By 'communism', I'm assuming you mean socialism, since communism, as a stateless society, cannot coexist with a state.

I choose the socialist state over the monarchist state.
User avatar #44124 to #44123 - feelythefeel (08/07/2013) [-]
I'm talking about the USSR version, so I essentially mean the transition to true communism.
User avatar #44127 to #44124 - oxan (08/07/2013) [-]

Yes, my answer remains socialism, since we all know how much of a 'Stalinist' I am.
#43906 to #43870 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #43907 to #43906 - pebar (08/06/2013) [-]
Actually, I've changed my mind. My individuality is important to me. I will not be a grunt worker of the state.
User avatar #43909 to #43907 - jewishcommunazi (08/06/2013) [-]
You'll be a grunt worker for the burgeoisie instead?
User avatar #43913 to #43909 - pebar (08/06/2013) [-]
#43898 to #43870 - byposted (08/06/2013) [-]
I would die for the King.
#43876 to #43870 - valeriya (08/06/2013) [-]
The monarchist side would most likely attack the communists pretty quickly, and by communist do you mean it's a communist system or a state trying to achieve communism?
User avatar #43878 to #43876 - feelythefeel (08/06/2013) [-]
The latter.
#43882 to #43878 - valeriya (08/06/2013) [-]
Ok I can live in that, I just imagine this would have to inevitably dissolve into war, because it's generally thought that the whole world would need to be socialist before a country can safely achieve communism, since transferring to communism is essentially "letting your guard down".
#43845 - feelythefeel (08/06/2013) [-]
Any general government types that you would rather die than live in?
User avatar #44126 to #43845 - undeadwill (08/07/2013) [-]

Mainly because I'll die at the hand of the state.
#43911 to #43845 - blakhawk (08/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #43895 to #43845 - akkere ONLINE (08/06/2013) [-]
I'm more or less pointing to if the worst case scenarios of a government type are occurring, in which these circumstances become relatively unbearable.

Absolute Monarchy - People have no power. The leader generally pushes for some sort of backing of being a leader chosen by a supernatural force (e.g. God) and therefore has every reason to sit in the throne. I generally don't like any government where the only way to get a new leader is to shoot them, and Absolute Monarchs generally have a lot of guards you have to get past to do that. Also, these governments can take national rivalries way too seriously, and it actually has an affect where they just tax the shit out of their people to bulk up armies and take colonies (see: Most Empires.)

Developing Communism: There's a lot of things about this that can go sideways; one thing I've noticed (from what I've gathered in the terminology this is brought up in; I might be mistaken about this) is how a big part of it is having a central backing to a single proletariat. Problem is, if the proletariat turns out to be a wannabe bourgeois, or an agent of the bourgeoisie, or just simply has more mental defects than your average asylum joe, than a lot of motifs of communism is thrown out the window and a lot of people get shot.

Absolute Democracy: Most of it can be summed up with the concept of Tyranny of the Majority (though I'm really pointing at if 51% of the populace overpowers the 49%, and the real world situation where parties control the masses.

Totalitarianism: Pretty much the same reasons as a Absolute Monarchy, only instead of having a royal backing, the dictator just simply gets total power from whoever helped place him back up there. Dictators also tend to have more people covering their ass, so good luck shooting them if you're not a military power.

This isn't really a government type, but I also don't like the Free Market.

Keep in mind I'm mostly pointing to the worst case scenarios in terms of likelihood.
User avatar #43896 to #43895 - akkere ONLINE (08/06/2013) [-]
(I had limited characters to the post; so I'm just gonna prematurely wrap this up here)

Free Market (can't really underline this in a specific government type, though I guess it could've fit in Absolute Democracy): Smaller businesses enter open season to bigger businesses. Monopolization out the ass. Competition except amongst bigger businesses would eventually reach a point of nonexistence, and every awful business practice you can think of becomes very possible.

Anarchy (I wouldn't really consider this a government type though): With no central powers of any sort, the populace falls victim to any unified forces within the group that seek to withhold power equivalent to the government that isn't there (See: Organized Crime). Vigilantism becomes a thing, and a big problem with vigilantism is the idea that every vigilante is going to be this professional with a tower of principals and a razor edge skill (thanks: every piece of media regarding vigilantes ever). What you're more likely to end up with is mobs and even lynch groups.

Annnd, I thought I had more, but I can't remember any other types.
#43833 - aczzoh (08/06/2013) [-]
الخراء المقدسة يا رفاق وسخيف مثلي الجنس. يجب عليك قتل كل نفسك.
#43843 to #43833 - feelythefeel (08/06/2013) [-]
Убирайся из моей территории.
 Friends (0)