Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds

Per page:
Latest users (1): alimais, anonymous(16).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #45108 - CapnInterwebz (08/14/2013) [-]
So now the new Egyptian government has installed generals as provincial governors and is currently razing the pro-Morsi sit in camps around the country.

How long until the people rebel against this government?
#45110 to #45108 - valeriya (08/14/2013) [-]
No idea, watching al jaz on this right now... It wouldn't be unheard of in Egypt for the military to consolidate power, but in the past it's usually had good affects, granted the modern Egyptian army isn't the same as the one 60 years ago.
#45106 - fatbenreloaded (08/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #45086 - Major Mayhem (08/14/2013) [-]
Could you guys show me your collection of jew comics, I fucking love those
#45092 to #45086 - valeriya (08/14/2013) [-]
I've some around here somewhere.
#45096 to #45092 - valeriya (08/14/2013) [-]
Spot the difference.
User avatar #45097 to #45096 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
The tucans aren't secretly trying to control the world through an international conspiracy?
#45101 to #45097 - teoberry (08/14/2013) [-]
What do you think froot loops are for? One bite, and you've got millions of nanobots in your bloodstream, making their way to your brain and slowly taking control of you
User avatar #45102 to #45101 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
Oh yeah, now I remember! It even makes you desire interracial sex!
User avatar #45103 to #45102 - teoberry (08/14/2013) [-]
No, that's only the froot loops with the hearts in them
User avatar #45104 to #45103 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
Are the regular ones for pre-marital sex, then?
User avatar #45105 to #45104 - teoberry (08/14/2013) [-]
Yes. The marshmellow ones are for pedophilia, and I don't want to get into what the 'treasures' ones do to you
#45088 to #45086 - teoberry (08/14/2013) [-]
do you mean like this?
User avatar #45087 to #45086 - akkere (08/14/2013) [-]
byposted, it's your time to shine.
User avatar #45065 - alhemicar (08/14/2013) [-]
Would anyone care to explain me the difference between a parliament and a congress?
#45615 to #45065 - LarsGoes (08/21/2013) [-]
the congress is the parlament of the USA
User avatar #45077 to #45065 - byposted (08/14/2013) [-]
That's a loaded question. In the UK I know parties get seats in parliament proportional to the national vote while in the US Congress the composition is made up via local elections at the state (Senate) and district (House) levels.
#45076 to #45065 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #45078 to #45076 - alhemicar (08/14/2013) [-]
Eh, maybe you can answer this www.funnyjunk.com/politics/45073#45073

I have magical powers to reply to deleted comments that exceed the understandings of your mind
User avatar #45069 to #45065 - oxan (08/14/2013) [-]
They're just different names, basically.

Did you mean the difference between the presidential system and the parliamentary republic system?
User avatar #45073 to #45069 - alhemicar (08/14/2013) [-]
No, the difference between the institutions. I've read on the internet that in a congress the representatives/delegates are freer from influence of their parties, but no explanation as to why.
User avatar #45090 to #45073 - oxan (08/14/2013) [-]
The head of government in the US is elected independently of the congress, whereas parliamentary systems have the head of government drawn from the parliament and he or she must retain the confidence of that parliament. That generally means the leader of the largest party becomes the head of government. Party discipline, therefore, is necessary.
User avatar #45079 to #45073 - byposted (08/14/2013) [-]
I've read on the internet that in a congress the representatives/delegates are freer from influence of their parties
That would depend on how the members of parliament are appointed. We established that the different parties win x number of seats according to the national vote, but do the parties get to appoint these members? If so, they would most likely pick people who follow their party-line. Come the next national election, the parties can just remove those that deviate.

I believe, in effect, that the system we see in the U.S. allows for more distance from influence because the candidates are appointed not by the Party but by the people in different sectors of the country. The members of Congress have to be diverse in believes as a rule to appeal to their voters.

We need somebody with knowledge of British politics to confirm what I'm getting at.
#45109 to #45079 - valeriya (08/14/2013) [-]
British lower house (House of commons, 650 seats across gb & ni) is elected Upper house (House of lords) is mostly appointed, in order to run as part of a part you have to get permission from that party to do so, most parties operate like let's take the labour party there's about 2/3 factions, Democratic "socialists", Trade union roll overs and petty bourgeois with a guilt complex, so there's no clear "party line" on most issues but they'll still have a universal policy which is basically a heavy compromise which is what whips don't want you to deviate from (Explained lateR), you see it now with David Cameron trying to bring in gay marriage some of his own party are against him doing so. The solution parties around the world take to this, is whips they're the ones who will threaten bribe etc you to try keep you in accordance with the official policies which are agreed upon, if you keep deviating you'll probably have your party endorsement withdrawn but you'll still be kept in your seat just without a party and be considered independent, which isn't as big a deal as it is in America, some parties have less votes then others yet hold more seats, or hold more seats in proportion to votes. It's quite confusing. Source Living there.
User avatar #45080 to #45079 - alhemicar (08/14/2013) [-]
I'm not British, and yes, in my country we have a parliament and at first it was: party gets x seats, party appoints x representatives/delegates. But later the election law was changed that the representatives get elected directly, person for person (while delegates in the upper house were elected indirectly).

Still, the parties have great influence at their members, but I think oxan was right, from what I've gathered it's just different names. I've only now realised it's just most common for parliamentary republics to have a parliament, and presidental countries mostly have a congress.

How the parliament (or congress) works is, after all, defined by the constitution and election law.
User avatar #45082 to #45080 - byposted (08/14/2013) [-]
Indeed. As for the upper house, there are different manners in which delegates can be appointed there. The crown can do it, thus giving relevancy to the modern-age monarch, or a commission of some sort which is the case in Britain. How does this "indirect electing" work in your country? It interests me for there's nothing like it in the US.
User avatar #45083 to #45082 - alhemicar (08/14/2013) [-]
My country's unique in forms of gouvernment. Bosnia & Herzegovina's constitution is the Dayton peace agreement, wich ended the Bosnian war.

B&H remained in it's historical borders and the only sovreing state, but it was parted into two "entities": The Federation of B&H and Republika Srpska. The upper house of the parliament is the "House of peoples", it has 5 Bosniak, 5 Croat and 5 Serb delegates, and the quorum is the majority of votes, if atleast 3 Bosniak, 3 Croat and 3 Serb delegates are present.

The entities have the same type of parliaments, so the B. and C. delegates get appointed by the respective clubs in the house of peoples of FB&H, and the S. delegates get appointed by the council of peoples in Republika Srpska.

The state-level excecutive power is made up by the council of ministers, headed by the prime minister, who also acts as the mandatary and after a coalition is formed the parliamentar assebly gives a constructed gouvernment it's affiance (and can remove it later, if necesary).

There is no state-level judicial power that is established by the constitution, but the court of B & H was formed in 2003 and works the haviest cases of crime: war crimes, organised crimes etc.

Interestingly, I think this is the only country that formally is nothing - not a republic, not a monarchy, not a confederation...
Also, our head of state is a three-man presidency, of course a Bosniak, Croat and Serb member of the presidency...
User avatar #45037 - tredbear (08/13/2013) [-]

What is your Most Preferable Form of Government?

User avatar #45074 to #45037 - akkere (08/14/2013) [-]
>No Anarcho-Monarcho-Socialist-Totaliarianism

Welcome to pleb-ville. Population: You.
User avatar #45064 to #45037 - pebar (08/14/2013) [-]
What the hell is a capitalist government? Run by private property rights?
#45039 to #45037 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]
Only three votes... this is kind of boring.
Only three votes... this is kind of boring.
User avatar #45040 to #45039 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]

>Form of government.
User avatar #45042 to #45041 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]
Did you vote?
User avatar #45043 to #45042 - tredbear (08/13/2013) [-]
that's confidential information.
#45044 to #45043 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]
You either voted for fascism or nazism, didn't you?
#45047 to #45044 - tredbear (08/13/2013) [-]
it's going to take a lot more than that to make me crack
#45048 to #45047 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]
Oh yeah? What if I zoom in the picture like this?
#45049 to #45048 - tredbear (08/13/2013) [-]
Le legionary flag should give you a hint
User avatar #45050 to #45049 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
Is it Fascism (Francoism), then?
User avatar #45051 to #45050 - tredbear (08/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #45052 to #45051 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
I see... it's a yes, then. You seem to change your philosophy pretty quick, then.
User avatar #45053 to #45052 - tredbear (08/14/2013) [-]
no, I always had that ideology in my mind, it was always communism second.
User avatar #45054 to #45053 - tredbear (08/14/2013) [-]
very different things, but I am a strange man
User avatar #45055 to #45054 - tredbear (08/14/2013) [-]
both have their advantages and disadvantages though
User avatar #45056 to #45055 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
Basically, they're the opposite of each other regarding a lot of things (especially positions regarding race, nationality, class, etc.). In short (unless you want to give a big answer, I'm fine with both), Why communism and why fascism?
User avatar #45059 to #45056 - tredbear (08/14/2013) [-]
fascism because it consists of an all-powerful totalitarian government, which has total control of the people, the nation and the economy, and you end up with things like free health care, and paid vacations, better national security, Limits media on biased bullshit ( even though the gov can use it to lie and shit, but every governent does that) and it also gives Economic growth.

Communism because everyone gets a paycheck, the poor are fine with that, all People are equal, so no women be oppressed and shit, An internally stable economic system, everyone can get a job, efficient distribution of resources, and no other political party to try and ruin it all for everyone else.

User avatar #45063 to #45059 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
So, Stalinist socialism?
User avatar #45071 to #45063 - tredbear (08/14/2013) [-]
stalin was not my favorite leader in my book
User avatar #45098 to #45071 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
What was your favourite?
User avatar #45045 to #45044 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]
On a side note, I really only asked this so that I could make use of this picture of this fish from Spongebob with a judgemental look.
User avatar #45046 to #45045 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]
Although I'm kind of curious too, but no need to answer.
#45036 - akkere (08/13/2013) [-]
The North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed in the Voter ID bill into law yesterday, Monday August 12th.
The bill would require voters to show some form of government-issue (student IDs are not valid) photographic identification - a driver's license, passport, veteran's ID, etc. The governor states that the bill will not require for voters to provide an ID until the 2016 elections.

The bill also adds that it would provide for a "free ID" at DMVs, though some state estimates claim that the costs to providing voters that lack IDs would be substantial ( $834,200 for the current populace of voters, and then $24,100 every two years).

The bill has been met with legal opposition, as a coalition of groups including the ACLU and NAACP have filed a lawsuit against the bill, charging that it violates the Constitution's equal protection clause and Voting Rights Act of 1965.

User avatar #45057 to #45036 - pebar (08/14/2013) [-]
don't most states already do this?
User avatar #45061 to #45057 - akkere (08/14/2013) [-]
34 States require Voter ID in general; not all of them are exactly the same, and certainly not most of them are similar to what North Carolina is doing, I believe.

The States that have voter ID laws vary heavily;


Some require a Photo ID, some require IDs that don't have to be photographic, and some are "strict", which I'm not sure what that means right off the bat.

I'm not quite sure where North Carolina would stand, but I'm guessing from the way this whole thing is being broadly placed, it's probably going to be Strict ID.
User avatar #45032 - mykoira (08/13/2013) [-]
i hate D'Hondt method. Let's say Bieber wants to get in gongres, but he is in same party with Hitler and Stalin and other shitty persons (no offend to any of our stalinist or neo-nazies). Because Bieber is so popular he gets many votes what means he brings Hitlers and Stalins votes up what means that they too get in the gongres even they had just 7 and 2 votes and someone with 20,000 votes can't get in
User avatar #45035 to #45032 - pebar (08/13/2013) [-]
Oooh you mean people getting votes because they're popular, not because of their political views?
Yeah, that happens all the time, especially with democrats because of Hollywood and stuff...
#45019 - mykoira (08/13/2013) [-]
so, i found this map, it's a map of people England has invaded.
User avatar #45038 to #45019 - tredbear (08/13/2013) [-]
lol, nobody invades Mongolia
User avatar #45089 to #45038 - teoberry (08/14/2013) [-]
You don't really invade mongolia, you just sort of walk in, give a goat to the leader, and then you're in charge
#45031 to #45019 - sgtdalesmith (08/13/2013) [-]
BRITAIN not England !! There are other countries around England you know.
#45021 to #45019 - yourbed has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #45022 to #45021 - mykoira (08/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #45010 - undeadwill (08/13/2013) [-]
Hey fascists what was Italy's strong point in WW2 if any?
User avatar #45002 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]
I'm not sure if I asked this before, but what are your ideologies/ideas/methodologies/stuff/etc.?
User avatar #45058 to #45002 - arisaka (08/14/2013) [-]
Postmodernism and poststructuralism
User avatar #45060 to #45058 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/14/2013) [-]
Welcome back.

Also, can you explain more or less what it means? I'm not very familiar with those terms.
User avatar #45062 to #45060 - arisaka (08/14/2013) [-]
Both are terms that are hard to kind of describe. Post-structuralism relates to ideas and currents that evolved in critical theory during the 1960's and 1970's. "A post-structuralist approach argues that to understand an object , it is necessary to study both the object itself and the systems of knowledge that produced the object."

Post-modernism is a philosophy that argues against the ability to put all knowledge into a single framework (called a metanarative).
#45029 to #45002 - rety (08/13/2013) [-]
Religious Views- Whatever floats your boat as long as it doesn't affect other people in a bad way (fundamentalism and getting rid of separation of church and state)
Political views- human rights and shit, yo
world views- Stop putting your army into everything , America.
Personal Views- Live a good life, get educated, marry late, have kids that surpass you.
User avatar #44990 - Major Mayhem (08/13/2013) [-]
What do you think are the serious odds of another party being voted into American office? Like none of this Tea Party or Liberal bullshit anymore.
User avatar #44998 to #44990 - akkere (08/13/2013) [-]
Presidential or Congressional/Senatorial?
Either way, it's more or less unlikely. Dems and Reps have a major advantage of the fact that they can achieve massive funds from lobbying to fund even more massive campaigns. Seriously, campaigns are the equivalent of rolling up dolla dolla bills y'all and smoking it away to get one man into an office. Smaller parties can hardly ever get the publicity required to acquire the funds to achieve any of that, so presidential office is extremely unlikely.
Congressional/Senatorial Offices are more likely but it requires a lot more grunt work most people (sadly) will generally assign themselves as a major party and cast their vote in that direction no matter what. Even if an up-and-coming super-star type comes running up the aisles throwing actual plans to solving issues, if he's in a state that's populated by people that simply don't see the point in stepping away from a more dominant force that's at least somewhat appealing to their own view, he might as well look into a different career (I think shoe designers are actually in a good market now).

It's more likely a lesser party will augment themselves into a larger one to an extent, in which they are slowly assimilated into the views of the major and eventually become nothing more than a puppet party, as... tin-foiled as I'm sure that sounds. The people that were slowly hoping to maintain a degree of independence from the larger forces only remain fooled, for their independence is merely an illusion and dream so long as they believe any party that augments itself entirely into a major one is worth following no matter what.

tl;dr It's pretty hard for any small party to win anything unless they can shit entire gold bars.
User avatar #45016 to #44998 - Major Mayhem (08/13/2013) [-]
Hardly anyone here tl;dr's, You had very valid points.
#45007 to #44998 - valeriya (08/13/2013) [-]
The Alternative Vote Explained Maybe introduce this...
User avatar #44991 to #44990 - CapnInterwebz (08/13/2013) [-]
Next to none. I bet the majority of Americans are unaware that there's other teams besides red and blue.
#44989 - Major Mayhem has deleted their comment [-]
#44953 - tredbear (08/13/2013) [-]
since drawing board is dead, I thought this would be related to politics, anyways, I can't think of a decent background, got any ideas?
User avatar #44995 to #44953 - oxan (08/13/2013) [-]
Hammers and sickles!
Hammers and sickles!
Hammers and sickles!
User avatar #45066 to #44995 - pebar (08/14/2013) [-]
dare I ask what you have as a background?
User avatar #45068 to #45066 - oxan (08/14/2013) [-]
A black and white photo of the Red Banner above the Reichstag, with the flag coloured.

When I have my laptop connected to my old monitor, the second wallpaper is a painting of Red Army soldiers celebrating victory on the steps of the Reichstag.
User avatar #45072 to #45068 - arisaka (08/14/2013) [-]
Mine is a picture of Peel Street, Montreal, 1972. The roads are covered with snow.

It is serene.
#44986 to #44953 - heyhowsitgoin (08/13/2013) [-]
Something kinda like this, a winter, depressing background. Something that the soldiers of France and Germany felt when they invaded Russia.
#44960 to #44953 - pebar (08/13/2013) [-]
I most definitely have a few decent backgrounds. Would you like me to dump them?
they're all 4:3 and nature related
User avatar #44961 to #44960 - tredbear (08/13/2013) [-]
sure, why not?
#44962 to #44961 - pebar (08/13/2013) [-]
sorry I'm late, I took a shower
User avatar #44980 to #44965 - undeadwill (08/13/2013) [-]
I like this one
User avatar #44982 to #44980 - pebar (08/13/2013) [-]
my fav is 44962
User avatar #44955 to #44953 - junkaccountman (08/13/2013) [-]
The balcony of a fancy Mexican restaurant, complete with a Mariachi band.
User avatar #44939 - liberalgodess (08/13/2013) [-]
It seems the US is still as uncivilized as Africa. Why we still keep the 2nd amendment is beyond me...
User avatar #45020 to #44939 - junkaccountman (08/13/2013) [-]
Oh no! You called Africa uncivilized! That's politically incorrect!


Oh wait, I forgot. "Liberals" are immune to their own rules. My bad.
User avatar #44987 to #44939 - Ruspanic (08/13/2013) [-]
You can't call Africa uncivilized, you're a liberal.
#44950 to #44939 - fatbenforever (08/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #44981 to #44950 - undeadwill (08/13/2013) [-]
Look at how blue that fat ben is.
Could it be...
#44948 to #44939 - repostsrepost (08/13/2013) [-]
Freedom is soooo 19th century. Why don't we keep with the times and just go with totalitarian statism?
#44935 - anotherfatben (08/13/2013) [-]
#44936 to #44935 - evenmorefatben (08/13/2013) [-]
#44937 to #44936 - fatbenforever (08/13/2013) [-]
#44938 to #44937 - herecomesfatben (08/13/2013) [-]
#44940 to #44938 - lookatfatbenspoops (08/13/2013) [-]
#44941 to #44940 - loookatfatbenspoop (08/13/2013) [-]
#44942 to #44941 - moarfatben (08/13/2013) [-]
#44943 to #44942 - yetanotherfatben (08/13/2013) [-]
WE ARE FAT BEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#45026 to #44943 - fatbenreloaded has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #44923 - failtolawl (08/12/2013) [-]
ITT: Political Science majors. (oh wait lol)
User avatar #44988 to #44923 - Ruspanic (08/13/2013) [-]
International Studies major here. Close enough?
Foreign policy and languages.
inb4 working at McDonald's
#44945 to #44923 - repostsrepost (08/13/2013) [-]
I used to be a political science major until I figured out that the classes were all completely useless and the pay is shit until you actually get elected. Now I study economics.
User avatar #44926 to #44923 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/12/2013) [-]
Like me?
#44928 to #44926 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/13/2013) [-]
Well actually I'm not, but what if I was? You didn't really think about that, did you buddy?
User avatar #44924 to #44923 - pebar (08/12/2013) [-]
I think Oxan once said he was majoring in political science
User avatar #44992 to #44924 - oxan (08/13/2013) [-]
Political economy. The bachelor is political science.

Also, not yet.
#44951 to #44924 - fatbenforever (08/13/2013) [-]

#44883 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
Alright, I think I'm ready. I've honed my skills and now consider myself a warrior of the typed word, a minstrel of logic and a tactician of thought. If I'm not ready for it, there are few here who could be. So here it is, what may very well be my final ITT, the one to rule them all and in the darkness bind them.

ITT: I debate with the biggest feminazi you've got.

Come at me. I dare you.
User avatar #44896 to #44883 - liberalgodess (08/12/2013) [-]
do your worst... most crime in the world is committed by men and the statistics prove it.
User avatar #44996 to #44896 - oxan (08/13/2013) [-]
Almost had me, troll.
User avatar #44898 to #44896 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
Before we continue, are you fucking around about this? I'm pretty sure rety is, so I just have to check.
User avatar #44901 to #44898 - liberalgodess (08/12/2013) [-]
Violence against women is no joking matter. We must act now to achieve true equality.
User avatar #44906 to #44901 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
What about violence against men? If I got raped by a woman tomorrow, would you care? Google apparently doesn't, as it doesn't even classify that as rape.

What about discrimination against men? What if I get fucked over by a gold digger who marries me and then divorces me for my stuff? The courts don't care, divorce courts are renowned for favoring women.

I don't blame you for wanting a better life for women. I do however blame you for not looking at the shit we have to deal with, and pretending we oppress you in every way. Grow up and realize that we're all fucked by somebody.
User avatar #44914 to #44906 - liberalgodess (08/12/2013) [-]
Men getting raped by women happens far less so it's not exactly a problem. 95% of rapists are men.

That's actually just a myth. The only time courts favor women are if children are involved because children need their mother. If you married a gold digger, its kind of your own fault. Women need money to compensate for the outrageous amount of discrimination that exists in today's society.

Statistically, women earn 70% of what men do. We're not pretending...
User avatar #44916 to #44914 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
You do realize that five percent of rape victims must mean thousands, if not millions of people, right?

I don't know, my dad got pretty fucked over by divorce courts. Or is my dad a myth to you? Also, kids need a mother? What the fuck do you have against gay couples? And about that last part, I say we've come pretty far in that field considering you're not typing this barefoot in the kitchen (Or maybe you are, I don't judge).

You need to login to view this link
"The 75 cent figure is terribly misleading. This statistic is a snapshot of all current full-time workers. It does not consider relevant factors like length of time in the workplace, education, occupation, and number of hours worked per week. (The experience gap is particularly large between older men and women in the workplace.) When economists do the proper controls, the so-called gender wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."
#44895 to #44883 - rety (08/12/2013) [-]
Fuck you cismale, You're just calling all true humanists "Femnazis", labeling a group as something bad when its not.

You're just enjoying your white male cisprivelage.
#44952 to #44895 - fatbenforever (08/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #44897 to #44895 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
>not realizing the difference between normal feminists and feminazis
Please tell me you're fucking with me.
#44899 to #44897 - rety (08/12/2013) [-]
I am not "fucking with you" you sexist pig, you are just trying to rape me verbally with your word choice

Feminists are the best people in the world and we should castrate all males who arent

feminazi is just a cisprivelage term to describe us humanists that are true warriors against inequality
#44904 to #44899 - valeriya (08/12/2013) [-]
You're probably going to destroy your own mind in you carry on, save yourself and my sides now.
#44908 to #44904 - rety (08/12/2013) [-]
Save your sides? I don't have to do shit for you sexist cisprivelaged males.

I have to "save your sides"? Fuck you! You can't force other people to your will like you are a harem king and control all women.
User avatar #44902 to #44899 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
Just making sure. It's just that I don't exactly remember you being like this, and I'm pretty sure I've seen you on the board before.

Prove that feminists are the best people in the world. By what criteria are you in any way superior? Certainly not in the way of sympathy or empathy, if you're wanting to castrate people against their will.

Actually, the word feminazi is a term to describe feminists who take their ideology too far, often to the point of threatened and even actual violence. I have nothing against normal feminists, but the whole fringe are that is commonly described as "feminazism" ruins it for me.
#44903 to #44902 - rety (08/12/2013) [-]
We are better than other because we are trying to actively end cisprivelage.

Its just that simple, and saying there are specific qualifications of feminazi is like saying only poor black people can be niggers, its still offensive to people that you may not consider niggers, but their definition includes themselves in that group.
User avatar #44911 to #44903 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
A lot of people are trying to end shitty things in the world, the difference between them and you is that what they're trying to end actually exists.

We're not divided by gender. We're not even divided by creed, race or nationality. We're divided by class, and you're not doing yourself any favors pretending its otherwise.

In other words, I'd admire you at least a drop more if you were saying this shit about someone who is actually doing stuff as bad as what you accuse men of. As cliche as it sounds, the bourgeois comes to mind.
#44913 to #44911 - rety (08/12/2013) [-]
Check statistics More men inflict violence on women than vice versa and women are paid less on average, causing them to live lower quality lives.

That right there is your proof, all youre doing is closing your eyes and ears and saying "Know no evil"
User avatar #44915 to #44913 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
I don't know where you're getting that first fact from, but I can disprove the second one. That's only a snapshot of all current full-time workers. If you factor everything in, the gap narrows down to nothing.
#44917 to #44915 - rety (08/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, I'm done with this, I already played devils advocate for gun control, but this is too much.

I aint a feminst, nor have i ever been one, i could give three shits about the whole equality crap since social class will divide us farther than sex ever could.

You win, Im just not patient enough to act the idiot right now, have fun you win. thumbs for you
User avatar #44918 to #44917 - feelythefeel (08/12/2013) [-]
Good, I was worried for a second.
 Friends (0)