Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds

Per page:
Latest users (3): nadam, spneil, youregaylol, anonymous(21).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #50057 - finni (10/30/2013) [-]
There is one thing that Obama has said that would have made me give him my vote during the first election.

"There is not a Liberal America or a Conservative America, there is a United States of America"
-Barrack H. Obama

However, he sort of went away from that now because he realized that politics was harder than he thought. Now I wouldn't have given him my vote (if I was an American citizen).

Yeah, I'm a patriot. Sue me
User avatar #50102 to #50057 - bypest (10/30/2013) [-]
He didn't "realize" anything. He was trying to show himself as a populist but after the Congress split, he showed his true colors.
#50148 to #50102 - turdofdoom (10/31/2013) [-]
User avatar #50104 to #50102 - finni (10/30/2013) [-]
Exactly. After that thing about the congress, he really started bashing the conservatives, going against his own speech.
User avatar #50106 to #50104 - bypest (10/30/2013) [-]
Obama isn't the first self-proclaimed "people's president." Ever since voting rights were expanded to the lowest common denominator, all it takes is rhetoric like "THERE AINT BE NO MURIKA BUT UNITED STATES OF MURIKA NOMSAYIN" to win the hearts of morons. Obama is a partisan president as was Jackson, who started this trend to its culmination today.
User avatar #50062 to #50057 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
Why is that worth your vote?
That is worth nothing.

Also too much slow poke.
User avatar #50064 to #50062 - finni (10/30/2013) [-]
As I said, I'm a patriot. He's speech indicates a United America instead of a divided one, which in my opinion is one of the things I hold highest, a united country. Doesn't matter if you're left or right, we are all American. Speaking of a united people, is something that I would support and find beautiful.

However, he goes against his own saying so I would probably have gotten really mad after a year with him.
User avatar #50065 to #50064 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
Again why Is that worth your vote its a speech not an action he's done more to increase partisanship than any republican.
User avatar #50105 to #50065 - finni (10/30/2013) [-]
It's just that he's implying he stands for a version of America that is not just the left of America or the right of America, but a United States of America. However, as bypest said, he quickly showed his true colours.
User avatar #50058 to #50057 - beatmasterz (10/30/2013) [-]
A two party system sucks anyway.
User avatar #50061 to #50058 - finni (10/30/2013) [-]
Glad I don't live in a country like that.
#50055 - feelythefeel (10/30/2013) [-]
top lel, much indoctrinate.
User avatar #50169 to #50055 - jewishcommunazi (10/31/2013) [-]
Some of those sencences seem a little fascistic.
User avatar #50063 to #50055 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
I saw that earlier on tumblr Wait.... You stole my reblog
User avatar #50059 to #50055 - beatmasterz (10/30/2013) [-]
Gross, do they actually do that in America?
User avatar #50100 to #50059 - CapnInterwebz (10/30/2013) [-]
This is the first time I've seen it.
User avatar #50050 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link

So.... This is my blog how did I do?
User avatar #50113 to #50050 - jewishcommunazi (10/30/2013) [-]
Needs more emancipation of the working class.
User avatar #50115 to #50113 - undeadwill (10/31/2013) [-]
No u.
#50068 to #50050 - pebar (10/30/2013) [-]
I enjoyed this
User avatar #50071 to #50068 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
Indeed. I like my design of it.
User avatar #50054 to #50053 - feelythefeel (10/30/2013) [-]
Can I just say that it's fine and not start a debate?
User avatar #50056 to #50054 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
I was taking about the design.
User avatar #50067 to #50056 - feelythefeel (10/30/2013) [-]
Oh. Yeah, it's fine.
#50047 to #50046 - CapnInterwebz (10/30/2013) [-]

Are we really banning the word "boobies" from a high school?
User avatar #50037 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]

From one faggot to another fucking. Stop. Seriously. You aren't a politi-fag you are down voting shit stain on this board. Either post or GFTO.
User avatar #50043 to #50037 - teoberry (10/30/2013) [-]
Sadly, I doubt he's gonna stop. He's too buttmad at bypest for whatever reason to see things clearly.
User avatar #50044 to #50043 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
Why is he so butt hurt?
User avatar #50045 to #50044 - teoberry (10/30/2013) [-]
Doesn't agree with his views, I guess. Still, not a reason to thumb down everything with no sort of response.
User avatar #50049 to #50045 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
god damn reach around

Thumbing with no rebuttal? MFW
User avatar #50029 - noblexfenrir (10/30/2013) [-]
Fucking democracy 3, I keep forgetting to please immigrants and then they rise up and fuck no matter what I do to please their asses after that they still kill me.
User avatar #50030 to #50029 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
How is that game btw?
User avatar #50033 to #50030 - noblexfenrir (10/30/2013) [-]
Eh, not worth the money. Maybe if it's 50% off.

Game length depends on how you play it. If you play it like, well...your choices actually matter, then things won't work out so well. For example, I increased sales tax, gasoline tax, and capital gains all slightly and reduced income tax and in one quick scenario I completely canceled federal pensions. Result? It only works off hard values for the taxes, so the damage done to specific groups heavily, heavily, outweighs the lax given to everyone through decreasing income tax.

And federal pensions? Small backlash, barely did anything in long term. May I stress I didn't ween them off it, I just outright canceled it, and the result was basically "Awww, people are sad now, but you gained 200b back in revenue so higher credit rating, so people are happy!"

User avatar #50038 to #50033 - lulzforhiroshima (10/30/2013) [-]
wait is this a real fucking game or have you guys been joking the whole time.
User avatar #50039 to #50038 - noblexfenrir (10/30/2013) [-]
Game on steam, democracy 3.
#50018 - pebar (10/30/2013) [-]
Everything I know is a lie and now I have to rethink my entire political philosophy.
Everything I know is a lie and now I have to rethink my entire political philosophy.
#50020 to #50018 - pebar (10/30/2013) [-]
This has more to do with management and not so much economics and government policy. However the gov should take note with how it tries to manipulate people.
This has more to do with management and not so much economics and government policy. However the gov should take note with how it tries to manipulate people.
#50021 to #50020 - valeriya (10/30/2013) [-]
social sciences use equivolent to economic models, they can still be applied on larger scales youre way to easily swayed by everything... also searh milgram experiment whenever you bored that's pretty much enough for anything.
User avatar #50024 to #50021 - pebar (10/30/2013) [-]
I'm swayed easily because I'm still in the process of developing my view. I'd like to have as much info as I can. This is why I'm very excited for my macroeconomics class next semester.
User avatar #50004 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
we should all thumb up bypest's (even if you strongly disagree with him) comments cuz some asshole decided to get butthurt and thumbed him down on every comment and know he's close to being banned.
#50013 to #50004 - valeriya (10/30/2013) [-]
only if poland gets partitioned again.
User avatar #50014 to #50013 - lulzforhiroshima (10/30/2013) [-]
how about we just nuke it?
User avatar #50010 to #50004 - teoberry (10/29/2013) [-]
That's ivoryhammer being ivoryhammer. He posts nothing, he just serves to thumb bypest down occasionally. He's also an obama fan
User avatar #50048 to #50010 - ivoryhammer (10/30/2013) [-]
I'm an Obama fan? Since when?
User avatar #50066 to #50048 - teoberry (10/30/2013) [-]
You've said it before.
User avatar #50096 to #50066 - ivoryhammer (10/30/2013) [-]
That's news to me
User avatar #50011 to #50010 - lulzforhiroshima (10/30/2013) [-]
how retarded could you be to actually consider yourself a fan of obama?
User avatar #50041 to #50011 - teoberry (10/30/2013) [-]
IDK, he's in his own tier of retarded.
User avatar #50042 to #50041 - lulzforhiroshima (10/30/2013) [-]
retard tiers:

Tier 1: Uneducated Uni drop out
Tier 2: Highschool drop out
Tier 3: Autistic
Tier 4: Liberal
Tier 5: Obama fan ivorynigger
#50019 to #50011 - bypest (10/30/2013) [-]
This image has expired
"Why is 'faggot' and 'gay' the only insult people use on the internet? It's weird." ― Sexually confused ivoryhammer
User avatar #50023 to #50019 - lulzforhiroshima (10/30/2013) [-]
lel nice one
User avatar #50040 to #50022 - lulzforhiroshima (10/30/2013) [-]
this is fucking amazing

although i kinda disagree with the political point it stands on
User avatar #50026 to #50022 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
What a fucking faggot.
#49980 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
Debate/Opinion Time:   
Should the drinking age be lowered?    
Should we arm teachers?    
Does the United States have the right as a developed democratic society to police the world into respecting human rights?    
Should there be a limit to how many children you can have?
Debate/Opinion Time:

Should the drinking age be lowered?

Should we arm teachers?

Does the United States have the right as a developed democratic society to police the world into respecting human rights?

Should there be a limit to how many children you can have?
User avatar #50107 to #49980 - domitius (10/30/2013) [-]
Yes - Depends on the country, some already have limits as low as 16 without the drinking culture

No - We shouldn't see arming more people as a solution, not only that but we should stop stacking people with authority they can't handle

No (America respecting human rights? Good Joke)

Yes or more specifically a means test to prevent the Government bailing more people out that could have avoided it
User avatar #50060 to #49980 - beatmasterz (10/30/2013) [-]
18 is adulthood, you shouldn't be prohibited from drinking by that time.

No, teachers with guns is the worst message to send to kids in school. And I doubt it will stop school shootings.

>developed democratic society, lel no

User avatar #50027 to #49980 - undeadwill (10/30/2013) [-]
18 sounds about good.
Yes. Arm them.
If you kill a man to free him from killing another man the cycle will never end.
User avatar #50025 to #49980 - Ruspanic (10/30/2013) [-]
1. Yes, in the US. It should be lowered to 18.

2. No. But whether they're allowed to arm themselves should be decided by state and local governments.

3. It's a difficult question. I think non-democratic states that don't care about their people's welfare have no legitimacy or sovereignty, but the US only gets to make those judgements because it's powerful, and what we consider human rights is sometimes arbitrary and inconsistent. Humanitarian intervention is justified in serious crises, but we can't make a habit of using our military to go on moral crusades unrelated to our national security.

4. No.
User avatar #50017 to #49980 - pebar (10/30/2013) [-]
It's fine where it is. The brain is still developing before 21 so it's best not to disturb it.

If they want to, but not required. Also, there needs to be restrictions to be very sure some dumbass kid doesn't somehow get a hold of the gun, like if the teacher leaves the gun in their desk

no - other countries have sovereignty that the US needs to respect

no - if the workload is too much for the parents they could either give the kid up for adoption or they shouldn't have had the kid in the first place
User avatar #50016 to #49980 - jadewest (10/30/2013) [-]
Yeah sure to 16

They should have the right to


User avatar #50000 to #49980 - poncakeforlife (10/29/2013) [-]
1: Should stay at 18, drinking affects education for some people
2: Yes, every person should have the right to defend themselves at all times regardless of where they are
3: No opinion on this, it's difficult to decide
4: Nope
User avatar #49998 to #49980 - teoberry (10/29/2013) [-]
1. No, 18 is fine
2. We should give them the right to, but they can opt out
3. If no one else is gonna do it, and as long if the US respects human rights, they can go ahead.
4. No limit, but maybe give tax breaks if you have less than, say 4.
#49995 to #49980 - valeriya (10/29/2013) [-]
age at which you can drink is pointless, legal purchase age should be 18

this is a western problem, control your borders and control your culture and stop metaphorically letting your government shoot it's people for benefit fo pharma companies and there would be no need for it

no, muh exceptionalism only works when you're not blowing your own foot off.

hmm, when i consider we've had taxation on childlessness, and huge payouts to mothers today it's just not possible because kleptocracy, old solution was import young persons (16-18) from 3rd world country, culturally assimilate them, educate them to high standard, boom problem solved (this actually happened)
#49986 to #49980 - bypest (10/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
1. It should not as this would only encourage consumption of that degenerate substance. There should not be a "war on alcohol" but a war on culture. Hang Hollywood Jewish producers who destroy American families. They haven't made a good movie in years anyway.

2. It should be decided according to district.

3. There is a difference between the US acting rightfully as a World Power and the US "spreading democracy." The latter has about as much substance to it as the USSR invading its neighbor and subsequently issuing a proclamation on said country's "liberation." It's ideological rhetoric without much ideology, in other words. The Middle East is Israel's playground and America, the bully.

امريكا لسنا نهاب.wmv

4. The West needs more native children and less foreign immigration. We are hardly like China, so this is counterproductive in the greatest degree. In a true People's Government, a system of eugenics would ensure this process proceeds correctly.
User avatar #50002 to #49986 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
that video was pretty funny
#49979 - lulzforhiroshima has deleted their comment [-]
#49959 - Shiny ONLINE (10/29/2013) [-]
CNN in a nutshell
CNN in a nutshell
User avatar #49999 to #49959 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
that actually happened?
User avatar #49988 to #49959 - bypest (10/29/2013) [-]
I remember something similar happening in the last election. They were speaking of Obama winning some state but their screen showed Romney winning it.
User avatar #50003 to #49988 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
ivoryhammer , your such a butthurt fagget for voting down all his comments...
User avatar #49889 - lulzforhiroshima (10/28/2013) [-]
I have another student in one of my classes that i sit next to who identifies himself as "left wing" and liberal. This asshole actually believes that it should be necessary for people to be giving money to the poor. He wants complete social equality.
User avatar #49905 to #49889 - azumeow (10/29/2013) [-]
Oh god that's disgusting...
User avatar #49893 to #49889 - Shiny ONLINE (10/29/2013) [-]
Oh, how I love college kids that don't get politics: the neo-conservative that believes every Reagan fairy tale his parents taught him and wants Bibles to be textbooks, the libertarian that got a B in economics and has no real political stances that are longer than two or three words, the Marxist that never actually read the Communist Manifesto and blogs on a brand-new Mac...
User avatar #49966 to #49893 - jewishcommunazi (10/29/2013) [-]
I never actually finished reading the Communist Manifesto.
User avatar #49967 to #49966 - jewishcommunazi (10/29/2013) [-]
And I like McDonalds™.
User avatar #49968 to #49967 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
mcdonalds is the fucking best
User avatar #49868 - feelythefeel (10/28/2013) [-]
The Internationale ITT: Opinions on "The Internationale". Opinions on any versions of the song are welcome, just make sure to mention which ones you're basing them off of.
User avatar #49878 to #49868 - bypest (10/28/2013) [-]
ahahaha more like "socialism in one country" worthless marxian socialists top lel

The fate of Red Army soldiers in Polish captivity
>top lel

Bitwa warszawska 1920
>top lel

Wojsko Polskie  - Maszerują Strzelcy
>top lel
User avatar #49879 to #49878 - feelythefeel (10/28/2013) [-]
I presume you don't like it?
User avatar #49880 to #49879 - bypest (10/28/2013) [-]
The Internationale once served practical importance in bettering the condition of workers through unity but that changed when adopted by commies as they took the "international" part a bit too seriously.
User avatar #49891 to #49880 - jewishcommunazi (10/29/2013) [-]
Yeah, commies totally neglected the conditions of workers. It's not like employment was almost 100% guaranteed under most notorious socialist countries until the revisionists came to power fucked it all up.
User avatar #49983 to #49891 - bypest (10/29/2013) [-]
The economics of full employment was not anything secluded to Communist theory. For example, Germany had such a system as did Russia. The difference was that Germany was a much better place to live and work.

"Revisionists" like Khrushchev actually took pity for the workers instead of killing them off with "five year plans." Khrushchev wished to be remembered by his housing projects which made it so that workers no longer had to live in slums. They are not pretty today of course, but like policies made him very popular amongst the people.
User avatar #49991 to #49983 - jewishcommunazi (10/29/2013) [-]
Five year plans were still somewhat used under Khrushchev, he simply made it more "simple" for his sucessors to get rid of them.
User avatar #49992 to #49991 - bypest (10/29/2013) [-]
I am speaking of the nature. Stalin stressed increasing manufacturing power while Khrushchev wished for the betterment of living standards.
User avatar #49996 to #49992 - jewishcommunazi (10/29/2013) [-]
When I refer to the employment in my comment, I don't mean it as the state making a good job at making the citizens productive, but more as in they almost completely having their right to work fulfilled as it's not seen on most countries. There's nothing wrong with sacrificing manufacturing power with better living conditions, although Stalin did increase living conditions aswell.
#49978 to #49891 - bypest has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #49881 to #49880 - feelythefeel (10/28/2013) [-]
I'm not a communist myself, just a democratic socialist.
User avatar #49882 to #49881 - bypest (10/28/2013) [-]
The communists stained the anthem as Hitler apparently did the Roman salute.
User avatar #49883 to #49882 - feelythefeel (10/28/2013) [-]
Wont stop me from liking it.
User avatar #49871 to #49868 - jewishcommunazi (10/28/2013) [-]
I like them all, but if I had to pick one, I'd probably choose Tang Dynasty's version.
User avatar #49872 to #49871 - feelythefeel (10/28/2013) [-]
the internationale I like the sound of this one.
User avatar #49873 to #49872 - jewishcommunazi (10/28/2013) [-]
Me too. I also like the estonian version because it sounds different from other versions.
Internationale Estonian
User avatar #49874 to #49873 - feelythefeel (10/28/2013) [-]
I'm more into the classic versions myself.
User avatar #49865 - pebar (10/28/2013) [-]
I've changed my mind on the death penalty. I don't think the government should have the authority to take someone's life as punishment for a crime. I don't care if it is a deterrent or not.
User avatar #49985 to #49865 - akkere ONLINE (10/29/2013) [-]
Should the government also have the authority to hold someone prisoner for crimes, especially when people exist within the governing positions that would have performed acts deemed... immoral, unethical, and perhaps even illegal?
Personally, I advocate the death penalty, but I think there needs to be a slew of things reformed into the justice system before it becomes viable.
First off, there needs to be a system of evaluation to whether someone's eligible for the death penalty - this includes one that evaluates the degree of certainty towards the victim performing the crime that would yield it. Someone who was witnessed raping and murdering a group of children, for instance, will have a heavy degree of certainty and therefore would be easily put to death. Someone who's conviction is hinged on forensics and factors that have margins for error might simply get the life sentence. Bottom line is a "one size fits all" policy can't coexist with something this severe.
Of course, you'd need to establish more judiciary departments that revolve around the evaluation of evidence, and this might even stir controversies with the legitimacy of a court (admitting that someone is not viable for the death penalty could be seen as saying the same thing as they were never guilty to begin with), but the death penalty's opposition is primarily geared towards fear of putting an innocent to death, and these are necessities in annihilating that fear.

Once you've implemented that, get rid of the lethal injection. It's too expensive, and once you've held people on a platform of certainty, more practical methods can be used (I wouldn't really advocate this, but one thing China supposedly does is have a firing line in use to execute the con, and then they send the family the bill for the round).
User avatar #49930 to #49865 - delphine (10/29/2013) [-]
I used to be against it, but I do think there should be harsher punishments. Murderers and gang leaders get better accommodations than I do and I have to work my ass off to earn my keep and to pay taxes that are going towards providing prisoners with cable TV and free health care.
User avatar #49907 to #49865 - azumeow (10/29/2013) [-]
I oppose the death penalty in 98% of cases. Because mainly I think life in prison with ABSOLUTE ZERO chance of parole is a far worse crime. You get to watch the entire world advance while rotting in a jail cell for up to 60-70 years depending on how long you live to and when you're sentenced.
User avatar #49885 to #49865 - lulzforhiroshima (10/28/2013) [-]
Yeah so we should spent more tax dollars keeping some douchebags alive, no thanks. The death penalty should be used on the worst of crimes (murder, serial raping, ect) which have too much evidence to be unfully certain of. And dont bring up that argument that it takes more money to get lawyers for the person to try to remove his penalty because we should remove that crap altogether if the crime is 100% certainly provable and brutal in nature.
User avatar #49892 to #49885 - Shiny ONLINE (10/29/2013) [-]
The death penalty actually costs a fortune to implement since convicts spend millions of tax dollars on appeals. And if they couldn't do that, we'd basically be flushing the entire concept of a justice system down the shitter.
User avatar #49894 to #49892 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
i just fucking mentioned how these appeals are stupid when death penalties account for absolute provable crimes. (100% no doubt)
User avatar #49895 to #49894 - Shiny ONLINE (10/29/2013) [-]
So what? You can't just make exceptions to peoples' rights.
User avatar #49897 to #49895 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
fuck people's rights, you kill someone else on purpose, i believe the same can be done to you.
User avatar #49898 to #49897 - Shiny ONLINE (10/29/2013) [-]
Two wrongs do not make a right, lest you bring yourself to their level.

If you think the justice system is failing, feel free to hit the gun store and take matters into your own hands. I'm sure that well go just dandy.
User avatar #49899 to #49898 - lulzforhiroshima (10/29/2013) [-]
i never talked about taking justice in my own hands, im just stating my belief. Frankly i coudnt give too much a shit i just think it'll cost the government a bit less money if some of these prisons quickly reduced their populations.
User avatar #49900 to #49899 - Shiny ONLINE (10/29/2013) [-]
If you want to save money on incarceration, then support reforming the childish "harsh punishment" policies we're dealing with.
User avatar #49884 to #49865 - Shiny ONLINE (10/28/2013) [-]
Euthanasia may be necessary in cases of high treason, where his very existence may put the lives of theaters of citizens in serious risk. However, I think punishing killing someone with killing someone is petty, hypocritical and ultimately counterproductive.

"we ned 2 hab justis"
User avatar #49886 to #49884 - lulzforhiroshima (10/28/2013) [-]
nah i dont want to keep some douchebag alive
User avatar #49877 to #49865 - bypest (10/28/2013) [-]
Because it gives the government too much power? I would assume, in a libertarian mindset, that this argument is flawed in the sense that it is not the government which is killing the convicted criminal.

The local judicial system is separated from the government. Juries are not government agents nor are judges. Judges are the ones who kill criminals, and they are not appointed by the government. Thus government theoretically has no say in the death penalty, except to make clear whether it is legal or not. And that is an issue of state's rights.

You can contradict by speaking of the "prison-industrial complex" and a good point would be made. Execution, as a process, is too expensive. Let's take the example of illegal immigrant Jose. Jose decides to rape some little chica and dismember her body, dumping the pieces in some forest. He gets caught, and it costs the government thousands of dollars to kill his worthless self. How about a bullet to the head outside the courthouse after the worthless spic's last appeal is over with?
User avatar #49870 to #49865 - jewishcommunazi (10/28/2013) [-]
If the crime is really serious and there's certainty on the one responsible, euthanizing him should be considered. And the government could go softer on taxes, which you people dislike so much.
User avatar #49862 - pebar (10/28/2013) [-]
Keynesianism Part I - It's All About Spending Thoughts?
User avatar #49863 to #49862 - noblexfenrir (10/28/2013) [-]
On keynesian economics or just the video?

It's an innocent idea but it's only applicable under two very specific conditions, The economic fall is predictably controllable and therefor the spending can be seen as more of an investment in the future than simply throwing money blindly at a gamble, and the economy is static. The first of which could be true, except when the second premise is false, due to that we can only make very limited predictions about the market.

Give the free market all the hell you want about it being too fluid with rises and falls, it still has the most adaptable structure to bounce back from such things.
User avatar #49864 to #49863 - Shiny ONLINE (10/28/2013) [-]
Either way, you're choosing between long term or short term trouble, and you basically have to, since people view transition between economic policies as a lack of integrity from their politicians.
#49843 - pebar (10/27/2013) [-]
5 dead is mass stabbing
#49853 to #49843 - CapnInterwebz (10/27/2013) [-]
Ban assault knives and limit knife length.
Ban assault knives and limit knife length.
User avatar #49855 to #49853 - jewishcommunazi (10/27/2013) [-]
And ban high capacity grips.
User avatar #49847 to #49846 - noblexfenrir (10/27/2013) [-]
"But...but...but...it could have been alot worse if the killer had a gun!"

In all seriousness, this a prime example of why people gun control advocates are fighting a symptom and not the problem.
User avatar #49851 to #49847 - Shiny ONLINE (10/27/2013) [-]
Well, technically, it could have been worse with a gun, considering all possible circumstances. That's just not relevant. America's issues with violence are convoluted and deeply rooted in our culture, but long, gradualistic change that benefits everyone doesn't get you reelected.
#49841 - fatbenreloaded (10/27/2013) [-]

User avatar #49852 to #49841 - Shiny ONLINE (10/27/2013) [-]
So what? That doesn't mean fucking kids will become legal, since the scientific consensus is that children lack the maturity to partake in sexual behavior.
User avatar #49844 to #49841 - noblexfenrir (10/27/2013) [-]
Okay, does anyone actually research the sources they're using?

The "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" is generally seen as not being reliable in the sense of how they categorize and apply guidelines for specific mental health problems. There are many cases brought up against them for unreliability, corruption in the sense of advocating medication more often than not when therapy is shown to be a better method, etc etc.

The "International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems" is a much more reliable source and is the general rule of thumb for diseases in the US and the UK.

Also, so fucking what? Some people fantasize about kids, who gives a fuck? As long as they aren't committing a crime, it doesn't matter. I am perfectly fine with non-child molesting pedophiles, who stick to nothing but their fantasies.

And please don't make the slippery slope argument like anyone would actually think someone would make a pedophilia relationship legal since the reason we have an age of consent isn't based on an arbitrary ruling of "muh feelings" like with gay marriage, it's based on brain development of children.
#49849 to #49844 - fatbenreloaded (10/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #49837 - casuals (10/27/2013) [-]
Why does Rush Limbaugh make up so many portmanteaus involving Nazis or Fascists for people he disagrees with?

For example, Feminazi, Ecofacist, Homofacist.
 Friends (0)