Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (1): youregaylol, anonymous(23).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#52638 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
The only difference between supply and demand is point of view.

Thoughts on this statements? I think it's accurate.
User avatar #52696 to #52638 - undeadwill (11/29/2013) [-]
Supply is something unused, while demand is people wanting to use it.
User avatar #52735 to #52696 - pebar (11/30/2013) [-]
suppliers want money and they want to use it
User avatar #52736 to #52735 - undeadwill (11/30/2013) [-]
Demand is the market of consumers, supply is the accumulation of said product.
#52636 - feelythefeel (11/29/2013) [-]
Knowledge of the wheneverIfeellikeit: Man is born a population of empty canvases, filled by inspiration and immortalized by greatness. Yet the greatest of men do more than fill their own canvases, for they also enable others to follow suit. The greatest of men are those who herald others of their kind.
User avatar #52631 - jewishcommunazi (11/28/2013) [-]
What do you think of abortion?
User avatar #52639 to #52631 - Shiny (11/29/2013) [-]
Abortion is wrong because it doesn't give fetuses a chance to defend themselves. The only ethical choice is a postpartum duel at ten paces.
User avatar #52661 to #52639 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
Be sure to obtain consent from the parents since children are not legally allowed to enter into contracts on their own (sort of).
User avatar #52632 to #52631 - pebar (11/28/2013) [-]
The whole debate boils down to whether or not a fetus is a person.
If it is then it has the negative right to life and the government has a duty to stop anyone from taking that life away.
If it's not a person then it's no one else's business.
User avatar #52762 to #52632 - lulzforhiroshima (11/30/2013) [-]
inb4 muh right to life, too bad im for death penalty too
User avatar #52760 to #52632 - lulzforhiroshima (11/30/2013) [-]
Even if its technically classified as living, i really still don't mind abortion.
1. We're pretty cool with the killing other millions and billions of species to eat just as am I
2. Its mooching fully of the parent, the living thing is fully attached to the parent and lives of it in every way, i don't see why she doesn't have the right to let it stop keep feeding off her
3. Illegal abortion kills tens of thousands (if not hundreds) of women per year.
4. Just what we need, a child not really loved by his parents because he was "forced" born
5. Your mom and many other reasons but these are just some general one's
User avatar #52618 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
Why don't we kill all niggers?
vk.com/video211623959_165565544
User avatar #52764 to #52618 - lulzforhiroshima (11/30/2013) [-]
DISGUSTING, ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING. these people should be beat and killed, not that i agree with the whole niggers thing your talking about.
User avatar #52685 to #52618 - poncakeforlife (11/29/2013) [-]
I'm South African, and I can confirm, this shit happens all the time.
User avatar #52687 to #52685 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
I know that feel bro, I've got nothing against you. There are a great number of blacks who are really nice people. But this is just niggering.
#52690 to #52687 - poncakeforlife (11/29/2013) [-]
I'm not black.
User avatar #52692 to #52690 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
Oh, Well I tought since you were from South niggerland......
User avatar #52694 to #52692 - poncakeforlife (11/29/2013) [-]
Well, more than 80% of our population is black, so wouldn't blame you for making that assumption. Most black people in South Africa live poor lives in shantytowns so they can't afford internet connection.
User avatar #52697 to #52694 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
lol
User avatar #52677 to #52618 - undeadwill (11/29/2013) [-]
Nuke it from orbit. They had their chance.
User avatar #52672 to #52618 - hawaiianhappysauce (11/29/2013) [-]
What's worse about this is that it's not a group of people attacking one person, it's a community attacking one person.
#52663 to #52618 - CapnInterwebz (11/29/2013) [-]
*processing*
*processing*
User avatar #52763 to #52663 - lulzforhiroshima (11/30/2013) [-]
i like that guys reviews
#52656 to #52618 - 4chan refugee (11/29/2013) [-]
I don't know why I watch things like this that just make me feel angry and powerless.

I have no idea why any white south african or Boer would stay in that shit hole. The current government and their bullshit Black Economic Empowerment is killing them, and the government won't protect them.

Let them go back to a civilized white first world country. Heck I would welcome them in the US to combat the Hispanic invaders.

The leftists and the progressives are to blame for the current war on our race. White traitors high and their on social justice bullshit that they allow other races to attack us freely, and prevent us from uniting to defend our homes because they think being white is shameful. Fuck them, deport all leftists into the countries of the hispanics and the blacks. Let them live with them and away from us. Death to all traitors.

White Pride!
#52648 to #52618 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
This is what happens when you carry out national liberation without immediately introducing socialism and applying the steadfast discipline of a Leninist society. The SACP is pathetic these days.

Would anyone happen to have the crime rates of black communities during the final years of apartheid and crime rates now, for comparison?
User avatar #52678 to #52648 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
I don't, had to wipe the HDD weeks ago.
#52637 to #52618 - duudegladiator (11/29/2013) [-]
I... I really want to kill many South African blacks now..
I... I really want to kill many South African blacks now..
User avatar #52633 to #52618 - pebar (11/28/2013) [-]
We tried that process before with another undesirable group but it wasn't well received.
User avatar #52619 to #52618 - jewishcommunazi (11/28/2013) [-]
I think there's some kind of law against killing people.
User avatar #52623 to #52619 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
Why don't niggers obey the law?
User avatar #52634 to #52623 - Shiny (11/28/2013) [-]
Even in the most crime-ridden ghetto, the vast majority of blacks are not criminals. This is a fact.
User avatar #52679 to #52634 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
So I should be a victim but be glad that the most are not doing it.
User avatar #52707 to #52679 - Shiny (11/29/2013) [-]
Criminals are going to exist in a racially homogenous society, too. I hope you realize that.
User avatar #52713 to #52707 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
cough cough [spoiler] Slovenia [/spoiler]
But not in this size THE GAME
User avatar #52714 to #52713 - Shiny (11/29/2013) [-]
I'm not sure what your point is.
User avatar #52715 to #52714 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
We can't destory it, but we can pin it.
User avatar #52716 to #52715 - Shiny (11/29/2013) [-]
"Pin" what?
User avatar #52717 to #52716 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
Crime.
by the nuts
User avatar #52722 to #52717 - Shiny (11/29/2013) [-]
Getting tough on crime only makes it worse. Sweden's policy on criminal justice makes a lot more sense when you realize that its recidivism rate is incredibly low, and hasn't even bumped up a little as their immigrant population has increased.
User avatar #52723 to #52722 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
xD
User avatar #52724 to #52723 - Shiny (11/29/2013) [-]
Well, it is. Have fun breeding a new generation of career criminals.
User avatar #52725 to #52724 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
xD
Go to Africa nigger
User avatar #52726 to #52725 - Shiny (11/29/2013) [-]
African cities are economically flourishing at an extremely fast rate and opening up a myriad of entrepreneurial and cultural opportunities, so that's not really an insult.
User avatar #52727 to #52726 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
ahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahah ahaha
User avatar #52730 to #52729 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
You always make me laugh.
User avatar #52699 to #52679 - akkere (11/29/2013) [-]
'course not, you just have to reconcile that the problem isn't in race, but in individuals.

The solution is to have Robocops about the vicinity, put on a kill order to annihilate criminals with a single shot from their eyebeams.
Boom, no more crime.
User avatar #52700 to #52699 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
Those individuals in 'Merica do 50% of the crime. Those individuals.
User avatar #52701 to #52700 - akkere (11/29/2013) [-]
Refer to socioeconomics and culture stickage.
User avatar #52703 to #52701 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
Do you know why the Romans killed all Etruscans?
User avatar #52705 to #52703 - akkere (11/29/2013) [-]
Because they couldn't into Hastati spam
User avatar #52706 to #52705 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]

flank
flank
flank
flank
gtg play coop
User avatar #52704 to #52703 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
Don't google it.
User avatar #52702 to #52701 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
Individually.
User avatar #52627 to #52623 - jewishcommunazi (11/28/2013) [-]
Low social status, lack of law enforcement and the kind of 'culture' these things help to create?
User avatar #52647 to #52627 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
Not necessarily lack of law enforcement.

High police presence can lead to an increased interception of crimes, and therefore crime rates appear higher in heavily policed areas. That's always a possibility.
User avatar #52680 to #52647 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
Pizza will get there faster than a cop.
User avatar #52598 - poncakeforlife (11/28/2013) [-]
What is in your opinion the best political ideology and give me a detailed reason as to why you think it is the best.
User avatar #52675 to #52598 - undeadwill (11/29/2013) [-]
Constitutional republic with a focus on states rights and major over power state limits the federal government has to get a state's approve for every law.
User avatar #52676 to #52675 - undeadwill (11/29/2013) [-]
People would be the force that changed and shaped the world not governments.

Oh and amendments keeping business and government separate the government acting only as a referee
User avatar #52626 to #52598 - Shiny (11/28/2013) [-]
Capitalistic social democracy.
User avatar #52625 to #52598 - lulzforhiroshima (11/28/2013) [-]
Capitalism with some regulation and equality for the people.
No welfare, no forced "sharing". If you dont work, die on the streets for all I care.
User avatar #52628 to #52625 - jewishcommunazi (11/28/2013) [-]
What if you can't find work and aren't able to start up your own business?
User avatar #52629 to #52628 - lulzforhiroshima (11/28/2013) [-]
You always can. The point is the government wont give you welfare (unless disabled of course). Corporations give you enough money once layed of in the time period you are un-employed to find a job. No mooching of big, brother government.
#52614 to #52598 - 4chan refugee (11/28/2013) [-]
Ecclesiarchy Communism (if done right)
User avatar #52615 to #52614 - CapnInterwebz (11/28/2013) [-]
>any type of communism
>done right

Pick one
User avatar #52603 to #52598 - maddboiy (11/28/2013) [-]
capitalism with some elements of third way socialism
User avatar #52608 to #52603 - jewishcommunazi (11/28/2013) [-]
>Third way;
>Socialism;

Pick one.
User avatar #52609 to #52608 - jewishcommunazi (11/28/2013) [-]
I know what you mean though.
#52600 to #52598 - oxan (11/28/2013) [-]
Marxism-Leninism.

Frees you from exploitative labour.

But if you want specifics, ask away.
User avatar #52611 to #52600 - jewishcommunazi (11/28/2013) [-]
I have a question: do you think maoism remains relevant these days?
User avatar #52641 to #52611 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
Eh, in some cases. India and the Philippines, with their ongoing communist insurgencies, have some use for Maoism.
User avatar #52607 to #52600 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
xD
User avatar #52616 to #52607 - Shiny (11/28/2013) [-]
Says the self-proclaimed Nazi.
User avatar #52620 to #52616 - lulzforhiroshima (11/28/2013) [-]
he's a troll, try to best ignore him.
User avatar #52617 to #52616 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
hue
User avatar #52604 to #52600 - pebar (11/28/2013) [-]
How would you measure the scarcity of resources?
User avatar #52643 to #52604 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
Yeah, like JCN said, proper planning can factor in such a reality. It was done rather well in the past, even without computers. I mean, the divergence of prices from the equilibrium in East Germany was only .4% higher than in the West.
User avatar #52645 to #52643 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
how do you determine how much to produce?
User avatar #52646 to #52645 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
How do capitalist enterprises?

To put it simply, all you need to do is look a previous levels of consumption of whatever item you're looking at producing. This is how you'd produce your necessities.

How to produce consumer goods, allowing for innovation, etc, is a different matter, and one of ongoing debate. I'm not sure how to resolve this issue myself.
User avatar #52649 to #52646 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
Does Capitalism Exploit Workers? Capitalist enterprise produce until marginal revenue = marginal cost

next question: what do you think of this video?
User avatar #52651 to #52649 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
And it's fucking utopian as shit. Reality is much different than the pretty picture this video fails miserably at painting.
User avatar #52657 to #52651 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
Isn't your idea of communism also utopian?
User avatar #52658 to #52657 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
Not at all.

Almost done with the other video.
User avatar #52650 to #52649 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
The video is a load of bullshit which failures to understand Marxism, and then attempts to argue in purely moral terms before scaremongering about big gubmint.
User avatar #52652 to #52650 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
Milton Friedman - Poverty and Equality Alright then, how 'bout this one?
#52659 to #52652 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
First time watching this.

>States don't have responsibilities
Nothing inherent, but as the state is a social construct, we can apply to it whatever attributes we so wish.

>Comparison to the Soviet Union
He seems to forget that the cost of living in the USSR was much, much, much lower than the cost in the United States. There was something like 1% of people in the USSR living in poverty, which is nothing compared to capitalist states.

>Equality
Top lel, his statement about equality and liberty. Fact is, socialist states were actually more equal than his libertarian fantasy would ever be. That was determined by the gini index. In regards to liberty... pic related.

Anyway, the rest of what the guy had to say was empty assertions and didn't even come close to proving that capitalism is more efficient at alleviating poverty than socialism, as the video description declares.
User avatar #52660 to #52659 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
>indeed it is, the problem is what the role of the state should be. Is it to provide jobs, even if those jobs are useless (like digging a trench and filling it up again), or is it to protect the basic rights of people such as laws against murder and maybe private property which you probably hate and the institutions which markets fail to provide like national defense?

>The poverty line that is often talked about is an arbitrary line that differs from country to country. Friedman compared the citizens of the USSR to the standard of poverty that the US uses. There is a global standard of poverty which is about $1/day but it's usually irrelevant to conversation since almost nobody in any decent country fits in that class.

>The gini coefficient measures income inequality so of course capitalist countries are more unequal. You have to look at the actual people at the bottom because most of them get out of poverty within a few years.

>So communism is desirable because even though it may be less productive, the people are content with life because they don't have much anxiety? I remember seeing some statistics a while back (don't remember where) that compared job satisfaction in various countries; capitalist countries were way higher since they were able to choose and the government which would still exist in a communist society; don't kid yourself didn't place them in a position based on ability.

I remember in another one of Milton Friedman's lectures, he talked about a trip in China, which at that time was way more centrally planned than it is now. He say a group of people digging a ditch with shovels. He asked the government official who was with him, "why do these people have shovels and not heavy equipment?" The official said it was a job creation program, to which Friedman replied "why not take away their shovels and give them spoons?"
User avatar #52662 to #52660 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
Well, really, the state's role is to enforce the dominance of one class over another. So, enforcing property rights is a part of the state's role. In socialism, the state's role remains the same, but the proletariat is the ruling class.

The problem with comparing US poverty to, for example, Soviet standards of living, is that it's apples to oranges. If capitalism is so efficient, then all people in a capitalist state should enjoy relatively equal standards of living. If you're comparing your poverty to the standards of living to a state that was decades, if not centuries, behind the United States in terms of development before socialist revolution, capitalism is failing. Especially since the Soviet economy was destroyed during WW2, and then built back up. Again.

Precisely. And that's the point, capitalism doesn't do a good job at introducing equality, which refutes Friedman's point. I'd like to see the evidence that poverty, er, rotates.

How are we measuring productivity? In terms of economic growth? Socialism has proven its superiority in delivering economic growth. Citizens in socialist states selected their government. They did have elections, you know.

Anecdotal evidence which has no real relevance. I'd need to know what year, where in China and a lot more about the situation than what Freidman would be willing to give.
User avatar #52664 to #52662 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
Are the Poor Getting Poorer? >enforce the dominance of one class over another
BULLSHIT! I mean, uh, could you please clarify?

Equal standards of living? Why? How about at least decent standards of living for the bottom class and if people can do better than that, that's fine.

vid: the mobility that he talked about

I briefly looked for some data on economic growth comparisons between the USSR and the US but I couldn't find anything. not that I looked very hard... But the US in the 19th and early 20th century are a great example of economic growth under capitalism.

meh it was kinda anecdotal but I think the point still stands that jobs for the sake of jobs is a gross misallocation of resources.
#52665 to #52664 - oxan (11/29/2013) [-]
'The state is a product and a manifestation of the irreconcilability of class antagonisms. The state arises where, when and insofar as class antagonism objectively cannot be reconciled. And, conversely, the existence of the state proves that the class antagonisms are irreconcilable.'

Decent standards of living for the lower classes? Sounds swell. That's how things were in socialism. Were there people who had higher standards? Of course, as socialism rewards according to work done.

I have my skepticisms regarding that video. Young people today have less money than young people a few decades ago. Wages have stagnated while cost of living continues to increase. Since 1980, the rich had been getting rich a lot faster than everyone else. It's disproportionate, especially when you remember that wages have been stagnating. The lower and middle classes might be moving around a bit, but the rich are staying quite firmly rich.

Lost my graph on Soviet growth during the Great Depression. It's probably on my phone somewhere. I'll find it later. Found pic related, though. Tis prior to the '65 economic reforms, too.
#52667 to #52665 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
Milton Friedman - The Great Depression Myth >the great depression
User avatar #52666 to #52665 - pebar (11/29/2013) [-]
The Real "Truth About the Economy:" Have Wages Stagnated? The bourgeoisie are too busy fight among themselves to be a problem for the lower classes of just the proles since commies think there are only the two

Capitalism also rewards those who provide better labor with higher wages

video
as for the rich remain rich, that's to be expected; education helps a lot with maximizing human capital and the rich have access to that. The government subsidizing higher education could be a topic for another thread. Also inheritance (which is heavily taxed already).
User avatar #52630 to #52604 - jewishcommunazi (11/28/2013) [-]
"The 5-year plan will fix it".
#52599 to #52598 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
National socialism
cuz heil heity : DDD
Got no time to talk, doing my project
User avatar #52606 to #52605 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
What about it?
User avatar #52610 to #52606 - pebar (11/28/2013) [-]
"cuz heil heity : DDD"
User avatar #52612 to #52610 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
: DDDDDDDDDDDD
#52597 - feelythefeel (11/28/2013) [-]
Knowledge of the wheneverIfeellikeit: The greatest course to be set for mankind is the one set by mankind itself.
#52596 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
I took a picture of lulzforhiroshima an hour ago.
User avatar #52635 to #52596 - teoberry (11/29/2013) [-]
Not true, lulz is actually a poor child from the streets of ontario.
User avatar #52681 to #52635 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
What?
User avatar #52691 to #52681 - teoberry (11/29/2013) [-]
Lulz is so fucking poor it's insane. Drawing him with sheckels is a serious over-exaggeration. Rumour says he had to sell his jew gold just to stay live
User avatar #52693 to #52691 - schnizel ONLINE (11/29/2013) [-]
xD
User avatar #52601 to #52596 - lulzforhiroshima (11/28/2013) [-]
lel, you got butthurt after i started calling you mudslime.
User avatar #52602 to #52601 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
Not really. I know what I am.
User avatar #52621 to #52602 - lulzforhiroshima (11/28/2013) [-]
Yes you did, you've been nice to me all this time until i brought up the fact that your a mudslime...
User avatar #52622 to #52621 - schnizel ONLINE (11/28/2013) [-]
xD
User avatar #52624 to #52622 - lulzforhiroshima (11/28/2013) [-]
Exactly...
0
#52595 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #52588 to #52587 - lulzforhiroshima (11/28/2013) [-]
LIKE SERIOUSLY, THE GOVERNOR OF QUEBEC, AND SHE DOESN'T SAY ANYTHING. and all the other crap...
0
#52573 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #52584 to #52572 - Shiny (11/28/2013) [-]
I'd rather have the NSA know what kind of porn I look at than my parents.
User avatar #52585 to #52584 - pebar (11/28/2013) [-]
would your parents use it to blackmail you?
User avatar #52586 to #52585 - Shiny (11/28/2013) [-]
Honestly wouldn't put it past my mom.
User avatar #52550 - pebar (11/27/2013) [-]
Healthcare Explained
User avatar #52557 to #52550 - Shiny (11/27/2013) [-]
The "Sam Fed" guy in the comments has a pretty good point.
User avatar #52547 - lulzforhiroshima (11/27/2013) [-]
☭ + ☭ = ☭
User avatar #52548 to #52547 - pebar (11/27/2013) [-]
☭ + ☭ = 2☭
User avatar #52552 to #52548 - lulzforhiroshima (11/27/2013) [-]
no, communism + communism = communism not 2communisms, that doesn't make sense, duh!
#52542 - byposted (11/27/2013) [-]
worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/11/26/21623507-pope-francis-attacks-tyranny-of-unfettered-capitalism-idolatry-of-money   
   
>In it, Francis went further than previous comments criticizing the global economic system, attacking the "idolatry of money" and beseeching politicians to guarantee all citizens "dignified work, education and healthcare."   
   
newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/11/25/larry-king-rush-limbaugh-playing-loose-deck   
   
>KING: Political crazies. You know, NPR is good radio. But, the Limbaughs and these guys are just playing with a loose deck. And a lot of it’s an act.   
>NPR is good radio   
   
>KING: Some are good broad, I came to respect Howard Stern.   
>Howard Stern
worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/11/26/21623507-pope-francis-attacks-tyranny-of-unfettered-capitalism-idolatry-of-money

>In it, Francis went further than previous comments criticizing the global economic system, attacking the "idolatry of money" and beseeching politicians to guarantee all citizens "dignified work, education and healthcare."

newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/11/25/larry-king-rush-limbaugh-playing-loose-deck

>KING: Political crazies. You know, NPR is good radio. But, the Limbaughs and these guys are just playing with a loose deck. And a lot of it’s an act.
>NPR is good radio

>KING: Some are good broad, I came to respect Howard Stern.
>Howard Stern



User avatar #52569 to #52542 - lulzforhiroshima (11/27/2013) [-]
larry king should have died long ago. God, pls give him cancer.
User avatar #52544 to #52542 - byposted (11/27/2013) [-]
www.cnn.com/2013/11/19/showbiz/larry-king-birthday/

Holy shit he's only 80? I thought that senile bastard died before he got some sort of a gig on RT.
User avatar #52549 to #52544 - akkere (11/27/2013) [-]
He'll never die so long as he has his suspenders of immortality.
They don't suspend his pants, they suspend his life.
User avatar #52558 to #52549 - Shiny (11/27/2013) [-]
I laughed harder at that than anything on the front page.
#52536 - tredbear (11/27/2013) [-]
Iran in a nutshell
#52540 to #52536 - byposted (11/27/2013) [-]
No. Iran has agreed to a series of terms which it is willing to carry out well in beyond accordance with international nuclear treaties, most notably the NNPT. It is not a matter of them not carrying out what they agreed to, because of largely increased inspections which prove their trust, but the west doing its side of the deal. What happens over the next six months will show whether or not peace is really mutually desired.

All this neocon and nuttyYahoo! asspain was delicious on Sunday Breitbart. They just can't come to the realization that Iran is destined to be a regional power, and that coercive diplomacy with her is far outdated. I loved especially threats of an Israeli and/or Saudi strike. Insha'Allah, give the Shia freedom fighters in Lebanon and Iraq the justification to rain death upon both illegitimate countries!
>muh munich
>muh islamists
>muh relationship with israel
>muh shoah
User avatar #52555 to #52540 - lulzforhiroshima (11/27/2013) [-]
the problem with all of this is the known fact that Iran smuggles weapons and equipment to Hezbollah and other groups against Israels existence syria? not 100 percent sure on that . Maybe a nuclear warhead could turn up in Hezbollah and they shoot it to Israel, this is what they are much afraid off...
User avatar #52574 to #52555 - byposted (11/27/2013) [-]
We spoke of Israeli motives before. They want all of their neighbors to be stuck in the stone age. Nuclear energy is the way of the future and all countries with potential should be able to pursue it. Iran has natural potential in the post-Saddam Middle East.

This weapons fiasco with Israel dates back to the late 90s. Then you had Israel, under Netanyahu, claiming Iran was only "a few years away from a bomb" and you have the same thing being said today.

About Hezbollah obtaining a nuclear weapon, I seriously doubt that. It goes against all etiquette to supply a militant organization with such things, especially if it is based in Lebanon.

What Israel is afraid of is losing its stature over Iran. If Iran gets a nuke then no longer will they be able to treat Iran like dirt. If Iran, at that rate, proves its peaceful motives to the West they will not be able to bring about anti-Iranian sentiment.
#52575 to #52574 - 4chan refugee (11/27/2013) [-]
"About Hezbollah obtaining a nuclear weapon, I seriously doubt that."

The problem is is I and the Israeli government don't.
User avatar #52577 to #52575 - byposted (11/27/2013) [-]
You may doubt it, but all Hezbollah needs are conventional weapons. They are not yet in a position to carry such arms. There is no precedent set for smuggling nuclear weapons like that.

But this rests on the assumption that Iran is producing such weapons to begin with. Until otherwise proven, Iran has its right to enrich uranium.
User avatar #52576 to #52575 - lulzforhiroshima (11/27/2013) [-]
wtf, i meant to write this on my account, sorry
#52533 - 4chan refugee (11/27/2013) [-]
Do you personally believe in Climate Change?

If so how do you believe it could or should be combated, if at all?
User avatar #52613 to #52533 - kanadetenshi (11/28/2013) [-]
You don't "believe" in facts, you understand them.
User avatar #52553 to #52533 - lulzforhiroshima (11/27/2013) [-]
Yes, it is a basically a scientific fact.
I heard they did some survey and like it was 98 or 97% of scientists believed in climate change.
However i don't believe we as humans can stop it or are actually willing too
User avatar #52551 to #52533 - undeadwill (11/27/2013) [-]
No.

And it can't be combated.
User avatar #52541 to #52533 - pebar (11/27/2013) [-]
I saw an article recently that said if we stopped all carbon emissions over night, it wouldn't stop climate change
#52529 - 4chan refugee (11/27/2013) [-]
Set to inherit small mansion and a buttfuck ton of money.

Everyone in my family is telling me to sell the mansion and to donate all the money to a local charity.

And they also called me a capitalist pig.

And by everyone I mean sort of everyone (mostly my cousins and such.)

What relevance is capitalism in something like that?
User avatar #52554 to #52529 - lulzforhiroshima (11/27/2013) [-]
Are you kidding me? Don't donate that, you have an amazing chance that most people don't to live your life and invest it to make even more. Take that opportunity.
User avatar #52531 to #52529 - akkere (11/27/2013) [-]
Capitalism has often been butchered into a derogatory term usually used to describe anyone with any amount of wealth significantly greater than their peers.
I suppose it'd be relevant in terms of having the wealth be rightfully yours if it was inherited as such, which is a central part of capitalism (kind of), but honestly you should think nothing of it.
If I were you, I'd move away from those family members honestly, or at least deafen any contact with them. They sound pretty volatile.
#52532 to #52531 - 4chan refugee (11/27/2013) [-]
I probably will.

One of my dickface scrawny male cousins literally wanted to try and kill me so he could have it instead.

Fun fact, he knocked up another cousin of ours, and he does drugs.

Great.
User avatar #52535 to #52532 - akkere (11/27/2013) [-]
Was the cousin hot?
Those are the kind of people you usually punch in the nose a couple of times and they'll never show their face in front of you again. That or you could buy a firearm, assuming you live in the States.
#52538 to #52535 - 4chan refugee (11/27/2013) [-]
No, she's not hot. I have her added on facebook. Every time i login and see her idiotic pictures with her obvious photoshop. You can see all her wrinkles and shit. She looks like a fucking granny. And her breath stinks.

Yep, fuck them all. I do own a couple shotguns. So, I'm cool.
User avatar #52530 to #52529 - CapnInterwebz (11/27/2013) [-]
"more money = you are a selfish greedy pig that hates poor people and minorities"

~your family
User avatar #52519 - pebar (11/26/2013) [-]
I'm working on my college plan and I have it mostly worked out, but I'm stuck on one thing. For my economics minor, I have to take one more 400 level class and I'm stuck between two choices: history of economic thought or monetary theory and policy.
Which is better?
User avatar #52534 to #52519 - akkere (11/27/2013) [-]
Choose monetary theory and policy in terms of understanding how currency (usually our modern day fiat money) works; good to have in understanding how things work today.
History of economic thought in terms of understanding economic structures and how they develop to the modern world.

Basically, if you want to understand something ongoing and consistently applied (though you yourself may not be able to use it except in discussion), go Monetary Theory.
If you want what's essentially the equivalent to a humanities class in economics that'll also give you plenty to discuss about, go with History of Economic Thought.

I've taken both and I've personally found History of Economic Thought as a "breath taker" class (every humanities class is), which is good if you're loaded up on heavy weight classes that'll bog you down in studying time.
User avatar #52523 to #52519 - lulzforhiroshima (11/27/2013) [-]
For sure History of Economic Thought, and not just because of this board.
#52520 to #52519 - valeriya (11/26/2013) [-]
history of economic thought (assuming of mixed theory syllabus) because you'll learn more widely.
User avatar #52491 - schnizel ONLINE (11/26/2013) [-]
Mugabe and white african
User avatar #52497 to #52491 - Shiny (11/26/2013) [-]
It's shocking that Mugabe hasn't been shunned by the international community yet.
#52590 to #52497 - 4chan refugee (11/28/2013) [-]
Meh, Africa.
User avatar #52563 to #52497 - schnizel ONLINE (11/27/2013) [-]
People don't give a shit about anything these days.
 Friends (0)