| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
Comments(31270):
#18990
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
there's a politics board for 10 y/o to discuss politics HA
#18984
-
jelatinman (12/31/2012) [-] 
I thought there was gonna be a poll... not send me to Politics board. I'll just be leaving now
#18951
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
America is freedom, take away our guns and we wont be free, i say marijuana should be legal and gay marriage the same
#18949
-
malhaloc (12/31/2012) [-] Wait...71% of FJ thinks we should ban guns or legalize gay marriage or both?
#18947
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
They should not ban guns. The bad people will always have guns, they do not follow laws, and the good people with guns will be the only ones able to protect us. They should also not legalize gay marriage. We should stop the hate against them though. I think that this will only lead more people to believe they are gay because people make them feel different. Relationships with the opposite sex are very difficult haha but in the end are worth it. I want "gay" people to find someone of the opposite sex that is right for them so they can be happy with a family of thier own.
#18968 to #18952
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
No, I think people just get mislead and they form a self image of themselves based on certain stereotypes. If you look it up, there are many stories about "gay" people who became straight. I am not a hater, but making it legal would change a lot of things for the worse.
#18967 to #18962
-
thirteenthdoctor (12/31/2012) [-] There really is. Monkeys, seals, otters, dolphins, buffalo and apes have all been documented to have long-term relationships with a member of the same sex, while refusing to breed with females/males (depending on their gender)
Plus, humans have had homosexuality forever, and gay marriage has been around since before Christianity.
Plus, humans have had homosexuality forever, and gay marriage has been around since before Christianity.
#18983 to #18979
-
SemiAnon (12/31/2012) [-] "Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity.[7] One species in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[8][9] "About 10% of rams (males) refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams."
Down Syndrome is a rarity, too. I always knew sheep were the gayest animal.
Down Syndrome is a rarity, too. I always knew sheep were the gayest animal.
#19001 to #18996
-
SemiAnon (12/31/2012) [-] Because mentally retarded people are a drain on society. If you can't function on your own and contribute to something, you aren't worth keeping alive.
Higher risk of contracting HIV, inability to procreate unless going against their "natural" tendency. Seems like there's some downsides.
Higher risk of contracting HIV, inability to procreate unless going against their "natural" tendency. Seems like there's some downsides.
#19011 to #19003
-
SemiAnon (12/31/2012) [-] HIV and AIDS spread faster because there is more of them. A higher percentage of gays contract the diseases than straight people, due to their limitation to anal sex.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_sex#Infection
The population doesn't change the inherent problem with being unable to add to it. Would that be such a point of support if there were only 200 millions people in the world?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_sex#Infection
The population doesn't change the inherent problem with being unable to add to it. Would that be such a point of support if there were only 200 millions people in the world?
#19026 to #19011
-
thirteenthdoctor (12/31/2012) [-] You obviously haven't watched enough gay porn if you think gays are limited to anal.
There is no problem with homosexuality. In most cultures around the world, homosexuality is seen as a good thing, and many times homosexuals are given spiritual importance.
In our world today, I see no problem with homosexuality. The only reason I can think that you do is because you're in denial.
There is no problem with homosexuality. In most cultures around the world, homosexuality is seen as a good thing, and many times homosexuals are given spiritual importance.
In our world today, I see no problem with homosexuality. The only reason I can think that you do is because you're in denial.
#19042 to #19026
-
SemiAnon (12/31/2012) [-] Limited as in there is no vagina.
That is a blatant lie.
I'm against blind acceptance of everything that differs from the norm for the sake of equality. I disagree, so that must mean I'm in denial/bigoted/cousin fucking redneck.
http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
That is a blatant lie.
I'm against blind acceptance of everything that differs from the norm for the sake of equality. I disagree, so that must mean I'm in denial/bigoted/cousin fucking redneck.
http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
#18928
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
>implying Obama can just wave a magic wand and make guns illegal.
#18923
-
angelious (12/31/2012) [-]
but then gay people will never experience the joy of shotgun marriage :(
#18916
-
themasterdebater (12/31/2012) [-] Obama should:
Legalize gay marriage
Ban assault weapons, but not guns
Legalize weed
Recognize the WBC as a hate group
Try not to let us go over the fiscal cliff
Legalize gay marriage
Ban assault weapons, but not guns
Legalize weed
Recognize the WBC as a hate group
Try not to let us go over the fiscal cliff
#19024 to #18916
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
I think you're wrong about the assault weapon ban. If someone wants to massacre defenseless people he/she can do it just as effectively with an assault rifle as they can with a pistol shotgun etc. The second amendment clearly implies that it's purpose is to protect peoples livelihoods (hunting), lives, and freedom (from government oppression. How can one protect himself and his rights from the government (the likelihood of this situation is absolutely irrelevant fyi) with pistols and shotguns or whatever else if he's fighting people with superior weaponry.
#19008 to #18916
-
qwermy (12/31/2012) [-] An "assault weapon" functions exactly the same as any other semi-auto, but looks more 'military'. Banning weapons based on appearance is useless. However, semi-autos make up the majority of guns used, and i do not want to see them banned either, particularly handguns, which are almost exclusively semi-auto (since bolt-action/single-shot handguns would be very impractical altogether). Therefore, I stand against the assault weapons ban. I wouldn't be opposed to background checks, and may be open to magazine limits for rifles, but no sweeping guns bans, and no registration. Why no registration? Look at what happened in New York. A newspaper made a map with the addresses of all gun owners. They're law-abiding citizens, not "potential criminals" or sex offenders. It isn't right to single out people for exercising a constitutional right.
#18985 to #18969
-
internetzsoviet (12/31/2012) [-] Any semi-automatic weapon is going to look like an assault weapon.
Because, you know, guns are manufactured primarily for the military, and the military is in the business of killing, and they kind of need their weapons to kill.
Fucking argument against "certain types" of guns is retarded.
Because, you know, guns are manufactured primarily for the military, and the military is in the business of killing, and they kind of need their weapons to kill.
Fucking argument against "certain types" of guns is retarded.
#18914
-
HumbertoL (12/31/2012) [-] Guys Guys Guys
Did you know
Obama never said he was going to do either of those things. Apparently no one knows judging by the butthurt in some the comments.
He did speak about gay marriage, but that is being left up to congress.
Did you know
Obama never said he was going to do either of those things. Apparently no one knows judging by the butthurt in some the comments.
He did speak about gay marriage, but that is being left up to congress.
#18908
-
hawkenboy (12/31/2012) [-] I don't care about gay marriage. I don't think Obama should ban guns, like the CEO (I forgot if it was or not) said, "The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a goog guy with a gun."
#19060 to #18908
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
You mean the CEO who blamed Video games and other media for the shooting? after the fact it was proven it wasn't the shooter who even liked video games on facebook and he refused to support the senator of California's (I think) bill to investigate the effects of video games on a persons behavior.
#18906
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
Obama should not ban guns and should legalize gay marriage. He should also recognise the Westboro Baptist Church as a hate group.
#19044 to #18906
-
toplica (12/31/2012) [-] I don't think it's fair to recognize them as a hate group because they haven't done anything illegal and if we take away their right to free speech then a precedent will appear that makes it ok to ban free speech and the right to assemble from peaceful (they are peaceful so shut up) groups like OWS or whatever else. As for WBC i could hardly give a shit.
#18899
-
nigalthornberry (12/31/2012) [-] We go down the fiscal hill
At his inauguration speech obama blames republicans and gets more support
Everyone forgets about the debt ceiling deal
no deal is met and the US defaults and gets a credit downgrade
At his inauguration speech obama blames republicans and gets more support
Everyone forgets about the debt ceiling deal
no deal is met and the US defaults and gets a credit downgrade
#18896
-
N. Korean citizen (12/31/2012) [-]
I say we just have a better police policy. Rather than have just a solid police force, have something of a trained volunteer policy. Give volunteer citizens certain training and give them some legal authority in situations of clear and evident violation of the law. So if you want to own a gun, you have to take the responsibility after being trained and evaluated by actual police. That way, responses to the immediate crime would be a lot faster and we could prevent more things such as mass shootings because these people would probably be everywhere, but we would still maintain a regular police commission who have more legal authority.
The only problem I can see is that people don't want guns so they can protect others, they only want to protect themselves.
However, you can rest assured that as long as people feel the need for guns to defend themselves, there would always be a presence of people ready and capable of countering crimes in progress, but would not have to increase taxes much if at all for a volunteering program. The rest of us could rest assured that the people who have guns are not going to use it when they come home to their wives cheating on them (where the vast majority of gun murders occur).
Think of it like your local volunteer fire dept. They are always on call and have other jobs, but they are present when they are needed.
The only problem I can see is that people don't want guns so they can protect others, they only want to protect themselves.
However, you can rest assured that as long as people feel the need for guns to defend themselves, there would always be a presence of people ready and capable of countering crimes in progress, but would not have to increase taxes much if at all for a volunteering program. The rest of us could rest assured that the people who have guns are not going to use it when they come home to their wives cheating on them (where the vast majority of gun murders occur).
Think of it like your local volunteer fire dept. They are always on call and have other jobs, but they are present when they are needed.
#18892
-
thegaminator (12/31/2012) [-] What if this is magical fairy princess's way of getting us to go after items again?
