Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#495 - anonymous (01/12/2012) [+] (5 replies)
You guys realize Ron Paul has 0 support from the party he is running for.... and those who do support him are least likely to vote.... its never going to happen.
#496 to #495 - bigbagel (01/12/2012) [-]
getting top 3 finishes in the iowa caucus and new hampshire least likely to vote? GTFO and learn about the people you are talking about.
#471 - JohnJohnboy (01/12/2012) [+] (1 reply)
we need Ron the 						*******					 Paul NOW!
we need Ron the ******* Paul NOW!
User avatar #396 - tehweave (01/12/2012) [-]
You ************ !

#393 - anonymous (01/12/2012) [+] (3 replies)
<------ my face when red pinkieed. Rick Perry FTW
#402 to #393 - anonymous (01/12/2012) [-]
literal Ron Paul hater.
#200 - anonymous (01/11/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolled a random image posted in comment #4 at the ultimate male fear... **

User avatar #149 - philliyoMLB (01/11/2012) [+] (1 reply)
I'm tired of seeing this Ron Paul **** , sure he's a good canidate if there was no problem in the middle east though. But c'mon i'm tired of all you people talking about him and trying to get everyone to vote for him. Really? This is just gettting childish, and oh boy he makes weed legal that's so childish.
#186 to #149 - anonymous (01/11/2012) [-]
I couldn't give a rats ass about weed being legal.
What I care about is that he is a libertarian and that he has no skeletons in his closet. He's president material, not a flip-flopping ************ affair-having "politician".
#137 - mrclass (01/11/2012) [+] (1 reply)
before all you get into political arguments, read this: http://www.theonion. com/articles/obama-openly-asks-nation-why-on-earth-he-would-wan,26933/
#118 - EddieD (01/11/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#5 - Persistence (01/11/2012) [-]
I DONT GIVE A **** this is too ******* funny to be true xD
#451 - qworta (01/12/2012) [+] (2 replies)
**qworta rolled a random image posted in comment #1 at How to get reblogs on Tumblr **
walk into random thread
roll random picture
#464 to #451 - kaycie (01/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#357 - myownparasite (01/12/2012) [+] (17 replies)
“The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers. On the contrary, our Founders’ political views were strongly informed by their religious beliefs.”

He's an uneducated, gay hating prick who knows nothing about running the country. **** Ron Paul.
User avatar #440 to #416 - myownparasite (01/12/2012) [-]
In 2004, Paul said on the House floor, “I oppose federal efforts to redefine marriage as something other than a union between one man and one woman.” In August, Paul repeated, “I think that marriages should be between a single man and a single woman.”
User avatar #348 - justinitforthecorn (01/12/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Well is anyone really a Ron Paul hater?
#250 - elitezombiee (01/12/2012) [-]
sneaky white guy lvl: over 9000!
#228 - VivaLaAnon (01/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

User avatar #68 - cheekymilkshake (01/11/2012) [+] (1 reply)
**cheekymilkshake rolls 6** size of obama's dick, also in OP's mouth.
#21 - anonymous (01/11/2012) [+] (14 replies)
I am intensely liberal and socialist, but I hate the Democratic party as well and I think that Ron Paul would be a way better president than Obama.
His one flaw, though, is that while he claims to be a libertarian, he still supports giving corporate institutions more power, even though they too are governing institutions and would be considered illegitimate authoritarian systems by any true libertarian, just as the government would.
When we're talking about economic liberty, we shouldn't be concerned with the rights of corporate executives; that wouldn't make any since, since they're already the ones with all the power. Rather, we should be concerned with the rights and liberties of the actual workers. All enterprises should be run democratically by those who work in them, rather than autocratically by managers and CEOs.
That, my fellow FJers, is the purest form of socialism, an that is what we need in this country.
 Friends (0)