everyone knows that filthy frank is a black female-to-male trans person who underwent same procedure as Michael j, just instead of white they turned him asian.
This isn't about tumblr culture appropriating, it's the fact that she mistook him for white because he looks white. He could have a spray tan for all they knew. Plus if it was a white guy playing an egyptian, that would be a valid complaint. That's like having an asian guy playing the role of martin luther king, it just doesn't make sense.
Egyptians north of the Sahara and near the Mediterranean coast (e.g. almost all of the populated part of Egypt) are Caucasian. They have a Mediterranean olive skinned tone.
Well, theres this stupid ******* Afro-centrism movement going on the claims that Egyptians were black.
They also claim that Hannibal was black, the Celts were black, the Romans were black, and that white people arent humans because of a lack of melanin.
They also go on and on about the Moors, as if they were ever an important Empire in Europe, while conveniently ignoring the fact that there were quite a few white Moors. Because the Moors were in ******* Spain, where white people are native.
Where's that video of the black chick talking about how the blacks built the Great Wall of China and invented mathematics and how they were never cavemen when I need it
p.s. "Hannibal Barca is black" ******* kek
its sad as **** because they have this 1 picture someone took in the 21 century... compared to like 200 statues and paintings of him from all the way 100 B.C. to 1800+
why are blacks so sad and pathetic, really.. how are you gonna take a picture of some niga and claim its the guy from 2300 years ago? and only have this 1 picture nothing else,
funny how blacks just love to bring up the Moors with pride in any chance they get...even though the Moors were predominantly Arabs and Berbers, and the only European territory they had control over were 3 island near Italy, nothing past that. It literally says all of this on the first paragraph of the Wiki page.
But when it comes to the fact that whites colonized and controlled the entire continent of Africa all the way down to South Africa we're supposed to for some reason "feel bad" about it... LMAO
you're just a sore loser who can't face the fact that you
no there went lmao. romens didnt accept anyone into thair culture who wasnt roman. the greeks lived like peasents unther thair rule. they would never let a negro be a empheror
"we're all mixed" is only said by blacks mostly the woman cuz they need a way to take credit in other peopls history and accomplishments cuz they have nothing of thair own other than slavery
theres no excuse for not doing research before making a complaint about something. all she had to do was google search. that would've taken seconds and prevented them from making a dumb comment. they deserve to be shamed for laziness and stupidity
Hollywood always portraits Egyptians and tan skinned (dark skinned) but not black. they spend 100s of millions of $$ on these movies. they in fact employ eyptologists and historians to fact check and work with the design crew to get everything right. if they say that egyptians were not black, they are not black. every movie about egypth shows them as tanned
if she doesn't know anything about the image to Google it, such as the movie name or his name. then she shouldn't comment at all. better to make no comment than an ill informed comment.
Then she should behave like a rational human being and shut the **** up because she doesn't have all the info. **** , if everyone on Tumblr did that, it might actually become a website usable for things other than porn and trolling thin-skinned pyrofoxes.
"ok, but whys there a white guy playing an egyptian?" Doesn't sound so angry or offended, just a simple question. How do you even get the impression that she's mad or offended by it.
Doesn't matter if she was upset or offended. She stated, with certainty that the actor was white, that a white actor was playing an Egyptian, leading to the spread of misinformation and further fueling the rage of uneducated 13 year old SJWs. This could have been entirely avoided-by her shutting the **** up.
Because she thought he was white, could have fooled me tbh. He looks like a white guy with a spray tan to me, so that really isn't even an issue. It's more "wait, he isn't white? Wow i never knew that, that makes more sense" . It's not spreading false information, it's simply being unaware of the facts.
So really, who the **** cares in the end? She made a mistake, someone corrected her, she most likely learned and moved on. Don't bring your bias about tumblr into this, and just look at it for what it is.
It's not liberal logic. It is a particular sect of liberalism. Do not mistake me; I absolutely believe this is a popular sect, especially among the young. I know this because I know lots of people like this. But don't think your average liberal voter thinks in these ways; they're generally more moderate, for good or for ill.
And no matter how many times you cite this I will remind you that:
a) The natural progression of ideologies is to the left
b) You continuously use the word "liberal" when you mean to say "progressive", which aside from being incorrect makes you look like an idiot.
c) Seriously, I actually am the thing, so I reckon I know what the thing is.
A progressive and a liberal are similar if not the exact same thing, changing the name because you're embarrassed about the word's history isn't going to change a damn thing. But then again, some people enjoy ignorance so much , when the facts are shown to their face they still refuse to believe and that's why the world is in the ******* now.
I think you're getting liberal and libertarian confused.
Libertarian- a person who believes that people should be allowed to do and say what they want without any interference from the government, a person who upholds the principles of individual liberty especially of thought and action
Liberal- believing that government should be active in supporting social and political change, relating to or supporting political liberalism,not opposed to new ideas or ways of behaving that are not traditional or widely accepted
So a libertarian believes it's ok if you wanna be a gay weed farmer with a huge stockpile of guns and ammo without help from the government, a liberal wants their ideas pushed to the general population so there's more national conformity and government control in everyone's lives so we can be micro managed and support by the government not ourselves. You were probably just trying to be bait but it hurts when I serve in the United States military and see people who are to stupid to have an opinion of their own, read a book, get a job and hopefully go to college and get a useful degree. Our country needs more hard workers and less uneducated vocal welfare cunts.
I keep seeing you everywhere shouting ill informed opinions based on anecdotal **** . I've seen things you've posted that i agree with and i still can't take your side because of how bad you are at making points. I'm honestly half convinced you're a troll account.
I barely even care about politics, if i'm being honest, but the way you try to get your points across is absolutely abysmal. For **** sake, saying you are something doesn't give you any knowledge on it whatsoever. You're using logic similar to someone who's been indoctrinated into a cult would use.
"I actually AM part of the new age of xenu so i think i know we represent love and peace and not killing ourselves to ride a comet into space."
You're the one who looks like an idiot. Yelling your opinions louder and sounding condescending doesn't make you right, it just makes you seem more retarded when you're wrong.
No, that's not how it works. Saying you're right with no solid supporting evidence doesn't make you right. All you've shown me is you can make half-assed statements that are either logical fallacies or have very very little substance to them.
You have to differentiate between US liberalism and classical liberalism. European politics views US conservatism as a variety of classical liberalism, whereas only the social values represent liberal ideologies in the US left wing.
The meanings are different depending on your political entity. I'm not saying that it is correct, but that is the reality. US liberalism means liberal application of government programs. Classical liberalism is rooted in liberty.
Yeah, it got stolen. That's my whole point. The Progressive movement emerged in the 1890s and included intellectual reformers typified by sociologist Lester Frank Ward and economist Richard T. Ely. They transformed Victorian liberalism, retaining its commitment to civil liberties and individual rights while casting off its advocacy of laissez-faire economics.
When people say things like "libtard" they are referring to US left wing.
If you wish, but the idea of using taxpayer funding on large businesses as per the examples in the previous article is antithetical to classical liberal ideology. Thomas Malthus' theory states that poor urbanization is inevitable. Redistribution of wealth at any magnitude is dissipated among the poorest orders (this has been thus far proven by application in the welfare state). The solution to lift the poor is by allowing them to work for the highest paying employer, and to encourage lassaiz- faire. Government involvement should be as minimal as possible especially concerning the unequal bargaining power of big corporations.
He's not wrong. Social movements aren't fixed.
The definition of 'liberal' you probably have in your dictionary most likely doesn't resemble modern liberalism. And all of those white people that are racist against white people call themselves liberal and have, along with SJWs, hijacked the movement. People who didn't agree with them, jumped off.
I consider myself very left-wing since the definition of that doesn't change (or at least not as much), but I don't consider myself liberal anymore.
It's a bit like modern day feminism that got hijacked by misandrists and are about how women are superior to men and men being redundant rapist scum, while it used to be about equal rights for everyone, sunshine and rainbows. Many former feminists, such as myself, jumped off and now ride under the tag 'equalitarianist', which used to be different as well.
Using people like that as your representation of "Liberal logic" is a lot like using the WBC or the KKK as your representation of "Conservative logic."
Neither of those organizations are conservative;
In the United States, conservatism is rooted in the American Revolution and its commitment to republicanism, sovereignty of the people, and the rights and liberties of Englishmen while expelling the king and his supporters. Most European conservative writers do not accept American conservatism as genuine; they consider it to be a variety of liberalism. Modern American liberals in the New Deal do not disagree with that consensus view, but conservatives spend much more emphasis on the Revolutionary origins, with the Tea Party advocates using an episode from the 1770s for their name and some even dress in costumes from that era at their rallies.
Historian Gregory Schneider identifies several constants in American conservatism: respect for tradition, support of republicanism, "the rule of law and the Christian religion," and a defense of "Western civilization from the challenges of modernist culture and totalitarian governments."
Both are much more aligned with facism, which doesn't properly fit on the L-R standard political scale
just so everyone is clear. ethnically Egypt is not African. the Egyptian royal line was Greek after the invasion of Alexander the Great it was called the Ptolemaic dynasty. the area was much more heavily influenced by the middle east and Europe than it was any African group from an ethnic stand point. so next time someone says Cleopatra wasn't white kindly tell them to **** off. she was Ptolemaic.
Yeah but this is Tutankhamun who ruled 1100 years before the Ptolemaic Dynasty. In any case, modern Egyptians are quite different from Ancient Egyptians physiologically. Ancient Egyptians were emphatically African - not as dark as more Southern populations, but definitely different from other Middle Eastern populations,
I think The Pacific is the only thing I've seen him in.
Actually, that's a lie; I definitely saw him in something else because I recognised his face, but I can't even remember what I was watching at the time.
I'm behind this 100% Just imagine all the ******* , thugs and would be gangsters boarding the flying pyramids and ******* off, hopefully burning up while leaving the atmosphere and suffocating once they do It's fun to imagine.
#129 Why mars, humans will colonize our solar system in this century (unless we kill ourselves ) Go big you help us conquer the whole universe, don't underestimate your powers, you are THE chosen one
A gas giant sure but we could make a space platform above the planet (that would be syphoning the gas for future use) that would expand till it envelops the whole planet and holds milions of people.
So far it seems you don't swing at all
I'm not judging And please once you get your wizard powers, use them for the good of mankind, don't just mindlesly kill all those who got some ass.
Trust me ******* is way overrated, you can do great things Kal El
I'm gonna assume that's an Arab, not a sub-Saharan.
Which is still******** , because Arabs ain't ancient Egyptians. Hell, the guys they usurped weren't ancient Egyptians; the Greeks had taken care of that.
this is what pure blooded Egyptians look like, they share all their DNA with ancient Egyptians, they are closely related to Arabs and Berbers. they are dark skinned but not Negros. literally non of the statues and wall paintings resemble negros.. but i guess when ****** can go as far as to try and take credit for romans, greeks, vikings, celts, chinese and aztecks they'll also take credit for egyptians