Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
16 comments displayed.
#38 to #19
-
anon (16 hours ago) [-]
Honestly, if a movie "isn't your cup of tea" then I would never tell someone whether it was good or not, because the opinion is obviously jaded by the fact that you didn't want to or expect to like it. Same with books. The number of times i have seen a decent book get a bad review because some guy was like "this isn't my normal genre but..." annoys me.
#42 to #38
-
Hreidmar (13 hours ago) [-] I can still objectively tell that something is a good movie/book/etc, even if I don't like it. Maybe I don't have the most unbiased view, but if you want an unbiased view, well, good luck. You're not getting one from pretty much anyone. I can still appreciate good acting, design, writing, etc in a movie, even if in the end I find myself not that entertained by it. Same goes for the opposite case, when a movie is objectively pretty bad but you can't help but to enjoy it. There are some movies I really like that I nonetheless wouldn't recommend just because my reasons for liking it are unlikely to be applicable to them.
#9 to #2
-
letmethink (01/12/2016) [-] What? The second movie was just fine. It was different, but not worse.
#16 to #9
-
streetshark (22 hours ago) [-] People will find any excuse to call a sequel bad. Besides Spiderman 2 there really aren't any that people universally appreciated more than the original.
#32 to #16
-
thesimonved (17 hours ago) [-] The godfather and Lord of the Rings II would be two more examples, but you're right tho
#5 to #2
-
anonmynous (01/12/2016) [-]
The sequel wasn't bad. Would have been better if Willem dafoe was the investegator again, though.
