Teacher searching rape
i Frequent amine searches: I "
...
| |
Comments(66):
goldendarknessx has disabled anonymous comments.
Refresh Comments Show GIFs 66 comments displayed.
#60 to #54
-
BabyPainter (05/31/2014) [-] uhm.... uh.... I know this is wierd but....
uh... Sauce?
uh... Sauce?
#9
-
pleeyer (05/30/2014) [-] can anyone here play watchdogs on the ultra setting, everything full spec?
I have an i7 3820 3.6GHz, 16 GB RAM DDR3, and an older geforce 560ti 1GB video ram.
I can play on the high setting, no AA, water ultra and HBOA+LOW.
Am thinking about buying a Geforce 770.
I have an i7 3820 3.6GHz, 16 GB RAM DDR3, and an older geforce 560ti 1GB video ram.
I can play on the high setting, no AA, water ultra and HBOA+LOW.
Am thinking about buying a Geforce 770.
#39 to #9
-
sniffythebird ONLINE (05/31/2014) [-] i7-4700MQ
GTX 780M
16GB RAM
Running 1920x1080 on ultra, with HBAO+ on low and temporal MSAA for anti aliasing. Vsync off, max pre rendered frames = 1, forced 16x Anisotropic filtering through control panel.
It's playable, but not always super smooth. Mostly 35-45 FPS average, in some areas below 30, but extremely rarely below 25.
I dunno why I see people complaining about stuttering when driving, it might be because desktop graphics cards usually have 2-3GB VRAM, but for some reason the 780M has 4GB, so ultra textures causes no problems for me.
GTX 780M
16GB RAM
Running 1920x1080 on ultra, with HBAO+ on low and temporal MSAA for anti aliasing. Vsync off, max pre rendered frames = 1, forced 16x Anisotropic filtering through control panel.
It's playable, but not always super smooth. Mostly 35-45 FPS average, in some areas below 30, but extremely rarely below 25.
I dunno why I see people complaining about stuttering when driving, it might be because desktop graphics cards usually have 2-3GB VRAM, but for some reason the 780M has 4GB, so ultra textures causes no problems for me.
#50 to #9
-
nanako ONLINE (05/31/2014) [-] I run it at maxed out/ultra settings permanantly, bit i wouldn't say it's perfectly smooth. Specifically i'm just using the ingame "ultra" preset. there
My framerate lurches somewhat dramatically from 20-50 fps depending on how much is going on. generally as long as i'm not driving or embroiled in a gunfight, things are pretty fine.
my specs:
AMD FX 4300
AMD R9 270 X
8 GB ram
win7 64bit
My framerate lurches somewhat dramatically from 20-50 fps depending on how much is going on. generally as long as i'm not driving or embroiled in a gunfight, things are pretty fine.
my specs:
AMD FX 4300
AMD R9 270 X
8 GB ram
win7 64bit
#42 to #10
-
sniffythebird ONLINE (05/31/2014) [-] If you're all maxed out, use temporal SMAA instead of TXAA, and set HBAO+ on low (it's weird, but it looks better than MHBAO and HBAO+ high, yet has the least of a performance drop).
As for AA, temporal SMAA is a tiny bit heavier than FXAA, vegetaion looks a bit more crisp and sharp, and not as smudged out as with FXAA or TXAA.
As for AA, temporal SMAA is a tiny bit heavier than FXAA, vegetaion looks a bit more crisp and sharp, and not as smudged out as with FXAA or TXAA.
No, nobody can. Atleast not to my knowledge. I have more or less the same rig as you, except I have a Geforce 780. Even if I can play on Ultra just walking around, it always gets choppy when driving or in areas with lots of objects. It also gives me a really good incentive to get water cooling, because everything above medium makes my computer warmer than the burning flames of hell. Optimization is crap, but it always is when it comes to Ubisoft, especially newly released titles. This one was an utter plane crash.
#43 to #12
-
sniffythebird ONLINE (05/31/2014) [-] How choppy? As in stuttering when loading new stuff or moving around in a car?
Cause I have a laptop with a 780M, which is somewhat weaker, but it has 4GB VRAM, and apart from getting 25-30FPS in some bad areas, I don't get any stuttering with ultra textures.
I think anything less than 4GB VRAM just causes ******** no matter what.
Cause I have a laptop with a 780M, which is somewhat weaker, but it has 4GB VRAM, and apart from getting 25-30FPS in some bad areas, I don't get any stuttering with ultra textures.
I think anything less than 4GB VRAM just causes ******** no matter what.
Depends on speed and how long I've played it for a stretch. It works perfectly for a while, but gets worse after that. But the textures look the same anyway, it's the "nextgen" bloom, motion blur and such that makes the game difficult to handle.
#64 to #63
-
sniffythebird ONLINE (05/31/2014) [-] Yeah, it's mostly shadows, ambient occlusion, and lighting that's heavy on the GPU. Slap on 58 different shading filters and bam, there goes the framerate, instead of improving on stuff like polygons and long draw distance LOD which really matters (though I can't say I've noticed any bad LOD popping in this game).
It's a bit weird though. My framerate probably isn't as high as yours at most times (seeing a desktop 780 is more powerful), but the laptop version has 4GB, so I've had no choppyness or stuttering when driving or being in cities. The worst lag I had was getting down to 20-25fps for a while in a suburb area with lots of vegetation, plus rain and a thunderstorm. Also the neighborhood where Aiden's sister lives (can't remember her name). Other than that it performs pretty consistently at 30-40 FPS, albeit unoptimized.
And yeah, the textures... I dunno, I've always had em on ultra, but they don't really look any sharper than any older games. Could be all the blurring and lack of texture filtering (which I did force to 16x, but it doesn't seem to help much).
It's a bit weird though. My framerate probably isn't as high as yours at most times (seeing a desktop 780 is more powerful), but the laptop version has 4GB, so I've had no choppyness or stuttering when driving or being in cities. The worst lag I had was getting down to 20-25fps for a while in a suburb area with lots of vegetation, plus rain and a thunderstorm. Also the neighborhood where Aiden's sister lives (can't remember her name). Other than that it performs pretty consistently at 30-40 FPS, albeit unoptimized.
And yeah, the textures... I dunno, I've always had em on ultra, but they don't really look any sharper than any older games. Could be all the blurring and lack of texture filtering (which I did force to 16x, but it doesn't seem to help much).
I don't really care. Ultra graphics is just added bloom, reflections and motion blur. It's hardly a noticable difference, so I'm fair with Medium-High. It's just an insult to my rig, is all. Playing all other games on max except those that still struggle with optimization (Rome 2, and such).
#59
-
icecoldkilla (05/31/2014) [-] This game is ******* amazing. The hacking part is cool but the gun graphics and the gunfights are absolutely outstanding. Idk if its just me but there's something about the guns. Most of them look and sound so realistic (for a video game, anyway). The graphics for the 416 assault rifle especially look so ******* real its insane. Great story, good length and there's so much side content it's ridiculous. 9/10 would strongly recommend for PS4. just my opinion
#65 to #59
-
sniffythebird ONLINE (05/31/2014) [-] To be honest it feels really similar to GTA, except that the hacking part is just a twist to it and gives you more opportunities/options to outsmart enemies and make for cool fights.
FYI for anyone who starts out on this game: The beginning / early stages gameplay kind of sucks, cause there's tutorials and introduction to the story and what not. But later on it's more free and feels like that sandbox GTA kinda game.
FYI for anyone who starts out on this game: The beginning / early stages gameplay kind of sucks, cause there's tutorials and introduction to the story and what not. But later on it's more free and feels like that sandbox GTA kinda game.
Not relevant at all, but holy **** that was amazing. Thumb for you!
