Upload
Login or register
x
Anonymous comments allowed.
3 comments displayed.
User avatar #91 - fuzzyballs (01/04/2016) [-]
look, it bugs me that they made ****** gameplay and when went "oh, it was totally intentional, we're making fun of CoD's ****** gameplay"
**** that, just admit your game sucked
and it didn't have any real choices either

shoot that fleeing soldier? he was just running, not even pointing a gun at you, of course I didn't shoot, but what did it matter anyways, you just go straight into a firefight against other US soldiers

this game sucked, and I am ready for your read thumbs, see if it changes anything
User avatar #101 to #91 - frenzyhero (01/04/2016) [-]
The gameplay was solid. I don't know what you're talking about. Not good enough to warrant a 2nd playthrough, but it didn't bore me, and I enjoyed finding interesting ways I could interact with the environment in combat. I didn't play multiplayer.

It's not about choices. The game is about the illusion of choice. Yes, it didn't have ANY choices. That's life. As the post said - don't use the phosphorous, you die. Use it, and you're a monster. There's not a choice.
#96 to #91 - theruinedsage (01/04/2016) [-]
Or   
you know   
   
It was intentional, and they were making fun of the gameplay   
To lul you into a sense of "it's just a game"   
   
But if you have the emotional debt of a potato, good for you, go back to CoD.
Or
you know

It was intentional, and they were making fun of the gameplay
To lul you into a sense of "it's just a game"

But if you have the emotional debt of a potato, good for you, go back to CoD.
 Friends (0)