Upload
Login or register
x
Anonymous comments allowed.
71 comments displayed.
User avatar #5 - homestuckxplain (01/02/2016) [-]
I havn't played Life is Strange, but I hear mixed reviews on it. Some say its artistic and innovative, some say it's SJW fodder and worthless.

Isn't blue haired chick the one that complains about the patriarchy having guns and then shoots herself?
#136 to #5 - sonofargo (01/03/2016) [-]
Just finished it today actually. Its was alright. The endings make everything else you went through pointless so I was rather let down. But up to that point it was compelling.
User avatar #106 to #5 - kaiyuni (01/03/2016) [-]
The game is quite good until the last chapter/section of the game where they throw it all away. I would argue that one before that is pretty 'meh', but still acceptable. Had a good thing going and blew it.
User avatar #105 to #5 - klina (01/03/2016) [-]
it's bad because of different reasons

it's just a game that fakes choices, whatever you do is ultimately meaningless in the end and the dialogue sounds like some 40 year old virgins were writing it trying to sound cool

not to mention that you have to replay stupid scenes because some moron had the impression narrative story games are supposed to be hard to beat

and by hard to beat I mean you have to re-play a section for 20 times just to get the correct order of things or some item is badly placed so you spend hours looking for it etc

it had potential, ep 1 was pretty nice, but every other one just went downhill really hard, really fast
#127 to #105 - anon (01/03/2016) [-]
Now repeat that WITHOUT the salt.
Can you do that?
#95 to #5 - anon (01/03/2016) [-]
its a game of choices without choices
User avatar #93 to #5 - highkingtorygg (01/03/2016) [-]
its both


and yes, shes the cunt who shoots herself
User avatar #89 to #5 - turtlewithashotgun (01/03/2016) [-]
not really SJW pandering, I played the whole game. I just found it blatant and stupid that it had the characters just vomit up their emotions into dialogue at every waking moment. "OH, KATE YOURE SO STRONG FOR BLABLAHLAHLBALH, YOURE SUCH A HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR"

Also, theres once sequence where you stop a girl from killing herself and based on your decisions beforehand, it basically goes "ohey yeah that one thing you did i liked it (+1 will to live/ 5)" throughout. Other than that I liked the mechanics and the concept is really interesting.
User avatar #87 to #5 - pikapoopie (01/03/2016) [-]
I thought it was fun, alright story driven game but I really mainly enjoyed it for the concept.
#76 to #5 - destaice (01/03/2016) [-]
GIF
The people who say "omg tumblr is strange sjw fodder" didn't even play the game.

Tumblr hates this game because the main character almost dies but is saved by, get this, a straight white conservative military male that beats his daughter.

There's a 20-30 second video going around that takes two scenes from the game out of context. Making a bunch of people think the game is about gun control/hate for men.

This is 20-30 seconds out of 2-4 hours worth of play. But of course these idiots see this **** and assume they know everything about the game.

Heck the second main villain of the game almost raped your best friend and the game makes you feel sorry for him. Another straight white male, this one being a rich kid.
User avatar #72 to #5 - thematthew (01/03/2016) [-]
any story driven game that needs it's character to flat out say what emotion they are feeling is a bad story driven game, time travel mechanic was pretty neat though.
#55 to #5 - elky (01/03/2016) [-]
I played a little but was getting increasingly frustrating with a few cringy dialogs here and there. Finally deleted the game after one of them said "STUPID GUN!!" after I purposely shot myself at the shooting range. lmao
User avatar #53 to #5 - akkere (01/03/2016) [-]
I think the story finds a decent balance with the characters.
The blue-haired chick (Chloe Price) has views that run parallel with SJWs (such as the segment where she goes 'WE NEED TO DISARM THE MEN'), but she's not exactly a SJW and more just someone who really hasn't grown up (what's the difference am i right fellas).
She's a very emotional person who basically blames a lot of her problems regarding an event in her early life the death of her father, the introduction of a step-father into her life, and constantly in conflict with said step-father. which the game doesn't try to justify in the slightest; it's pretty much ideal for you to realize Chloe is full of **** early on and act accordingly.

A lot of the characters can easily be taken with a grain of sand and the game doesn't really try to ******** you one way or the other with some political idealogue, which is ultimately why I say it isn't SJW pandering, because you simply don't get any freebies for siding with Chloe on things that don't make sense logically you will often get punished for siding with Chloe unanimously.

My biggest complaint with this game is the constant "YOUR CHOICES WILL TAILOR AND AFFECT THE STORY" when, as pointed out in previous posts, this isn't actually the case for the big ending. There some choices here and there that leave a great magnitude of difference in dialogues and events around, but the actual core events of the story aren't wholesomely affected, and that's my problem. If the game didn't just straight up push the mantra that literally other game in its genre tries (and fails) of "YOUR CHOICES MAKE AWORLD OF DIFFERENCE", I wouldn't be as annoyed at the ending as I was when I completed this.

Life Is Strange is pretty well designed for what it is. I don't know if I'd throw around words like "artistic" and definitely not "innovative", because the game's mechanics aren't THAT much different from others of its genre (e..g TellTale series games).
tl;dr - If you generally like games of this genre, you might like Life is Strange. If you generally don't, it's probably not something you'll like.
User avatar #77 to #53 - destaice (01/03/2016) [-]
She never said she wanted to disarm men. Her exact quote is "its the men who needs to be checked." This is due to the fact that she's in major conflict with David, Frank, and Nathan. She never really says anything further about a hate for men. Just expresses her hate for the 3 people who happen to be men.

We also know that Chloe is bi and not gay since she was getting the hots for Mr. Jefferson at the party.
User avatar #146 to #77 - akkere (01/03/2016) [-]
I understand Chloe isn't hardened enough to outright want to take away guns from the opposite sex, which is why I pointed out that at the heart of Chloe's character she's just an overtly emotional teenager who blames a lot of her faults on problems around her (some of which is valid but to only a small extent). I think the interpretation that Chloe is pure SJW fuel is really exaggerated and a result of people trying to find a bunch of examples of social justice invading things they like, like what /pol/ keeps trying to do with The Force Awakens.
User avatar #54 to #53 - akkere (01/03/2016) [-]
can be taken with a grain of salt*
User avatar #34 to #5 - Sethorein (01/03/2016) [-]
It's cute. Gets a little unhinged. Ends crappily
User avatar #26 to #5 - canyou ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
The ending made everything feel pointless imo. All those decisions and only 2 endings
#124 to #26 - sadisticsalmon (01/03/2016) [-]
I could go on for hours about not only the problems the game had in episode 5, but there was something about the ending that just made me so damn furious, I was genuinely unable to comprehend that it completely brushed over the enormous connections to the Prescotts the game made, just how Jefferson managed to manipulate Nathan's parents, the native American allusions it made and basically the whole theme of involvement, something left me very confused as to why episode 4 got mediocre reviews, (might have been one of the best eps) whereas episode 5 got AMAZING reviews (even though it was a huge letdown that was about 60% filler)

I also quite like looking at the key features on steam... one of them seems to be a HUGE ******* LIE little bit off.
User avatar #129 to #124 - canyou ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
They could have just added multiple endings to episode 4 and it would ended better imo
User avatar #30 to #26 - crimsongungnir (01/02/2016) [-]
C'mon, you know the saying, it's about the journey, not the destination.
User avatar #49 to #30 - akkere (01/03/2016) [-]
When you get constant dialogues of "THESE CHOICES MAKE A DIFFERENCE, THE WHOLE STORY IS TAILORED TO YOOOOOOU"
... and you get to the ending, you're left feeling a bit... lied to. Just a wee bit.
User avatar #121 to #49 - subejio (01/03/2016) [-]
Yep, like the illusion of choice is shattered. Almost like the farther you get into the game, the more you realize you don't have much, if any control over what happens.

Honestly, I feel like that was the point.
User avatar #147 to #121 - akkere (01/03/2016) [-]
Here's what I understand;
I get that the fundamental story is that the universe is pissed at Chloe for whatever reason and intends to kill her all the same, or destroy everything around her trying. I get this is supposed to translate to some antithesis to the whole basis of choice.
I still think it's utterly lazy and manipulative that they ride the "YOUR CHOICES TAILOR EVERYTHIIIING" marketing wagon. The fact nothing but a few texts comes from a choice as supposedly big in magnitude as deciding how far Warren should beat Prescott is pretty dumb. In fact, nothing having to do with either Nathan Prescott or Veronica, two relationships that you gradually build up and around, have absolute dick in reflection to the ending. They barely make any sort of appearance.
The final episode just seemed horribly rush and the more you look at it the more the whole universe refuses to let you have a choice at some matters is a real cop-out for a game of this genre.
User avatar #157 to #147 - subejio (01/04/2016) [-]
Alright, that's fair. It seems to me to be a game about being unable to escape fate without major consequences, but I can see where you're coming from. I guess I'm just used to going into point and click games like these knowing that they have a story to tell, and the ending can't change too much.
User avatar #31 to #30 - canyou ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
The destination gets rid of the journey
User avatar #27 to #26 - feelythefeel (01/02/2016) [-]
One of which retcons everything you've done.
User avatar #28 to #27 - canyou ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
Sad part is I think that's the better ending
User avatar #103 to #28 - ladymaria (01/03/2016) [-]
It is, because it actually relates to the theme and point of the story. The other ending is ******* stupid.
#22 to #5 - xardian (01/02/2016) [-]
actually it is a very well written story and especially as you learn a lot about the background of the character chloe (blue hair) who hates men, to a point where you just understand her point of view.
Her father died in an accident. And he was like the perfact father nice and friendly but also manly, so the perfect male rolemodel, almost a cliche.
And after that her mother marrys a guy who's a total jerk, who's controlling and **** . He's also the school security guy and secretly spying on the students because he thinks there is some kind of conspiracy going on.
And so she grew up with this guy as only male parent that she ever had and so she really starts to hate guys, also because most of her friends (including the main char) left her around the time her dad died.


Now to say it is SJW fodder is nonesense, it is a very artistic game that tries to explain different characters and their backgrounds. And it tries to show the main character (max) interacting in a world which tries to be as realistic as possible. And while you can chose to be with chloe and choose to go with her, you can also choose to go with a guy Max likes.
In the end you have to decide whether you save Chloe and let the whole town die or whether you go back in time and let her be killed when she was supposed to be killed in the first place. (There is some kind of super tornado heading for the town, which occures seemingly because of Max using her timey wimey powers.)

It is a really nice game and a great story and yea chloe is a man hating lesbian, but she sure doesn't paint a good picture of SJWs. But in the end it's a game that a SJW wouldn't complain about...
User avatar #19 to #5 - sircool (01/02/2016) [-]
main character says wowsiers in full seriousness.

game is best to skip and not play.
User avatar #80 to #29 - megaton (01/03/2016) [-]
how do you post youtube videos here? they never work for me.
#83 to #80 - boomerpyro (01/03/2016) [-]
when commenting, press youtube button, then you post the video url into the field
User avatar #84 to #83 - megaton (01/03/2016) [-]
well **** . i never saw a youtube button. now i feel dumb for always looking at it but not noticing it.
#85 to #84 - boomerpyro (01/03/2016) [-]
nah, you were just too deep to notice
User avatar #78 to #29 - cocoman ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
God I love that fat **** .
#47 to #29 - doucheonmandic (01/03/2016) [-]
brote is best
User avatar #32 to #29 - fourfoursix (01/03/2016) [-]
hand up ass
#15 to #5 - StealerShock ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
People love to take that line out of context and make the whole game seem like it's about SJW ******** . In reality it spends the first two episodes setting up the context that basically a pair of teenagers who deal with the usual highschool teenage girl drama get thrown into a super weird murder-mystery type of story combined with one of them being able to rewind time.

It gives it a pretty interesting tone when you use the time-travel to solve both major problems like the disappearance of a friend, or the blue-haired chick accidentally shooting herself with a ricochet; but also use it for teenager kind of stuff like getting questions right in class, or making a bucket of paint fall on the school bitch.

Was a really fun game to watch people play on twitch, but I never picked it up due to lack of money.

also, blue-haired girl is hot af
#14 to #12 - newprinny ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
#10 to #5 - nmurphy (01/02/2016) [-]
GIF
My honest review, there is some special snowflake stuff, but that's only in the 1st episode, by 2 and beyond, the writing for Chloe (Blue haired, I hate my stepdad, the patriarchy) get's a lot better, to the point where I like their relationship. The writer's even poke fun at how bad she was before

The gameplay is honestly a lot better than telltale, because in telltale, no matter what action you take, it doesn't have any affect on the story. This, because it involves time-travel, is also true, but there is a choice which I won't spoil that does change a huge section of the game. If you fail this choice, there's a 20 minute section of a later episode that's just cut out, and having played it both ways, it does feel like it has an effect on the game. And because you can rewind time, if you do **** up, you can change it to fix everything. The theme of using time to make everything perfect is really good and the story revolves around this.

The other thing is that a lot of choices don't matter and that's what makes it good. There's a plant in your room that if you don't water, dies in the 3rd episode. That has absolutely no bearing on the larger story, they feel more important or I can feel more invested in them because you can choose to do or not do them.

The main character (Max) is pretty good and well fleshed out and her likes and interests don't feel as cringy or trying to be cool as a lot of young characters are. My only real complaint is that by the end you have all the popular guys and girls telling her how much they like her and how cool she is and it feels more like wish fulfillment than anything else.

Honestly, the only thing I thought was irredeemable was Warren. Warren is the most cliche nice-guy betamale character that expects you to love him just because he's nice and it's the only thing that becomes worse as the story progresses. I'm not going to spoil too much, but it's just bad

Overall: It's a surprisingly good game with a lot stronger emotional pull then most of this genre. The gameplay is fun and original and most of the characters feel unique and interesting. I'd say give it a shot if it's on sale

#145 to #10 - anon (01/03/2016) [-]
>telltale
>decisions don't impact the story

And here we have someone who has never actually played through a telltale game
#25 to #10 - fantasticfox (01/02/2016) [-]
How many times can you save and if i want to make a different choice can i go back to a previous save or am i screwed until i start a new playthrough?
#81 to #25 - nmurphy (01/03/2016) [-]
Your power is that you can rewind time for a few seconds, so if you say something wrong or make a bad choice, usually you can rewind it. Later on, your powers become stronger, and you can change things from earlier episodes, but those are story choices and you don't have a choice for them
User avatar #51 to #25 - akkere (01/03/2016) [-]
The game's specially designed for players who want the option of going back on decisions with ease. If you make a choice and the instant result wasn't what you expected or what you're comfortable with, it only takes two seconds to go back to the choice. Long-term results are a bit more complicated, but not with too much inconvenience.
There's a plot-reason that becomes obvious a few moments into when you start playing the first episode.
#21 to #10 - fauxnix (01/02/2016) [-]
As someone who has played the game through once and doesn't feel the need to make a second playthrough to experience all the choices, can you elaborate on the "failed choice" you mentioned? Or at least roughly which episode it's in? (1-5, beginning, middle, end, etc.)
#82 to #21 - nmurphy (01/03/2016) [-]
When you save Kate if you do, in the 3rd episode, There's a scene where you visit her in the hospital, if you didn't save her, the scene's missing completely .

Other thing I forgot to say, my main problem with telltale games is, and this is what they've (writers/developers from TT) said, is that if you can save someone or if some choice is clearly the 'correct' one, than they think people will play to save that person rather than 'playing as the character' which is true and can work with games like The Walking Dead where everyone dies or Tales from the Borderlands where it's not serious, but for Game of Thrones or TWD2, having all roads lead to failure makes the game much more unsatisfying
#94 to #82 - fauxnix (01/03/2016) [-]
For some reason I thought you were talking about something else, such as Chloe dying after you get caught by Jefferson or something. Out of curiosity did you Save Chloe or Arcadia Bay?
#98 to #94 - nmurphy (01/03/2016) [-]
First time: Save Arcadia Bay ******* rough
#100 to #98 - fauxnix (01/03/2016) [-]
That doesn't have Undue concequences does it? It really is save, no more tornado, right? I got to that point and I had to save Chloe. Couldn't go through with killing her after all that time. She was and will always be my favorite character.
#152 to #100 - nmurphy (01/03/2016) [-]
Unless you call Chloe Dying undue consequences, then no. Arcadia bay is alive and well, Jefferson/Nathan are stopped and Kate is okay
User avatar #119 to #100 - subejio (01/03/2016) [-]
No consequences beyond the obvious, the town really does get saved. There's a funeral and you get to listen to the service.
#150 to #119 - fauxnix (01/03/2016) [-]
And what happens to Jefferson? Part of my reasoning at that point besides loving Chloe was that If Prescott killed Chloe in the bathroom, nobody would find out about him, and he'd keep doing what he was doing, whereas if I saved Arcadia Bay he'd be at least killed by the storm(hopefully)
User avatar #9 to #5 - andywazowski ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
To be honest I was put off by the whole "unique snowflake, blue haired, SJW" vibe it gives, but I actually enjoyed it a lot, when I finally tried it. Despite what it looks like it's a pretty good story. If you enjoy the Tell Tale "gameplay" you will probably like this one.
User avatar #6 to #5 - meringueluka [OP]ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
it's good, people who complain about it being SJW fodder re the same type of people how fregrant /pol/ and truly believe all black people are ****** . the blue haired women is Chloe, and at the start of the game is is very hypocritical. but she does have a good character arch
User avatar #37 to #6 - tapeworms (01/03/2016) [-]
Biased lesbianism?
User avatar #17 to #6 - dndxplain ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
I loathe /pol/ but it legitimately is sjw fodder
User avatar #18 to #17 - meringueluka [OP]ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
no.
User avatar #20 to #18 - dndxplain ONLINE (01/02/2016) [-]
you can deny it all you want. it's a good story, but it's still SJW pandering.
#137 to #20 - sonofargo (01/03/2016) [-]
how is it so social justicey?
User avatar #153 to #137 - dndxplain ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
okay, once again let me rephrase that. the game itself is not SJW pandering. it was marketed as pandering
User avatar #42 to #20 - austinboyer (01/03/2016) [-]
What parts are pandering, though? Outside of implied lesbianism, nothing in the game was even excessively liberal, let alone "SJW fodder". As far as I can remember, at least. I mean, I'm no genius, so if there really is something like that, then I probably just didn't understand.
User avatar #96 to #42 - tenaciouslee (01/03/2016) [-]
The only part I remember being SJW Pander Express is Chloe blaming men for all her problems and saying men shouldn't own guns, I think she said, "It's not gun that need to be controlled, it's the men that need to be controlled."

Or something, other than that it was just artsy fartsy and **** .
User avatar #43 to #42 - dndxplain ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
the concept alone was proposed and designed to be SJW pandering. I'm not saying "hurr durr it's a liberal cuckfest" (note: I ******* hate the term "cuck") it's just designed to pander. it's still a good game.
User avatar #44 to #43 - austinboyer (01/03/2016) [-]
I mean, in that sense it is wish fulfillment, but to a dream we all have had (of time travel), nothing about SJW values. Unless you're saying that the fact that it's a woman in an arts college is SJW stuff, which I can't agree with.
User avatar #46 to #44 - dndxplain ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
two lesbians go through life, one of which is a liberal lesbian hipster with colorful hair. it's a slice of life that on the outside is pure SJW pandering. again, nothing in the game itself is pandering, but it was marketed as pandering.
User avatar #35 to #20 - dorkledumbs (01/03/2016) [-]
Would you recommend it for it's current sale price ($13.39)?
User avatar #36 to #35 - dndxplain ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
it's a great story with decent mechanics. don't get me wrong, man. go for it
#38 to #36 - dorkledumbs (01/03/2016) [-]
thanks bro
 Friends (0)