The Truth About Weed (read desc.)

Well of course it's bad for you, you're inhaling a substance that's not supposed to be there that's very damaging. But when I said "not anything wrong", I didn't mean "it's perfectly healthy."
I meant I don't see anything morally wrong with smoking it. The health benefits/damages are theirs to weigh. Not mine.

right you are sir

HEY! While smoking blunts, or joints, or bowls, or whatnot, you're inhaling smoke. WHICH IS BAD FOR YOU. That's why the smart people like me "smoke" out of a vaporizer. (It's not really smoking because you're only inhaling vapors from heating the pot, not burning it.)
Tl;dr
Joints= Bad
Vaporizer=Good

Where's your source for your bullshit facts?

I'm afraid he's right actually, but the worst type is when you put weed in a normal roll up cigarette. For some reason they mix together badly and can completely fuck you up even if you go light. But what he's talking about is when people don't use filters in weed, if you make a normal cig then you put a filter in, which takes out some of the tar but most people don't put filters in weed, so you get all the tar, rather than a quarter of it. So marijuana itself is not worse than tobacco, it's just the way you take it.
So basically don't smoke it, take it some other way or try and use filters. Sorry man :(

yw bro

Then your dumb comment can be disregarded. I don't see any rat poison or nicotine in the weed I smoke. There also, is no tar in weed.

Putting caps on doesn't make you seem any smarter.

He's right though, tar is not some mystery substance that appears in tobacco, it's kinda like wet carbon, so any smoke you inhale produces minute amounts of tar in the lining of your lungs, four times as much if you use unfiltered weed (refer to my other comment).

Alright, so I was ignorant about the tar. My original point is that cigarettes are worse for you than weed. There is a much greater risk of getting lung cancer or having health problems with cigarettes than you are with weed. There are not anywhere near as many addicting and poisonous chemicals in it.

Yes, you're right but we were talking about the tar so your point is irrelevant.
Anon was being an idiot and not making his point very well so you misunderstood and thought he was talking about the whole thing, not just tar and similar effects.
I'm not anti weed in any way, in fact I plan on getting into it a little later, from a good, rat poison free source my sister is good friends with. I'm just planning on knowing as much about the negative and positive effects as possible -.- As far as I'm aware, there are almost as many bad effects as there are good but that doesn't mean it's bad for you, if you work hard enough you can prove the miraculous/fatal qualities and effects of everything. I'll give you two examples:
1. The positive one - Dynamite, thought of as a horrible killing explosive by many, has been proven to "cure" cancer, this was only because it made for a good news story. The Mail (a very bullshit paper from England) said that when injected into the tumor, it would eat away at it while doing minimal damage to surrounding cells. What they failed to mentio n was that it sin't a good idea injecting liquid TNT, that it would probably fuck up the entire cancerous region through damage cause by the swelling of the tumor and that it would not stop the cancer from retreating. They basically just focused on the good points of the theory, to make for good news.
2. The negative one - Some people once made a survey stating that we should do all we can to eradicate the sales of dihydro monoxide, a dangerous chemical which can cause death if accidentally inhaled, is a major component in acid rain, it constantly wearing away many landscapes and beautiful architecture and, worst of all, is sold bottled in shops throughout the world. Guessed what it is yet? Water, and a large proportion of members of the survey voted yes to ban sales of this chemical.
A similar thing happens with weed, the pros only know/showcase the good parts and vice versa...

What do you think resin is, hun? If you smoke in tobacco in a pipe the residue is called tar, but smoke weed in a similar pipe and the residue is resin. They look similar, and have a similar texture.

wow, 'certain toxins'. you're knowledge of science is bafflingly accurate. give me one legit source to back up a single one of your bullshit statements and I might take you more seriously than I take justin bieber.

Win.

I smoke weed on occasion and when I read the stoner comics I'm feel as if their smoking crack or something. I've smoked weed enough and for long enough that I'm sure I'm no "newRichard Simmons" but most of these comics seem to be made by people who only read about getting high, and does not know what it feels like. Also, I don't think smoking is "cool", I find it an enjoyable way to relax after a long day, like alcohol or cigarettes (though I don't smoke weed as often as one would enjoy a cigarette everyday). I respect and agree with your rant, and thumbed you up. Glad to see someone on this site with a rational mind.

I dont know about you, but I smoked it a few times and could go for some right now,

FUCK YOU HAVE A DOSE OF MY GREEN ANTI-REALITY-STAB!!!!

No point really thumbing you. Your anonymous. :)

dude, half my school tried weed at least once. What kind of goody two shoes are you?

No, unless someone takes like 5 or more hits in a row without breathing in between. Taking one hit is about the same as holding your breath for ten seconds, it isn't gonna hurt you at all.

No but there's no reason to hold your breath in the first place, in fact it makes it worse for you OO
The chemicals which get you high are absorbed instantly because there are receptors for that kind of thing which just grab them but the tar_, takes a few seconds to stick, so you're not making the high any better but you are taking in more smoke...
The reason people think it makes it better is because after holding your breath you get a momentary high off the lack of oxygen, which people obviously thought was the weed taking extra effect. Well it isn't, sorry :\

Did I say that it was better to hold your breath for as long as you can? Did you even read my comment?

If you're really all that scared of losing brain cells from smoking weed, you might as well abandon swimming under water for yourself. It kills pretty much the same amount of brain cells as holding your breath for that long. It's not a serious worry at all.

Thats only if your smoking with a gas mask on, because for even weed to light on fire you need a steady stream of oxygen and not all of it is used to light the weed when u use a pipe or a joint, but if ur using a gas mask then u want to be careful bc that shit can fuck up your brain

Yo - read the description, I have linked to the sources that tell you what you'd like to know. None of it is bullshit.

If you're going to take the time to write a few paragraphs trying to debase me, why not take a few extra minutes to read the sources I have provided in the description? That will probably settle any concern you have before you even bother to post.

Moreover, this isn't for you. This is for the educated stoners, the stoners in college/university that are fed up of being treated like idiotic yuppies there on daddies money, or any stoner that wants to be taken seriously.

what? no, the message was that i wanted to get accros the most is that i want to browse fj not and not be smaked round the head with a million and one posts on weed. if you want to help that much go support a campaign that supports weed legalization it gets allot more done. it wassn't your post that was annoying it was the million that came before and then yours was just another one.

3. u canott spall!

yeah i know

Happens to everyone, bro! Take it as a compliment; your argument was too good and I was too lazy to come up with any other argument.

Eat it instead then.

You know how to get marijuana away from a brian in devolpement? Legalize it... There was a huge study that proved its easier for american youth to get their hands on cannabis than on alcohol, because its sold on a black market that doesnt gives a shit about age, were alcohol is sold by people who loses their job if they sell it to underages.

You saw what OP said right??
Educate yourself... brah.

There isnt a single factual reason to keep marijuana illegalized, i dare you.

Thank you for recommending me to educated, but I think I am. I've taken many drug courses in health and I think I know what I'm talking about. The only way I'd support it is for medical purposes, I don't support it otherwise. That's that, have a nice day.

Seems like youre not.

I could sit here and spout off facts as to why you shouldn't start doing marijuana, or any drugs at all, but I have better things to do in my day. If you wanted it, you know how to find it.

Sure.. educated.. riiiight.

Because I definitely care what a person using the internet, yet fails to know anything about me thinks. I think I'll stop replying now because we're wasting our time.

It really is people like you that keep our society from evovling.

First of all, You are right with your first point but it would take you smoking a amount which is very un-lightly but through defined use of the word addiction you are right.
However your second and third points are misguided and also you said cause lung cancer in rats? Where in the post does it say weed does not cause lung cancer in rats? The second can you actually show any which information on how weed causes schizophrenia? You might get it yes but there is no such link to weed causing it through medical study. If you want post have fun, But don't be a pussy and back your point up with ill thought arrangement's and baseless claims. Baka..

That's called being habitually addictive, it's basically just mental weakness. The addicted that's properly dangerous is psychologically addicted, means you actually think you need it, and you'll have proper reactions if you don't.
By the same logic, mcdonalds, games, funnyjunk, all the stuff people like, should all be illegal.

Righto, anything that you burn and inhale is dangerous, no matter what it's made out of.

And I'd imagine that It'd be like acid, where it just exposes what's already there, not necessarily increases the risk of developing it.