Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(92):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
92 comments displayed.
#5 - memymoe (12/21/2015) [-]
User avatar #65 to #5 - animedudej (12/21/2015) [-]
and choreography (though i guess that's a part of acting)
User avatar #88 to #5 - anusdestoyer (12/21/2015) [-]
You sick bastard! I stared for a good 2 minutes waiting for him to move but he never did.
#1 - simonhatesfj (12/20/2015) [-]
**simonhatesfj used "*roll picture*"**
**simonhatesfj rolled image**
that kinda looks like fun
#7 to #1 - daredevizz (12/21/2015) [-]
10/10 would get high as **** and join them
#6 - xpyrobluex (12/21/2015) [-]
This falls right under " **** I didn't need ruined for me." This scene was cool. Now all I shall ever see is silliness.
User avatar #11 to #6 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
John Williams score will help you forget this gif when you watch the scene.
#13 to #6 - smellypantsmcgee ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
this makes the scene that much better
User avatar #51 to #6 - thepizzadevourer (12/21/2015) [-]
Adding a little of the magic back:
In Episode I, Ewan McGregor got so into his lightsaber battles they had to keep reminding him not to make lightsaber sounds while dueling with Darth Maul.
User avatar #2 - stankebottoms ONLINE (12/20/2015) [-]
No wonder the film looked like polished **** .
User avatar #12 to #2 - rossodonavanv (12/21/2015) [-]
when this is from the second episode
User avatar #15 to #2 - whitebuddha (12/21/2015) [-]
two is like 99% cgi
User avatar #21 to #18 - whitebuddha (12/21/2015) [-]
trolling? cuz he literally admits that he tried to shove as much special effects and computer ******** as possible into the movie.
#23 to #21 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
Should i post more images from episode 2 that wasnt CGI?
User avatar #26 to #23 - whitebuddha (12/21/2015) [-]
naw i just woke and don't feel like arguing. i also don't keep many pictures on my computer so i don't have anything to throw back at you. go look at how many animators are in the credits for two. I just feel the whole movie felt fake and animated. I respect that you disagree. Even if had a lot of pics of people standing in front of green screens, i don't think it'd prove a lot. I just think in comparison to the OT, they animated and faked a lot of stuff they didn't have to because it was cheaper to animate it and looked better to kids. It's just my opinion.
User avatar #29 to #26 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
I can respect that.
User avatar #35 to #29 - lathyrusvii (12/21/2015) [-]
I respect the two of you respecting each other.
User avatar #36 to #35 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
I respect you for respecting us
User avatar #42 to #36 - quackyquack (12/21/2015) [-]
i hate you all
User avatar #43 to #42 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
I respect you for hating us.
#52 to #44 - funkymelon (12/21/2015) [-]
I respect you saying ****
User avatar #70 to #52 - tapberry (12/21/2015) [-]
al u r reported
User avatar #93 to #23 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/10/2016) [-]
Weren't*
#22 to #21 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
No, the prequels had more practical effects than the entire OT.
User avatar #24 to #22 - captinchikin (12/21/2015) [-]
Yes because every shot was dense, but look at the content. Just because it had "more" doesn't mean that the CGI **** doesn't stick out like a sore thumb.
User avatar #40 to #24 - huntergriff ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
to be fair though, most of the prequels took place on worlds they can't exactly replicate without CGI, like the exterior shots of coruscant, or everything on mustafar outside of where anakin slaughters the separatists, or kamino (Which i think was a mixture of a set and cgi), or felucia, or mygeeto, or cato neimoidia, or kashyyyk.
#41 to #40 - captinchikin (12/21/2015) [-]
For some of that you're right, but the Coruscant CGI didn't even look bad, and most of Mustafar was practical. Most of the worlds done with CGI in the prequels were okay, the only worlds I disliked were things like >>#27 where it could have easily been done practically and it looks terrible. My main problems are the images like >>#28 and most of the shots with the Clone Troopers
#49 to #41 - huntergriff ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
well...i mean the clone troopers are exactly the same, they're supposed to be the same body mass and body type, that's not something you can really do with some random extras. if they were to do that, you could notice the differences when they stand in formation, like so.
User avatar #50 to #49 - captinchikin (12/21/2015) [-]
Hmm...out of all the answers I've gotten to that one over the years, yours makes the most sense, I never really thought about it that way.
User avatar #53 to #50 - huntergriff ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
i mean obviously it doesn't matter now, what with the jango fett clones most likely dying out after the original six movies. since the first order apparently kidnaps children according to finn.
User avatar #54 to #53 - captinchikin (12/21/2015) [-]
Yep, Kylo even mentions going back to Hux because of Finn's "failure"
User avatar #55 to #54 - huntergriff ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
yeah, this ****** going to be really weird with the next couple...it feels like the shoved two or three movies into one. which i personally love.
#46 to #41 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
I definetly see you point with >>#28. Atleast the battledroids looked great in the gungan battle
#25 to #24 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
I disagree, i think the CGI looked great.
#30 to #27 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
For the most part.
User avatar #31 to #30 - captinchikin (12/21/2015) [-]
Now I will agree that Grevious is some of the best CG I've seen in my life, even surpasses the blue dudes from Avatar IMHO. How did you feel about TFA?
User avatar #32 to #31 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
I enjoyed it, but it felt a little to similar to ANH. I watched it three times in cinema and it was a blast.
User avatar #33 to #32 - captinchikin (12/21/2015) [-]
That's the same feeling I had. I'm going for #3 in 2 days but the first two have been incredible.
User avatar #34 to #33 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
It really is nice to watch star wars on the big screen.
#47 - rayeightk (12/21/2015) [-]
PEOPLE!
SERIOUSLY!
SPOILERS MUCH?!
#3 - anon (12/21/2015) [-]
must turn more into cgi!! MOAAARRR!!! Neva good enouff..der Lucas needz more Blue and greenscreens...must ruin! must put money up mah ass...MOAAAARR
#8 to #3 - anon (12/21/2015) [-]
Well, yeah. It's why his latest movie was a cgi animated, pop culture spewing mess
#10 to #3 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
The prequels werent all CGI.
User avatar #56 to #10 - voltkills ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
we know they wernt, but they wher too much CGI, for example, every single ******* clone was CGI, even most of the close up ones, its stupid, and looks ugly as balls. a new hope special effects look better than the prequals, yea sure they are old as **** and look kinda sketchy, but at least it looks like effort went into them, and they dont stick out like a sore thumb.
User avatar #62 to #56 - huntergriff ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
RE: clones

>>#49

User avatar #64 to #62 - voltkills ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
thats not an excsuse and you know it, it would not have been hard to find 4/5 similarly shaped people, hell you could even use some CGI to make them look more alike, and it would still be 100x better than the CGI they used.
theres a scene where a clone takes off his helmet, and its the fakest ******* thing ive seen in my life, why they couldnt get the actual actor to come in and be in a clone costume for a bit is beyond me, instead they film his head and stick it ontop of a fake ass looking body.
#71 to #64 - huntergriff ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
i thought commander cody looked neat. honestly the only clones that don't look good are the ones in episode 2. I agree, they look gooey in attack of the clones, but i thought they made them look more realistic in episode III.
#80 to #71 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
The clones looked pretty good at times in AotC as well.
User avatar #83 to #80 - huntergriff ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
well yeah, but sometimes they look gooey. like...you know how in halo 3 your armor looks...like it'd melt if you sat under the sun?
User avatar #84 to #83 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
Thats true. I guess CGI just wasnt ready for them in 2002. Atleast the battledroids still looked great.
#58 to #56 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
You sure? Because alot of people say they are 100% CGI. About the clone troopers, huntergriff had a good explanation for that.

And a lot of effort did go in to these movies, dont discredit ILM
User avatar #60 to #58 - voltkills ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
im not, the practical effects look amazing, they are really good. but holy **** , every single bit of CGI detracts from the movies. why did EVERY clone need to be CGI, why not hire at least a few actors to play the ones who where going to be in closeups, its so fake it hurts to watch somtimes. what they did wrong is, they used practical effects for the big scale stuff, like cities and landscapes, so they look good, but for all the close up stuff its all fake ****** CGI when it doesnt need to be at all.
#67 to #60 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
Not all CGI looked bad, General grievous looks amazing and so does most of the battledroids. And they had plenty of practical aliens.
User avatar #68 to #67 - voltkills ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
oh I should say im (mostly) excluding episode 3 from what im saying, its mostly good (clones still look like **** )
and the droids in episode 1 look awful, just really, really awful. looks like the first render of the CGI accidentally made it into the final film.
User avatar #74 to #68 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
And wow. I just re-read you first comment. I never said anything about the prequels use of CGI but you decided to start an argument about it. I only said that the prequels werent all CGI, why did you feel the need to argue with that? Its a fact, the prequel are not all CGI.

Seems to me like you only wanted to argue, so im done.
User avatar #75 to #74 - voltkills ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
I saw you all over this post defending over and over the use of CGI in the prequals, it got to me how much you ignored the awfulness of it.
User avatar #77 to #75 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
And you dont know what an opinon is do you? I think it looks good, i never said you had to.
User avatar #78 to #77 - voltkills ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
>the quality of CGI is now an opinion
lol OK
User avatar #79 to #78 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
It is.
0
#76 to #75 - cisdroidcommander has deleted their comment [-]
0
#73 to #68 - cisdroidcommander has deleted their comment [-]
#69 to #68 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
I disagree, i think the battledroids look fantastic. And TPM look beautiful.
User avatar #4 to #3 - bulwark (12/21/2015) [-]
Well waddya expect? Real ******* lightsabers and blasters?
#14 to #4 - anon (12/21/2015) [-]
WHAT!?
LIGHTSABERS AND BLASTERS WEREN'T REAL?
RUINED.
#9 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
What were they supposed to do? If I'm not wrong this is the shot where they get forced to the middle of the arena because they get outnumbered. They can't build a real droidarmy or a life-size Geonosian arena.
User avatar #63 to #9 - kevintk (12/21/2015) [-]
Sure, they utilized practical models and miniatures, but despite this, the prequels still looked like garbage. Trying to defend those movies by insisting on their use of real-life assets is like saying a diet of pure mcdonalds is good for you, as long as you have a vegetable here and there.
#66 to #63 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
Well, i do like these movies. A lot. And i think the prequels looked pretty good.
#91 to #66 - anon (12/22/2015) [-]
Honestly I have to agree with CDC the force awakens I think tricked people with their so called practical effects sure I will give some credit to jar jar Abrams but he literally got away with corporate plagiarism I wanted a sequel not a ******* reboot and they got some ******* whiny little pretty boy prick to play kylo and is so bad was struggling with his accent throughout the entire movie no way is this guy deserve to be a sith he a overrated vader fan boy the prequels are never going to get the credit they deserve because I'm glad they took the time to build these massive worlds and used cgi at times because they are supposed to be massive in my opinion there is no planet in TFA that stood out they all look lazy and uninteresting the only planet I remember is jakku and that's because they say it like 12 times over all Star Wars is following marvel and is being dumbed down to sell to the larger audience tell me I'm wrong I dare you
User avatar #92 to #91 - cisdroidcommander (12/22/2015) [-]
Thanks anon
User avatar #82 - severepwner (12/21/2015) [-]
I don't understand why people are complaining about the CGI here, I really don't. Like what the **** did you expect

"REEE, LUCAS SHOULD HAVE ASSEMBLED A REAL DROID ARMY AND PROVIDED THE ACTORS WITH REAL LIGHTSABERS REEEEEEEEEEE"
User avatar #17 - thekieran ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
The prequels were **** . Lucas shouldn't have ever been allowed to direct any star wars films.
User avatar #20 to #17 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
I disagree. I for one like the prequels and would love if George came back to do another movie.
-16
#38 - chayio Comment deleted by opu [-]
#90 to #38 - Glitched (12/21/2015) [-]
No such thing as spoilers.
everyone had the same access as anyone else.
If they want to cry. Remind them to unplug until they see it.

Gave you a thumb
#57 to #38 - anon (12/21/2015) [-]
Hows that micropenis working out for you?
User avatar #61 to #38 - thedutchs (12/21/2015) [-]
What drives someone towards being an ass like you?
User avatar #72 - iamrexraptor (12/21/2015) [-]
WHAT IF "STAR WARS: EPISODE I" WAS GOOD? (Belated Media) This is what i watch whenever I start feeling down, it gives me a little hope, that maybe one day they'll remake 1,2,3 and make it what it shouldve been.
User avatar #85 to #72 - severepwner (12/21/2015) [-]
He had good ideas, but it's clear that episode 2 and 3 shouldn't have been left to JUST him either. Most of his ideas really like build up and climax, and make for really unexciting movies.

I didn't really have any problems with his episode 1 video though.
User avatar #16 - trisketthebiskit (12/21/2015) [-]
George Lucas created star wars then ruined it with ****** CG ******** that mucked up the OT and finding the actual un edited OT is ******* impossible. also the prequels were just bad. i remembered them fondly but after re watching them they were just bad movies. then JJ Abrams fixed it
#19 to #16 - cisdroidcommander (12/21/2015) [-]
JJ abrams fixed it by remaking ANH? Didnt know that was fixing it
#59 to #19 - anon (12/21/2015) [-]
it wasn't a scene for scene remake but you could tell they were trying hard to remind people of the good Star Wars films as much as possible as if to tell the audience "Don't worry this won't be anything like the prequels!". As long as they make the rest their own films it should be okay but after what Abrams did with Star Trek Into Darkness maybe i'm not so sure
#87 - xxTheJesterxx (12/21/2015) [-]
This movie is already trash enough, think of it without L Jackson and Ewan McGregor
User avatar #86 - asthmetheus (12/21/2015) [-]
I think I can see Ewan Mcgregor doing the whole "Pew pew, vwoom" noises.
User avatar #37 - kameken (12/21/2015) [-]
Luke Skywalker's dad dies
 Friends (0)