Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
57 comments displayed.
#60
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
On completely unrelated not, why do lightsaber users keep using their swords in both hands when lightsabers weight practically nothing? As someone who have practiced swordsmanship, I can honestly say that a weapon that is too light is downright uncomfortable to use in two hands.
Also, why is it actually called lightsaber when it is not curved at all?
Also, why is it actually called lightsaber when it is not curved at all?
The saber (the energy) weight nothing......the hilt is heavy as **** .
starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Lightsaber
Read thru that if you want, I'm too lazy to look it up, but I know I read it somewhere.
Read thru that if you want, I'm too lazy to look it up, but I know I read it somewhere.
#117 to #114
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
There is not a single reference to the weight of the weapon in that article really.
See #112, I know sorry, but I would bet my left nut that it is, just trust me, Im a star wars geek to the extreme (well I wont dress like Chewbacca any time soon....but trust me)
Sorry I read (quickly) thru that and no mention of the weight....but I know I read it somewhere, Its heavy trust me (actually the quote was, when someone picked it up, he mentioned that its far heavier then he imagined)
#122 to #115
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
Yeah, but far heavier means nothing in terms of weight. I cant really imagine a hollow stick filled with electronics weighting more than a full steel telescopic baton, and that weapon is actually chore to use in both hands, due to the balance. I have one of these so I am certain on that front.
Well an medieval sword might weight up to 10Kg, and it is quite balanced, (if its made by a proffesional) now imagine if you had a "sword" that had all its weight (lets say 10Kg) in the hilt alone, it would be unbalanced as **** , but if you trained with it, it would be the most dangeours weapon, would that not be worth the time to train with it?
#133 to #124
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
10Kg??? Sorry but no, even your heaviest two handed swords didn't weight more than 4 kilograms.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zweih%C3%A4nder
This is pretty much one of the heaviest widspread swords fielded on battlefields known to man, still usable as sword, but used as short spear most of the time. I don't really know how did people came to believe medieval european swords were as heavy as 10kg, but please believe me, this not a case realistically.
Also, medieval swords went as far as to weight several kilograms, because of the weight of the blade, which is pretty much not the case with lighsaber, as the ''blade'' is simply a beam of weightless light.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zweih%C3%A4nder
This is pretty much one of the heaviest widspread swords fielded on battlefields known to man, still usable as sword, but used as short spear most of the time. I don't really know how did people came to believe medieval european swords were as heavy as 10kg, but please believe me, this not a case realistically.
Also, medieval swords went as far as to weight several kilograms, because of the weight of the blade, which is pretty much not the case with lighsaber, as the ''blade'' is simply a beam of weightless light.
Well damn, I lift 15Kg with one hand when i workout, I would have expected a twohander to be a lot heavier than that.
I didn't read anywhere that they are 10Kg that was just my guess, so don't say that people believe that, that was just me
Here I found a quote for you:
"Eh, In one of the documentarys in the OT boxset, Mark hamill says George Lucas said they were about 50-60 lbs. Like really heavy. "
By my calculations that is 22-27Kg now thats ******* heavy, if I may say so.
I looked some more and yeah, they are 50-60lbs. I know Jedis augment their strength with the force, but still the ******* are tough! I mean by those calculations even the kiddie saber Yoda uses gotta be like 10-15Kg!
I guess thats just another reason why the normies in Star Wars don't play with those things..........now think for a second how heavy the staff Maul used had to be......it was like 4 sabers put together.....Maul just got a LOT more scarier......
I didn't read anywhere that they are 10Kg that was just my guess, so don't say that people believe that, that was just me
Here I found a quote for you:
"Eh, In one of the documentarys in the OT boxset, Mark hamill says George Lucas said they were about 50-60 lbs. Like really heavy. "
By my calculations that is 22-27Kg now thats ******* heavy, if I may say so.
I looked some more and yeah, they are 50-60lbs. I know Jedis augment their strength with the force, but still the ******* are tough! I mean by those calculations even the kiddie saber Yoda uses gotta be like 10-15Kg!
I guess thats just another reason why the normies in Star Wars don't play with those things..........now think for a second how heavy the staff Maul used had to be......it was like 4 sabers put together.....Maul just got a LOT more scarier......
#135 to #134
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Well, the thing is that while being in combat, you move your whole body, and you strike as fast as you can, as opposed to simply trying to raise what you hold in certain manner repeatedly. It is much more tiring than it looks, especially if you wear something like suit of metalarmor.
Also, the thing about the weight, I cannot fanthom what possible material would a hollow rod with some electronics and a small crystal have to be to weight over 5 kg, let alone five times as much, while still being able to be destroyed by something like factory press, as shown in episode 2.
Hell even a claymore made out of depleted uranium wouldn't weight even half of that, let alone a small metal rod, made out of mandalorian iron/durasteel, which are supposed to be pretty similar to real life steel in characteristics and density.
Also, the thing about the weight, I cannot fanthom what possible material would a hollow rod with some electronics and a small crystal have to be to weight over 5 kg, let alone five times as much, while still being able to be destroyed by something like factory press, as shown in episode 2.
Hell even a claymore made out of depleted uranium wouldn't weight even half of that, let alone a small metal rod, made out of mandalorian iron/durasteel, which are supposed to be pretty similar to real life steel in characteristics and density.
Hmmmmm I don't know that much about metals, so.......would (could) a sword made of (depleted) uranium be better than one made of modern steel? Uranium sword sounds ******* awesome
#140 to #137
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
It makes for really good disposable vehicle armor, as it is dense and soft (think lead but with higher density), but well, imagine lead sword... that would suck pretty hard
I used that comparison because depleted uranium is one of materials with highest density available to humanity, if not THE material with highest density, so anything out of it is going to be real heavy.
I used that comparison because depleted uranium is one of materials with highest density available to humanity, if not THE material with highest density, so anything out of it is going to be real heavy.
Well **** swords then, uranium warhammer sounds fun too till the handle bends
Well the handle can be wood/steel......I can has uranium warhammer?
#145 to #143
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Hahaha that would be funny. But yeah, you wouldn't have to make the head as big because it would be as heavy as a steel head twice of its size. Now that I think about it, if combined with some other material, you could make a war-hammer with incredibly concentrated field of impact, while having it retain the weight of your garden-variety steel war-hammer.
But then again, even though it is called depleted uranium, it still actually emits radiation.
But then again, even though it is called depleted uranium, it still actually emits radiation.
I got a ******* nice idea, uranium (not depleted) arrow heads
I'm no expert but I think if a piece of "pure" uranium got into your bloodstream you're kinda ******
Yeah I know the radiation sucks, but hey no victory without sacrifice
I was thinking if an ancient civilisation finded uranium, if they could forge it......but they would probably regard any uranium lode as haunted by evil spirits as soon as the first people would start dropping to the ground.
I was thinking if an ancient civilisation finded uranium, if they could forge it......but they would probably regard any uranium lode as haunted by evil spirits as soon as the first people would start dropping to the ground.
#150 to #149
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
You are right about that. Science was not exactly advanced back then.
#146 to #142
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Jesus Christ only seeing that picture makes muscles on my arms hurt
I have a one handed sword at home (a cheap one I'll admit, but it's still steel)
I know the basics, correct stance and guard, edge alignment, conservation of momentum blablabla.
Anyway since I started weightlifting my sence of weight is all over the place, I though even the one hander (arming sword) I have had to be like 3Kg at least, I guess not
And take the lightsaber weight with a grain of salt, like most things George Lucas did, he probably pulled it strait outa his ass, he told it to the actor(s) so they would hold it with two hands and act like its really heavy, (and not wave it around like it's a cardboard tube) and so Vader (who mostly used it one handed) would look that much more intimidating (also check it, Luke uses it in one hand more and more, as he grows more powerfull and skilled)
I remember something similar, when filming the prequels the animators asked George what color is Yoda's blood, and he just stood there stunned.......and after a long while he said "green.....I guess". That tells you all you need about George thinking ahead and about details.......
I know the basics, correct stance and guard, edge alignment, conservation of momentum blablabla.
Anyway since I started weightlifting my sence of weight is all over the place, I though even the one hander (arming sword) I have had to be like 3Kg at least, I guess not
And take the lightsaber weight with a grain of salt, like most things George Lucas did, he probably pulled it strait outa his ass, he told it to the actor(s) so they would hold it with two hands and act like its really heavy, (and not wave it around like it's a cardboard tube) and so Vader (who mostly used it one handed) would look that much more intimidating (also check it, Luke uses it in one hand more and more, as he grows more powerfull and skilled)
I remember something similar, when filming the prequels the animators asked George what color is Yoda's blood, and he just stood there stunned.......and after a long while he said "green.....I guess". That tells you all you need about George thinking ahead and about details.......
#144 to #136
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
No shame about that, passion for the trade is important, not what gear you use.
Also, yeah, I think you are pretty much right on the account of Lucas pulling the stuff out of his bottocks. I mean, it would be understandable if they used something like katanas, but with edge being etched out and replaced with some kind of laser emmiter and receiver like in the picture, to be usable with kendo techniques.
Also, yeah, I think you are pretty much right on the account of Lucas pulling the stuff out of his bottocks. I mean, it would be understandable if they used something like katanas, but with edge being etched out and replaced with some kind of laser emmiter and receiver like in the picture, to be usable with kendo techniques.
This is my dream sword.........but the price........one day......
albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-kriegsmesser-knecht.htm
albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-kriegsmesser-knecht.htm
Is that picture a one off, or is it from something? It reminds of the swords from the Metal Gear Revengeance, but I know thats not it. Anyway looks cool.
#123 to #122
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
*far heavier than I imagined*
My bad, messed up the phrasing.
My bad, messed up the phrasing.
Yeah no idea why its called a saber, always makes me happy when someone (in the EU) calls it a laser SWORD.
I love putting railroad spikes into meter long PVC pipes so that the 'blades' feel almost weightless, and goddamn is it fun to swing them around. And while lightsabers are weightless they originally were used with fighting styles within kendo, in which case its less a matter of strength and cunning in a fight and more of speed and routine memorization, and in both instances having both hands on your weapon helps, both in how fast you can swing and how much control of your blade you have something i would imagine is very important when using a lightsaber when fighting single longsword against any other melee weapon you are going to be fighting that person's strength every time you parry and/or block, and weapon weight is something you get used to. i like tip-heavy arming swords because i like wrapping and stabbing and its easier to build momentum and feel the blade when its like that, so now standard balanced swords feel slightly foreign to me.
TLR; if Jackie Chan can kick ass with a ladder you can kick ass with a sword that has no mass, regardless of feel and hand position.
TLR; if Jackie Chan can kick ass with a ladder you can kick ass with a sword that has no mass, regardless of feel and hand position.
It's that two handed strikes have more power behind them. The blade may weigh nothing, but they still teach that two-handed strikes give more power and balance with less speed, one-handed gives more precision and speed with less power and dual handed gives more attack openings and a flurry of blows with less power. Also take into account that some lightsaber users put the force into their swings to augment the power. I assume it's this way for normal swords, so they would have just based it off that without having the need for all the different types of blade that would make those styles work.
#88 to #80
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
That is not how it works. Any weapon has a certain limit on how hard can it hit, based either from its sharpness, or weight. At certain weight threshold, you will be unable to make your swings any more hard hitting even if you switch from using one hand, to using both. This is why you dont for example use both hands when handling light one handed swords. It simply offers no benefit whatsoever.
This is especially the case for lightsabers as they are incredibly light and sharp (sharpness is a figure of speech here, they dont have any cutting edge but the point still stands).
In my opinion, count Dooku is one of the few in SW universe, who uses the light saber in a proper manner, as using using both of your hands is simply completely redundant with a weapon like this.
This is especially the case for lightsabers as they are incredibly light and sharp (sharpness is a figure of speech here, they dont have any cutting edge but the point still stands).
In my opinion, count Dooku is one of the few in SW universe, who uses the light saber in a proper manner, as using using both of your hands is simply completely redundant with a weapon like this.
Well after some research, it seems that two handed styles provide more control, not so much power. Others have asked this question before and there was a discussion about it on reddit: www.reddit.com/r/AskScienceFiction/comments/2kx82h/star_wars_why_are_lightsaber_bouts_generally/
The first response seems to be a good answer to your question with information like: "...lightsabers also have a gyroscopic effect that creates an unusual amount of inertia and resistance when you start moving the blade around", but you may still have questions that the rest of the thread may address. Take a look, it may give you the answers that I cannot.
The first response seems to be a good answer to your question with information like: "...lightsabers also have a gyroscopic effect that creates an unusual amount of inertia and resistance when you start moving the blade around", but you may still have questions that the rest of the thread may address. Take a look, it may give you the answers that I cannot.
#97 to #94
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
Even with a certain amount of inertia, a lightsaber is going to be considerably easier to maneuver with one handed than a metal sword of half the lenght and blade width, which are already unwieldy when used two handed.
Those people do present some interesting arguments, however this does not co-relate with anything I have seen in the movies, where they show the swords as being flashlights with weightless beam of light sticking out of them.
Those people do present some interesting arguments, however this does not co-relate with anything I have seen in the movies, where they show the swords as being flashlights with weightless beam of light sticking out of them.
Personally, I don't think the movies are the best portrayal of the all the Star Wars universe is, especially when it comes to the sheer amount of power that Force wielders can have, so I wouldn't be surprised if something like accurately portraying things like that would fall short in the movies. The EU is (or WAS, ******* Disney...) the best source of what the universe is actually capable of, like the amazing feats the Force can do when you are particularly strong in it such as pulling an entire spaceship from orbit.
A simple chop with a single hand versus two hands is not only harder to do from a defencive position, but is less efficient. Also; watching through Dooku's fights he uses his saber in both hands 70% of the time, and with most of his shots for the reasons i've stated.
#95 to #92
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
Depends on what weapon you use. Something tip heavy like an axe or a mace? Yeah. But a flashlight with weightless beam sticking out of it? Hell no. Balance of a weapon is important thing to consider when using it, and if lighsabers actually existed, those using them as rapier would have incredible advantage over those who use them like two handed swords, simply because rapier style is focused on speed and precision, fields where lighsabers absolutely squander any opposition.
Strength becomes completely irrelevant with a weapon that can effortlessly cut plates of steel like paper.
I mean, I understand it looks cool from cinematic point of view to swing them like baseball bats, but those weapons are completely unfit for two handed usage.
Strength becomes completely irrelevant with a weapon that can effortlessly cut plates of steel like paper.
I mean, I understand it looks cool from cinematic point of view to swing them like baseball bats, but those weapons are completely unfit for two handed usage.
The problem is we really dont know how lightsabers react when crossed, they could require extreme strength to slide them against one another, thus us only seeing it happen once with a powerful sith.
It seems pretty specific that Kylo Ren's 'crossguard' is really just some exhaust ports after some of the fan base got all hyped for confirmed sliding lightsabers.
My best friend if one of the best fencers i know and i have grown up around them since i was seven, when we fight with shinai i can push into his defence with very non-textbook maneuvers for fencing Not just windshield wiping that would work even better without weightless blades. I feel like we are both correct and wrong inb4 middleground fallacy, i rebuke it with the fallacy fallacy while a fencing esque fighting style would be effective, so do the myriads of other fighting styles, each with their strengths and weaknesses.
Also; fencing is all about stabbing the **** out of your opponent as fast as possible, something only a sith would do.
Also; strength isnt useless because you are still fighting sword on sword on someone with weightless levers. And blade pinning can still happen in an actual fight when fencing. I feel that arming sword duels would be a far better equivalent to lightsaber duels, and like i said, certain things can be performed two handed that just cant be or very poorly with one hand. There isnt a perfect martial art for a weightless blade, i'll just learn how to counter fencing.
Regardless, since you are going to be fighting japanese esque styles you're going to be blocking in wide motions and will be fighting in a saber like fashion anyway.
It seems pretty specific that Kylo Ren's 'crossguard' is really just some exhaust ports after some of the fan base got all hyped for confirmed sliding lightsabers.
My best friend if one of the best fencers i know and i have grown up around them since i was seven, when we fight with shinai i can push into his defence with very non-textbook maneuvers for fencing Not just windshield wiping that would work even better without weightless blades. I feel like we are both correct and wrong inb4 middleground fallacy, i rebuke it with the fallacy fallacy while a fencing esque fighting style would be effective, so do the myriads of other fighting styles, each with their strengths and weaknesses.
Also; fencing is all about stabbing the **** out of your opponent as fast as possible, something only a sith would do.
Also; strength isnt useless because you are still fighting sword on sword on someone with weightless levers. And blade pinning can still happen in an actual fight when fencing. I feel that arming sword duels would be a far better equivalent to lightsaber duels, and like i said, certain things can be performed two handed that just cant be or very poorly with one hand. There isnt a perfect martial art for a weightless blade, i'll just learn how to counter fencing.
Regardless, since you are going to be fighting japanese esque styles you're going to be blocking in wide motions and will be fighting in a saber like fashion anyway.
#129 to #128
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Arming swords do have weight to them though, considerably more than lighsaber handle can ever have. The thing is, one handed usage allows of much greater deal of mobility and freedom of movement, since you dont have to switch stance sides to ensure your other hand will not end up limiting the range of your motion, which is my biggest irk when using two handed weapons.
I understand that there are certain reasons, but judging from how they moved while dueling in the movie, it seems extremely unreasonable to use kendo stance, techniques and moves, while using something as unbalanced and hilt centered like light saber. The weapon is practically begging to be used for quick repeated lunges and wrist focused light slashes, since there is practically zero weight behind the blade.
But well, rule of cool applies I suppose. I mean, movies like those, they aren't probably made with demography like us in mind.
I understand that there are certain reasons, but judging from how they moved while dueling in the movie, it seems extremely unreasonable to use kendo stance, techniques and moves, while using something as unbalanced and hilt centered like light saber. The weapon is practically begging to be used for quick repeated lunges and wrist focused light slashes, since there is practically zero weight behind the blade.
But well, rule of cool applies I suppose. I mean, movies like those, they aren't probably made with demography like us in mind.
All weapons aside from lightsabers have weight to them, the weightlessness would **** up any trained swordsman trying to use one.
Im not even discussing rule of cool, lightsaber fights wouldnt have to be choreographed at all, there are just inherent dynamics that cant be ignored both mechanically with the saber and ideologically with the sabers wielders that dont allow for fencing.
Who said your second hand was glued to the hilt either? swapping from grips would provide extreme versatility to your fighting style. also, in a lightsaber fight a tunnel visioned fighting style like fencing would be at a disadvantage against florentine sabers or a dual saber. And because of how heavily reliant it is on ranging and footwork any fencing jedi would be dead or about to be by the time of the empire because of Vaders adjustable lightsaber, eppe to shlager and back in a beat.
Im not defending the movies, but with the rules they have put forth for the hypothetical debate, fencing is not the end all fighting style, which one is is still up to debate however. I think it is an amalgamation of several styles so as to be versatile in any situation. The wonder of the longsword is its versatility, and that is just amplified with lightsabers as we know how many kinds there can be.
Fencing only is where it is today because royalty mad it the only way to legally stab the **** out of someone, not because it is the best, there is no best.
Im not even discussing rule of cool, lightsaber fights wouldnt have to be choreographed at all, there are just inherent dynamics that cant be ignored both mechanically with the saber and ideologically with the sabers wielders that dont allow for fencing.
Who said your second hand was glued to the hilt either? swapping from grips would provide extreme versatility to your fighting style. also, in a lightsaber fight a tunnel visioned fighting style like fencing would be at a disadvantage against florentine sabers or a dual saber. And because of how heavily reliant it is on ranging and footwork any fencing jedi would be dead or about to be by the time of the empire because of Vaders adjustable lightsaber, eppe to shlager and back in a beat.
Im not defending the movies, but with the rules they have put forth for the hypothetical debate, fencing is not the end all fighting style, which one is is still up to debate however. I think it is an amalgamation of several styles so as to be versatile in any situation. The wonder of the longsword is its versatility, and that is just amplified with lightsabers as we know how many kinds there can be.
Fencing only is where it is today because royalty mad it the only way to legally stab the **** out of someone, not because it is the best, there is no best.
#131 to #130
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Well, I will have to disagree with you there. Fencing has gotten prominent because it made plate armor effectively useless, while also allowing the fencer practically to dance around anyone encased in heavy armor, delivering quick and effective attacks while making it pretty much impossible for the opposition to do the same.
What you see nowadays is people using foils and toys like that, but the fact is that by the time fencing became widespread, weapons associated with that style were fairly light, rigid, and extremely pointy, sort of like lightsabers that are practically same, except they can also cut and can cut damn well.
The main appeal with longsword is that it allows for wide range of movements and techniques, while having enough weight and balance to be used both against fast, and heavy opponents. But When you have a melee weapon that weights practically nothing, while being able to cut practically through anything and everything, the only remaining desirable attributes are speed and mobility, pretty much two attributes where fencing style excels.
I agree fencing style is not the best of any style, because with every combat discipline, there is a weapon type best suited for it, but it is most certainly best style for usage with light-saber in my opinion, as it focuses on speed, mobility, and simple and fast movements.
Also, the argument that two handed grip is is more controllable is only true if the weapon is too heavy to be used one handed without any problems. If it is, then using both hands is downright uncomfortable, since it doesn't keep any residual energy from your attack to allow easier stance recovery, or continuation of attack, something I prefer to call flow, which is extremely important, as most weapons styles including kendo have great deal of focus on utilizing the weight and residual energy in their techniques.
I mean try to take a light knife with long handle and swing it a couple of times one handed, then try swinging it with both hands afterwards.
What you see nowadays is people using foils and toys like that, but the fact is that by the time fencing became widespread, weapons associated with that style were fairly light, rigid, and extremely pointy, sort of like lightsabers that are practically same, except they can also cut and can cut damn well.
The main appeal with longsword is that it allows for wide range of movements and techniques, while having enough weight and balance to be used both against fast, and heavy opponents. But When you have a melee weapon that weights practically nothing, while being able to cut practically through anything and everything, the only remaining desirable attributes are speed and mobility, pretty much two attributes where fencing style excels.
I agree fencing style is not the best of any style, because with every combat discipline, there is a weapon type best suited for it, but it is most certainly best style for usage with light-saber in my opinion, as it focuses on speed, mobility, and simple and fast movements.
Also, the argument that two handed grip is is more controllable is only true if the weapon is too heavy to be used one handed without any problems. If it is, then using both hands is downright uncomfortable, since it doesn't keep any residual energy from your attack to allow easier stance recovery, or continuation of attack, something I prefer to call flow, which is extremely important, as most weapons styles including kendo have great deal of focus on utilizing the weight and residual energy in their techniques.
I mean try to take a light knife with long handle and swing it a couple of times one handed, then try swinging it with both hands afterwards.
You still havent addressed the facts that it is exceedingly violent and not for jedi use whatsoever, you will have to adapt to fight all of the other people not fencing, thus changing many of the stances and maneuvers you would take.
I can pick up the hilt of a sword and feel the balance in both one and two hands and not think its uncomfortable. If you fight with foam swords you would know that regardless of fighting style the lightness of a weapon makes it easier and faster to feint, wrap, and swing meaning that if i hold up your saber enough so it takes half a second to re-center you would probably be dead and if not, then crippled. If people lose their hands like mad in star wars already fencing would make every fight end with someone losing a hand if not both consistently, not to mention doubles would be way more common since once you impale someone they could still react and with no strength behead you.
And no, if your two handed argument were valid the katana and longsword would only be used in one hand or both not swap from one to both, there are situations that benefit one or two handed styles, and restricting yourself to just one or the other gimps you in the situations where you need the other because you don't practice it.
Numerous styles focus on speed and precision, one of the most over hyped japanese styles is about killing your opponent with the drawing of your blade, something i think would be extremely effective with lightsabers, but yet again its far too violent to be adopted by the jedi.
The problem is that there has never been a weapon that has required 100% blade control, they all require you to feel where it's moving and how/where to move it next via balance, you cant do this with a lightsaber, all you can do is tell it where to how/where to move, such a large change from any weapon we have ever had it would have to have its own fighting style taking elements from all over the world to function the best.
And we are still pretty sure lightsabers cant slide still, completely ruining fencing altogether.
Swinging knives two handed with any european stance besides some german ones would feel like ass of course, but when you do it with most japanese ones its fine, because they are far more focused on blade control than letting the momentum carry the swing, they use the momentum, but it isnt their guide, so when you do it with practically anything it will be effective, thus Japan having a story of someone beating the **** out of a bunch of robbers with nothing but a boats oar, because rather than need a balanced blade with quillons of this length, a guard of this diameter and a pommel this heavy to be the most effective, you just need a thing you can hold the length of a sword. and no matter what the balance is your years of training will make you hold it a certain way so it sticks out in the proper direction so when you swing it, regardless of what physics make it want to do, your body makes it block/attack certain zones. The problem with fencing it that its techniques thrown out in response to attacks just made or engaging attacks. Japanese styles are like dance routines, and the person who dances best wins far more often than not, which i cant say for fencing, sure it happens more often than not, but not as much as with japanese styles. In japanese culture a double is a sign of extremely even matches, yet i see doubles happen between good fencers against bad fencers all the time.
I can pick up the hilt of a sword and feel the balance in both one and two hands and not think its uncomfortable. If you fight with foam swords you would know that regardless of fighting style the lightness of a weapon makes it easier and faster to feint, wrap, and swing meaning that if i hold up your saber enough so it takes half a second to re-center you would probably be dead and if not, then crippled. If people lose their hands like mad in star wars already fencing would make every fight end with someone losing a hand if not both consistently, not to mention doubles would be way more common since once you impale someone they could still react and with no strength behead you.
And no, if your two handed argument were valid the katana and longsword would only be used in one hand or both not swap from one to both, there are situations that benefit one or two handed styles, and restricting yourself to just one or the other gimps you in the situations where you need the other because you don't practice it.
Numerous styles focus on speed and precision, one of the most over hyped japanese styles is about killing your opponent with the drawing of your blade, something i think would be extremely effective with lightsabers, but yet again its far too violent to be adopted by the jedi.
The problem is that there has never been a weapon that has required 100% blade control, they all require you to feel where it's moving and how/where to move it next via balance, you cant do this with a lightsaber, all you can do is tell it where to how/where to move, such a large change from any weapon we have ever had it would have to have its own fighting style taking elements from all over the world to function the best.
And we are still pretty sure lightsabers cant slide still, completely ruining fencing altogether.
Swinging knives two handed with any european stance besides some german ones would feel like ass of course, but when you do it with most japanese ones its fine, because they are far more focused on blade control than letting the momentum carry the swing, they use the momentum, but it isnt their guide, so when you do it with practically anything it will be effective, thus Japan having a story of someone beating the **** out of a bunch of robbers with nothing but a boats oar, because rather than need a balanced blade with quillons of this length, a guard of this diameter and a pommel this heavy to be the most effective, you just need a thing you can hold the length of a sword. and no matter what the balance is your years of training will make you hold it a certain way so it sticks out in the proper direction so when you swing it, regardless of what physics make it want to do, your body makes it block/attack certain zones. The problem with fencing it that its techniques thrown out in response to attacks just made or engaging attacks. Japanese styles are like dance routines, and the person who dances best wins far more often than not, which i cant say for fencing, sure it happens more often than not, but not as much as with japanese styles. In japanese culture a double is a sign of extremely even matches, yet i see doubles happen between good fencers against bad fencers all the time.
#159 to #153
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Fencing is exceedingly violent? How is fencing any more violent compared to more archaic styles while using weapons like two handed swords?
Also, as I have said when a weapon is too light the weight will simply mess with your movements, making them too fast and unbalanced. At least that is the case for me as I use the weapon as counterweight for advanced maneuvers, momentum conservation, and stance recovery. It is a chore to use a weightless weapon two handed as it doesn't allow for any smooth transition between attacks.
Also, I will have to disagree with the notion that using fencing techniques would lead you to losing at arm. I mean yes Anakin did that to Dooku at the start of episode 3, but then again, Dooku did the same to Anakin episode earlier.
Any swordman worth their salt is going to learn how to parry in a manner as to keep their opponents from cutting off their arms and fingers, and In my opinion, fencing is actually much safer than using the weapon as longsword, because it revolves around staying behind your weapon at all times.
''And no, if your two handed argument were valid the katana and longsword would only be used in one hand or both not swap from one to both, there are situations that benefit one or two handed styles, and restricting yourself to just one or the other gimps you in the situations where you need the other because you don't practice it.''
Except that longsword is in a category of swords too heavy for comfortable one handed usage, unless the user is strong enough, and katana is a sword without pommel with blade heavy balance. Both of them are weapons not suited better for one handed usage than for two handed usage. Lightsaber on the other hand is a flashlight with a beam sticking out of it, weighting practically nothing, with pommel heavy balance.
''Numerous styles focus on speed and precision, one of the most over hyped japanese styles is about killing your opponent with the drawing of your blade, something i think would be extremely effective with lightsabers, but yet again its far too violent to be adopted by the jedi.''
Even If I were to ignore the fact the jedi would have to ambush their target at the lenght of their lightsabers to utilize something like that, what I have meant was continuous focus on speed and precision, not sudden attacks meant to quickly end the fight.
In fact, Iaijutsu is focused on element of surprise and quick elimination of your opponent, not switching between active defense and aggressive offense like fencing is. Besides I am not even sure if there would be any point in using Iaijutsu techniques without having any scabbard to speak of.
''Japanese styles are like dance routines, and the person who dances best wins far more often than not, which i cant say for fencing, sure it happens more often than not, but not as much as with japanese styles. In japanese culture a double is a sign of extremely even matches, yet i see doubles happen between good fencers against bad fencers all the time.''
The problem is that modern fencing is done with foil, a wobbly weapon too hard to follow properly and use properly, which is the reason for doubles to happen so often really. Give both fencers a backsword and you will see their control and reaction times will improve dramatically, if only because the blade is solid (allowing for better parrying and blocking), and more easily visible.
''Japan having a story of someone beating the **** out of a bunch of robbers with nothing but a boats oar, because rather than need a balanced blade with quillons of this length, a guard of this diameter and a pommel this heavy to be the most effective''
I am almost positive that person (If this is true at all, as Japan also has stories of people cutting solid rocks in half) used the oar as polearm, rather than sword. If you tried to use something as heavy and unbalanced as that as sword, I can guarantee it would end badly, especially if the person in question is outnumbered.
Also, as I have said when a weapon is too light the weight will simply mess with your movements, making them too fast and unbalanced. At least that is the case for me as I use the weapon as counterweight for advanced maneuvers, momentum conservation, and stance recovery. It is a chore to use a weightless weapon two handed as it doesn't allow for any smooth transition between attacks.
Also, I will have to disagree with the notion that using fencing techniques would lead you to losing at arm. I mean yes Anakin did that to Dooku at the start of episode 3, but then again, Dooku did the same to Anakin episode earlier.
Any swordman worth their salt is going to learn how to parry in a manner as to keep their opponents from cutting off their arms and fingers, and In my opinion, fencing is actually much safer than using the weapon as longsword, because it revolves around staying behind your weapon at all times.
''And no, if your two handed argument were valid the katana and longsword would only be used in one hand or both not swap from one to both, there are situations that benefit one or two handed styles, and restricting yourself to just one or the other gimps you in the situations where you need the other because you don't practice it.''
Except that longsword is in a category of swords too heavy for comfortable one handed usage, unless the user is strong enough, and katana is a sword without pommel with blade heavy balance. Both of them are weapons not suited better for one handed usage than for two handed usage. Lightsaber on the other hand is a flashlight with a beam sticking out of it, weighting practically nothing, with pommel heavy balance.
''Numerous styles focus on speed and precision, one of the most over hyped japanese styles is about killing your opponent with the drawing of your blade, something i think would be extremely effective with lightsabers, but yet again its far too violent to be adopted by the jedi.''
Even If I were to ignore the fact the jedi would have to ambush their target at the lenght of their lightsabers to utilize something like that, what I have meant was continuous focus on speed and precision, not sudden attacks meant to quickly end the fight.
In fact, Iaijutsu is focused on element of surprise and quick elimination of your opponent, not switching between active defense and aggressive offense like fencing is. Besides I am not even sure if there would be any point in using Iaijutsu techniques without having any scabbard to speak of.
''Japanese styles are like dance routines, and the person who dances best wins far more often than not, which i cant say for fencing, sure it happens more often than not, but not as much as with japanese styles. In japanese culture a double is a sign of extremely even matches, yet i see doubles happen between good fencers against bad fencers all the time.''
The problem is that modern fencing is done with foil, a wobbly weapon too hard to follow properly and use properly, which is the reason for doubles to happen so often really. Give both fencers a backsword and you will see their control and reaction times will improve dramatically, if only because the blade is solid (allowing for better parrying and blocking), and more easily visible.
''Japan having a story of someone beating the **** out of a bunch of robbers with nothing but a boats oar, because rather than need a balanced blade with quillons of this length, a guard of this diameter and a pommel this heavy to be the most effective''
I am almost positive that person (If this is true at all, as Japan also has stories of people cutting solid rocks in half) used the oar as polearm, rather than sword. If you tried to use something as heavy and unbalanced as that as sword, I can guarantee it would end badly, especially if the person in question is outnumbered.
All of my knowledge of fencing is in historic recreation, so i dont know anything about foils, only schlagers and mostly eppes and all of the things i have stated about fencing has been coloured in that spectrum.
Now in proper descending order; You are right in that regard, aggressive is a better word. I would see someone constantly pointing their lightsaber at their opponent, and stabbing at them when they do a lot of their blocks as a style not only designed by sith, but one that would tempt people to the dark side with how overtly threatening it seems, if not then just portray it.
The whole point of the routines in japanese styles is so that you dont have to focus on what you are doing as much, its what practice is for in general, but specifically with the dedication that was spent Not saying western fighters didnt spend time practicing, but they just didnt regard combat the same way they did in the east. as long as a samurai held something that was of proper length and durability they could zone perfectly. I work in a deli and my zoning was fine when swinging every knife we have with both hands, and when fighting i find that it helps me stay centered. Using one hand makes me overextend frequently. Nearly every hand lost besides when Luke cut off Vaders hand i think has happened during a from behind the blade guard or near it and then the hand remover pins the blade of the handless and then takes their hand in the midst of the pin.
While you are right about the longswords except when we replace them with lightsabers Musashi; probably the highest acclaimed samurai The guy who used the oar to beat the guys, which he broke in half, if you want to know more about the situation read the story. And it is assumed that the group of thieves gave him honorable combat. said that the katanas main purpose was to be used in the main hand, while the wakizashi is used in the off hand.
When i made my cosplay lightsaber i was able to balance it so that it was crossguard heavy, thus providing a semblance of balance. Anyway lightsabers are supposed to weigh like 1-3 pounds i thought, so its barely like your holding anything at all really.
Example aside, there are countless sword fighting styles. I downright refuse to accept that fencing is the only one that focuses on speed and precision, some of the simplest concepts in fighting overall.
He broke the oar in half.
Also by the definition of fencing you cant fence with a lightsaber since its not a sword. This is a joke
Now in proper descending order; You are right in that regard, aggressive is a better word. I would see someone constantly pointing their lightsaber at their opponent, and stabbing at them when they do a lot of their blocks as a style not only designed by sith, but one that would tempt people to the dark side with how overtly threatening it seems, if not then just portray it.
The whole point of the routines in japanese styles is so that you dont have to focus on what you are doing as much, its what practice is for in general, but specifically with the dedication that was spent Not saying western fighters didnt spend time practicing, but they just didnt regard combat the same way they did in the east. as long as a samurai held something that was of proper length and durability they could zone perfectly. I work in a deli and my zoning was fine when swinging every knife we have with both hands, and when fighting i find that it helps me stay centered. Using one hand makes me overextend frequently. Nearly every hand lost besides when Luke cut off Vaders hand i think has happened during a from behind the blade guard or near it and then the hand remover pins the blade of the handless and then takes their hand in the midst of the pin.
While you are right about the longswords except when we replace them with lightsabers Musashi; probably the highest acclaimed samurai The guy who used the oar to beat the guys, which he broke in half, if you want to know more about the situation read the story. And it is assumed that the group of thieves gave him honorable combat. said that the katanas main purpose was to be used in the main hand, while the wakizashi is used in the off hand.
When i made my cosplay lightsaber i was able to balance it so that it was crossguard heavy, thus providing a semblance of balance. Anyway lightsabers are supposed to weigh like 1-3 pounds i thought, so its barely like your holding anything at all really.
Example aside, there are countless sword fighting styles. I downright refuse to accept that fencing is the only one that focuses on speed and precision, some of the simplest concepts in fighting overall.
He broke the oar in half.
Also by the definition of fencing you cant fence with a lightsaber since its not a sword. This is a joke
#132 to #131
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
*If it isn't, then using both hands is downright uncomfortable*
It's all dependent on their style. Most people who use a saber with tw hands use Shii-Cho or Makashi.
the blade looks straight, but is actually in an upsidedown U shape. (otherwise the beam wouldn't end)
#67 to #65
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
*A sword with s single edged curved blade.* Sorry for the grammar, not exactly feeling best today.
#66 to #65
-
nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
I see. But still, it doesn't have any focus on one side over another in any ways. A saber is categorically a sword with a cured blade, single edged blade.
I mean, the name does sound cool, but it does not make much sense terminologically.
I mean, the name does sound cool, but it does not make much sense terminologically.