GUN ARE LOGICAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. . If this is xia_ ll rifle and this is, an " assault" rifle and this is a Fire Nozzle By this logic then this is an assault" F Hoes Nozzle fire Guns this logic post Ace repost water assault Gunner
x
Click to expand

GUN ARE LOGICAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If this is xia_ ll rifle
and this is, an " assault" rifle
and this is
a Fire Nozzle
By this logic
then this is an
assault" Fire Nozzle
BTW the 2 above rifles are
the same firearm
...
  • Recommend tagsx
-6
Views: 494
Favorited: 1
Submitted: 01/31/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to acemcgunner Subscribe to sickkickers submit to reddit
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#17 - saddened (01/31/2014) [-]
It's not a different frame. It's a different stock. The action and the barrel are the same, meaning they are functionally identical. They are both practical for hunting, because that firearm is not designed for long-range shots, meaning the iron sights of the second one will work fine. The point of the post is to point out that the difference between a "regular" rifle and an "assault" rifle is a legal definition that only includes cosmetic features. The legal definition of an assault rifle has nothing to do with the actual function of the firearm.   
   
I am a U.S. Army vet (Small arms repairer if you must know) and I can say that there are important differences between the guns catching flack and the guns soldiers use.   
   
tl;dr: I took the time to write it, so go back and read it.
It's not a different frame. It's a different stock. The action and the barrel are the same, meaning they are functionally identical. They are both practical for hunting, because that firearm is not designed for long-range shots, meaning the iron sights of the second one will work fine. The point of the post is to point out that the difference between a "regular" rifle and an "assault" rifle is a legal definition that only includes cosmetic features. The legal definition of an assault rifle has nothing to do with the actual function of the firearm.

I am a U.S. Army vet (Small arms repairer if you must know) and I can say that there are important differences between the guns catching flack and the guns soldiers use.

tl;dr: I took the time to write it, so go back and read it.
User avatar #4 - flemsdfer ONLINE (01/31/2014) [+] (24 replies)
While I don't question the second rifle isn't an assault rifle, the two certainly aren't the same
+1
#1 - kinginyellow Comment deleted by acemcgunner [+] (14 replies)
 Friends (0)