Gun Control?. Gun are dangerous, they just leap up and shoot at people right?.. This proves they don't listen either. freedom
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (671)
[ 671 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
User avatar #21 - xdjerredlongxd
Reply +202 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
This proves they don't listen either.
User avatar #24 to #21 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply +238 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
proves guns are women:

* They dont listen
* They do harm when abused
* You have to do ********* to get one, and ********* to care for one
* The fun they offer lasts only as long as the person having fun with them wants it to
* If you abuse gun too long, the courts will take it away from you and cause you legal and financial punishments
#209 to #24 - mooghens
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
But you can silence a gun
User avatar #318 to #209 - nogphille
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
you can silence the second with the first..
User avatar #25 to #24 - shockstorm
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
my god... I finally understand...
#26 to #25 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
dont **** with female guns
#389 to #24 - anon id: 708e67ed
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
"********* to get one and take care of one"
False, It took me 30 minutes to go to a gun show and get my Remington 760 30-06, no background check, and all I have to do is clean out the barrel and oil it after use.
User avatar #659 to #389 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
okay so you took the prostitute way of guns
go to a special place, throw money at someone, poof, got what you want
#58 to #24 - anon id: 473c1c4a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
i wouldnt say ********* to get one im 18 in highscool and they sold me an ar 15 after signing a paper giving them money and waiting three days
#16 - iamtheblackgoat
Reply +89 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Technically, yes, guns do kill people

But someone has to be wielding that gun and make the choice to misuse that powerful tool in order for it to actually kill

I'm just waiting for the gun debate to flare up in the comments
User avatar #577 to #16 - ilikebuttsex
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
captain obvious... AWAAAAAAAAY
#31 to #16 - anon id: 7aaf1562
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Technically guns don't kill people the bullet kills people
if you want to get technical
User avatar #35 to #31 - ilovehitler
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
we can go further.
Blood loss kills people, not bullets.
User avatar #32 to #16 - asasqw
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Yes just like how forks make people fat.
User avatar #36 to #32 - bramdk
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
ok please just stick comparing tools to guns up your bum. I dont care about gun control one way or the other, but saying a hammer or a fork is simmilair to a gun is ********.
A hammer is used to hammer nails in, a fork is used to eat. Yes you can bash someones skull in with a hammer and YES you can ******* get fat from eating to much
a gun kills things and thats all it does
#57 to #16 - anon id: aa2694d5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
pools kill more people than guns everyday and they mostly kill children, does that mean we should ban pools?
i understand that guns were made to kill and that people want to feel safe, but one thing you have to understand is that the vast majority of gun owners have no intention and never will have any intention to use their gun(s) to bring harm to others. less than one percent do have those intentions and a large portion of them get their guns illegally so a ban wouldn't stop them.
and another thing to consider is that law enforcement can't be everywhere at once and in many cases they need to rely on civilians to defend themselves due to long travel distances or overwhelming opposition.

(just a general statement about my stance on gun control)
#138 to #16 - anon id: 73cb6f08
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
i guess almost everything in existence kills people

we should ban everything
User avatar #336 to #16 - anonymouzx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
Technically, they don't. Bullets kill people.

But someone has to load it into the gun and make the choice to misuse that powerful tool in order for it to actually kill.

lel.
User avatar #483 to #16 - oceanfrank
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
but do the objects themselves actually press the trigger on their own and kill the person?

Christians: 0
Atheists: 0
2nd Amendment: Still debated
User avatar #552 to #16 - missrainbowdash
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
consider the following, if these crazy people only had knives, people could just run away from them.
#613 to #16 - anon id: f999106b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
31 replies. Good job, Iamtheblackgoat
#82 to #16 - dirtyharold
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
then if it's the gun killing people we should put it in jail
#173 to #16 - xXScrappyJrXx
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
not actually joining in the conversation/debate just posting this as it's relevant to you're picture
don't hate me
#184 to #16 - notafunnyguy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
TECHNICALLY, blood loss or organ failure caused by the bullet shot by the gun that is wielded by the person, is the real killer
User avatar #561 to #16 - spysappinmysasha
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
Bears kill people. and Bears made that choice all on their own.


I think we all know the real issue here...
User avatar #17 to #16 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
well most objects when used by the wrong person can be a weapon used to harm or kill someone
User avatar #19 to #17 - iamtheblackgoat
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
I can kill multiple people from a removed distance in a short amount of time with a gun...a rock or a stick or even a chainsaw or a weedwhacker are all slow and have the possibility of close-up retaliation
#33 to #19 - winglit
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
I can rather easily improvise an explosive device with information found on the internet, and basic understanding of chemical reactions, a bomb can take out multiple people in a short time from a removed distance, do we ban all forms of combustive chemicals? do we ban radio transmitters or cell phones to prevent explosives from being improvised? if youre really that determined to kill someone you will find a way, its not a question of banning guns its a question of teaching people the proper use and care of weapons, and not making murderers out to be the anti hero, I know a dozen names of brutal murderers and villains, I know 1 actual hero by name and only because he was a sniper who killed hundreds for the good guys... no one remembers the good guys, so maybe instead of worrying about the tools they might use we can worry about our entire society glorifying school shooters and plastering their names over every ******* news channel? making them world famous?
User avatar #20 to #19 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
bows and crossbows can do ranged attacks too
pretty straightforward to build a bow too, you dont need a license to have one, can carry it in public, hell you can even add poisons onto the arrows easily enough

ban bows too?
User avatar #22 to #20 - iamtheblackgoat
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
You average handgun is small, easily concealable device that holds multiple rounds and is very easy to fire

A bow is a large piece of material that is not easy to hide, you can only fire one arrow at a time, and any idiot can bump you and ruin your shot, whereas a misfiring gun can cause a lot more injury...you'd have to be surrounded by some pretty dense ************* to not have them suspect you're up to no good if you're carrying a bow around

Honestly, I own a gun and I think that gun laws shouldn't go too far, but people who don't respect them and think that they should unregulated are too naive to own them
User avatar #23 to #22 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
well i do believe that guns do require laws to define standards to their use and care, and where needed, who should or should not own or have access to guns

also i think that society needs to educate people in the proper morals of guns, where to and not to carry or use, etc

respect is a major issue, for too long people have been getting progressively indifferent or ignorant about responsible gun ownership, taking them for granted and ignoring safety....thats one major step we need to fix
User avatar #542 to #22 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
I disagree completely. More people need to carry guns because it is the only deterrent to shooters (and quite effective). Few people, no matter how mental, are stupid enough to try to shoot up a room full of armed men. Mental illness is being diagnosed to an insane number of people. It's possible their understanding of mental illness is still premature. After all, what we call crazy is often quite subjective, and used to qualify anyone who thinks different than we do. Restricting rights based on that could potentially even be used to cut out sectors of society.
#18 to #17 - iamtheblackgoat
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#28 to #17 - mattseven
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Of course, but a fork wasn't created to kill, even though it could, if stuck in one's throat. Guns were made to kill people, and this is why I'm against weapons.
If your argument is that your hobby is to go at a shooting range, maybe you need a new hobby, or just some paintball or airsoft equipment....
Just think about it, why would you want to wield something made to end one's life?
Call me butthurt, throw me the red thumbs, but I don't care.
It isn't about the thumbs, it's about sending a message.
User avatar #39 to #28 - blackcomet
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Guns were used to hunt for food. A bow can only shoot an arrow so far, but guns have a greater reach. Like all things humanity bastardized it and we kill each other with the tools we have.
Take away the invention of guns and everything used to kill, and I promise you we will find new ways.
User avatar #45 to #28 - sheepysquirrel
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
So forks were created to eat, that means forks make people fat by your logic.
User avatar #64 to #45 - mattseven
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Of course, but responsible use of a fork leads to healthy eating.
Normal use of a gun includes killing my default.
User avatar #75 to #64 - smithforprez
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
people are the problem, no people, no problem.
User avatar #78 to #75 - mattseven
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
People are generally problematic.
User avatar #660 to #28 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
i agree, people dont need to go to ranges just to randomly shoot ****.....and people dont need to shoot random animals for the sadistic sport of putting their heads on a wall, hunting should only be for food or animal population control,

people should only need a few guns for home defence, because god knows theres tons of ******* assholes out there, and people have the right to use force to protect their families from intruders
a lioness will rip the head off anithing treatening her cubs, so whats wrong with a human putting a bullet in someones leg to disable them till police arrive

yes guns were originally made for attacking people, but smart people learned how to use them defensively, we need to spread that message
User avatar #662 to #660 - mattseven
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
My point is that if nobody had guns, there would be less home intrusions (as anything else that can be used as a weapon is way less effective than a gun). And if by lack of luck, anyone breaks into your house at night, there are other ways to defend yourself than guns. I think this is why pepper spray was invented.
I'm just saying that there are better ways of doing all these things, without a gun that it. I live in a country with good gun control, and there are so many less murders than in America.
User avatar #663 to #662 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
not really, not every intruder carries a gun, and people can protect themselves from pepper spray
if pepper spray became the mainstream defence, then intruders would just wear goggles

what country do you live in?
User avatar #665 to #663 - mattseven
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
I live in Canada
I agree with your point, but I still think guns shouldn't be sold to the public anymore.
User avatar #715 to #665 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
Canada
where the most violence comes from people arguing who's the most sorry
User avatar #717 to #715 - mattseven
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
"**** you! I was sorry before you were!"
#44 to #28 - almightysausage
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
"but a fork wasn't created to kill"
#283 to #44 - winglit
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
Yeaaaaah Ima need to see your registration for that Assault Fork...
#587 to #28 - anon id: 96b16ac9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
You have a point about guns being intended for killing, I'll give you that much. You said you're against weapons which I would assume encompasses anything that could be lethal at a range, like guns and bows. Have you ever considered what would happen to wildlife populations if we couldn't hunt? When wildlife populations get too large they have a tendency to run over into human populations causing problems. Deer/moose/caribou/elk can cause potentially lethal car wrecks, wild boar will attack with little to no provocation, and other predatory species may leave their over populated habitats in search of food in human populations including pets,livestock,and even some people.

That's just part of the issue, I'm sure if we took guns away from law abiding citizens that wouldn't deter criminals from obtaining them through illegal means. It may keep some like those who would rob gas stations from getting guns, which could decrease violent crime, but it wouldn't stop it.
User avatar #661 to #587 - mattseven
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
Sorry for not being clear about that, but I actually am against personal property of a gun. People shouldn't have guns home, that's it. However, there could be people whose jobs are to hunt animals where the population is getting excessive, and take the gun back to the "office" or something like that.
#27 - petjon
Reply +61 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
#48 - jedisquirrel
Reply +53 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Do you really want to take their jobs away?
Do you really want to take their jobs away?
User avatar #97 to #48 - icecreamonnips
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
DEY TERK OUR JERBS?
#100 to #48 - emosadpanda
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
"gets paid more"
#34 - serhiy
Reply +46 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
This image has expired
guns don't kill people
'uh' 'uh'
I kill people
'CHICK' 'CHICK'
with guns
User avatar #193 to #34 - laspussy
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
vagina vagina

i wanna have sex with your vagina
User avatar #47 to #34 - zorororonoa
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
pow
#60 - Dairycow
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
**Dairycow rolled a random image posted in comment #2137072 at Friendly ** what actually kills people
#240 to #60 - anon id: 94d8f8d7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
Flawless roll
User avatar #546 to #60 - cabbagemayhem
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
That kills me.
#62 to #60 - ehzio
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Well no ****, Yuno kills everyone
#302 - Exar
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
I know this might seem like overkill...but I like to take this opportunity to enlighten anyone who wishes to read this. I wrote a research paper for a college english class on gun control and learned a lot.

It's come to my attention that the media commonly labels guns as the root of all evil, especially those categorized as "assault rifles". They claim that rifles are used in connection with heinous crimes and should be banned.

"There are lies, damned lies, and statistics" - Mark Twain.

Statistics don't lie people. Here are the FBI's the murder by weapons statistics for 2011:
Total: 12,664
Handgun: 6220
Rifles: 323
Shotguns: 356
Other guns: 97
Firearms not stated: 1587
Knives, fire, drowning, hands, etc: 4081

Of all the murders committed in the United States, only 323 (that's less than 3%) of the total homicides used the very weapon that the media thinks we should ban: a rifle.

That 3% statistic holds up for the 1990's and 2000's as well.

Banning rifles won't solve a damn thing.
User avatar #315 to #302 - wium
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
since you are talking about statistics, lots of other countries ban guns are have low death rates caused by guns.
#326 to #315 - Exar
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
Yes they do. However, those countries like Sweden and Britain have a higher violent crime rate than the U.S.
User avatar #371 to #302 - mookiez
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
I did research for a speech class in college last semester. Saying that we need guns and banning them will only make things worse. I had to give it to 30+ people. I had good statistics and events where people had guns and didn't have guns in an event of a crime. I got a a for that speech, everyone loved it.
User avatar #6 - alexdevlin
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
As I remember from that episode;
"Guns don't kill people, people kill people. Guns protect people from people with bigger guns"
#37 to #6 - fireyvoidence
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Don't mean to pick bones with you or anything, but he actually says people with SMALLER guns.
#7 to #6 - konradkurze [OP]
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
User avatar #65 to #6 - theexplodingcheez
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
... by killing them."
#88 - iworshipsanta
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
**iworshipsanta rolled a random image posted in comment #160 at What Pythons look like ** what really kills people
#630 to #88 - kingrui
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
sauce? its a nostalgic feeling
User avatar #644 to #630 - inspectah
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
I think its Codename kids next door or grim adventures of billy and mandy. Either those or some show with a similar art style.
User avatar #646 to #644 - kingrui
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/20/2013) [-]
probably Billy and Mandy, never watched the other show

Thanks anyway
#61 - felixjarl
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
User avatar #70 to #61 - smithforprez
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
is that fiberglass?
#72 to #70 - felixjarl
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
I have reached a new lvl of butthurt so big that i can take it.
User avatar #73 to #72 - smithforprez
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
lol, fiberglASS


oh **** the sky is turning yellow, the ********* is REAL