Makes sense.. no it doesn't.. Drop the gun, or I'll shoot
x
Click to expand

Comments(306):

[ 306 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#12 - shadowrated ONLINE (01/26/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Drop the gun, or I'll shoot
#118 to #12 - sammyjankiis (01/27/2013) [-]
Great movie. I highly recommend it!
User avatar #21 to #12 - Tsuna (01/26/2013) [-]
Only In Bruges.
#29 - semisane (01/26/2013) [-]
You're really going to convince people to change their opinions on gun control by posting this on funnyjunk.
#186 - keasbyknight (01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #223 to #186 - samxdaxman (01/27/2013) [-]
that is Saints Row 3 in a nutshell...... except in SR shed be naked and beating the **** out of them.
User avatar #271 to #186 - Nihatclodra (01/27/2013) [-]
Dildo Lance... I want it for science.
#106 - ichbinlegion **User deleted account** (01/26/2013) [-]
mfw the comments...
mfw the comments...
+37
#14 - ninjalazor **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #17 - nass (01/26/2013) [-]
The thing is, all these guns are controlled by people who were trained using them properly.
User avatar #218 to #17 - dadukesta (01/27/2013) [-]
>Implying people who arn't trained to shoot properly shoot people to death.
#224 to #17 - notafunnyguy (01/27/2013) [-]
so why cant we train civilians to use guns properly
User avatar #308 to #224 - natedimes (01/27/2013) [-]
That type of service would have to be subsidized somehow. If by the Government, you'll likely say hello to higher taxes. If it's privatized, it'll probably be too expensive for most.

Also I'm not too fond of the idea of turning a nutjob who can't use a firearm properly, into a nutjob who can use one properly.
#109 - habasparkz (01/26/2013) [-]
>The comments
#28 - oosulley (01/26/2013) [-]
*********		 Inbound
********* Inbound
User avatar #24 - omarski (01/26/2013) [-]
in england no one has guns (apart from specialised armed units that only respond to gun related crimes which there are few) our normal police dont even have guns and 11,000 of us dont die every year from gun crime.

you can live with out guns the rest of us do.
User avatar #229 to #24 - revanthewin (01/27/2013) [-]
But see, if someone just walked down the street in England shooting people with an assault rifle he'd probably kill about twenty people, but in America he might kill five or six before someone in the crowd shoots back. So you really have to ask, is it really worth banning them? I mean, if people continued shooting places up at the same rate they are now we'd be even worse off.
#268 to #24 - dirtyharold (01/27/2013) [-]
its also completely  illegal to defend your home or yourself in England.    
   
EX: guys robbing your home.    
you: ello police some wanker is robbing me bloody flat   
police: right o mate we'll do our best to get there an chase em with our wakety wakety beating stickaroos. but for now all you may do is sit'n watch. the wanker and make sure he dont injure himself mate or else he can sue you
its also completely illegal to defend your home or yourself in England.

EX: guys robbing your home.
you: ello police some wanker is robbing me bloody flat
police: right o mate we'll do our best to get there an chase em with our wakety wakety beating stickaroos. but for now all you may do is sit'n watch. the wanker and make sure he dont injure himself mate or else he can sue you


#300 to #24 - theelderscrolls (01/27/2013) [-]
Well you see...this is The Unite States Of America. We left because we didn't want to live like you.
#66 to #24 - John Cena (01/26/2013) [-]
well if you don't have guns, of course you will have less gun crimes

however, that doesn't necessarily mean your crime rate is any better as a result. just a thought to think about
User avatar #91 to #24 - kirkbot (01/26/2013) [-]
Switzerland has more guns per person than America
do you ever hear about gun crimes in Switzerland in the international media?
yeah didn't think so
User avatar #97 to #91 - inflatablewalrus (01/26/2013) [-]
its because americans are stupid not because of the guns. you should have to pass an IQ test to get a gun license
#96 to #91 - jinkazama (01/26/2013) [-]
Your argument is about as sound as "But bills mom lets him have TWO weiners."
#136 to #24 - chazzxz (01/27/2013) [-]
You don't have ridiculous amounts of illegal guns pouring over your border on a daily basis. America is in a situation where guns are present in criminals' hands regardless of any laws we make right now. The issue is whether taking licensed guns out of the hands of civilians will help anything (it probably won't).
User avatar #254 to #136 - fuckdisshit (01/27/2013) [-]
yeah but illegal guns get in so easily because the country allows guns. If there are no guns I doubt as many would get in because if you see someone with a gun you take it away instead having to check if its legal or not
#302 to #254 - chazzxz (01/27/2013) [-]
they get in because our southern border security is rubbish. If a border guard sees a gun he doesn't say "Hey that guy crossing the border has a gun, lets assume its registered and let him take it. Step one is border security, an issue nobody in our country is even talking about.
User avatar #41 to #24 - cactaur ONLINE (01/26/2013) [-]
wait wait wait, you're telling me that because you guys banned guns you have less gun related incidents? pfft, you probably will also say that if you banned cars you will have less car related incident and if you banned pools you will have less drowning.
User avatar #98 to #41 - omarski (01/26/2013) [-]
school children don't get shot in the face in England.
User avatar #198 to #98 - cactaur ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
that's what happens when you make places gun free zones.
#47 to #41 - leharpy (01/26/2013) [-]
Not exactly sure what you're getting at.

But anyway, whenever England and Australia banned guns violent crime shot up by astronomical levels, England is the most violent place in the EU I believe. For comparison, in the Czech Republic, you can buy new full autos and concealed carry and whatever you want. Less strict than the US once you get your basic license there. They're quite a peaceful and non-violent place.
#49 to #47 - mrbull (01/26/2013) [-]
Czech Republic and peaceful used in the same sentence. I didn't think I'd ever see the day. My uncle lives there, I've been there once and from that experience I'll never go there again. It is not peaceful and non-violent place.
#55 to #49 - leharpy (01/26/2013) [-]
www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/2012-GPI-Map-with-Rankings-and-Scores.pdf
www.visionofhumanity.org/globalpeaceindex/2012-gpi-findings/
The Czech Republic was 13th on the GPI this year, for comparison, the UK is 29th. There are tons more sources that show they're a peaceful country. The Roma account for 60% of the prison population and only a few percent of the actual population, so there's that. Also, the majority of crimes there are breaking into cars.

You clearly were in some Roma craphole neighborhood or you have no clue what you're talking about.
#58 to #55 - mrbull (01/26/2013) [-]
Have you ever been to the Czech Republic?
#65 to #58 - leharpy (01/26/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link
wiki.answers.com/Q/How_safe_is_it_to_travel_in_the_Czech_Republic_and_are_there_any_precautions_that_a_tourist_should_take
You need to login to view this link
I plan on going, and know several people from there. What gave you the impression it wasn't a safe place? Apparently they hate on gay people though, just learned that.
#195 to #65 - cactaur ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
the 			****		 you doing?!?! Don't the red thumbs mean anything to you? You do not know how to conduct an argument in FJ. First of all you do not post links to support your argument, that there is just plain silly. What you have to do it divert the question or argument to a more emotional stand point and you must have it look like that those opposing your want to club baby seals and use their blood to summon the great lord Cthulhu. And, this is the important  part, make a lot of name calling. The more the merrier i say. Finally you must end the argument as if you're opposition is beneath you and not worth arguing in the first place. Hope that helps you, you ignorant twat.
the **** you doing?!?! Don't the red thumbs mean anything to you? You do not know how to conduct an argument in FJ. First of all you do not post links to support your argument, that there is just plain silly. What you have to do it divert the question or argument to a more emotional stand point and you must have it look like that those opposing your want to club baby seals and use their blood to summon the great lord Cthulhu. And, this is the important part, make a lot of name calling. The more the merrier i say. Finally you must end the argument as if you're opposition is beneath you and not worth arguing in the first place. Hope that helps you, you ignorant twat.
#51 to #24 - IronWill (01/26/2013) [-]
Good luck on zombie apocalypse.
User avatar #207 to #51 - mrcowll (01/27/2013) [-]
Bitch I plan to get close and personal with these bastards. Not pussy out with a firearm.
User avatar #251 to #207 - alexkarino (01/27/2013) [-]
You'll probably die of infection within the first 72 hours of the outbreak than.
User avatar #162 to #24 - Faz (01/27/2013) [-]
Im from England and i would feel a lot safer in a country without guns than one with them but in America they cant just ban guns like we did here in the UK, the UK is small and very easy to monitor and we are an island, smuggling guns into the UK is an INCREDIBLY difficult feat but since America borders Mexico and that border is almost impossible to fully monitor guns would still find a way to the criminals in America.
User avatar #193 - jouten ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
More civilians die in Chicago through gunshots than in Afghanistan

User avatar #200 to #193 - generaljosh ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
There is no doubt in my mind that that is an actual fact
User avatar #201 to #200 - jouten ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #203 to #201 - generaljosh ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
See, that article is being deliberately misleading by comparing civilian shootings to combat shootings. The vast majority of troop casualties in Afghanistan result from IEDs, not from shootings.
User avatar #205 to #203 - jouten ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
Doesn't really make the situation better you know. This means that more people are shot in Chicago than soldiers who are killed by explosions in Afghanistan
User avatar #226 to #203 - goblingang (01/27/2013) [-]
It's the Daily Mail, don't pay attention to it...
User avatar #18 - azraelthemage (01/26/2013) [-]
When I was in High School, we had a cop on campus at all times in case of an emergency. We never had a single problem because of that. Why this isn't standard school policy all across the country is beyond me.
#25 to #18 - ruinmassacre (01/26/2013) [-]
same here. I actually thought it was the norm until SHES happened
#27 to #18 - hillko (01/26/2013) [-]
We have that, except he isn't allowed to carry weapons.
Which kinda defeats the purpose of him being there
User avatar #30 to #27 - nucularwar (01/26/2013) [-]
we had one but he had a tazer not a gun, which i guess works too
User avatar #38 to #30 - azraelthemage (01/26/2013) [-]
Ours carried both. He even used the tazer a few times.
User avatar #78 to #18 - crazyhindu (01/26/2013) [-]
mine does while its only like a 500 person school in like one of the safest towns in illinois where the crime rate is actually close to 0, the only bad thing would be the evergrowing use of heroin, while a neighboring school that is ******* huge probably thousands of kids has no police officer and has a really bad crime/gang rate
#75 to #18 - comradewinter (01/26/2013) [-]
How do you know it was because of that? School shootings don't happen that often, you know. Considering the amount of schools compared to the number of school shootings, you're more likely to be killed by tripping on wet surface.
User avatar #83 to #75 - azraelthemage (01/26/2013) [-]
Because there was this one time a kid assualted the principle (who was in a wheelchair with a broken leg at the time), and the cop tazed and arrested his ass. We didn't have any trouble like that for as long as I was there after that.
User avatar #284 - aerius (01/27/2013) [-]
when something goes wrong----------------------blame it on videogames
User avatar #187 - thedustlord (01/27/2013) [-]
I work at Pizza Hut. We were about to be robbed once, but the man came to a dead halt when he saw our "No weapons allowed" sign.

Just kidding.
User avatar #230 to #187 - twatmissile (01/27/2013) [-]
Just kidding as in the whole story is false? Or just kidding as in he didnt stop even after seeing the sign and ****** **** up anyway?
User avatar #304 to #230 - thedustlord (01/27/2013) [-]
The whole story is false. But we do actually have a sign like that, and it just seems stupid to me.
#249 to #187 - John Cena (01/27/2013) [-]
Guess he was trying to get some dough.
User avatar #40 - saintkarlos (01/26/2013) [-]
if you were to take away guns from the public and replace it with knives, do you think there would be the same number of robberies, murders and muggings a year?
User avatar #257 - DmOnZ (01/27/2013) [-]
Which is why I believe that schools should be protected by armed professionals with extensive back ground checks and firearms training, and do not believe in arming untrained, potentially dangerous civilians with PDW's.
#296 to #257 - John Cena (01/27/2013) [-]
The US sounds so ****** up! The media has a lot to do with people going on these killing rampages. It serves to inspire disturbed people into doing disturbing things when they see an example of how they can create an outlet for their craziness. Having guns easily accessible doesn`t help either. I feel a lot safer knowing my neighbors and I don`t carry firearms. The thing is too criminals don`t use weapons here all that often unless fighting over drugs and such with other criminals.
#3 - snowshark (01/26/2013) [-]
That's a pretty good point. Now, I could get into the debate nice and early by staring examples of countries that are far safer to live in that ban the ownership of guns outright or by bringing up the arguable notion that America is way too far gone with the gun-craze to ever be saved from the idiocy that particular brand of idiocy and that removing guns would make perfect sense if America wasn't so 			*******		 useless at educating it's population on why guns are a bad idea and even worse at taking account of their psychological needs so that they -don't'- go and shoot the 			****		 out of someone because they're too angsty for life...   
   
But at the end of the day, this is Funny Junk and I'm here to laugh. So here is a baby catching fire. Because it makes me laugh.
That's a pretty good point. Now, I could get into the debate nice and early by staring examples of countries that are far safer to live in that ban the ownership of guns outright or by bringing up the arguable notion that America is way too far gone with the gun-craze to ever be saved from the idiocy that particular brand of idiocy and that removing guns would make perfect sense if America wasn't so ******* useless at educating it's population on why guns are a bad idea and even worse at taking account of their psychological needs so that they -don't'- go and shoot the **** out of someone because they're too angsty for life...

But at the end of the day, this is Funny Junk and I'm here to laugh. So here is a baby catching fire. Because it makes me laugh.
#4 to #3 - wheresthefudge (01/26/2013) [-]
At first I was going to thumb you down because I completely disagree with pretty much everything you said.   
But then I realized.
At first I was going to thumb you down because I completely disagree with pretty much everything you said.
But then I realized.
User avatar #7 to #4 - snowshark (01/26/2013) [-]
Nice .gif by the way. There's not enough compliments on this site so, nice gif.
#6 to #4 - snowshark (01/26/2013) [-]
Basically. This is funny junk. A baby catching fire is funny. It pleases me in a slightly questionable but, though understandable manner.   
   
Arguments are a pointless waste of time which stop the comment section from being funny. Here is another gif. It is not in context but it always makes me laugh a little bit.
Basically. This is funny junk. A baby catching fire is funny. It pleases me in a slightly questionable but, though understandable manner.

Arguments are a pointless waste of time which stop the comment section from being funny. Here is another gif. It is not in context but it always makes me laugh a little bit.
#8 to #6 - wheresthefudge (01/26/2013) [-]
Fair enough. Let's see...   
Yes. This one makes me giggle upon occasion.
Fair enough. Let's see...
Yes. This one makes me giggle upon occasion.
#9 to #8 - snowshark (01/26/2013) [-]
He auditioned for the part of Harry Potter.   
   
Sucks to be him.   
   
Have a motivational penguin. It makes me smile.
He auditioned for the part of Harry Potter.

Sucks to be him.

Have a motivational penguin. It makes me smile.
#10 to #9 - wheresthefudge (01/26/2013) [-]
Man, you know what I just realized? The animal onto which Malfoy's head has been shopped is a rabbit. I always thought it was a hedgehog.
Man, you know what I just realized? The animal onto which Malfoy's head has been shopped is a rabbit. I always thought it was a hedgehog.
#11 to #10 - snowshark (01/26/2013) [-]
True. Rabbits are not very good at not ******* everything they can fit their manhood inside (and the fitting inside part is optional.)
User avatar #176 - imakejewburgers ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
Enough with these ******* gun posts. If it really means that much to you go bitch at a congressman or something.
#76 - Wobey (01/26/2013) [-]
The influence of having a gun avaible at any time makes people more aggressive and more incline to violence when faced with a stressful situation. I'm not saying that taking the guns away will make everyone go magically peacefull and safe, I'm just saying that the chance of shooting someone because you feel threatened by him/her having a gun is diminished considerably. Don't take away the guns, make bullets ******* expensive and people will think twice before shooting everything.
User avatar #125 to #76 - Zarke (01/27/2013) [-]
They are really ******* expensive. Especially for the people who shoot regularly. You know, the recreational shooters, who are a menace and a threat to our nation's helpless population of paper, clay, and soda cans.
User avatar #130 to #125 - runtubbyrun (01/27/2013) [-]
ooooh, i like that come back.

mind if i use that?
User avatar #131 to #130 - Zarke (01/27/2013) [-]
It's been my dream to be quoted.
User avatar #134 to #131 - runtubbyrun (01/27/2013) [-]
that reminds me of another quote.

"always be able to quote yourself"
-myself
User avatar #126 to #76 - runtubbyrun (01/27/2013) [-]
or:
require education and licensing for guns, require proper gun handling and keeping guns in a secure place for a homeowner to get if theres a break in, educate others on how guns can be a good tool if used properly, and lower ammunition rates so that if they truly have to shoot someone they don't feel stressed by how much money it'll cost them.

dont change anything about the guns. just change how smart the people are that own them.

also, if a person feels threatened, then they should probably have a gun.
#232 - europeanswallow (01/27/2013) [-]
This would be a better sign to put up
[ 306 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)