Circumcision. Female genital mutilation = OMFG WHY PWNED! Male genital mutiliation = It looks better, why are you complaining!? ahh sweet sweet hypocrisy.. Edit
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Circumcision

Female genital mutilation = OMFG WHY PWNED!
Male genital mutiliation = It looks better, why are you complaining!?
ahh sweet sweet hypocrisy.

Edit
mum; to man:
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+458
Views: 25923
Favorited: 14
Submitted: 05/21/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to teranin Subscribe to political E-mail to friend submit to reddit

Comments(180):

[ 180 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#22 - newbrony (05/22/2013) [+] (3 replies)
no data   
   
Is my dick circumcised or not? This is important to me, I ain't having no Shrodinger's dick.
no data

Is my dick circumcised or not? This is important to me, I ain't having no Shrodinger's dick.
User avatar #5 - whovianofawesome (05/22/2013) [+] (19 replies)
Well I am no expert, but I'm pretty sure that with female circumcision, it's to reduce any pleasure they can have to promote chastity. It's actually quite dangerous and really terrible. Male circumcision is usually done to help prevent infection or other issues in the future.
#71 - cerdomen (05/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Guys, guys, XBOX ONE it's the worst
User avatar #56 - dogwars (05/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Apparently my mom had to stop me from getting cut like 5 times before I left the hospital when I was born.
#20 - domitius (05/22/2013) [-]
mfw i still have mine
mfw i still have mine
#69 - jinapayne (05/22/2013) [-]
Coke is better than Microsoft
User avatar #47 - scoopdeedoo (05/22/2013) [-]
this entire comment section is just people being irrational about cut or uncut. It seems that people will cling to their studies if they're false or over exaggerated just because they have foreskin or not.
#42 - mourningbenders (05/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
"Global Map of Male Circumcision"

What is female circumcision? o_O
User avatar #45 to #42 - whitetoxicarrow (05/22/2013) [-]
They cut of the clitoris, the labia and sometimes even sew the vagina part-shut(This is more culturel though, and is done so that they can't have sex before marriage)
It's done to take away sexual pleasure from women, because some believe that they should not feel pleasure, but only give birth.
It's pretty brutal and is often done without anethesia, and many dies of infection, pain or bleedings.
Personally I think both circumcision for men and women is wrong, especially since it's done on young people who can't decide for themselves.
I'm happy to live in Denmark where the female one is illegal, and the male one is something that rarely ever happens (if it does it's mostly on jewish or muslim people, and the our doctors do it for free with anethesia)
#26 - Offspringofwolves (05/22/2013) [+] (6 replies)
love how if you prefer circumcision everybody flips 						****					. IMO i prefer mine to be circumcised. to me it looks better is easier to clean and the whole "you lose all the feeling"is total BS. i still have plenty of feeling all the way around and no numb spots or hypersensitive spots. It is old and perhaps now may be a bit archaic but its proven to prevent STDs, STIs, and reduce the risks of penile cancer. its tagged as being religious but im pretty sure no religious text demands it ttbomk. in the countries where its still very commonplace hygiene may not be the #1 prority, so it can be risky not to have your child circumcised. another thing is the foreskin protected the head from externalities  when we were still just bushwackers living in the woods without clothes. but seeing as we are long past that it may not be a necessary anymore. at least in 1st world countries.
love how if you prefer circumcision everybody flips **** . IMO i prefer mine to be circumcised. to me it looks better is easier to clean and the whole "you lose all the feeling"is total BS. i still have plenty of feeling all the way around and no numb spots or hypersensitive spots. It is old and perhaps now may be a bit archaic but its proven to prevent STDs, STIs, and reduce the risks of penile cancer. its tagged as being religious but im pretty sure no religious text demands it ttbomk. in the countries where its still very commonplace hygiene may not be the #1 prority, so it can be risky not to have your child circumcised. another thing is the foreskin protected the head from externalities when we were still just bushwackers living in the woods without clothes. but seeing as we are long past that it may not be a necessary anymore. at least in 1st world countries.
#28 to #26 - teranin ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
All of that was so uneducated that I don't even know where to start. The things about your personal feeling in your own junk I can't really contest because everyone's opinions are different about that, regardless of the facts of thickening outer material, drying out, and reduction in total nerve endings. Still having the foreskin is what protects from STDs, hygene is what protects from the ones previously claimed to have been protected by from by circumcision. Both the Torah and the Qu'ran very specifically order that all men be circumcised, in the Bible it is in the old testament (which is the Torah) but is a command that was nullified by the advent of the new covenant. Removal of the foreskin is not "hygene" it just makes it easier to perform tasks related to hygene that you should be doing regardless. Still, feel free to prefer having been cut, I know a lot of people do, but don't just spout a ******** of false information as though they are facts like that, it's detrimental to anyone who blindly decides to believe you.
#7 - anonymous (05/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Looking at the description makes me think OP doesn't know very much about female circumcision. Not that I agree with male circumcision, but I think one snip versus having a sharp instrument shoved repeatedly up the vaginal canal to reduce feeling (and thus promote chastity) are two very different things.
#36 to #7 - teranin ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
Ok tell you what, we'll slice off part of your clit, and then you can tell us how it was no big deal and just a little snip.  The fact is, while the scale of the procedure might be larger on female circumscision, neither is in any way beneficial and both are archaic, sick, twisted, and were generally used as methods reduce or prevent sexual pleasure, although in the boy's case it was used to prevent childhood masturbation.  I am well aware of their differences, perhaps you are not aware of their similarities?
Ok tell you what, we'll slice off part of your clit, and then you can tell us how it was no big deal and just a little snip. The fact is, while the scale of the procedure might be larger on female circumscision, neither is in any way beneficial and both are archaic, sick, twisted, and were generally used as methods reduce or prevent sexual pleasure, although in the boy's case it was used to prevent childhood masturbation. I am well aware of their differences, perhaps you are not aware of their similarities?
User avatar #65 - inyourmind (05/22/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Health benefits one way or the other are not evident in any serious studies.
The reason for circumcision now is purely cultural with not benefits shown one way or the other.
Please stop this flame war and get back to the funny.

This concludes the FunnyJunk public service announcement.
User avatar #74 to #65 - mutzaki (05/22/2013) [-]
It's more beneficial to not be circumcised. If not for the increased sensitivity, then for the simple reason that like any other surgical procedure, it comes with risks. Infection is always a present risk, and sometimes, rarely but still, they have to amputate the entire penis, sometimes the cut is too deep, and so forth.
There's also a relatively common risk that due to the fact that a glans and foreskin are stuck together for the earliest years of a boy, in order to cut off the foreskin, you have to basically tear it off, leaving the glans and remaining skin raw and in need of healing. This can cause remaining skin to fuse with the glans, which creates complications later on in life.
It's an unnecessary procedure that comes with risks, and it makes you lose a lot of sensitivity.
User avatar #58 - commanderbunbun ONLINE (05/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i thought it was for sanitary reasons. at least nowadays. i know the jews do it to take out their anger. i'd be pissed too if i couldn't have a mcrib
User avatar #63 to #58 - teranin ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
You've heard wrong. People are capable of cleaning themselves regardless of foreskin, only someone incredibly lazy would want to slice part of themselves off to make cleaning take perhaps 5 seconds less time. Of course, usually circumcision isn't a choice being made by the person who has the dick being cut in the first place.
#108 - trishmay (05/22/2013) [+] (6 replies)
The benefits of male circumcision include lower risk of infection including HIV.

The benefits of female circumcision include no sexual sensitivity and having your labia sewn shut so that you can only urinate and menstruate until you begin having painful, pleasureless sex.

I understand that m.c. lowers sensitivity, but imo the benefits outweigh that. besides, if you were circumcised as a baby like most men, you don't know the difference. And if you're less sensitive, you can last longer.

TL;DR it's worth it for men, useless for women.
User avatar #110 to #108 - corundum (05/22/2013) [-]
You're weighing the "benefits" pretty heavily. There really aren't any proven benefits except a slightly lower chance of infection.
User avatar #70 - rastafariswatteam (05/22/2013) [+] (6 replies)
I tried to get my sister to not circumcise my nephew. In the future I'll be able to talk to my nephew and go

"I was there for you when no one else was"

Is there even infection that happens in un-circumcised penises? That's what I've heard.
User avatar #78 to #75 - mutzaki (05/22/2013) [-]
That's only if you don't clean. Girls also get smegma, but we don't cut off their labia because we assume they're retarded enough not to clean their privates.
#84 - waffies (05/22/2013) [+] (10 replies)
there's this massive amount of arguments below about penises. I was circumcised, i have never thought anything of it, and I still don't care. Is it really that big of a deal?
User avatar #95 to #88 - Jackimole (05/22/2013) [-]
As a circumcised male, I can assure you that jacking off is not a problem. It is a practice in which I engage quite frequently.
#53 - anonymous (05/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
how the **** can you compare being cut or being uncut you pieces of **** .
you can only choose one bitches
#60 to #53 - teranin ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
Most of us don't really get a choice on that.  It's kinda the problem.
Most of us don't really get a choice on that. It's kinda the problem.
User avatar #43 - sniperknug (05/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I heard most americans were circumcised to prevent them from fapping.
#61 to #43 - teranin ONLINE (05/22/2013) [-]
You heard correctly.
User avatar #16 - spikethepony (05/22/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Studies suggest that circumcision helps reduce the chances of various STDs, including HIV. Honestly, in many first-world cases, it has very little to do with religious purposes. Seriously, the health benefits are clearly evident.

Also, dicks=/= vaginas. You wouldn't put a tampon in a dick, would you? Therefore, don't compare female genital mutilation to circumcision.
#35 to #16 - markowuzhere (05/22/2013) [-]
The same studies suggest that you're giant flaming faggot
[ 180 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)