Upload
Login or register
x

Japan's History Books

 
Japan's History Books. r/polandball (EArcee) Yes I know Japan apologized for that stuff. We talkin about DA CHILDREN and dem japan books.. I' m of so sorry of w

r/polandball (EArcee)
You need to login to view this link
Yes I know Japan apologized for that stuff. We talkin about DA CHILDREN and dem japan books.

I' m of so sorry of what
happen, will never into "
plea: '! will gin:
l of hall
Mr" tritt,' . twh' We of never
killing ::heheehe!
...
+655
Views: 42680
Favorited: 25
Submitted: 01/26/2014
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to sequel Subscribe to polandball

Comments(207):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
207 comments displayed.
Reply
+84
#6 - vladstronsy (01/27/2014) [-]
I've always found the Chinese and Japanese seem to find themselves as nations incapable of wrongdoing. I mean **** there isn't so much guilt built into the system as there is here, I hate to say it but most of central Asian culture as a whole is built into a very self-centered ideology. I mean **** , I know Japanese and Chinese guys who've gone back home and agreed that both countries are full of xenophobic asshats. Things need to change for the east on a cultural scale, and the whole world needs to be reminded every once in a while that we bear the sins of our forefathers on our backs like the greatest of turtle shells. Then maybe we'd be less inclined to do **** , no matter your ethnic, religious, national or cultural identity.
Reply
0
User avatar #30 to #6 - sadisticplatypi (01/27/2014) [-]
given how the communists killed more of us than the japanese ever did, and they even drove us off to a single island, it is kind of easy to forget about WW2, even if my parents served in it.
-1
#113 to #6 - cortzanza has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
0
#128 to #6 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
Read Chinese history.

They do it like that for 3000 years. They also went down because of that. They only opened up again when the british came to hongkong and forced them to do so. China also never really had an army in the ancient times. They only had barbarians fight for them. Experts believe that it is their aim to enclose their country again.
Reply
0
User avatar #137 to #6 - nought (01/27/2014) [-]
cool
Reply
0
#24 to #6 - stalini (01/27/2014) [-]
"we bear the sins of our forefathers on our backs"

Are you retarded?

**** you

Let's go to Africa and ******* genocide them for selling their own kin as slaves.


And "Xenophobic" is used in a retarded way all the time.

They like their nationality to stay like that, without foreigners, who the **** are you to decide they don't have right to do that?
0
#121 to #24 - cortzanza has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+2
User avatar #159 to #6 - nitsuan (01/27/2014) [-]
China and Japan are countries that don't ever want to be viewed badly, so they try to never admit blame. One time and American bomber was flying by China's eastern border and as usual Chinese planes would come by and follow them through. The Chinese had this one pilot that would get all hot shotty and fly super close to the bomber. One day that idiot rammed the bomber on accident killing himself and the whole bomber crew. The US was fairly furious that China let this reckless behavior happen and demanded the Chinese return what was left from the crash. China said it was the US's fault and refused to give anything back until the US offered an apology. Even after the US got sick of their crap and apologized, they didn't get anything back for months in which the US assumed it was probing the crash to learn how to make better bomber. They are selfish self centered countries, which is a shame because they have so much rich and interesting history.
Reply
+3
#9 to #6 - chcknchsr ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
the greatest of turtle shells
Reply
+8
User avatar #10 to #6 - feelythefeel (01/27/2014) [-]
>we bear the sins of our forefathers
I'm more of the mind that we're each our own person, I don't think you should be blamed for something your ancestors have done. It's not my fault that people who look like me have killed people, and I don't see why I should feel guilty about it.

At least we can agree that there's something to be learned from such histories.
Reply
0
#44 to #10 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
History did not start the moment you were born and it wont end when you die.
If your mom **** an african gentleman and gets aids, gives birth to you and you have aids, its not your fault but its still there.
Or
Your dad gets some money from the "Happy merchant bank of Israel" and gets hit by a truck tomorrow I wonder who will pay the debt?
Reply
+2
#66 to #44 - jollo (01/27/2014) [-]
I dont agree that we should carry the guilt of our forefathers because then the next step would be to start blaming each others for it, and isnt that how hate and distrust is created in the first place?
as for the scenarios you mentioned, it wouldnt matter who you'd blame because you would just as ****** no matter what. The only valid reason(that i can think of) to assign blame for the past is to stop it from happening again.
Reply
0
User avatar #67 to #66 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Oh my jolly boy. The universe is not fair. And I am lifting weights, I will talk to you later.
Reply
+1
#94 to #67 - jollo (01/27/2014) [-]
The universe is indeed unfair, but that doesnt mean that we should give up and accept it. Sure, we might have to accept that injustice happens more often than we like, but that makes it even more important to make sure that we ourselves dont become the source of it.

ps. enjoyed the video, saw some clips from some of my favourite movies
Reply
0
User avatar #97 to #94 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
<3
Want more
And I would like to forget history but you can't forget that the turks ruled over us when we were close to our prime and that we have been almost wiped clean 20ish years ago.
Reply
0
User avatar #177 to #44 - feelythefeel (01/27/2014) [-]
In example one you're implying that the person with AIDS should feel guilty for it, which he shouldn't. Just ****** . Because he has AIDS.

Example two is just random and inane.
Reply
0
User avatar #185 to #177 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
Is it insane that people take loans from the bank?
Is it insane that people get hit by cars?
Reply
0
User avatar #186 to #185 - feelythefeel (01/28/2014) [-]
I said inane, not insane. I'm saying I don't understand what you're trying to say with it.
Reply
0
User avatar #187 to #186 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
All debts must be paid.
Reply
0
User avatar #188 to #187 - feelythefeel (01/28/2014) [-]
What does that have to do with this?
Reply
0
User avatar #189 to #188 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
Damn ***** y stupid
I love talking to jews more than I love talking to talk with you
Reply
0
User avatar #190 to #189 - feelythefeel (01/28/2014) [-]
I'm sorry if I prefer an intellectual opponent to actually say what they're trying to say in a debate.
Reply
+1
#192 to #190 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
It's not what I say it's what I mean.
Reply
0
User avatar #193 to #192 - feelythefeel (01/28/2014) [-]
In that case, you're **** at debate.
Reply
0
User avatar #194 to #193 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
Not everything has to be a ******* debate you ******* dork, we could just talk about things not be hitchens all about it.
Reply
0
User avatar #196 to #195 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
>implying you can have a formal discussion on FJ
>ever
Reply
0
User avatar #197 to #196 - feelythefeel (01/28/2014) [-]
I thought that was exactly what we were doing.
Reply
+1
#198 to #197 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
no *****
if you want to have a disscousion you will have to talk to me and i will respond to you in my sexy voice
Reply
0
User avatar #200 to #199 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
why
what are you, rejsis?
0
User avatar #202 to #201 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
then tell me why dont y want to hear my sexy voice
Reply
-1
User avatar #191 to #190 - schnizel (01/28/2014) [-]
*tips fedora*
Reply
0
User avatar #46 to #44 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
the past shapes the present my lovable goy
Reply
+40
User avatar #1 - stocxt (01/27/2014) [-]
The japanese are too proud to admit what they did was wrong
Reply
0
#2 to #1 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
uh, no they're not
Reply
0
User avatar #36 to #1 - symustafa (01/27/2014) [-]
A lot of the people in Japan don't even know of the crimes Japan committed during the war, since they were never taught about it.
Reply
0
#5 to #1 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
Actually, they've admitted to it multiple times, and was actually a driving factor in their culture that had many invest in China. Other issues, like the Yasakuni Shrine and Diaoyu/Senkaku disputes have been made up by the Chinese government to increase nationalist ideology. The Yasakuni Shrine doesn't specifically commemorate war criminals, its meant to thank all people who died for Japan. Even Prime Minister Abe, who is incredibly nationalistic, has stated that he is not visiting it for the war criminals. Japan has apologized dozens of times, and the Chinese media instead reports that Japan hasn't apologized due to it being controlled directly by the government, which profits from political tension that might increase their status in East Asia. The Diaoyu Islands are disputed by China on the claim that they were historically Chinese - a claim based on an ancient text describing its location. In reality, Japan has administered it for 50 years and the issue was never mentioned.
Reply
0
#7 to #1 - rainbowmuffins (01/27/2014) [-]
who wants to admit the wrongdoings they have done? I didn't learn about the Native American genocide we have committed in high school, or how Britain violently oppressed the Irish, and Russia doesn't admit to the atrocities they have committed in world war 2.
Reply
0
User avatar #19 to #7 - reginleif (01/27/2014) [-]
We actually did learn about the Native Americans in our public ghetto school. (Amazing how they managed to include that in huh?)

The British on the other hand, yeah those ******* could at least stand to learn that their Armed forces have fire upon unarmed people in every country they have occupied.

They even wiped out all men over 18 in one city of their Asian colonies.
Reply
+3
User avatar #62 to #19 - aloneinkyoto (01/27/2014) [-]
Yeaaah, the general decorum most history teachers in the UK established when I was in school was that we were pretty massive dickheads in the past. We even talk about some of the atrocities committed by British soldiers/civilians today. We don't bury our past haha, we're well aware of it.
Reply
+2
#175 to #19 - xxmemosxx (01/27/2014) [-]
"their Armed forces have fire upon unarmed people in every country they have occupied."

Citation needed
Reply
0
User avatar #203 to #19 - milthyfoustache (02/01/2014) [-]
Well in history (I'm English btw) we learnt about the history of Britain in Ireland, and we know we were utter evil bastards.
Reply
+1
#16 to #1 - lilRican ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
Dude, your Avatar is my steam avatar
also **** yes Aioi
Reply
0
#56 to #16 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
***** **** yo waifu.
Reply
+16
#12 - murrlogic ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
+17
User avatar #4 - apaulcolypse (01/27/2014) [-]
I had a professor that spent time in China and he would discuss with older Chinese people how they felt about Japan today. He said a lot of them said things like, "Why didn't you Americans finish the job and nuke the rest of Japan?!" The Chinese still hold a strong grudge against Japan.
Reply
0
#131 to #4 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
My brother's girlfriend is chinese and they told me they ******* hate each other.
Reply
0
User avatar #17 to #4 - reginleif (01/27/2014) [-]
>Why didn't we finish the job.

1.We're not genocidal maniacs like the Japs, Chinese, and Germans.
2. We only had two bombs.
Reply
0
User avatar #33 to #17 - apaulcolypse (01/27/2014) [-]
Precisely, but he Chinese have been under the threat and the guns of the Japanese from the 1st Sino-Japanese War to the end of WWII. My point is that it's no wonder why the Chinese hate the Japanese so.
Reply
+2
User avatar #37 to #33 - reginleif (01/27/2014) [-]
Oh no doubt the Japanese have been aggressive and committed atrocities. I'm not going to deny that, but all of Asia seemed to have had the same problems with expansion, and respecting humans rights at the time.

It wasn't just the Japanese.

Granted I do understand why people are angry at them, they haven't exactly owned up to any of it.

But we have to remember that if we're on the topic of finishing off, many people still criticize Eisenhower for not ******* up the Chinese with the nuclear stockpiles available at the time during the conflict over Taiwan. Not everything can be solved with bombing the **** out of people. And that's something the Korea, China, Japan and the US needs to learn.
Reply
+1
User avatar #89 to #4 - sadisticplatypi (01/27/2014) [-]
this is mostly the effect of hate propaganda that is present everywhere within the PRC it promote nationalism. it is very funny that the regions that is occupied by the Japanese for the longest period of time, is also the one with the least amount of resentment.
hate propaganda is present within almost all major wars, to make the war seem just even if it is no more than an ugly brawl. just like how the nazies began all that ayran race **** and Napoleon with his whole anti-corruption **** . the only difference that that the Chinese never ended the war even if ww2 is over for 60 years.
Reply
+3
User avatar #13 to #4 - skaffanl (01/27/2014) [-]
My grandma is from Indonesia and has spent time in a Japanese holding camp. She has also seen **** like bodies flowing past in rivers. Just looking kinda Japanese is enough for my grandma to hate you, even though you could very well be Chinese. xD
Reply
+4
#14 to #13 - indonesia (01/27/2014) [-]
but I hate you all
Reply
+4
User avatar #18 to #14 - skaffanl (01/27/2014) [-]
I am a descendant of someone who used to live inside of you hehe.
Reply
+7
#11 - anbieter ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
Oh, good old germany.
Oh, good old germany.
Reply
+14
User avatar #3 - nervaaurelius (01/27/2014) [-]
I know OP already did say that the Japanese did say sorry for the rape of nanking(just putting it in the comments in case you didn't read it) but I'm glad Japan isn't forced to be submissive to China in the same way Germany is to Isreal.
Reply
+1
User avatar #123 to #3 - sursum (01/27/2014) [-]
I don't think Japan should at all be forever submissive and beholden to the world for what happened, I usually took a neutral stance when I was living in china and people ask about what I thought about the Japanese and Chinese. But come one, If your going to visit a military shrine, chisel off the names of the 16 (17? I don't know, **** its probably 6 or 7 for all I can remember) names of those convicted of war crimes. **** is just blatant in meaning given the region's situation.
Reply
+4
User avatar #165 - benjiburns (01/27/2014) [-]
I think Germany should seriously stop feeling the need to be so sorry about what happened.
Reply
0
User avatar #25 - ryuggu (01/27/2014) [-]
Can someone explain what this "jajajaja" means? I've seen this so many times and wonder what the hell it means.
Reply
+3
User avatar #26 to #25 - kwanzalord (01/27/2014) [-]
It's really dumb...
It's actually spanish. jajajaj is hahaha
In spanish you say the j like an h, Therefore, jajajaja is said just like hahahaha.

Not sure why it's being used for germans....
Reply
0
User avatar #42 to #26 - derein (01/27/2014) [-]
'Ja' is German for yes, so it's yes multiple times.
Reply
-1
User avatar #35 to #26 - ryuggu (01/27/2014) [-]
So when spanish guys laugh then say jajaja? Must be weird^^
Reply
+1
User avatar #49 to #35 - folkflunky (01/27/2014) [-]
Not spanish people, everyone writing in spanish laughs like that.
And no it's not weird, it's just like "hahaha", only that we use a J.
It's not like we use the Ñ or some **** .
Reply
0
User avatar #136 to #49 - ryuggu (01/27/2014) [-]
Thank you for explaining it too me. I also saw 'keke' as laugh, can't really remember what language it is from.
Reply
-1
#43 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Major redpill time FJ
Reply
0
User avatar #63 to #43 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
It had nothing to do with judaism, it was strictly about proletarian liberation.
Reply
0
#64 to #63 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
***** plz
>Made by a jew for goyim to serve jews
>Nothing to do with jews
I'm sorry what?
One more thing, long live Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov.
Reply
0
User avatar #70 to #64 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
I meant the revolution, they happened to be jews but that was irrelevant, even for them.
Reply
0
User avatar #71 to #70 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
>Jews made communism
>Jews supported communism
>Jews fought for communism
>Jews funded communism
>they happened to be jews
Yeah, it was a coincidence.
Reply
+1
User avatar #81 to #71 - generaljosh (01/27/2014) [-]
"Jews made communism"
One of the core tenants of every communist government ever has been strict atheism.
What the hell are you smoking?
Reply
0
User avatar #88 to #81 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
Also, I think he's referring to ethnic jews and not people who believe in judaism.
Reply
0
User avatar #90 to #88 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
^
You are 1 smart jew
Reply
0
User avatar #86 to #81 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Marx was a jew, google it, and look up the men he was friends with and the rulers of communism and where the money went, google that too.
And atheism is also backed up by the jews.
Reply
0
User avatar #84 to #81 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
Secularism would be more accurate, but yeah, most communists are either atheist or agnostic.
Reply
0
User avatar #78 to #71 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
Fine, jews like communism. That doesn't mean they want to gain power through it and make the illumizion control the world.
Reply
0
User avatar #79 to #78 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Read the Talmud and read the protocols.
Reply
0
User avatar #82 to #79 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
My point is that most of these jews are strictly ethnic jews and think judaism is utter ******** .
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #82 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Shhh, don't the elders that, I know a jew who got his ass kicked by his dad cuz he told him he was an atheist
Reply
0
User avatar #95 to #43 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
>/pol/
Don't tell me you honestly believe anything written there?

also

>"Jewish uprising"
>communist party
Bush fighting the "War on terror" didn't make it an attempt to bring Christianity into Taliban. Jews fighting for Communism doesn't make it a Jewish movement.

Lastly

>jewish parents/family
having a Jewish family doesn't automatically make you a Jew, it's not a blood thing.
Reply
0
User avatar #176 to #95 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
They might be ethnic jews regardless of following or supporting judaism as a religion.
Reply
-1
#96 to #95 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Read the Talmud, the protocols, America is a capitalist ********** with a culture worth as **** not a crusading christfag nation
>having a Jewish family doesn't automatically make you a Jew, it's not a blood thing.
You killed yourself right there.
And ask jewishcommunazi about how much it is a jewish movement.
I'll let you take care of it from here dude.
Reply
-1
User avatar #98 to #96 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
Have you read the Talmud and the "protocols"?

and a jewish-commu-nazi? what? we have nazi Jews now?
I don't know any of those, you'll have to redirect me to someone, or to a legitimate source where they interview one.
Reply
0
User avatar #163 to #98 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
Is-a me!
Reply
-1
User avatar #99 to #98 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
jewishcommunazi
a guy on FJ
and
read the Talmud.pdf
and Protocols of zion.pdf
All made by jews and it will explain you their plan
Reply
-1
User avatar #104 to #99 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
oh you'll have to find a more reliable source than some dude on funnyjunk. your ethos is pretty weak, and I doubt nazi jew will have a stronger ethos.

and you didn't answer my question? have you read the Talmud? all 6200 pages of it?

as for the protocols, forged nazi propaganda from early 1900 doesn't scream truth either.
Reply
-1
User avatar #105 to #104 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Yes, I had a lot of time
And the protocols of zion is not made by the national socialists
Reply
0
User avatar #111 to #105 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
I know, it was written in Russia based on (I mean it plagiarized) a satire written in France by Maurice Joly and a book by the founder of zionism.
However original Russian versions of the protocol has no mention of a Jewish state, and doesn't have anything to do with zionism.
Reply
+1
#117 to #111 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Forgot the pic
Reply
0
User avatar #126 to #118 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
Dude the burden of proof is on you, you have to give me something more than a bunch of faces, I see someone from the Luftwaffe, some journalist and a Marxists. how does this relate to the Jewish communist uprising of 1918 again?

and as stated, /pol/ is not a legitimate source.
Reply
-1
User avatar #132 to #126 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Do you trust me?
Reply
0
#127 to #126 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Well, you have to respect me to trust me.
Reply
0
User avatar #133 to #127 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
Now you're just linking me the same wikipedia article cropped in a different manner and with different commanders and leaders. you're not building up a whole lot of trust here.
Reply
-1
User avatar #134 to #133 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Well, we need to talk somewhere private, chat maybe?
Reply
0
User avatar #140 to #134 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
no thanks, I'd like to keep this to comments.
Reply
-1
#145 to #140 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
I want you to read this
Reply
0
User avatar #161 to #145 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
That was indeed a nice read, grade A Illuminati stuff.
However as I stated I do not find 4chan to be a reliable source, and while the text references to different books and people I simply do not have the time to sit down and learn the broader picture the author here writes about. It has been fun Schnizel, I truly do find conspiracies to be interesting (and funny) stuff, but in the end they never convince me to believe. better luck next time maybe.
Reply
-1
User avatar #164 to #161 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
And DO YOU THINK they would go door to door and say, hey, we want to conquer the world with our money, if thats ok.....
Reply
0
User avatar #166 to #164 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
I never disagreed that rich people carve power. I don't however see all the lines you are trying to draw with this Jewish communist uprising, your red pill is not working so to say.
Reply
-1
User avatar #170 to #166 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
And the elders are rich and powerfull and they have the entire US, and Israeli army behind them.
Reply
0
User avatar #171 to #170 - shitposts (01/27/2014) [-]
I bet you can't wait for ~2050 then, when all these old men are dead and it becomes your chance to shine.
-1
#174 to #171 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Thanks man
And 1 more thing
It does not matter who you are
except turk nignog or jew
you should be proud of your heritage
-1
User avatar #172 to #171 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Well, TBH I dont like lying, but Im a good public speaker....
But the thing is the oldfags have kids.... But they are kids, not their fathers.
Reply
-1
#169 to #166 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
And jews are best at it.
Reply
-1
#167 to #166 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Well, dude, I'm chating with my buds and can't focus on this but You need to look this up yourself.
Reply
-1
User avatar #168 to #167 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
^Frankfurt communist school
Reply
-1
User avatar #162 to #161 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Well, believe it or not rich people want power.
Reply
0
User avatar #114 to #111 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
But I wonder who is using the book right now?
Reply
0
#47 to #43 - sunick (01/27/2014) [-]
i just want a trustable source
Reply
0
User avatar #80 to #47 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
just go to the wiki page
Reply
+1
#112 to #80 - sunick (01/27/2014) [-]
welp, it stills is a huge amount of stupid and racists asumptions to justify the nazis
good day, gentleman
Reply
0
#115 to #112 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
I'm sorry, can you repeat that?
Reply
0
#122 to #115 - sunick (01/27/2014) [-]
you know what? no
i'm not gonna start this discussion, i will not
i'm studying for history major and from everything a haver read inb4 hurr durr jude durr comunist books i know that becouse "iluminated truth-bringers" ********* like you is that history repeats
gg
Reply
0
User avatar #124 to #122 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Tuck tail and run
A well known jewish tactic
Reply
0
User avatar #61 to #47 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
And I'll get back to you in a space minute.
Reply
0
User avatar #55 to #43 - generaljosh (01/27/2014) [-]
The Christians started the crusades and killed billions of people, so America deserved 9/11
Sarcasm, obviously
Reply
0
#57 to #55 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
>AD 632 -- Muhammad’s death.
>AD 635 -- Christian Damascas fell to invading Muslims.
>AD 636 -- Christian Antioch fell to invading Muslims.
>AD 638 -- Christian Jerusalem,and later Alexandria,fell to invading Muslims.
>AD 650 -- Muslim armies reached Cilicia and Caesarea of Cappodocia. In the same period Muslim forces carried out raids on Cyprus, Rhodes, Crete and Sicily, carrying off thousands of Christian slaves.
>AD 668 -- Muslim armies laid siege to Constantinople. They were repulsed.
>AD 711 -- Muslim armies invaded Spain. By AD 715 they had conquered most of Spain.
>AD 717 -- Muslim armies again laid siege to Constantinople. Again repulsed.
>AD 732 -- Muslim armies invaded France. Charles Martel stopped them at Tours.
>AD 792 -- The Muslim ruler of Spain, Hisham, called for a new invasion of France. An international Islamic crusade was assembled, and was repulsed by the French.
>AD 827 -- Muslim warriors invaded Italy and Sicily, terrorised monks,and raped nuns. Sicily was held by Muslims until AD 1091.
>AD 846 -- Muslim armies reached Rome, where they forced the Pope to pay them tribute.
>AD 848 -- France was again invaded by Muslims. And again repulsed.
>AD 1059 -- Pope Urban II launched the FIRST Crusade.
Reply
0
User avatar #59 to #57 - generaljosh (01/27/2014) [-]
Sorry if you didn't catch the drift of my comment, BUT NO ONE ALIVE WAS INVOLVED IN ANY OF THE EVENTS WHICH ARE BEING "AVENGED"
Reply
0
User avatar #60 to #59 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
We can't live forever, that is why men have sons to carry on their names.
Reply
0
User avatar #69 to #60 - generaljosh (01/27/2014) [-]
With ~8000 years of recorded history, and the genealogical mixing that has occurred during that time, by your logic, everyone has ample reason to hate everyone, and, indeed, themselves.

Since your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather killed your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-uncle, you should probably avenge him by killing yourself.
Reply
0
User avatar #72 to #69 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
>Implying I'm not pure illyrian
Its not just personal conflict but conflicts of groups
Reply
0
User avatar #73 to #72 - generaljosh (01/27/2014) [-]
People didn't evolve in Illyria. Sorry to break it to you, but you're not "pure" anything. And even if you were, that's not something to be proud of.
Reply
+1
User avatar #75 to #73 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
I am, I come from a pure bloodline, and I'm proud of who I am, I'm proud to be white, who are you but an angry liberal to tell me otherwise.
Reply
0
User avatar #92 to #75 - jewishcommunazi (01/27/2014) [-]
Says the bosniak.
Reply
0
User avatar #93 to #92 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
actually yes
Reply
0
User avatar #85 to #75 - generaljosh (01/27/2014) [-]
But see, there's no such thing as a pure, white, bloodline. The first humans were black, and, according to modern studies, most likely became white through interbreeding with neanderthals.
Reply
+1
User avatar #87 to #85 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Pure enough for me.
haplogroups
I'm pure I2
Reply
+2
User avatar #125 to #43 - thegamegestapo (01/27/2014) [-]
>Spartacist rebellion
>Jews
>Wut

Reply
0
#138 to #130 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
I'm just trying to work out if you're trying to justify the holocaust or if you're the sort that denies it too.

If you knew anything about the Sparatacist revolt then you'd know that the majority of people involved were not actually Jewish but many of their leaders were as a result of them having both a higher standard of education than most Germans and a history of being oppressed by virtually every European power. As such they tended to be leaders in Leftist movements.

That being said the likes of Rosa Luxemburg were politically distinct from the mainstream Communist movement at the time so suggesting that this was part of some Evil Jew Conspiracy is as ludicrous as saying that the Nazis wanted to return Poland after the war.
Reply
+1
#143 to #138 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
The yolocaust happened, but the numbers are way off and bu ******* wo.
The majority of the commisars in the Soviet army were jewish and most of the ********* that followed them were slavs. But the power controls to those who are in power.
And google what the jewish communist party said what they wanted to do to the Germans.
I mean, THERE IS NO WAY THAT THE JEWS WANT TO CONTROL OTHER PEOPLE, NOT A SINGLE CHANCE, JEWS ARE GOOD PEOPLE, OY VEY YES.
Reply
0
User avatar #146 to #143 - thegamegestapo (01/27/2014) [-]
You want to play "who was in charge"

Given that Jesus was a Jew does that make Christianity part of the Zionist conspiracy?

Reply
-1
User avatar #147 to #146 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Not zionist but jewish, but he to was hated by the jews, IDK why but those mofos hate him to this day
I feel sorry for him sometimes
And I never said I was a christian nor supported them
I'm a pagan
ill send y something in a sec
Reply
-1
User avatar #152 to #147 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
too*
Reply
0
User avatar #139 to #138 - thegamegestapo (01/27/2014) [-]
Still me, just having technical issues.

I'm sure that's the Jews fault too.
Reply
-1
User avatar #144 to #139 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
;)
Reply
+2
#129 to #43 - dankeshein (01/27/2014) [-]
OY VEY GOY M-MUH SIX KAZZILLION BILLION
Reply
+7
User avatar #48 to #43 - scorcho (01/27/2014) [-]
wow, that is probably the most colossal ******** i have ever read. The time between 1918-1919 in germany is known as "Novemberrevolution", a politically driven revolution inspired by communist ideas (which is not a bad thing) and the insistence of the german supreme command to have a naval battle with the royal navy, despite the war being pretty much a lost cause, due to the fact that the shiny new german navy did not see any action during the war. That uprising led to the replacement of the imperial government with the weimarer republik. Jews are not even remotely related to that conflict, so i don't even know what that idiot is talking about, or is that a regular occurrence on /pol/?
Reply
0
#77 to #48 - meinfuhertroll (01/27/2014) [-]
Yes.. Good goy.. We are not even remotely related..
Yes.. Good goy.. We are not even remotely related..
Reply
+1
User avatar #100 to #65 - scorcho (01/27/2014) [-]
alright then, i wouldn't have thought i would ever meet someone who actually believes in the myth of jewish bolshevism, but here we go. First of all the overrepresentation of jews in communist movements in that time, is easily explained by the low social status of many jews, which means that communism is a favourable ideology. Other overrepresented minorities include georgians, armenians and latvians. noone ever mentions those, i wonder why. Secondly, after communist rule was established, the prominence of jews usually quickly declined. That some jews would remain in influential positions is only natural, due to the huge number of them in said movements. On to the novemberrevolution.
The bavarian communist movement was hardly of relevance to the overall revolution, due to the fact that it was quickly subdued by the forces of the german empire and their leaders executed. Bavaria, especially munich was later established as one of the most prominent nazi strongholds by the way, so as a bavarian i can conclude that bavaria was rather prone to extremism at the time.
The revolution was also not motivated by anything related to jews, but rather the inability of the current empire to properly lead the country, not least thanks to the delusional emperor. After the weimarer republic was established, not a single jew was in a major position in the new government. That included the head of state president Friedrich Ebert (not jew) and the chancellor Phillip Scheidemann (not jew; later adolf hitler - definatly not jew).
If the jews (if we now assume the jews had any kind of unified body, which is ridiculous) had any intention whatsoever to subdue germany in any way, they would probably have tried to gain at least some influence, don't you think? Lastly, the establishment of the Weimar Republik was ultimately what enabled hitler to rise to power, so well done jews.
Germany today is again a social democracy (like back then), so i guess communist jews are behind that aswell?
Reply
0
User avatar #102 to #100 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
I will get back to you after my workout
Reply
-2
#101 to #100 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Oh you ignorant little brat.
As for you read the Talmud
And the Protocols of Zion
Reply
+1
User avatar #107 to #101 - scorcho (01/27/2014) [-]
It's "schnitzel" by the way. And you are the kind of person who shames us germans the most. Not the ones accusing us and pointing their fingers, but those who have learned nothing from our past. With all due respect, which is not a lot, screw you, you nazi bastard.
Reply
+1
#109 to #107 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
Oy vey poor jews hahahahahahaha!
Reply
0
User avatar #110 to #109 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
It's not the jews!
SHUT IT DOWN!

I bet I'm going to be banned now?
Reply
0
User avatar #160 to #107 - mulciber ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
There's no point whatsoever about correcting spelling of someone's internet name. Maybe Schnitzel was already taken, or he spelled it incorrectly once before for whatever reason on another site, and carried it here for convenience to himself.

I'm also not on either side of this argument, I just dislike people pulling stupid **** into them.
Reply
0
User avatar #108 to #107 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
National Socialist*
I will get back to you on this one
Reply
-1
User avatar #91 to #48 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
did you see #65
Reply
0
User avatar #58 to #48 - schnizel (01/27/2014) [-]
I'll get back to you in a minute.
Reply
-10
User avatar #27 - kwanzalord (01/27/2014) [-]
As if China didn't deserve it...
Reply
0
#28 to #27 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
Why would million of innocent civilians deserve death? The only one who deserves death is you, to be sodomized by a mammoth tusk and then hung repeatedly by a barbed wire noose.
Reply
-9
User avatar #29 to #28 - kwanzalord (01/27/2014) [-]
1) you are anonymous and therefore no one cares
2) millions? you may need to check your facts
3)so America is a complete monster for dropping the atomic bomb and killing innocent civilians.
4) China never pulls stupid **** that people need to **** them up for.
Reply
0
User avatar #142 to #29 - rafeky (01/27/2014) [-]
your avatar is a picture of the guy from adventure time, that alone discredits anything you have to say. go back to school little boy
Reply
0
User avatar #178 to #142 - kwanzalord (01/27/2014) [-]
I'm glad we're all thinking logically here
Reply
0
User avatar #50 to #29 - defender (01/27/2014) [-]
R. J. Rummel, a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, estimates that between 1937 and 1945, the Japanese military murdered from nearly 3 to over 10 million people, most likely 6 million Chinese, Indonesians, Koreans, Filipinos and Indochinese.
Reply
0
User avatar #38 to #29 - SognaVetr (01/27/2014) [-]
1) nvm
2) in Nanking only 300.000 innocent citizens were killed. In total, about a million
3) yes, albeit understandable because an invasion would cost more casualties. Japan killing 1 million civilians was not needed for any strategic benefice.
4) every nation did, does and will do stupid stuff, if you think that way we should nuke the entire world.
Reply
0
User avatar #179 to #38 - kwanzalord (01/27/2014) [-]
I forgot we named funnyjunk to seriousjunk
Reply
0
User avatar #180 to #179 - SognaVetr (01/27/2014) [-]
You've awakened the dragon of knowledge.
Reply
0
User avatar #182 to #180 - kwanzalord (01/27/2014) [-]
1) dam straight
2) this number is associated with both military and civilian personnel. NOWHERE does it say that the number is ONLY for civilian deaths.
3) I understand that the atomic bomb was a necessary evil. I was being sarcastic more than anything there. However, to the Japanese the invasion of China and other Asian countries were a necessary evil as well. Japan is an island with VERY limited resources. With other larger countries being uncooperative (basically seeing Japan as weak and having no real power), they decided to take instead of having to beg and plead.
4) Was being sarcastic, but now on a serious note.
No one ever wants to think another country instigated a war. However, China throughout the years have caused so much grief to Japan. Albeit a long time ago, China along with many of the other asian countries have tried to invade Japan. Though it always turned out that the seas to Japan were treacherous and their troops would either be dead or demoralized before the invasion ever started. Japan made clean work of these so called invaders.
Then we have the fights over Korea. Once again, Japan decided they ONLY needed to take control of Korea. Therefore getting a foothold into the main Asian continent and resources. However, China believed Korea was theirs and waged war on Japan.
Reply
0
User avatar #31 to #29 - sadisticplatypi (01/27/2014) [-]
to be honest, the japs aren't as bad compared to the commies. the death toll from the japs is around 300 thousand, while the commies killed 45millions (according to Dr. Rummel in his study of Democides). while murder is murder, but it is easy to let racism rule our opinions.
Reply
0
User avatar #52 to #31 - defender (01/27/2014) [-]
R. J. Rummel, a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, estimates that between 1937 and 1945, the Japanese military murdered from nearly 3 to over 10 million people, most likely 6 million Chinese, Indonesians, Koreans, Filipinos and Indochinese.
Reply
-1
User avatar #181 to #52 - kwanzalord (01/27/2014) [-]
Murder- the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another

This really doesn't apply in times of war.
I'd agree with the term massacre though.

I don't deny that the massacre happened. However, we forget that a massacre doesn't imply that the people are civilians. Massacre just means one group of people killed **** loads of another group. There is no where that says that the numbers are of Civilians...it's a number of both civilians and soldiers.
Reply
0
User avatar #76 to #52 - sadisticplatypi (01/27/2014) [-]
but then again, compared to 45 million, this is not that much. I know that democide is a disgusting thing no matter who committed it. but the point I am trying to make is that, the emotions toward the mass murders are often based on hatred and political agenda. the PRC is responsible for the GREATEST genocide of all times in term of death toll, but it is often unreported. the reason... they won the war. and they got nukes.
Reply
0
User avatar #39 to #31 - SognaVetr (01/27/2014) [-]
300.000 in Nanking (one city) only.
Reply
-4
User avatar #32 to #31 - kwanzalord (01/27/2014) [-]
Agreed, there have been far worse tragedies that have happened.

However, I do agree that some issues are not hidden, but avoided. If you look enough, it's there, but they wont present it to you in school.

Reply
+2
#34 - redstonealchemist (01/27/2014) [-]
"for ze emperor!"
pic is related. female space marine. hail the sisters of battle.
Reply
0
#54 to #34 - solidderking (01/27/2014) [-]
sisters of battle are no spacemarines
Reply
0
User avatar #74 to #54 - redstonealchemist (01/27/2014) [-]
they are marines in space, therefore they are space marines
Reply
+2
User avatar #103 to #74 - solidderking (01/27/2014) [-]
ther are nuns in space, which sometimes lots of them dont use any weapons carries weapons

furthermore : is every soldier on a plane called a air soldier ?
answer : no
Reply
+1
User avatar #205 to #103 - redstonealchemist (02/08/2014) [-]
you win this round, mr logic!
Reply
0
User avatar #206 to #205 - solidderking (02/08/2014) [-]
thank you mr i reply two weeks
Reply
+1
User avatar #207 to #206 - redstonealchemist (02/08/2014) [-]
i tried to think of a decent comeback for two weeks, gave up and surrendered
it took me two weeks to surrender because i am 1/4 french
Reply
0
User avatar #183 to #34 - satrenkotheone (01/28/2014) [-]
Actually... where is this from anyway?
Reply
+2
User avatar #184 to #183 - redstonealchemist (01/28/2014) [-]
wreck-it ralph
Reply
+1
User avatar #41 to #34 - satrenkotheone (01/27/2014) [-]
Space PMS activate!
Reply
+2
#8 - SILENCEnight (01/27/2014) [-]
**SILENCEnight rolled a random image posted in comment #5 at Desolation of chalk ** they made up for it in anime and porn, and anime porn.
Reply
-2
User avatar #135 - richardastley ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
Okay I can understand when people accidentally write "Could of" or something like that, but seriously? "We of never killed Chinese"?
Reply
0
User avatar #150 to #135 - whycanticaps (01/27/2014) [-]
it's not accidental, it's supposed to be broken up and in engrish. That's polandball for you
Reply
0
User avatar #154 to #150 - duvallwhitey (01/27/2014) [-]
All of them are the same though....
Reply
0
User avatar #155 to #154 - whycanticaps (01/27/2014) [-]
the only ones that speak regular english are the english countries, so Canada, Great Britain and 'Murica
Reply
+1
User avatar #157 to #155 - duvallwhitey (01/27/2014) [-]
I know that but wouldn't Japanese have more of a "What? We no kirr any Chinese" accent instead of adding an "of" everywhere?
Reply
0
User avatar #158 to #157 - whycanticaps (01/27/2014) [-]
idk man haha
Reply
0
User avatar #151 to #150 - richardastley ONLINE (01/27/2014) [-]
...I don't like it, but I get it now.
Reply
0
User avatar #153 to #151 - whycanticaps (01/27/2014) [-]
ya. the only ones that speak regular english are the english countries, so Canada, Great Britain and 'Murica
Reply
0
#53 - gabemczombie (01/27/2014) [-]
The emperor you say?
Reply
0
#204 to #53 - greatgranpapy (02/01/2014) [-]
Yes of course, the Emperor.
Reply
0
#40 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
I normally just ignore these posts, because they are a strain on the eyes
Reply
0
#23 - Valid (01/27/2014) [-]
someone make a Korean one, too please
Reply
0
#22 - anon (01/27/2014) [-]
I kinda miss the "War Relocation Camps" from the US here.
Reply
0
User avatar #15 - Gandalfthewhite (01/27/2014) [-]
out of curiosity, with countries that are in land and have no coastline, where do they keep their navy's? like do they share a port with another country or are they always just floating around?
Reply
0
User avatar #20 to #15 - joeyliquid (01/27/2014) [-]
They probably just don't have navies.. They just rely on other countries I guess? I mean after all, everyone can have aircraft these days.
 
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)